Inland transport infrastructure at regional level


Data extracted in May 2019.

Planned article update: June 2020.

Highlights

In 2017, the most dense motorway networks in the EU are found around the capitals Wien, Madrid, Prague, Berlin and Amsterdam.

The highest density of railway lines can be found in the regions of Germany and Czechia.

Motorway density by NUTS 2 regions, 2017 Eurostat (tran_r_net)

This article presents recent data on the inland transport network of the European Union (EU), EFTA and candidate countries: motorways, railways and inland waterways. The evolution of the transport network is closely linked to the general development of the economy. This is particularly true for goods transport and, to a lesser extent, for passenger transport.


Full article

Overview

The EU has one of the densest transport networks in the world. This reflects a number of factors, including population density and transport demand. Transport demand is especially high in urban, industrial and other densely populated areas. The highest motorway density is found in the regions of Germany, the Netherlands and Austria (see Table 1).

Table 1: Regions with the highest motorway density in 2017 (km_1000 km²) Eurostat (tran_r_net) and (reg_area3)

Transport networks concentrated around economic hubs

The motorway network is especially dense in regions with urbanised areas. The most significant motorway expansion between 2008 and 2017 took place in regions of Spain, France, Romania and Hungary (see Figure 1). This reflects the general development programmes of the motorway network in these countries over the last decade.

Figure 1: Regions with the most significant motorway expansion between 2008 and 2017 (in kilometres) Eurostat (tran_r_net)

Motorways

The densest motorway networks are located around key economic hubs

Comparing the length of the motorways to the area of the regions gives a good picture of the motorway infrastructure and concentration within the EU.

In relative terms, the most significant motorway expansion between 2008 and 2017 took place in the Romanian region of Sud-Est, followed by the Polish region of Kujawsko-Pomorskie and Strední Morava in Czechia. These impressive growth rates are explained by the very limited motorway networks in these regions in the 2000’s.

The picture looks different when absolute changes over the same period are considered. Apart from the French region Aquitaine (+258 km) and the Romanian region Vest (+211 km) and Hungarian region Dél-Dunántúl (+180 km), five out of the ten regions that recorded the largest absolute change are located in Spain (see Figure 1): Castilla-y-Leόn (+362 km), Andalucίa (+294 km), Cataluña (+293 km), Castilla-la-Mancha (+ 262 km) and Galicia (+198 km). The fact that many Spanish regions are included is essentially the result of considerable investments (supported by European funds) realised in the framework of the Plan Estratégico de Infraestructuras y Transporte 2005-2020 (PEIT). Although the main weight of the PEIT is now shifting more towards high-speed rail transport, no other European country has experienced such massive motorway construction in such a short period of time.

The highest motorway densities are obviously found around European capitals and other big cities, in large industrial conurbations and around major seaports.

Most European capitals and large cities are surrounded by a ring of motorways in order to meet the high demand for road transport originating from these metropolitan areas. Dense motorway networks can be found around capitals: Wien (109 km/1000 km2), Madrid (96 km/1000 km2), Praha (89 km/1000 km2), Berlin (86 km/1000 km2), and Amsterdam (Noord- Holland: 72 km/1000 km2). Since the motorways are generally concentrated in a ring close to the cities, the reported density decreases when the area of the NUTS 2 region concerned increases. As a result, the motorway density reported for the small NUTS 2 region of Wien is higher than for the much larger NUTS 2 region of Île-de-France, even though the motorway network of Paris is larger.

Other densely populated regions with high motorway density include the Randstad region in the western part of the Netherlands (Utrecht : 121 km/1000 km2, Zuid-Holland : 108 km/1000 km2, and Noord-Holland : 73 km/1000 km2) .

High motorway densities are also found around the major seaports of northern Europe: the motorway densities of the NUTS 2 regions of Bremen (191 km/1000 km2) with the port of Bremerhaven, of Zuid-Holland with the port of Rotterdam (108 km/1000 km2) and of Hamburg (107 km/1000 km2) are among the highest of all European regions.

Another reason for the high density of the motorway network in some central European countries (such as Germany) is the proportionately high volume of transit freight traffic.

The density of motorways on islands is generally low, as islands cannot be reached directly by road. Instead, they rely on sea or air transport. Even so, the motorway density of the Canarias appears relatively high at 36 km/1000 km².

