Archive:Statistics on employment characteristics of households

Data extracted in May 2022. Planned article update: 1 June 2023.

Highlights

In the EU, in 2020, 72.2 % of women aged 25 to 54 with children were employed against 90.0 % of men with children.

In 57.5 % of the households, all adults were employed (either full-time or part-time) in 2020.

In 2020, more than 1 in 5 households were workless households in Greece and Belgium (21.7 % in both countries).

Employment rate by presence of children, 2020
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hheredty)

This article, using the European Union Labour Force Survey (EU-LFS) data, gives insight into characteristics of households with regard to employment. Results are presented for the EU as a whole and for 1 candidate countries (Serbia).

More statistics on this topic can be found in the Eurostat database under the section households statistics (see LFS series - specific topics). This article is complemented by the articles Employment - annual statistics, Unemployment statistics and beyond and Household composition statistics.

Full article

Overview of employment in EU households

In slightly more than half EU households, all adults living in the household were employed in 2021 (54.2 % of all private households) as it can be seen in Figure 1. Precisely, in 38.4 % of the households all adults were working full-time and in 15.8 % at least one adult was working part-time and all other adults (if any) were working full time. By contrast, in 29.9 % of the households at least one adult was not working and at least one adult was working and in 15.9 % no adults were working.

Note: For comparison purpose, the households composed solely of students or solely of people outside the labour force aged 65 and over were excluded.

Figure 1:Households by presence of children and working status, EU, 2011-2021
(% of total households)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hhnhwhtc)

This picture differs when the presence or not of children in the household is considered. In 57.9 % of households with economically dependent children, all adults were employed against 52.4 % of households without children in 2021. However, the share of households in which all adults work full time was higher among households without children (39.3 %) than among households with children (36.5 %). In parallel, the share of households in which at least one adult works part time (and all other working full time) was significantly higher among households with children (21.5 %) than among households without children (13.1 %).

Comparing the situation in 2011 and in 2021 as displayed in Figure 1, the share of households in which all adults work clearly increased over the last decade (+ 6.2 pp.) regardless of the presence of children.

The share of households 'with children' in which all adults work recorded a 6.0 pp. increase. This was mostly due to the increase in the share of households in which all adults work full-time (+ 5.8 pp.).
The share of households 'without children' in which all adults work increased by 6.5 pp. This increase was due to the increase in the share of households in which all adults work full time (+4.8 pp.) but also to the increase in the share of households in which at least one adult work part-time and the other work full-time (+ 1.7 pp.).

At national level, all adults were working in more than two thirds of the households in Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark and Estonia, recording the highest shares in the EU (see Figure 2).

The highest shares of households in which all adults were working full-time were recorded in Czechia (59.3 %), Estonia (56.4 %) and Lithuania (56.3 %).
Households in which at least one person work part-time while the other adults work full-time were more common, reaching more than one fourth of the households, in the Netherlands (39.3 %), Germany (28.3 %) and Austria (26.7 %).
The highest shares of households with at least one person working and another one not working were reported by Croatia (51.6 %), Portugal (47.1 %), Greece (45.8 %) and Slovakia (45.1 %).
Around 1 in 5 households are jobless households in Belgium (20.1 %), Italy (20.0 %) and Greece (19.2 %), so in which no adult works.

Figure 2: Households by working status and country, 2021
(% of total households)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hhnhwhtc)

Employment and children: education level and sex as key factors

Children: fewer employed women, more employed men

It is largely assumed that whether or not a person has children present in the household affects the way he or she participates in the labour market.

In 2021, the employment rate of women aged 25-54 with children was 72.4 %, 4.6 pp. below the employment rate of women without children (77.0 %). For men aged 25-54, it is the opposite, men with children are more employed than men without children (90.0 % against 80.9 %). In the EU, 20 in 27 countries followed this pattern. In 7 countries (Slovenia, Portugal, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Croatia and Greece), the employment rate of women with children exceeded or equalled to the employment rate of women without children in 2021.

