Summary sheet on Commission
Review (ref. XXIV/1991/97)
Ingredient :
Aristolochic acid (I,II,V)
CAS n° : 313-67-7;
475-80-9; 15918-62-4;
61117-05-3
Function and max in use
concentration : botanical
Relevant toxicity data :
Assessment of acute
toxicity (oral, i.v.) : Toxic
for kidneys.
Assessment of
chronic/sub-chronic toxicity :
Repeated dose toxicity (oral 21
d., 90 d.): multiple
carcinogenic gastrointestinal
tract cell metaplasia.
Assessment of
genotoxicity/carcinogenicity:
Mutagenic in vitro, clastogenic
in vitro and in vivo. Very
potent carcinogen affecting
forestomach, kidneys and
several other organs.
Human data: Causal
factor in "Chinese herb
nephropathy" (kidney
destructive process).
Classification: 2a (See
Classification of Substances)
SCCNFP Opinion
Aristolochic acid (A.A.)
is mutagenic in bacteria, in
mammalian cells and in
Drosophila.
A.A. binds covalently to
DNA inducing similar DNA
adducts in vitro and in vivo in
rats.
A.A. is a very potent
carcinogen affecting the
forestomach and several other
organs including the kidneys in
mice and rats after short
induction periods with low
doses. In rats, the effects
were shown to be time and dose
dependent.
Very recently (1996)
A.A. derived DNA adducts
biomarkers of A.A. exposure,
were found in renal tissues of
patients suffering from a rapid
kidney destructive fibrotic
process designated as Chinese
Herbal Nephropathy.
These data support
SCCNFP opinion that
Aristolochic acid and salts
must not be used in cosmetic
products. Moreover, A.A. being
the active constituent of
Aristolochia species, the SCC
is of the opinion to extend
that the ban to Aristolochia
species and preparations.
Statement on the
toxicological evaluation
The SCCNFP is the
scientific advisory body to the
European Commission in matters
of consumer protection with
respect to cosmetics and
non-food products intended for
consumers.
The Commission's general
policy regarding research on
animals supports the
development of alternative
methods to replace or to reduce
animal testing when possible.
In this context, the SCCNFP has
a specific working group on
alternatives to animal testing
which, in co-operation with
other Commission services such
as ECVAM (European Centre for
Validation of Alternative
Methods), evaluates these
methods.
SCCNFP opinions include
evaluations of experiments
using laboratory animals; such
tests are conducted in
accordance with all legal
provisions and preferably under
chemical law regulations. Only
in cases where no alternative
method is available will such
tests be evaluated and the
resulting data accepted, in
order to meet the fundamental
requirements of the protection
of consumer health.