Search Evaluation Publications

The 2019 report is designed for more condensed and quantitative assessment results to be able to aggregate them more easily with results from other EU countries. The 2019 evaluation report focuses on a possible comprehensive evaluation of the results and effects of RDP (MEPL III).

In this study, the attractiveness of different FAKT (support programme for agri-environment, climate protection and animal welfare)  flower mixtures for different pollinating insect groups (bees, butterflies, hover flies) was examined on the basis of empirical field studies. The species richness and frequency of these insects on the flowering areas that were sown with the flowering mixtures approved for FAKT funding and suitable comparison areas were assessed.

The purpose of this summary is to present the results of the last phase of the evaluation of the implementation of the 2014-2020 RDP of the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region, focusing on two Evaluation Questions on the implementation of the program. Question no. 1: ‘To what extent do the multi-partner organization set up within the framework of EAFRD management and the resulting implementation procedures contribute to effective implementation of the Fund?’ and Question no. 2: ‘To what extent do the tools put in place by the region and the governance within the framework of EAFRD management contribute to a good readability of regional action in terms of agricultural policy and rural development?’.  This report answers to these two evaluations questions and provides recommendations.  

This study asked the question ‘Do AECMs encourage new agricultural practices?’ and made it possible to analyse: the typology of beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of AECMs, the brakes and motivations of farmers to contracting an AECM, the relevance of the support actions of the AECMs with the farmers (impact of the intervention of the AECP) and finally the concrete benefits of new agricultural practices on the environment in Normandie.

This study analysed, ‘to what extent the mobilisation of technical assistance by the Normandie Region ensures effective and efficient implementation of its European programs and what are the obstacles, the levers, points of attention and identifiable opportunities’. The relevance of the communication strategy of the European programs in Normandie in view of its initial results as well as the adequacy of the resources mobilized for the implementation of the actions.

The evaluation examined the implementation of the LEADER principles and governance model in mainland Finland. 

This evaluation examines the results and impact of the Mainland Finland Rural Development Programme's training and cooperation measures and presents an assessment of the progress of innovation in the Rural Development Programme. The case studies deal with the Finnish Forest Centre's project activities and the EIB's rural groups, and the multidimensional development goals. 

This evaluation focuses on business diversification, improved employment, services and empowerment, including improving the accessibility, use and quality of information and communication technologies in rural areas. The data used in the evaluation for the program are from 2014 to 2018.

This report assesses how the Mainland Finland Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 has been able to achieve the environmental objectives set for it. The study was divided into three sections: case studies, review of the implementation of environmental measures and evaluation of their effectiveness.

The evaluation addresses the significance of the Mainland Finland Rural Development Programme 2014–2020 for biodiversity and the landscape. The evaluation examined the implementation, effectiveness, and environmental impact of the rural program. The main objective was to answer three Evaluation Questions common to the EU Member States. In addition, there was a national desire to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the various programme measures, and to receive suggestions for development in preparation for the next funding period.