Archive:Agricultural census in the Netherlands
- Data from November 2012. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database.
This article is part of a series of country-specific essays on the results of the European Union (EU) Farm structure survey (FSS) 2010. The FSS collects information on the structural characteristics of the agricultural holdings (land use, livestock and labour force) and is carried out by all European Union Member States every 10 years as an Agricultural census, with two or three additional, intermediate sample surveys carried out in-between. Although in the Netherlands an Agricultural census is carried out (almost) every year, the present analysis of the farm structure includes a comparison with the Agricultural census 2000 in order to compare the data at EU level. In the Netherlands, the reference years for the above mentioned Agricultural censuses were 1999 and 2010 respectively; nonetheless, the common designation is Agricultural census 2000 and 2010.
Source: Eurostat (ef_kvaareg) (ef_ov_kvaa) (demo_pjan) and FSS 2000 and 2010
Source: Eurostat (ef_kvaareg) (ef_ov_kvaa) and FSS 2000 and 2010
_by_UAA_size_classes_Netherlands_2010.PNG)
Source: Eurostat (ef_kvaareg) (ef_ov_kvaa)
Source: Eurostat (ef_kvftreg)
Source: Eurostat (ef_kvftreg)
Source: Eurostat (ef_lu_ovcropaa) (ef_oluaareg)
Source: Eurostat (ef_lu_ovcropaa) (ef_oluaareg)
Source: Eurostat (ef_mptenure) (ef_so_mptenure)
Source: Source: Eurostat (ef_poirrig)
Source: Source: Eurostat (ef_pmhouscatlaa)
Main statistical findings
Key indicators
As exhibited in Table 1, there were 72 320 agricultural holdings in the Netherlands in 2010. Compared to 2000, the number of agricultural holdings has greatly decreased in the country (-28.8 %), which was also the case in most of the other EU Member States.
Accounting for 1.9 million hectares, the utilised agricultural area (UAA) represented 45 % of the Dutch territory in 2010 – one of the highest shares recorded within the EU-27. As the UAA fell (-7.7 %) much less than the number of holdings within the 2000-2010 timeframe, the average size of farms increased from 20 ha in 2000 to 26 ha in 2010. Also the animal livestock expressed in livestock units (LSU) recorded a drop of 9 % within the period under analysis; there were 6.7 million LSU registered in the Netherlands in 2010, compared to 7.3 million LSU reported in 2000. Nonetheless, the Dutch animal livestock still remained one of the largest within the EU-27.
Similarly to most of the EU Member States, the number of persons working in agriculture in the Netherlands dropped from 275 730 to 211 630 between 2000 and 2010 (-23 %). Accordingly, the population working in agriculture represented a mere 2.5 % of the Dutch economically active population in 2010.[1]
Within the 2000-2010 timeframe, the Dutch population grew while the UAA decreased. As a result, the average UAA per inhabitant dropped, from 0.13 hectares per inhabitant in 2000 to 0.11 hectares in 2010.
Regional key indicators
On close inspection, the regional analysis (see Table 2) of the Dutch territory during the 2000-2010 period shows negative trends for nearly all regions across nearly all the key indicators, the only exception being the average area per holding. Nonetheless, the relative weights of the regions do not appear to have changed remarkably; the territories of Gelderland and Noord-Brabant remained the most important for the Dutch agriculture over the 2000-2010 decade.
In particular, the region of Gelderland recorded a fall of 29.9 % in terms of the number of holdings, though it still accounted for 17.1 % of the total population of farms in 2010. This was the second highest share, the first being the one registered by the territory of Noord-Brabant (17.8 %), which also recorded a substantial decrease (of 28.2 %) compared with the 2000 data.
In terms of the UAA, the Noord-Brabant region also recorded the highest relative share (13.4 %) over the Dutch territory in 2010, despite registering a decrease of 8.3 % over the 2000 data. Similarly, the region of Gelderland showed the second highest relative share (12.7 %) over the whole national territory in 2010, despite having recorded a 6.3 % fall in terms of the UAA.
A very similar picture emerges from the analysis of livestock units. Regardless of the fall of -10.1 % as compared with the FSS 2000 data, the territory of Noord-Brabant proved to be by far the most important one accounting for 28.2 % of the LSU of the whole country (about 1.9 million) in 2010. The region of Gelderland was the second most important one with 19.4 % of the Dutch LSU, despite suffering a drop of 12.5 % LSU as compared with 2000.
