Statistics Explained

Archive:Housing statistics

Revision as of 11:16, 28 November 2011 by EXT-G-Albertone (talk | contribs)

Data from October 2011, most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database.

Decent housing, at an affordable price in a safe environment, is a fundamental need and right. Ensuring this need, which is likely to alleviate poverty and social exclusion, is still a significant challenge in a number of European countries.

This article provides information in relation to recent statistics on housing in the European Union (EU), focusing on dwelling types, tenure status (owning versus renting), housing quality and affordability.

Main statistical findings

Figure 1: Distribution of population by dwelling type, 2009
(% of population) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvho01)
Figure 2: Population by tenure status, 2009 (1)
(% of population) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvho02)
Figure 3: Overcrowding rate, 2009
(% of specified population) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvho05a)
Figure 4: Severe housing deprivation, 2009
(% of population) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_mdho06a)
Table 1: Housing cost overburden rate by tenure status, 2009
(% of population) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvho07c) and (ilc_lvho07a)

Type of dwelling

In 2009, 41.8 % of the EU-27 population lived in flats, 34.4 % in detached houses and 23.0 % in semi-detached houses. The share of persons living in flats was highest in Latvia (66.2 %), Estonia (65.1 %) and Spain (64.6 %). The share of people living in detached houses peaked in Slovenia (68.7 %), Hungary (67.6 %), Romania (60.7 %) and Denmark (58.4 %); Norway also reported a high share (62.4 %) of persons living in detached houses. The highest propensity to live in semi-detached houses was reported in the Netherlands (61.4 %), the United Kingdom (60.9 %) and Ireland (57.6 %) – see Figure 1.

Tenure status

In 2009, over one quarter (27.1 %) of the EU-27 population lived in an owner-occupied home for which there was an outstanding loan or mortgage, while close to half (46.5 %) of the population lived in an owner-occupied home without a loan or mortgage. As such, a total of nearly three quarters (73.6 %) of the population lived in owner-occupied dwellings, while 13.0 % lived in dwellings with a market price rent, and 13.5 % in reduced-rent or free accommodation.

At least half of the population in each of the EU Member States (see Figure 2 – data for Germany not available) lived in owner-occupied dwellings in 2009; the share ranged from 57.5 % in Austria to 96.5 % in Romania. In the Netherlands (59.2 %), Sweden (56.8 %) and Denmark (52.8 %) more than half of the population lived in owner-occupied dwellings with an outstanding loan or mortgage; this was also the case in Iceland (70.6 %) and Norway (61.3 %).

The share of persons living in rented dwellings with a market price rent in 2009 was less than 10 % in 12 of the EU Member States, as well as in Iceland. In Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and Austria more than one quarter of the population lived in rented dwellings with a market price rent. The share of the population living in a dwelling with a reduced price rent or occupying a dwelling free of charge was less than 20 % in all of the Member States except for Poland where this type of housing was lived in by 29.1 % of the population.

Housing quality

One of the key dimensions in assessing the quality of housing conditions is the availability of sufficient space in the dwelling. The overcrowding rate describes the proportion of people living in an overcrowded dwelling, as defined by the number of rooms available to the household, the household’s size, as well as its members’ ages and family situation.

Some 17.7 % of the EU-27 population lived in overcrowded dwellings in 2009 (see Figure 3); the highest overcrowding rates were registered in Latvia (57.7 %), Romania (55.3 %), Poland (49.1 %) and Lithuania (49.0 %). In contrast, Cyprus (1.0 %) and the Netherlands (1.7 %) recorded the lowest rates of overcrowding.

Within the population at-risk-of-poverty (in other words, people living in households where equivalised disposable income per person was below 60 % of the national median), the overcrowding rate in the EU-27 was 30.0 % in 2009, some 12.3 percentage points above the rate for the whole population. The highest overcrowding rates among the population at-risk-of-poverty were registered in Hungary (68.8 %), Poland (64.9 %) and Romania (64.8 %), while the overcrowding rate for those at-risk-of-poverty was below 6 % (see Figure 3) in Cyprus (2.7 %), Spain (5.1 %), the Netherlands (5.5 %) and Malta (5.6 %).

In addition to overcrowding, some aspects of housing deprivation – such as the lack of a bath or a toilet, a leaking roof in the dwelling, or a dwelling considered as being too dark – are taken into account to build a more complete indicator of housing quality. The severe housing deprivation rate is defined as the proportion of persons living in a dwelling which is considered as overcrowded, while having at the same time at least one of these housing deprivation measures.

Across the EU-27 as a whole, some 5.9 % of the population suffered from severe housing deprivation in 2009 (see Figure 4). In Poland, Lithuania, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Latvia more than 15 % of the population faced severe housing deprivation in 2009, rising to a high of 28.6 % in Romania. In contrast, less than 1 % of the population in Finland, the Netherlands and Cyprus lived in conditions which could be qualified as severe housing deprivation.

Housing affordability

In 2009, 12.1 % of the EU-27 population lived in households that spent 40% or more of their equivalised disposable income on housing (see Table 1). The proportion of the population whose housing costs exceeded 40 % of their equivalised disposable income was highest for tenants with market price rents (25.6 %) and lowest for persons in owner-occupied dwellings without a loan or mortgage (5.8 %).

The EU-27 average masks significant differences between Member States: at one extreme there were a number of Member States where a relatively small proportion of the population lived in households that had housing costs in excess of 40 % of their disposable income, notably Cyprus (2.4 %), France (3.4 %), Malta (3.5 %), Luxembourg (3.7 %), Slovenia (3.9 %), Ireland (4.0 %), Estonia and Finland (both 4.4 %). At the other extreme, almost one quarter of the population in Denmark (24.4 %) and Greece (22.1 %) spent more than 40 % of their equivalised disposable income on housing, well above the next highest shares recorded in the United Kingdom (16.3 %) and Romania (15.5 %).

Data sources and availability

The data used in this section are primarily derived from micro-data from EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). The reference population is all private households and their current members residing in the territory of the Member State at the time of data collection; persons living in collective households and in institutions are generally excluded from the target population. The EU-27 aggregate is a population-weighted average of individual national figures.

Context

Questions of social housing, homelessness or integration play an important role within the EU’s social policy agenda. The charter of fundamental rights stipulates in Article II-94 that ‘in order to combat social exclusion and poverty, the Union recognises and respects the right to social and housing assistance so as to ensure a decent existence for all those who lack sufficient resources, in accordance with Community law and national laws and practices’.

However, the EU does not have any responsibilities in respect of housing; rather, national governments develop their own housing policies. Many countries face similar challenges: for example, how to renew housing stocks, how to plan and combat urban sprawl, how to promote sustainable development, how to help young and disadvantage groups to get onto the housing market, or how to promote energy efficiency among house owners.

Further Eurostat information

Publication

Main tables

Data:
Income and living conditions
Income distribution and monetary poverty
Living conditions

Database

Overcrowding rate
Housing cost burden
Housing deprivation
Housing conditions
Distribution of population by degree of urbanisation, dwelling type and income group
Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group

Dedicated section

Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)

Excel.jpg Housing statistics: tables and figures

Methodology / Metadata

Other information

  • Regulation 1177/2003 of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)
  • Regulation 1553/2005 of 7 September 2005 amending Regulation 1177/2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)
  • Regulation 1791/2006 of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Regulations and Decisions in the fields of ... statistics, ..., by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania

External links

See also