Figure 3: Employment rate by presence of children, sex and country, 2021
(in % of the total population aged 25-54)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hheredty)

Figure 4A shows a map of the employment gap between women aged 25-54 with and without children in 2021. It appears clearly that in central and eastern countries in particular, the presence of children affects significantly the employment rate of women. The largest differences between the employment rate of women with children and the employment rate of women without children are reported by Czechia (-19.6 pp.), Malta (-16.6 pp.), Romania (-10.8pp.), Germany and Estonia (both with -8.8 pp.). Looking at the same map for men (see Figure 4B), Malta, Romania and Czechia recorded the lowest differences in the employment rates of men with and without children but the largest differences for women as aforementionned. In southern and northern countries, the employment rate of men with children is much higher than the employment rate of men without children. The largest gaps were reported by Greece (+ 15.9 pp.), Croatia (+14.1 pp.), Finland (13.3 pp.), Italy and Portugal (both with + 13.0 pp.).

The employment rate analyse as regards the presence of children should also be complemented by the effect on part-time employment. As it is explained in the next section, in some countries, women with children are similarly employed or more as women without children but may show large differences in terms of part-time employment.

Figure 4A: Employment gap between women with and without children, 2021
(in percentage points)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hheredty)
Figure 4B: Employment gap between men with and without children, 2021
(in percentage points)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hheredty)

The lower the level of education, the more affected the employment rate

Looking at the level of education of people aged 25-54 is highly relevant to report on the differences in terms of employment and presence of children.

In the EU, the share of 'employed women with a low level of education' aged between 25-54 in 2021 was 53.8 % among women with children and 45.5 % among women without children (difference of 8.3 pp.). In addition, the higher the number of children, the lower the share of employed women: the employment rate was 51.9 % for women with a low level of education and with 1 child, 45.4 % with 2 children and 30.0 %. Moreover, slightly more than one third of women with a low level of education and a child less than 6 years are employed in 2021 in the EU. The employment rate of women living alone was 5 pp. higher than the employment rate living in another type of households.
Women with a medium level of education recorded higher employment rates than women with a low level of education: 78.0 % for women without children and 72.0% for women with children (6.0 pp. difference) but follow the same pattern as regards the impact of the number of children.
The picture differs significantly among women with a high level of education. First, almost 9 in 10 women with a high educational level living alone (as single adults) (89.1 %) are employed against 86.7 % for those living in couple and 82.7 % for those living in another type of household. Women without children are slightly more employed than women without children but the difference is minor (1 pp.) compared to women with a lower level of education). In addition, women with one (86.2 %) or two children (86.7 %) recorded similar employment rates than women without children (86.6 %). However, those with 3 children or with a child less than 6 years are less employed (79.6 % and 81.5 %). Once again, it is relevant to consider the level of part-time employment to get a better overview on the relationship between employment and having children.

Among men aged 25-54, the results differ considerably compared to women in the same age group.

First, men living in couple had a higher employment rate (91.2 %) than those living alone (as single adult) (82.7 %) or in another type of households (77.9 %), this applies for the 3 levels of education.
Around two thirds of men with a low level of education without children (66.8 %) are employed while this share was 79.2 % among those with children (difference of 12.4 pp.). The employment rate was higher among men with low level of education with one or two children (80.2 % and 81.1 %) and decreased when there 3 children or more in the household (72.3 %). Furthermore, 77.1 % of men with a low level of education and with a t least 1 child aged less than 6 years are employed.
Men with a medium and a high level of education follow exactly the same pattern as men with a low level of education. However, the employment rates were higher. The share of employed men with a medium level of education and with children was 92.1 % and 95.7 % for men with a high level of education and children. Among men without children, the employment rate was 83.2 for those with a medium level and 87.9 % for those with a high level of education.

