Statistics Explained

Archive:Agri-environmental indicator - gross nitrogen balance

Revision as of 10:47, 22 May 2018 by Baraneb (talk | contribs)
PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION !!!


Data from April 2018. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Planned update: April 2020.

This article provides a fact sheet of the European Union (EU) agri-environmental indicator gross nitrogen balance. It consists of an overview of recent data, complemented by all information on definitions, measurement methods and context needed to interpret them correctly. The gross nitrogen balance article is part of a set of similar fact sheets providing a complete picture of the state of the agri-environmental indicators in the EU.


The indicator gross nitrogen balance provides an indication of the potential surplus of nitrogen (N) on agricultural land (kg N per ha per year). It also provides trends on nitrogen inputs and outputs on agricultural land over time. It is measured by the following indicator:

Main indicator:

  • Potential surplus of N on agricultural land (kg N per ha per year)

Main statistical findings

Key messages

  • When calculated as 3-year averages in order to smooth out annual differences in weather or input prices, the gross nitrogen balance (GNB) per ha of utilised agriculture area (UAA) for the EU-28 decreased by 10 % from 2004-2015 (Figure 1).
  • Nine EU countries; DK, EL, FR, HR, LT, MT, NL, SE and UK, showed a decreasing trend in the gross nitrogen balance over the years 2004-2015 (Table 1).
  • Four EU countries had an increasing trend over the same time period; CZ, CY, LV and AT (Table 1).
  • In another four EU countries, IT, PL, PT, SI, as well as in NO and CH, the trend was stable from 2004-2015 (Table 1).
  • No clear trend was visible in the remaining 11 EU countries: BE, BG, DE, EE, IE, ES, LU, HU, RO, SK, and FI (Table 1).
  • The quality and accuracy of the estimated GNB per ha is depending on the quality and accuracy of underlying data and coefficients used. As methodologies (especially with regards to the coefficients) and data sources used in countries vary, the balances are only consistent within a country across time. The gross nitrogen balances are not consistent across countries, which mean that data values should not be compared between countries. Trends can be compared between countries.
  • Eurostat works to improve the coherence and transparency of data and methodologies used across the countries and to improve the coherence with related data collections such as greenhouse gas inventories by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the ammonia emissions inventories by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) - Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). Workshops and projects co-funded by Eurostat are steps in this direction.

Assessment

Analysis at EU level

The gross nitrogen balance for the EU-28 decreased from an estimated average of 54 kg N per ha per year in the period 2004-2006 to 49 kg N per ha per year in the period 2013-2015 (Figure %1).

The inputs of the gross nitrogen balance consist of mineral fertilisers, manure and organic fertilisers, atmospheric deposition, biological nitrogen fixation and seeds and planting material. Mineral fertilisers accounted for 45 % of the N input in the EU in 2014 (country data are not complete for 2015, therefore 2014 values are used for this section). Manure accounted for 38 % of the N input in the same year. The N input from seeds and planting materials is negligible. The re-use of N through the use of compost, sewage sludge, industrial waste etc. is also quite insignificant. Data on other organic fertilisers (except manure) are lacking in many countries and significance of these fertilisers could be underestimated. Data is mostly lacking on manure withdrawals, i.e. manure removed from agriculture and reused elsewhere. Biological nitrogen fixation is on average 6 % of total N input in the EU-28. The level of atmospheric deposition depends on ammonia (NH3) emissions (of which agriculture is the main source), nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions (where the contribution of agriculture is not significant) and climate conditions (transport through air to other regions). Atmospheric deposition was on average 8 % of total inputs in the EU-28.

Analysis at country level

As explained in the section on data and methodology Data used and methodology the current balances are not comparable between countries due to differences in definitions, methodologies and data sources used by countries. In this section, some trends at Member States' level are highlighted.

Few countries showed an increasing trend in GNB when monitored as 3-year averages from 2004-2015. Only CZ, CY, LV and AT (Table 1) belonged to this group, and the increases are moderate. A decreasing trend was shown in nine EU countries; DK, EL, FR, HR, LT, MT, NL, SE and UK, over the same years 2004-2015. For EL, FR, MT and NL the decrease stagnated over the years 2010-2015. Four EU countries: IT, PL, PT, SI, as well as in NO and CH, had a stable trend from 2004-2015 with no real changes. No clear trend could be identified in the remaining 11 EU countries: BE, BG, DE, EE, IE, ES, LU, HU, RO, SK, and FI. Here, the 3-year averages increased or decreased from data point to data point without consistency.

Nitrogen use efficiency

Another way of presenting the results of the gross nitrogen balance is the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) ratio, which is defined as total N outputs divided by total N inputs. It gives an indication of the relative utilization of nitrogen applied to an agricultural production system. In principle, by decreasing the nitrogen surplus over time, the nutrient use efficiency increases. NUE depends on the production system and its management. NUE increases as the N output in harvested products increases and/or the N input decreases. Conversely, NUE is low when the N output in harvested products is relatively low and the N input relatively high. Many combinations are possible, but the ideal case would be a high N output via harvested products combined with a high NUE and a low N surplus.