Map 1: Motorway density by NUTS 2 regions, 2017 Eurostat (tran_r_net)

Railways

Railway lines density is especially high in the regions of Germany, Czechia, Poland and Romania (see Map 2). Unsurprisingly, the highest rail density ratios are often observed in capital regions, such as Berlin, Prague and Bucharest where network nodes have developed. Regional rail density is also driven by the presence of economic activities such as heavy industries or seaport infrastructures.

High share of electrified railway lines in the Benelux countries

In general, the density of railway lines is high in western and central parts of Europe and lower in the peripheral areas. The highest network densities can be found in the regions of Germany and Czechia (all above 300 km/1000 km² on average), followed by the regions of Poland, Romania, France, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Luxembourg and Hungary (all above 100 km/1000 km²).

Looking at individual regions, the densest railway networks are observed in capital regions: Berlin (698 km/1000 km²) and Praha (476 km/1000 km²).

While central European capitals have traditionally had a strong railway infrastructure, the strikingly high values are to a large extent due to the small size of these regions within the NUTS 2 classification. Furthermore, the density of urban infrastructure tends to be much higher than the density of interurban roads and railway lines. Other capital regions with relatively dense rail networks are Bucharest (Bucuresti — Ilfov: 153 km/1000 km²), Paris (Île-de-France: 152 km/1000 km²) and Amsterdam (Noord-Holland: 89 km/1000 km²).

These regions are followed by Hamburg (395 km/1000 km²) and Bremen (337 km/1000 km²), two smaller NUTS 2 regions where extensive freight lines to and from seaports contribute to the high density. Like the capital regions mentioned above, Hamburg and Bremen are much smaller than regions such as Zuid-Holland and Antwerpen. These differences make it hard to draw direct comparisons with the infrastructure around other North Sea ports.

Freight transport railway lines also play a leading role in several regions where coal and steel industries remain predominant, such as the Saarland region in western Germany (134 km/1000 km²) and Śląskie in South-West Poland (160 km/1000 km²).

Focusing on railway infrastructure at country level, there are significant differences among countries with respect to the share of the network that is electrified. Luxembourg (95 %), the Netherlands (76 %) and Sweden (75 %) registered the highest shares, while Ireland, and the Baltic States were the only Member States where less than 20 % of the network is electrified.

Figure 2: Share of electrified lines in total railway network length, by country, 2017 (%) Eurostat (tran_r_net) see country codes


Map 2: Railway lines density by NUTS 2 regions, 2017 Eurostat (tran_r_net)

Inland waterways

Very high density of inland waterways in the Netherlands

Inland waterway transport concerns mainly goods transport. This network is unequally spread over the EU, with some regions completely lacking navigable inland waterways and others having a very long waterway system, such as the regions of the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, while the Rhine delta constitutes a natural feature for inland navigation, for most regions man-made canals constitute the main share of navigable inland waterways. There is only a single Dutch region (Gelderland) where rivers and lakes constitute the majority of inland waterways.

A very high density of more than 200 km/1000 km² is observed in eigth regions of the Netherlands: Zeeland (285), Zuid-Holland (278), Flevoland and Noord-Holland (both 248), Utrecht (240), Noord-Holland (248), Friesland (NL) (227) and Groningen (213) (see Table 2). The lowest density in the Netherlands was registered in the Drenthe region (63 km/1000 km²), which still ranked 16th amongst all regions for which data are available. A part of this dense inland waterway network plays a strategic role for freight transport between the ports of Rotterdam (located in the Zuid-Holland region) and Amsterdam (Noord-Holland) and Germany and Belgium.

Only two of the top 13 regions with the highest density did not belong to the Netherlands, but to Germany: Berlin (190 km/1000 km² - essentially composed of canals) and Bremen (145 km/1000 km² - entirely composed of rivers). The regions of Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein also have a dense network, with 70 and 47 km/1000 km² respectively, in both cases essentially constituted by rivers.

Other regions with a dense inland waterway network (in km) are found in Czechia (Prague: 65), Hungary (Budapest: 57) and France (Nord-Pas-de-Calais: 54, Île de France: 53). The network in most French regions is a mix between rivers and canals, except for Champagne-Ardenne, Picardie, Haute-Normandie, Basse-Normandie, Centre (FR), Midi-Pyrénées and Auvergne, where canals take a 100 % share and, in contrast, Poitou-Charentes where the inland waterways are entirely composed of rivers.