Figure 5: Employment rate by type of household, number and age of children and by educational attainment level, EU, 2021
(in % of the population aged 25 to 54)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hheredty) and (lfst_hheredch)

Part-time employment for men and women, with and without children

Figure 4 shows the effect of having children on part-time employment for both the male and female population. Note that all results are limited to persons aged 25-54 years, so that different national situations for pupils, students and retired persons do not influence the results and do not compromise the comparability between countries.

In 2020, almost one third of women aged 25-54 years with children worked on a part-time basis in the EU (32.6 %). Figure 4 shows that the share of part-timers differs greatly between men and women and that the gender gap becomes even wider when persons have children. In all countries, the proportion of women with one or more children that are employed on a part-time basis is higher compared to men, with Montenegro being the only exception. The gap between men and women with children for the part-time employment rate was 27.5 p.p. in the EU in 2020. Concerning men and women without children, the gap was narrower and amounted to less than half of the gap observed for people with children (12.7 p.p.).

In Romania and Bulgaria, differences between men and women and between people with and without children, are rather small. In these two countries, the proportion of part-time workers is relatively low. In Denmark, Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Greece, there are almost no differences (less than 1 p.p.) in the share of part-time employment between women with or without children. However, the most common pattern is that having children does influence the part-time employment among women. For example, in Germany 29.8 % of women without children worked part-time in 2020 against 66.9 % of women with children, in Austria these rates were 32.3 % against 64.4 %, and in the Netherlands 58.5 % against 81.7 %. This suggests that women in these countries tend to shift to part-time work from the moment they have children.

Figure 4: Gender gap in part-time employment by presence of children in the households and by country, 2020
(in % of employed people aged 25-54)
Source: Eurostat (lfst_hhptechi)

Children and adults in workless households

In 2021, in the EU, 8.7 % of children aged 0-17 and 9.3 % of people aged 18-59 were living in workless households.

In 2013, these shares reached 10.5 % for children aged 0-17 and 11.3 % for people aged 18-59, which were the highest shares recorded in the overall period 2009-2021.

Both categories steadily decreased during the period 2014-2019. In 2019, 8.7 % of children aged 0-17 and 8.8 % of people aged 18-59 were living in households where nobody works. However, they both increased in 2020 by 0.5 pp. (see Figure 5), most probably due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Figure 5: Evolution of people living in jobless households, EU, 2009 - 2021
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_jhh_a)

As shown in Figure 6, more than 10 % of children lived in 2021 in workless households in Romania (12.3 %), France (11.0 %), Belgium (10.8 %) and Italy (10.7 %) while it concerned less than 5 % of the children aged 0-17 in Hungary (4.8 %), Luxembourg (4.7 %), Croatia (4.2 %), Portugal (3.5 %) and Slovenia (1.9 %).

In Italy, Greece, Belgium, Spain, France and Romania more than 10 % of people aged 18-59 lived in households where no one was employed, whereas less than 5 % in Hungary, Slovenia, Malta, Portugal and Czechia.

In 9 EU countries, the share of men living in workless households was higher than that of women. Among these countries, the most pronounced differences were in Estonia (3.6 pp.) and Lithuania (2.3 pp.).

The opposite situation - a share of women being higher than that of men - was visible in 16 EU countries, with the largest gender gap among these countries recorded in Greece (1.9 pp.), followed by Italy, Belgium and Malta (gap of 1.5 pp. for all three).

In Slovenia and Portugal, the shares of men and women were the same.

Figure 6: Share of people living in jobless households by age group and country, 2021
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_jhh_a)

Source data for tables and graphs

Labour Market and Household Statistics 2020

Data sources

Source: All statistics presented in this article are derived from the European Union Labour Force Survey (EU-LFS). The EU-LFS is the largest European household sample survey providing quarterly and annual results on labour participation of people aged 15 and over. It covers residents in private households and excludes those in collective households. Conscripts in military or community service are not included in the results. The EU-LFS is based on the same target populations and uses the same definitions in all countries, which means that the results are comparable between the countries.