Concerning the workforce, the regions of Noord-Brabant, Gelderland and Zuid-Holland, all of which recorded above 30 000 persons working on the farms in 2010, proved to be the most important ones. Nevertheless, they all showed decreases compared to the 2000 values: -31 % for Zuid-Holland, -22.9 % for Gelderland and -22.7 % in the case of Noord-Brabant.
Agricultural holdings
Between 2000 and 2010, the Netherlands followed the general trend towards bigger and fewer holdings in the EU. Accordingly, agricultural holdings with 50 to 99 hectares of land increased in number (+27.7 %) as well as those with 100 hectares or more (+ 85.7 %). On the contrary, all the other classes of farms recorded significant drops, with the highest decrease registered among farms with less than 2 hectares of agricultural land (-45.3 %). The only exception was the farms with no agricultural land: mainly industrial livestock farms; these agricultural holdings increased in number (+14.1 %) compared with the FSS 2000 data.
Currently, about half of the Dutch UAA belongs to a small number of farms (see Figure 1) with 50 or more hectares of agricultural land, which account for 16 % of the total population of farms. In terms of the number of holdings, farms seem to be evenly distributed over the various classes, with the only exception being the classes of farms with no land – 2 % of the total number of holdings – and those with 100 or more hectares of UAA (3 % of the total population of farms).
In 2010, the largest farms proved to be located mostly in the Groningen region, as the average area per holding recorded in this territory (48.3 hectares) was the highest of the country. With 47.3 hectares, Flevoland recorded the second highest figure, a value well above the Dutch average (25.9 ha). On the contrary, the Zuid-Holland territory showed the lowest value (18.5 ha), followed by the region of Gelderland (19.3 ha).
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
Economic size of the farm
In 2010, the economic size of all the Dutch agricultural holdings was EUR 18 930 million (see Table 3), one of the highest values recorded within the EU-27. This value was calculated by summing up all the standard outputs (SO) per hectare of crop and per head of livestock of the farms, and represents a 4.8 % increase compared to the FSS 2007 data (EUR 18 071 million).
Accounting for 20.3 % of the Dutch agricultural standard output, the Noord-Brabant region proved to be the most important one in 2010. The second highest contribution came from Zuid-Holland (17.8 %), while the territory of Utrecht accounted for the smallest share (2.7 %). In 2007 the hierarchy looked very much the same: the Noord-Brabant region accounted for the highest share (19.6 %), the territory of Zuid-Holland recorded the second highest value (19 %) and the territory of Utrecht accounted for the smallest share (2.7 %) of the total SO of the Netherlands.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
Agricultural holding by main type of farming
In terms of the main area of production, holdings specialised in dairying were the most common in the Netherlands (see Figure 2). According to the Agricultural census 2010, they represented about 24 % of the total number of holdings. The second most common type of production was sheep, goats and other grazing livestock, which accounted for 16 % of the total number of holdings. Farms specialised in general field cropping accounted for another 14 %, while those dedicated to cattle-rearing and fattening recorded a share of 12 %.
If the economic size is taken into account, the hierarchy of the holdings changes. When looking at the distribution of the standard output (SO) across farm types, the holdings specialised in indoor horticulture had the biggest share (25.8 %). Most of these holdings were located in the Zuid-Holland territory; in 2010 the production of indoor horticulture in this region accounted for 13.9 % of the total SO of the Netherlands. The second highest contributions came from holdings dedicated to dairying (23.9 %), while the holdings dedicated to specialist pig farming accounted for 11.8 %. Farms specialising in other horticulture accounted for 6.5 % of the total standard output, whereas those specialising in general field cropping claimed a share of 6.2 % of the SO of the whole country.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
Land use
The utilised agricultural area (UAA) is the total area taken up by arable land, permanent grassland and meadow, permanent crops and kitchen gardens used by the holding, regardless of the type of tenure or of whether it is used as a part of common land.
In the Netherlands, the UAA decreased by about 155 000 hectares over the 2000-2010 decade (-7.7 %), resulting in a total area of 1.9 million hectares in 2010.
