Back to top
Reference metadata

Reference metadata describe statistical concepts and methodologies used for the collection and generation of data. They provide information on data quality and, since they are strongly content-oriented, assist users in interpreting the data. Reference metadata, unlike structural metadata, can be decoupled from the data.

For more information, please consult our metadata website section.

Close

Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12)

Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union

Need help? Contact the Eurostat user support


Short metadata
Full metadata

The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) is a survey about innovation activities in enterprises. The survey is designed to capture the information on different types of innovation, to enable analysis of innovation drivers or to assess the innovation outcomes. The survey focuses among others on the following aspects:

  • innovation activities
  • innovation expenditure
  • innovative products (new to firm; new to the market)
  • turnover from innovative products
  • business process innovation
  • incentives for implementation of innovation
  • innovation cooperation
  • source of financing of innovation
  • sources of information on innovation
  • innovation barriers
  • etc.

 

The information collected allows measuring the innovativeness of business sectors (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73).

 

The CIS provides various innovation indicators by three main breakdown variables: type of innovator, economic activity and size class of enterprises.

 

The innovation survey was first launched in the 90s and became a regular biennial data collection starting from CIS4 (2004) in the EU Member States, EFTA countries and EU candidate countries. Since its launch the survey was based on the methodology laid down in the Oslo Manuals — international standards for conceptualising and collecting data on innovation. First Oslo Manual was published in 1992. It has been revised on three occasions to take into account the experience and expand its measurement framework — in 1997, 2005 and in 2018. 

 

The CIS 2020 is the second CIS after the review of the Oslo Manual in 2018, resulting in its 4th edition (Oslo Manual (2018) 4th Edition).

 

The structure of the outputs of CIS 2020 (and CIS 2018) differs from previous CIS results due to a) significantly different approach in conceptualising the ‘innovation’ and b) a change in survey design. As for the concept of ‘innovation’: whereas before it was classified along ‘product’, ‘process’, ‘marketing’ and ‘organisational’ innovations, there are now only two classes,  ‘product’ and ‘business process’ innovation.

A change in questionnaire design marked mostly the change in target of responding units for different questions: since 2018 CIS has became a standardised, multi-usage survey with majority of questions (and variables) addressed to all the enterprises and not only to innovative enterprises what allowed to present the results for all enterprises (‘Total’), innovative enterprises (INN) and non-innovative enterprises (NINN).

 

See the document in Annex 1 detailing the transition from CIS 2016 to CIS 2018.

 

For each survey round, Eurostat together with the countries develops a standard core questionnaire – Harmonised Data Collection (HDC) listing the mandatory and rotational questions to be provided within a given round. The questionnaire includes the set of definitions and methodological recommendations to assure the comparability among countries. The CIS 2020 HDC is available in the Annex 2.

The inventory of questions and concepts included in CIS questionnaires since 1992 can be viewed in newly created virtual tool – CIS Questionnaire Library.

 

CIS 2020 results are collected under Commission Regulation No 995/2012. The Regulation defines the mandatory target population of the survey referring to enterprises in the Core NACE categories (see section 3.3) with at least 10 employees. Eurostat recommended using ‘person employed’ as size class unit already for the CIS 2018 in order to comply with the latest measurement standards in European business statistics and recommendations of Oslo Manual 4th edition. The standard mandatory questions refer to number of innovative enterprise, product and goods new to the market and new to the firm, innovation cooperation, objectives of innovation, sources of information for innovation, hampering factors, innovation developer, turnover from innovation and expenditure on innovation. 

The following questions are new in CIS 2020: market environment, consequences of climate change for business activities, innovations with environmental benefits, drivers of innovations with environmental benefits.

Most statistics in CIS 2020 are based on the 3-year reference period 2018-2020, but some use only one calendar year (2018 or 2020) (See details in the Annex 2 HDC).

6 February 2023

The CIS provides information on the characteristics of innovation activities at the enterprise level. It allows Europe's progress to be monitored in the area of innovation, creating a better understanding of the innovation process with analyses of the objectives and the effects of firm innovation activity. These results can also be linked to variables related to competitiveness, employment and economic growth.

The concepts are in line with those recommended by the Oslo Manual (2018, 4th Edition), which is the internationally recognized standard methodology for collecting innovation statistics.

 

Main concepts and definitions used for the CIS data collection:

An innovation is a new or improved product, or process (or combination thereof) that differs significantly from the unit’s previous products or processes and that has been made available to potential users (product) or brought into use by the unit (process).

The minimum requirement for an innovation to occur is that the product or process (marketing or organizational) method must be new or significantly improved to the firm. This includes products, processes and methods that firms are the first to develop and those that have been adopted from other firms or organisations.

 

Innovation activities include all developmental, financial and commercial activities undertaken by a firm to produce an innovation.

