skip to main content
European Commission
en
Newsroom

Overview   Mergers

Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen v Commission

The Commission takes note of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-289/24 rejecting Brasserie Nationale’s action for annulment against the Commission’s decision of 14 March 2024. In its decision, the Commission accepted the referral request under Article 22 EU Merger Regulation (‘EUMR’) submitted by the Luxembourgish Competition Authority for the Commission to examine the acquisition of Boissons Heintz by Brasserie Nationale.
In its judgment, the General Court confirmed that the Commission is in principle empowered to accept referral requests from Luxembourg, a Member State that does not have a national merger control review system, under Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation, if the conditions for such referral are met. It therefore confirmed the Commission’s power to review the compatibility of Brasserie Nationale’s acquisition of Boissons Heintz with the internal market under the EUMR.

 
New issue of the Competition Merger Brief

We have published our latest Competition Merger Brief. This issue contains the following three articles: (i) "Another brick in the wall?" The Commission's in-depth investigation of UMG/Downtown”; (ii) “RTL/SKY DACH - Is Sky the limit? ”; and (iii) “Clarios/Ecobat Germany/Ecobat Austria - "What goes around, comes around": Closing the loop of battery recycling”.

 
Commission sends Statement of Objections over the proposed acquisition of Anglo American's nickel business by MMG

The European Commission has informed MMG Limited ('MMG') of its preliminary view that its proposed acquisition of Anglo American's nickel business may restrict competition in the market for low-carbon ferronickel, a key alloying material in stainless steel production. In particular, the Commission is concerned that, following the transaction, MMG could divert low-carbon ferronickel supply away from European markets, leading to higher costs in European stainless steel production.

 
Online lunchtime workshop - Empirical study on the impact of mergers reviewed by the Commission on innovation and markups

On 4 September 2026, DG Competition published a new empirical study on the impact of mergers reviewed by the Commission on innovation and markups  prepared by Professors Joel Stiebale (DICE, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf) and Florian Szücs (WU Vienna University of Economics).  This study is particularly relevant at the time of the ongoing review of the EU Merger Guidelines, in the context of which the Commission study on the dynamic effects of mergers was also recently published.
On Tuesday 15 September 2026, DG Competition organises an online lunchtime workshop to discuss the findings of the new empirical study with economic experts and to compare the findings of the study to other recent research. At the workshop the presentation of the study report by the authors will be followed by a discussion with Fiona Scott Morton (Yale University), Sara Calligaris (OECD) and Giulio Federico (Oxera).

 
Economic Workshop on the Study on the Dynamic Effects of Mergers

As part of its review of the Merger Guidelines, the Commission has commissioned a study on the dynamic effects of mergers. Prepared by Oxera with leading academic experts, the study will be published on the Commission’s website by September 2026. A dedicated economic workshop will also be organised on 11 September 2026 in Brussels to present and discuss the outcomes of the study. Registrations for the workshop are open.

 
Study on the impact of mergers reviewed by the European Commission on innovation and markups: An empirical investigation

This report provides an ex post assessment of how mergers reviewed by the European Commission affect innovation and markups. We link merging firms and their rivals identified in DG Competition’s merger case database to patent data from PATSTAT and financial accounts from Orbis. Using a firm-by-year panel, we estimate staggered event-study and difference-in-differences models with matched control groups.

 
Airbus/Air France/JV - Fasten Your Seatbelts: A Ride Through the Efficiency Claims

The Commission unconditionally cleared the creation of a 50/50 joint venture between Airbus and Air France for worldwide component maintenance services for the A350 family.
The case is the first example of the renewed role of efficiencies in the overall assessment of a transaction. The Parties engaged early on, on a no-prejudice basis: pool synergies and geographic footprint synergies were found prima facie plausible as merger- specific and consumer- beneficial, even if their verifiability ultimately could not be established during the Phase I investigation.

 
ECN's Joint Statement on the implementation of merger call-in mechanisms

Together with the National Competition Authorities of the European Competition Network (ECN), we published today a Joint Statement on the implementation of merger call-in mechanisms. It has become increasingly evident that some concentrations that do not meet mandatory notification thresholds may still have a significant impact on competition, to the detriment of consumers and competitive market dynamics. As more and more Member States introduce call-in mechanisms into their national legal frameworks, this Joint Statement comes at a timely moment.
The three-page Joint Statement recognises that call-in mechanisms can be an effective and proportionate tool to ensure that potentially harmful mergers do not escape scrutiny, while also setting out key principles to enhance legal certainty and predictability for businesses.

 
Review of the EU Merger Guidelines – Stakeholder 3rd Workshop

As part of its ongoing public consultation on the Draft Merger Guidelines (published on 30 April 2026 for replies by 26 June 2026, more information here), DG Competition is organizing an interactive technical stakeholder workshop on key aspects of the draft text of the Merger Guidelines.

The aim of the workshop is to gather views on all sections of the draft text and discuss potential amendments to the final Merger Guidelines. 

 
Vivendi v Commission

The Commission takes note of today’s judgments of the General Court which dismissed the actions for annulment brought by Vivendi and Lagardère against two Commission’s decisions from 2023. Those decisions required Vivendi and Lagardère to submit certain internal documents as part of the Commission’s ongoing investigation into whether Vivendi breached EU merger rules by implementing its acquisition of Lagardère before merger approval.
The Commission will carefully study the judgments and reflect on possible next steps.
See also judgment in Lagardère v Commission.

 
Competition Merger Brief: fourth issue in 2026

The fourth issue of 2026 includes the following articles: "Cleared for Take-Off, Subject to Conditions" (looking at the Commission’s conditional approval of Boeing’s acquisition of Spirit AeroSystems following a Phase I investigation) ; and "M.11939 FrieslandCampina/Milcobel – A dairy tale" (which covers the Commission’s first assessment of a merger between dairy cooperatives in the context of a sustained milk shortage, following an in-depth investigation into the dairy sector in Belgium and the Netherlands.)