Table 2: Regions with the highest inland waterways (navigable canals, rivers and lakes) density, 2017 (km_1000 km²) Eurostat (tran_r_net) and (reg_area3)


Table 3: Inland waterways (navigable canals, rivers and lakes) density, by NUTS 2 regions, 2017 Eurostat (tran_r_net) and (reg_area3)

Source data for tables, figures and maps (MS Excel)

Data sources

Eurostat collects regional statistics on the infrastructure of road, railways and inland waterways, as well as vehicle stocks and road accidents. The data are provided by the Member States, the Candidate countries and some EFTA countries on a voluntary basis using the REGWEB online application. The data are collected at NUTS 0, NUTS 1 and NUTS 2 levels for these transport indicators.

Density calculation : the reference area for the calculation of motorway and railway line density is the land area of the regions (e.g. excluding lakes and rivers): this is the area where such infrastructure can be built; the reference area for the calculation of inland waterways density is the total area of the regions (e.g. area including lakes and rivers).

Rankings in figures and tables: as the data collection is performed on a voluntary basis, data are not available for some countries; consequently, the rankings presented are based on the available data and they should be analysed with caution.

Country coverage:

  • Table 2: 2016 data on inland waterways are not available at NUTS 2 level for Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Malta, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, the United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey
  • Inland waterways data not applicable for: Denmark, Ireland, Spain, Cyprus, Latvia, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Iceland, Liechtenstein and FYR of Macedonia.

Country-specific note:

  • Bulgaria: the length of the railway network excludes railway lines at stations.
  • Estonia: data on motorways refer to 1st class roads.
  • Switzerland: data on motorways cover 4- to 7-lane highways.

Regional breakdown

The Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) was established by Eurostat more than 30 years ago in order to provide a single uniform breakdown of territorial units for the production of regional statistics for the European Union. From 1 May 2004, the regions in the 10 new Member States were added and from 1 January 2007 the regions of Bulgaria and Romania. Certain smaller Member States are not sub-divided in NUTS regions. This is the case for Estonia (EE), Cyprus (CY), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU) and Malta (MT).

Context

Efficient transport services and infrastructure are vital to exploiting the economic strengths of all regions of the European Union, to supporting the internal market and growth, and enabling economic and social cohesion. They also influence trade competitiveness, as the availability, price, and quality of transport services have strong implications on production processes and the choice of trading partners.

Transport investments enable economic growth and job creations. Investing in transport infrastructure, particularly in railways and inland navigation, also contributes to the decarbonisation of transport. The sector currently accounts for a quarter of the EU's greenhouse gas emissions, of which 70% comes from road transport.

Transport however faces a wide range of challenges across the EU: underinvestment, lack of suitable financing solutions, insufficiently developed and non-transparent pipelines of transport projects, continuous growth of urban populations, and various regulatory and administrative barriers. The European Commission is addressing these issues, paving the way for the competitive and sustainable EU transport system of tomorrow.

Since the global economic crisis, the EU has been suffering from low levels of investment in transport infrastructure. This has held back modernisation of the EU's transport system. Collective and coordinated efforts at European level, recently boosted by the Investment Plan for Europe, need to reverse this downward trend. In particular the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) requires investment in new infrastructure, refurbishment and modernisation of the existing network. Better coordination is needed between EU countries on cross border infrastructure projects.

Building missing links at borders between EU countries and along key European routes, removing bottlenecks or interconnecting transport modes in terminals is vital for the Single Market and for connecting Europe with external markets and trade partners. The smooth functioning of the European network requires integration and interconnection of all modes of transport.

The adaptation of infrastructure to new mobility patterns and the deployment of infrastructure for clean, alternative fuels, pose additional challenges that require new investments and a different approach to the design of networks.

Direct access to
Other articles
Tables
Database
Dedicated section
Publications
Methodology
Legislation
Visualisations
External links




Database

Multimodal data (tran)
Regional transport statistics (tran_r)
Road, rail and navigable inland waterways networks by NUTS 2 regions (tran_r_net)
Demography (pop)
Demography - Regional data (demoreg)
Population and area (demo_r_poar)
Area - NUTS 3 regions (demo_r_d3area)

Dedicated section

Data visualisations