Types of innovation activities:

  • Successfully introduced product or process innovation
  • Completed innovation activities but not yet implemented innovation
  • On-going innovation activities, with work in progress that has not yet resulted in the implementation of an innovation
  • Abandoned innovation activities before the implementation of an innovation
  • R&D activities

 

R&D activities comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture, and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge.

 

product innovation is a new or improved good or service that differs significantly from the firm’s previous goods or services and that has been introduced on the market. Changes of a solely aesthetic nature and the simple resale of new goods and services purchased from other enterprises are not considered as innovation.

business process innovation is a new or improved business process for one or more business functions. It differs significantly from the firm’s previous business processes and has been implemented by the firm. The new definition of business process innovation merges the earlier concepts of process, marketing, and organisational innovation.

 

An overview of the operational definitions for types of innovators and main indicators based on CIS HDC 2020 is available in the Annex 4.

 

Together with and based on the CIS traditional concepts and definitions, seven mutually exclusive innovation profiles have been developed along a hierarchical structure that makes it possible to show the differences in how enterprises innovate. At the very top level, the structure distinguishes enterprises with innovation activities from those without them. At the second level, it distinguishes enterprises that have implemented an innovation during the reference period from those that have not. The third level refers to the innovation capabilities of enterprises. The resulting ‘innovation profiles’ are:

Profile I: In-house product innovators with market novelties. This group includes all enterprises that introduced a product innovation that was developed by the enterprise and that was not previously offered by competitors (‘new to the market’).

Profile II: In-house product innovators without market novelties. This group includes all enterprises that introduced a product innovation that was developed by the enterprise but that is identical or very similar to products already offered by competitors (‘only new to the enterprise itself’).

Profile III: In-house business process innovators. This group includes all enterprises that did not introduce a product innovation, but that did introduce a business process innovation that was developed by the enterprise.

Profile IV: Innovators without substantial own innovation capabilities. This group includes all enterprises that introduced an innovation of any kind but did not develop it themselves.

Profile V: Non-innovators that worked on innovations but did not implement them. This group includes all enterprises that have not introduced any innovation recently, but have either ongoing or abandoned innovation activities.

Profile VI: Non-innovators that tried to innovate but were impeded. This group includes all enterprises that did not introduce any innovation, and had no ongoing or abandoned innovation activities, but that did consider to innovate.

Profile VII: Non-innovators that did not try to innovate. This group includes all other enterprises, those that neither introduced an innovation nor have any ongoing or abandoned innovation activities, nor considered to innovate.

The derivation rules for the Innovation Profiles based on CIS HDC 2020 are available in Annex 7. The derivation differs slightly for Profile ? compared to the 2018 edition. 

The main statistical unit is the enterprise, as defined in the Council Regulation on statistical units (Council Regulation (EEC) No 696/93 of 15 March 1993, OJ No L76 of 3 March 1993) or as defined in statistical Business Registers.

The Regulation defines the enterprise as the smallest combination of legal units that is an organisational unit producing goods or services, which benefits from a certain degree of autonomy in decision making, especially for the allocation of its current resources. It may carry out one or more activities at one or more locations, and it may be a combination of legal units, one single legal unit or part of a legal unit.

The population of the CIS is determined by the size of the enterprise and its principal activity. All enterprises with 10 or more employees* in any of the Core NACE (see section 3.3 above) categories are included in the statistical population.

*Note: The Commission Regulation 995/2012 uses ‘employee’ as the classification unit for firm size class. However, the recommendation since CIS 2018 is to use ‘person employed’ to comply with current measurement standards in business statistics and Oslo Manual 4th Edition recommendations. This information will be completed after the publication of the final data in Autumn 2022.

The results of CIS 2020 are published for EU Member States, Norway, and Türkiye.

The CIS 2020 mainly covers a 3-year reference period (2018-2020). Some indicators may, however, refer to only one calendar year — 2020.

Eurobase, this metadata, and broader methodological notes use by convention the year 2020 for reference period and as the year of the survey round.

The information on the reference period of collected indicators is available in the Annex 2 of this Metadata file.

The information will be available in national quality reports - SIMS (planned release by the end of 2022).

CIS 2020 indicators are available according to 4 units of measure:

NR — Number. The number of enterprises and the number of persons employed.

THS_EUR — Thousands of euros. All financial variables are provided in thousands of euros, i.e., Turnover or Innovation expenditure.

PC — Percentage. The percentage is the ratio between the selected combinations of indicators.

At the national level, as in any regular sample survey, countries extrapolate the collected data with appropriate weighting schemes in order to obtain the population totals. At each survey round, national data producers compile the tabulated outputs according to Eurostat’s calculation rules and algorithms for a given round. After the data transmission to Eurostat, the compilation of data consists of assembling national data and deriving of the ratio and European aggregates that are summed up from national data. Derived data are then disseminated in the Eurobase tables.

All aggregations and indicators presented in the CIS collections are based on national CIS data collections.