Under the specific topic 'Households statistics', the EU-LFS currently covers statistics on household composition and number and size of households.

Reference period: Yearly results are obtained as averages of the four quarters in the year.

Coverage: The results from the EU-LFS currently cover all European Union Member States, the EFTA countries Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, as well as the candidate countries Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey. Nevertheless, EU-LFS household data are not available for Iceland, Norway, Switzerland. For Cyprus, the survey covers only the areas of Cyprus controlled by the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

Country note: In Germany, since the first quarter of 2020, the Labour Force Survey (LFS) has been integrated into the newly designed German microcensus as a subsample. Unfortunately, for the LFS, technical issues and the COVID-19 crisis has had a large impact on the data collection processes, resulting in low response rates and a biased sample. Changes in the survey methodology also led to a break in the data series. The published German data are preliminary and may be revised in the future. For more information, see here.

Definitions: The concepts and definitions used in the survey follow the guidelines of the International Labour Organisation.

• Employment covers persons aged 15 years and over (16 and over in Spain and Italy, 15-74 years in Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark, and 16-74 years in Iceland), living in private households, who during the reference week performed work, even for just one hour, for pay, profit or family gain, or were not at work but had a job or business from which they were temporarily absent, for example because of illness, holidays, industrial dispute or education and training. The LFS employment concept differs from national accounts domestic employment, as the latter sets no limit on age or type of household, and also includes the non-resident population contributing to GDP and conscripts in military or community service.

• The distinction between full-time and part-time work is generally based on a spontaneous response by the respondent. The main exceptions are the Netherlands and Iceland where a 35 hours threshold is applied, Sweden where a threshold is applied to the self-employed, and Norway where persons working between 32 and 36 hours are asked whether this is a full- or part-time position;

• Unemployment covers persons aged 15-74 (16-74 in Italy, Spain and Iceland) who were not employed during the reference week, were currently available for work and had either been actively seeking work in the past four weeks or had already found a job starting within the next three months.

• The level of education refers to the educational attainment level, i.e. the highest level of education successfully completed. Low level of education refers to ISCED levels 0-2 (less than primary, primary and lower secondary education), medium level refers to ISCD levels 3 and 4 (upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education) and high level of education refers to ISCED levels 5-8 (tertiary education).

Different articles on detailed technical and methodological information are available through: EU labour force survey.

Context

Employment statistics are at the heart of many EU policies. The European employment strategy (EES) was launched at the Luxembourg jobs summit in November 1997 and was revamped in 2005 to align the EU’s employment strategy more closely to a set of revised Lisbon objectives. In July 2008, employment policy guidelines for the period 2008–2010 were updated. In March 2010, the European Commission launched the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; this was formally adopted by the European Council in June 2010.

The European Pillar of Social Rights has been jointly signed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 17 November 2017. Employment and social policies are the main fields of interest of the European Pillar of Social Rights, which is about delivering new and more effective rights for citizens. It has 3 main categories: (1) Equal opportunities and access to the labour market, (2) Fair working conditions and (3) Social protection and inclusion. In particular, today's more flexible working arrangements provide new job opportunities especially for the young but can potentially give rise to new precariousness and inequalities. Building a fairer Europe and strengthening its social dimension is a key priority for the Commission. The European Pillar of Social Rights is accompanied by a ‘Social scoreboard’ which will monitor the implementation of the Pillar by tracking trends and performances across EU countries in 12 areas and will feed into the European Semester of economic policy coordination. The scoreboard will also serve to assess progress towards a social ‘triple A’ for the EU as a whole.

There are concerns about households where no one is working or has very limited access to work. There is indeed a need to address the issue of household joblessness for a number of reasons: for the households themselves, especially for the future of their children; to reduce poverty; for the productive capacity of the economy; and for the common good and societal well-being.