Statistics Explained

Archive:Housing statistics

Revision as of 14:10, 19 March 2010 by Mititli (talk | contribs)
Data from September 2009, most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Database.
Graph 1: Households broken down by type of tenure in the EU, 2007 [1]

Questions of social housing, homelessness or integration play an important role within the social policy agenda. The charter of fundamental rights stipulates in Article II-94 that ‘in order to combat social exclusion and poverty, the Union recognises and respects the right to social and housing assistance so as to ensure a decent existence for all those who lack sufficient resources, in accordance with Community law and national laws and practices’.

However, the EU does not have any responsibilities in respect of housing; rather, national governments have the duty to develop their own housing policies. Many countries face similar challenges: for example, how to renew housing stocks, how to plan and combat urban sprawl, how to promote sustainable development, how to help young and disadvantage groups to get on the housing ladder, or how to promote energy efficiency among house-owners. The social and economic cost of the absence of decent housing is generally accepted to compromise the efficiency of a country or region. Indeed, decent housing, at an affordable price in a safe environment is likely to alleviate poverty and social exclusion.


Main statistical findings

Graph 2: Households broken down by type of dwelling in the EU, 2007[2]
Graph 3: Percentage of people living in households to be considered as overcrowded (%), 2007[3]
Graph 4: Housing cost overburden rate (%), 2007[4]
Graph 5: Share of housing costs in disposable income (%), 2007[5]

Tenure status

In 2007, 65 % of households in the EU owned their home, 21 % paid rent at market rates, 8 % paid a reduced-rate rent and 7 % occupied free accommodation. A majority of households in all Member States owned their own home, with the highest proportions in Romania (96 %), Lithuania, Slovakia (both 89 %) and Hungary (87 %). By contrast, Germany (46 %), Austria (52 %), the Netherlands (56 %) and Denmark, France and Poland (all 58%) had the lowest percentages of proprietary households.

Type of dwelling

In 2007, 46 % of EU households lived in flats, 30 % in detached houses and 22 % in semi-detached houses. The share of households living in flats was highest in Latvia (72 %), Estonia (69 %), Spain (66 %) and Germany (62 %). The percentage of households living in detached houses was largest in Slovenia (65 %), Hungary (57 %), Romania (56 %) and Denmark (48 %). The highest percentages for semi-detached houses were reported in the United Kingdom (59 %), as well as Ireland and the Netherlands (both 55 %).

Housing quality

The overcrowding rate describes the percentage of people living in households considered to be overcrowded. It depends on the household's size, as well as its members' ages and family situation.

In 2007, 17 % of the EU population lived in overcrowded households. Among Members States, the highest percentages of overcrowded households were registered in Latvia (59 %), Romania (54 %), Lithuania and Poland (both 52 %). By contrast, Cyprus and the Netherlands (both 2 %) recorded the lowest percentage.

Housing affordability

Two new indicators were recently adopted to measure housing affordability. These are the 'Share of population whose housing cost overburden rate exceeds 40% of disposable income' and the median of the distribution of the 'Share of housing cost in disposable income' indicator, which is the proportion of disposable income spent on housing by half of the population.

In the EU in 2007, 12 % of European citizens spent 40 % or more of their disposable income on housing. This average masks significant differences between Member States. At one extreme are countries with a small percentage of the population whose housing cost exceeds 40 % of their disposable income including: Cyprus (2 %), Malta and Ireland (both 3 %), as well as Luxembourg (4 %). At the other extreme, this share was around 18-19 % in Romania, the Netherlands and Slovakia. The highest value was reached in Germany with 23 %.

The median of the housing costs burden distribution - measured by the share of housing costs in disposable income - reached 18 % in 2007. The median of the distribution, however, varied enormously across Europe, ranging from 6 % to 27 %. The lowest values were recorded in Malta, Cyprus, Ireland and Luxembourg, with 50 % of individuals living in households for which the housing costs represented less than 10 % of the total disposable income. By contrast, 50 % of the population in Romania, the United Kingdom, Greece, Slovakia, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands lived in households for which the housing costs represented more than 20 % of the total disposable income.

Data sources and availability

The information presented in this section are extracted from micro-data from EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) and refers to 2007, when EU-SILC covered all EU Member States plus Norway and Iceland. There is no data yet for Bulgaria.

Context

At the Laeken European Council in December 2001, European heads of state and government endorsed a first set of common statistical indicators of social exclusion and poverty that are subject to regular revisions by the Indicators Sub-group (ISG) of the Social Protection Committee (SPC). These indicators are an essential element in the 'open method of coordination (OMC)' to monitor the progress of Member States in the fight against poverty and social exclusion. The list was updated in 2006 and 2008.

The 2001 SPC report on indicators to monitor the social inclusion process recommended "improving comparable information and reporting on decency of housing, housing costs and homelessness". The 2006 SPC report on indicators reserved a slot in the social inclusion portfolio for housing.

To provide underlying data for indicators, the EU Statistics on income and living conditions ( EU-SILC) was implemented. The EU-SILC, organized under a Framework Regulation (1177/2003) of the European Parliament and the Council, is now the basis for statistics on income and living conditions, in particular for common social inclusion indicators.

Further Eurostat information

Database

Income and living conditions (ilc)
Living conditions (ilc_lv)
Housing conditions (ilc_lvho)
Distribution of population by degree of urbanisation, dwelling type and income group (Source: SILC) (ilc_lvho01)
Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group (Source: SILC) (ilc_lvho02)
Average number of rooms per person by tenure status and dwelling type from 2003 (Source: SILC) (ilc_lvho03)
Average number of rooms per person by tenure status and dwelling type until 2001 (Source: ECHP) (ilc_lvho03h)
Average number of rooms per person by type of household and income group from 2003 (Source: SILC) (ilc_lvho04)
Average number of rooms per person by type of household and income group until 2001 (Source: ECHP) (ilc_lvho04h)
Material deprivation (ilc_md)
Economic strain linked to dwelling (ilc_mded)
Share of housing costs in disposable household income, by type of household and income group (Source: SILC) (ilc_mded01)
Share of rent related to occupied dwelling in disposable household income, by type of household and income group (Source: SILC) (ilc_mded02)
Total housing costs in pps (Source: SILC) (ilc_mded03)
Financial burden of the total housing cost (Source: SILC) (ilc_mded04)
Financial burden of the repayment of debts from hire purchases or loans (Source: SILC) (ilc_mded05)

Dedicated section

Household Budget Surveys
Income, Social Inclusion and Living Conditions

Other information

External links

See also

Notes

  1. Source: EU-SILC 2007, no data for Bulgaria
  2. Source: EU-SILC 2007, no data for Bulgaria
  3. Source: EU-SILC 2007, no data for Bulgaria
  4. Source: EU-SILC 2007, no data for Bulgaria
  5. Source: EU-SILC 2007, no data for Bulgaria