There were some shifts in the relative importance of the UAA's main components. Arable land remained by far the most important element, as its share in the UAA increased from 49.8 % in 2000 to 54.6 % in 2010. An opposite tendency was recorded for permanent grassland and meadows, its share shifting from 48.6 % in 2000 to 43.4 % in 2010. Accordingly, the arable land and the permanent grassland and meadow together accounted for 98 % of the total UAA of the Netherlands in 2010, the very same percentage as recorded in 2000. The remaining 2 % was covered by permanent crops; kitchen gardens were non-significant in the Netherlands, hence were not surveyed.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
Arable land
In the Netherlands, the land worked (ploughed or tilled) regularly, generally under a system of crop rotation, decreased by 7.7 % (see Table 4) within the 2000-2010 decade. Nonetheless, in terms of land use, the production of cereals (+18.8 %) and fodder crops (+27.6 %) grew, which increased their importance in arable land. On the contrary, the cultivation of potatoes dropped by 12 %, though it still represented the third most important type of production within the arable land. Also the area of fallow land decreased (-19 200 hectares, i.e. -72.5%), mostly due to changes in regulations and subsidies that occurred in 2008.[2]
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
Permanent grassland
The area of permanent grassland and meadows decreased by 17.4 % compared to the FSS 2000 data, from 984 680 ha in 2000 (48.6 % of the Dutch UAA) to 813 310 hectares in 2010. This fall was mostly the result of a decrease in the area dedicated to pasture and meadow (-17 %), as the land dedicated to rough gazing accounted for only a minor share: 44 570 hectares, or 2.4% of the UAA, in 2010.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
Livestock
Statistics on livestock use two different units of measurement: the number of heads (number of animals) and livestock units (LSU), the latter allowing comparison across species by converting the headcount using coefficients based on feeding requirements. 1 LSU is the equivalent of a dairy cow.
According to the FSS 2010 data, there were 0.4 LSU per inhabitant in the Netherlands. In 2000, the corresponding value was 0.5, since in the decade under analysis the Dutch population grew, while the population of livestock decreased by 8.7 % between 2000 and 2010. This fall was mainly the result of the drop in the LSU for cattle (-7.7 %) and pigs (-14.3 %); these two types of livestock accounted for 79 % of the total livestock of the country in 2010 as compared to 88 % of the Dutch LSU population in 2000. Being fairly stable over the years, poultry recorded the third highest share (17.5 %) in terms of LSU in the Netherlands in 2010, as it also did in 2000.
Over the 2000-2010 period, the number of agricultural holdings with livestock decreased by 27 %, from 69 320 to 50 440. While decreasing in absolute terms, the population of holdings with LSU increased in relative weight with regard to the total number of farms, shifting from a 68 % share in 2000 to a 70 % one in 2010. Concerning the number of holdings with livestock, the territory of Gelderland proved to be the most important one in 2010, hosting 19.6 % of the Dutch farms with LSU and accounting for 1 302 130 LSU; in 2000, it hosted 1 488 280 LSU and accounted for 20.5 % of farms with livestock. On the other hand, Noord-Brabant proved to be the most important region in terms of LSU, as it hosted the highest number of livestock (1 895 230) while accounting for the second highest share of holdings with LSU (17.8 %); in 2000, it hosted over 2 million LSU and accounted for 19 % of the Dutch population of farms with LSU.
With the exception of the biggest farms – those with 500 LSU or more – which increased by one third over the 2000-2010 decade, decreases were recorded in all the classes of farms with livestock.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010 and 2000
Labour force
In 2010, 221 630 persons were employed in the agricultural holdings (see Table 6), indicating a fall of 23.2 % compared with the 2000 data, when 275 730 persons were working in the agriculture sector. A similar value is displayed if the annual work unit (AWU) is taken into account; The labour force fell by 26.9 %, from 193 540 AWU in 2000 to 141 410 AWU in 2010.
Among the sole holders, the gender gap appeared to be very large in 2010, as 96 % of them were male. The share of male sole holders recorded in 2000 was slightly lower (94 %), which indicates that instead of being closed, the gap had actually widened.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level on holders' age and gender for 2010 and 2000
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level on type of labour force for 2010 and 2000
Management practices
Type of tenure
According to the 2010 data, in the Netherlands the majority of UAA belonged to the farmers who actually worked on that land (see Table 7): 1.1 million hectares, accounting for 59 % of the Dutch UAA. The highest share was registered in Groningen, where about three out of every four hectares were recorded as farmed by the owner. On the other hand, Limburg was the only region where less than half of the UAA belonged to the farmers who actually worked on that land.