The highest value of NUE does not necessarily mean the best and desirable results. Rates which may be close to or above 1.0 would indicate a risk of soil depletion, as the nutrient uptake by crops exceeds the amount of nutrients applied to the soil. From a longer-term perspective, this trend cannot be considered sustainable.

The development of the NUE indicator is still in progress. For proper interpretation, NUE should be reported together with the N output in harvested products (as indicator for the productivity of the system), and the N surplus (as proxy for the potential N loss to the environment).


Figure 2 shows that the overall NUE in the EU-28 increased only slightly between 2004-2006 and 2012-2014. It could indicate improved utilisation of nutrients applied to the field in a considerable number of Member States. Figure 2 also shows that in most countries the average NUE 2012-2014 had increased compared to the period 2004–2006.

The evolution of NUE as the aggregate for EU-28 between 2004 and 2014 is shown in Figure 3a, and N output in harvested products in Figure 3b. NUE and N output in harvested products have roughly the same development, which is inversed to the GNB over the same time period (Figure 3c). In summary, the trends indicate that while the N losses to the environment are slightly decreasing the productivity is slightly improving in the EU-28, as is the nutrient use efficiency.

The NUE indicator may be useful for presenting how different strategies can contribute towards improving relative utilization of nutrients applied to agricultural production system, depending on the initial situation. Depending on context, both intensification and extensification strategies may contribute. In some contexts the main drive may be to increase food production and resource use efficiency, in other contexts the priority may be to protect soil and habitats from degradation.

Data sources and availability

Indicator definition

Potential surplus of N on agricultural land (kg N per ha per year).

Measurements

Main indicator:

  • Potential surplus of N on agricultural land (kg N per ha per year).

Links with other indicators

This indicator has links to a number of other AEI indicators that describe developments in some of the main contributory factors.

Data used and methodology

Due to missing data nutrient balances have been estimated by Eurostat for several countries and several years (Table 1). These estimations were based on data available in Eurostat's dissemination database, international public data collections, and published research, and confirmed with the countries in question as reasonable estimates. For 2015, no detailed estimates have been made and therefore no detailed analysis covers this year.

The methodology of the nitrogen balances is described in Eurostat/OECD Nutrient Budgets handbook. The gross nitrogen balance lists all inputs and outputs into and out of the soil and calculates the gross nitrogen surplus as the difference between total inputs and total outputs. The gross nitrogen surplus per ha is derived by dividing the total gross nitrogen surplus by the reference area. The reference area of the current version of balances uploaded in Eurostat database is the UAA. It should be noted that some countries use slightly different methodologies; Austria, UK and Spain fall into this group. It means that the time series are comparable within the countries, but the individual values should not be compared with other countries' individual values.

The inputs of the nitrogen balance are:

  • inorganic fertilisers,
  • organic fertilisers (excluding manure).
  • Gross manure input, which is calculated from:
  • manure production (N excretion; according to the current methodology no reductions are made for N losses due to volatilisation in stables, storages and with the application to the land);
  • manure withdrawals (manure export, manure processed as industrial waste, non-agricultural use of manure, other withdrawals);
  • change in manure stocks;
  • manure import.
  • Other nitrogen inputs, which consist of:
  • seeds and planting material;
  • biological nitrogen fixation by leguminous crops and grass-legume mixtures;
  • atmospheric deposition.

The outputs of the gross nitrogen balance are:

  • Total removal of N with the harvest of crops (cereals, dried pulses, root crops, industrial crops, vegetables, fruit, ornamental plants, other harvested crops);
  • Total removal of N with the harvest and grazing of fodder (permanent grassland and fodder from arable land including temporary grassland);
  • Crop residues removed from the field.


The N input and output is estimated for each item of the balance from basic data by multiplying with coefficients to convert the data into N content. Basic data (fertiliser consumption, livestock numbers, crop production, agricultural area) are mostly derived from agricultural statistics. Coefficients are mainly estimated by research institutes and can be based on models, statistical data, measured data as well as expert judgements.

Climatic conditions have a big impact on the balance through the impact on yield and therefore N output. Climate and weather conditions are beyond the control of the farmer. To dampen the effect of weather conditions on the balance the results presented in this fact sheet with regards to the nutrient balance are presented not referring to a particular year but as an average for a certain period. Input prices can have the same distorting effect.