Countries generally carry out a stratified sample survey to collect the data, while a limited number of countries use a census or a mix of census and sample survey. The target population is to be broken down into strata for sampling purposes. The stratification dimensions are firm size class of enterprises (according to the number of employees*) and the NACE classification of economic activities. These two dimensions are highly correlated with Innovation activity. It is recommended to break down the size classes in at least 3 categories: 10-49 employees (small enterprises), 50-249 employees (medium-sized enterprises), 250 + employees (large enterprises). Stratification by NACE Rev. 2 is generally done by 2-digit level (division) or groups of divisions.

The population of businesses used for the survey sample is mainly represented by the official Statistical Business Register.

*Note: The Commission Regulation 995/2012 uses ‘employee’ as the classification unit for the firm size class. However, the recommendation for the CIS 2018 and onwards is to use ‘person employed’ to comply with current measurement standards in business statistics and Oslo Manual 4th Edition recommendations.

Since 2004, the results of Community Innovation Surveys have been disseminated every two years in pair years.

According to Commission Regulation No 995/2012, national CIS statistics must be delivered to Eurostat within 18 (t+18) months from the end of the reference year (t).

Most countries conformed to the Regulation and transmitted the data by the requested time. Eurostat plans the dissemination of final data in Autumn 2022.

Overview of the timeliness of data provision:

  • 24 countries –  by the deadline;
  • 3 countries –  within a month after a deadline;
  • 2 countries – delay of 2 months after a deadline.

Same basic indicators collected in the frame of ‘Fast Track’ data collection in t+15 were published in Eurobase as preliminary data (flagged ‘p’) in t+19. 

In order to ensure comparability across countries, Eurostat, in close cooperation with the EU Member States and other countries, develops a standard core questionnaire (Harmonised Data Collection – HDC) for each CIS round, with an accompanying set of definitions and methodological recommendations.

The complete list of questions (and variables) included in all CIS waves since 1992 can be accessed via a virtual tool -  CIS Questionnaire Library.

Most countries follow the proposed structure and filtering used in the HDC. In some instances, the questions on basic economic information are placed at the beginning of the national survey. It is recommended to extract the information related to enterprise identification (question 1), ‘Turnover’ and ‘Number of employees/persons employed’ from the Business Registers whenever possible.

Missing data for the NACE categories covered by the EC Regulation 995/2012 may appear in the tables when the lack of an adequate number of observations does not permit appropriate data dissemination.

The CIS 2020 follows the methodology recommended by the latest Oslo Manual 4th Edition, revised in 2018. This edition redefined the concept of innovation by distinguishing between ‘product’ and ‘business process’ innovation, this latter formerly split into the categories of process, organizational and marketing innovations. 

 

The CIS 2018 was the first wave to implement the new guidelines: substantial changes were brought in the questionnaire to capture a revised list of innovation indicators. The questionnaire removed the majority of filters used until the 2016 wave, reduced the complexity of conditions for base populations, and thus allowed to increase the number of respondents to questions previously subject to filters. With this significant change, most indicators are computed for the total population and the groups of Innovative (INN) and Non-innovative enterprises (NINN).The CIS 2020 applies fully the new structure and filtering rules of the CIS 2018.

 

The CIS 2018 recommended using the number of ‘employed person’ for the first time in classifying of the enterprises by size class. All previous surveys were based on the number of  ‘employees’.

 

Due to the change in the underlying methodology and structure of the survey, the results of CIS 2018 and CIS 2020 cannot be directly compared with previous rounds. The users should note that the number of indicators transmitted to Eurostat changed.

For more information about the transition from the CIS 2016 to the CIS 2018 please consult the Statistics Explained article – Community Innovation Survey – new features or refer to Annex 1 of the current Metadata file.

 

In addition to core questions on innovation required by the Regulation 995/2012, the CIS surveys 2018 and 2020 introduced the following new questions:

 

CIS 2018 CIS 2020
not included Q2.2 Market environment
Q2.2 Customisation, Co-creation Q2.3 Customisation, Co-creation
Q2.3 Partners in Customisation, Co-creation not included
Q2.4 Turnover from Customisation, Co-creation not included
Q2.7 Used patents and IRPs Q2.6 Used patents and IRPs
Q2.8 Buying technical services not included
Q2.9 Purchases of machinery and equipment Q2.7 Purchases of machinery and equipment
not included Q2.8 Consequence of climate change on businesses
Q2.10 Using information channels not included
Q2.11 Organising work not included
Q3.5 Expectations met (product innovation) not included
Q3.8 Expectations met (business process innovation) not included
not included Q3.16 Innovations with environmental benefits
not included Q3.17 Drivers for innovations with environmental benefits
Q4.6 Total expenditure Q4.6 Total expenditure
Q4.8 Enterprise group: inflows and outflows Q4.8 Enterprise group: inflows and outflows