The second most common type of tenure was farming by the tenant. It accounted for 27.1 % of the Dutch UAA, corresponding to 507 020 hectares. In this case, the territory of Flevoland showed the highest percentage (39 %), while Zeeland recorded the second highest share (33.3 %).
The shared-farming agricultural area, which is agricultural area utilised in partnership by the landlord and the sharecropper under a written or oral share-farming contract, or area utilised under other modes of tenure, was relatively large (264 440 hectares) and accounted for 14 % of the whole UAA, the second highest value among the survey countries. It must be kept in mind that only rent agreements registered by the Agricultural Tenancies Authority (an official government authority) were counted as tenant farming.
Irrigation
Between 2000 and 2010, the total irrigable area decreased slightly (-2.5 %) in the Netherlands, from 498 330 to 486 010 hectares. Thus, in 2010 it accounted for about one fourth of the Dutch UAA, whereas the area irrigated at least once a year covered 7.3 % of the agricultural area, equating to a value of 137 310 hectares. However, when analysing data on irrigation, it should be kept in mind that the extent of the irrigated area varies over the years according to the weather conditions.
In terms of the type of crop, the largest share of irrigation water in the Netherlands was used fo temporary and permanent grass (26 %). According to the FSS 2010, other crops on arable land accounted for 30 880 ha of irrigated area, a share of 24 % of the total irrigated area of the country. With 22 390 hectares of irrigated land, the cultivation of potatoes was the third largest consumer (17 %), followed by open field cultivation of fresh vegetables, melons and strawberries (10 %).
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
In terms of the volume of water, 64.8 millions of cubic metres of water were used to irrigate 137 310 hectares of agricultural land in the Netherlands in 2010 – 472 cubic metres per hectare of irrigated land. The volume of water does not account for the water used for the area under glass, and it was calculated by combining the areas of the irrigated areas with the corresponding water levels in mm. The region of Utrecht recorded by far the highest value – 730 cubic metres of water per hectare – while Flevoland showed the lowest figure: 258 cubic metres per hectare.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
Animal housing
According to the FSS 2010, there were 32 830 holdings raising 3 975 190 heads of cattle in the Netherlands. Taking into account the fact that more than one type of housing could be recorded for a single holding, the majority of farms (67.9 %) hosted cattle in loose housing with slurry (3 199 700 places). The second most frequent category recorded was other (see Table 9); it was registered for 18 530 farms and accounted for over a million places. It must be noted that the number of places available for cattle surpassed the number of heads of cattle in the Netherlands.
Other gainful activities
According to the data of the Agricultural census 2010, roughly one out of four agricultural holdings (17 760) was involved in other gainful activities in the Netherlands. In relative terms, this was one of the highest percentages recorded within the EU-27. These farms recorded activities other than farm work, directly related to the holding and having an economic impact on the holding.
Information on other gainful activities was collected by eleven categories depending on their characteristics; each farm could be involved in more than one other gainful activity. The most common type of activity was contractual work (4 050 farms), which could be classified as contractual agricultural work (3 570 holdings) and contractual non-agricultural work (1 250 farms). Furthermore, tourism showed to be the second most common type of other gainful activity – it involved 2 830 farms and it recorded the highest value in the region of Gelderland (520 holdings).
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010 and 2000
Organic farming
Organic agriculture is an ecological production management system that promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles, and soil biological activity. It is based on the minimal use of off-farm inputs and on the management practices that restore, maintain or enhance ecological harmony.
In the Netherlands, the agricultural area in which organic farming is practiced remained fairly stable between 2003 and 2007 (see Table 11); however, it then dropped to 24 620 hectares in 2010, accounting for only 1.3 % of the Dutch UAA.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010 and 2007
Data sources and availability
Methodological notes
In the Netherlands, the Agricultural census was a joint effort of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation – especially its executive service NSIR – and Statistics Netherlands. In particular, data collection and pre-processing was done by NSIR, while processing, analysis, dissemination and data delivery to Eurostat was tackled by Statistics Netherlands.
Survey on agricultural production methods (SAPM)
In 2010 a unique survey was carried out together with the agricultural census, the Survey on agricultural productions methods (SAPM). This survey collected data at regional level needed to establish agri-environmental indicators as provided in COM final 508/2006 and to evaluate the greening of the Common agricultural policy.
Data were collected according to specifications listed in Annex V of regulation 1166/2008, namely data on tillage methods, soil conservation, landscape features, animal grazing, animal housing, manure application, manure storage and treatment facilities and irrigation.
In the Netherlands, no sampling was applied to the SAPM and the survey on other gainful activities – both were conducted exhaustively together with the FSS.
Reference period
Data were collected as of the 1st of April 2010, except for land characteristics which were recorded as of the 15th of May 2010. Furthermore, characteristics referring to labour force, tillage methods, soil conservation, animal grazing, manure application and irrigation were collected with reference to the April 2009-March 2010 timeframe. Characteristics referring to support to rural development and landscape features were collected over three years: from April 2007 to March 2009.
Threshold for agricultural holdings
In order to separate professionals from hobby farmers and to minimise the processing burden, only agricultural holdings above EUR 3 000 of Standard Output were taken into account in the census. This threshold accounted for about 99 % of total SO, 99 % of agricultural land use and 99 % of LSU in the Netherlands. Therefore, it was found to be compliant with the European regulation 1166/2008 and allowed the census to be considered exhaustive.
Common land
As already highlighted by the previous waves of the FSS, in the Netherlands there is no common land. Therefore, this characteristic was not surveyed.
Geo-reference of the holding
The location of the agricultural holdings was drawn by translating the postal code of the farms into latitude/longitude, which is regularly recorded in the Administrative Farm Register (AFR).
Economic size
Since the FSS 2007, the Standard output (SO), a new classification of the economic size of the holding, has been implemented. The SO has replaced the Standard gross margin (SGM) used before. Nonetheless, for comparability reasons, both classifications are available in the FSS 2007.
Volume of irrigation water
In order to estimate the volume of water for irrigation, respondents were asked to provide the average water amount (in mm) for each irrigated crop. By combining the irrigated area with the corresponding water amount, the volume of water used for irrigation was calculated for each crop: the volume of water used for crops under glass did not enter the calculation, whereas the category ‘other open field crops’ did.
Context
European Commission Rural development policy aims to improve competitiveness in agriculture and forestry, the environment and the countryside, as well as to improve the quality of life in rural areas and to encourage the diversification of rural economies.
As agriculture has modernised and the importance of industry and services within the economy has increased, agriculture has become much less important as a source of jobs. Consequently, increasing emphasis is placed on the role farmers can play in rural development, including forestry, biodiversity and the diversification of the rural economy, in order to create alternative jobs and provide environmental protection in rural areas.
The FSS continues to adapt in order to provide timely and relevant data to help analyse and follow these developments.
Further Eurostat information
Publications
- Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics — Main results – 2010-11 - 2012 edition
- Farm Structure Survey in the Netherlands - 2007 - Statistics in focus 115/2008
- Farm Structure Survey in the Netherlands - 2005 - Statistics in focus 13/2007
Main tables
- Agriculture, see:
- Structure of agricultural holdings (t_ef)
Database
- Agriculture, see:
- Structure of agricultural holdings (ef)
Dedicated section
Methodology / Metadata
- Structure of agricultural holdings (ESMS metadata file - ef_esms)
- Methodological Report – FSS 2007 the Netherlands
- Methodological Report – FSS 2010 the Netherlands
Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)
Other information
- Regulation 1166/2008 of 19 November 2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation 571/88
- Regulation 1200/2009 of 30 November 2009 implementing Regulation 1166/2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards livestock unit coefficients and definitions of the characteristics
External links
See also
- Agricultural census 2010
- All farm structure articles by country (survey 2007)
- Farm structure statistics
Notes
- ↑ A value calculated over the total number of active people aged 15 to 64, as it is reported by the 4th quarter 2010 of the EU Labour force survey (LFS) Population by sex, age, nationality and labour status (1 000).
- ↑ As reported in the National Methodological Report, page 22.