Context

The gross nitrogen balance lists the N inputs to agricultural soils and nitrogen outputs removed from the soil. The main indicator from the gross nitrogen balance is the gross nitrogen surplus (GNS) which is calculated as the difference between total N inputs and total N outputs. The GNS can also be expressed in kg N per ha per year, by dividing the surplus by the reference area. The gross nitrogen balance provides insight into links between agricultural N use and losses of N into environment. A persistent surplus indicates potential environmental problems, such as ammonia (NH3) emissions (contributes to acidification, eutrophication and atmospheric particulate pollution), nitrate leaching (resulting in pollution of drinking water and eutrophication of surface waters) or nitrous oxide emissions (a potent greenhouse gas). A persistent deficit indicates the risk of decline in soil fertility.

The gross nitrogen balance can only indicate the potential risk to the environment as the actual risk depends on many factors including climate conditions, soil type and soil characteristics, management practices such as drainage, tillage, irrigation etc.

Policy relevance and context

  • Rural Development Programme (RDP): The Agri-Environmental Measures were introduced in 1992 under the MacSharry reform of the Common agricultural policy (CAP), integrated as an obligatory measure within the Rural Development Regulation in 1999 (pillar two) in order to promote environmental friendly farm practices. The key objectives of these measures are to promote agricultural methods to protect the environment and maintain the countryside. The Member States develop their own agri-environment measures according to their environmental needs. Some measures are designed inter alia to reduce the use of inputs, to conserve valuable farmed habitats, and to introduce changes in land use for environmental purposes. These identified positive impacts contribute to biodiversity, landscape, water and soil resources. Nitrogen balances are required for the Rural Development Programme as part of the EU’s Common monitoring and evaluation framework (CMEF). The CMEF is laid down in a set of documents drawn up by the European Commission and agreed with the Member States. These documents are put together in a handbook, which includes a series of evaluation guidelines and guidance sheets on the common indicators.
  • The Water Framework Directive (WFD) (Directive 2000/60/EC) requires Member States to protect and restore the quality of their waters. Water management is based on natural geographical and hydrological formations: the river basins. It sets out a precise timetable for action to get all EU waters into good status. A good status is defined through several factors: biology, chemistry as well as morphology and quantity. Environmental quality standards are defined as the concentration of a particular pollutant or group of pollutants, sediment or biota, which should not be exceeded in order to protect the environment. In the legislative text of the Water Framework Directive, there is an indicative list of pollutants that contribute to eutrophication (in particular nitrates and phosphates). Measures applied under the Water Framework Directive affecting the use of N in agriculture relate to best environmental practices. They may include the reduction of nutrient application, the modification of cultivation techniques and the proper handling of fertilisers. Most measures suggested in this context are aimed at reducing the influx of nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus to the groundwater as well as surface waters. The nitrogen balance surplus (every 6 years at level of water body catchment) is a commonly used indicator for identifying areas vulnerable to nutrient pollution in the WFD pressures and impacts analysis.
  • The Nitrates Directive (ND) (Directive 1991/676/EEC), aims to reduce water pollution caused or induced by nitrates from agricultural sources and prevent further such pollution. The directive requires the Member States to monitor nitrate concentrations in surface water and groundwater, identify waters affected by pollution and waters which could be affected by pollution if no measures are taken and designate nitrate vulnerable zones, defined as all known areas of land which drain into the waters identified. For these vulnerable zones, action programmes containing measures to reduce and prevent nitrate pollution must be developed, implemented and revised every four years. The action programmes of Member States should contain rules relating to the limitation of the land application of fertilisers based on a balance between the foreseeable nitrogen requirements of the crops, and the nitrogen supply to the crops from the soil and fertilisation. These balances should be calculated at farm level every 4 years.
  • The The 7th Environmental Action Programme encourages the full implementation of both the ND and WFD, in order to achieve levels of water quality that do not give rise to unacceptable impacts on, and risks to, human health and the environment.


Other policies which are indirectly linked to the gross nitrogen balance are:

  • The main legislative instrument to achieve the 2030 objectives of the Clean Air Programme is Directive 2016/2284/EU on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants which entered into force on 31 December 2016. This Directive sets national reduction commitments for the five pollutants (sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, ammonia and fine particulate matter) responsible for acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone pollution which leads to significant negative impacts on human health and the environment. More information is available here. This new Directive repeals and replaces the National Emissions Ceiling Directive (NEC Directive) (Directive 2001/81/EC) from the date of its transposition (30 June 2018) ensuring that the emission ceilings for 2010 set in that Directive shall apply until 2020. Directive 2016/2284/EU also transposes the reduction commitments for 2020 taken by the EU and its Member States under the revised Gothenburg Protocol and sets more ambitious reduction commitments for 2030 so as to cut the health impacts of air pollution by half compared with 2005.
  • The Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) (Directive 2008/1/EC) introduces an integrated cross-media approach, aiming to prevent or minimise emissions to air, water and land, as well as to avoid waste production with a view to achieve a high level of environmental protection as a whole. The purpose of the IPPC Directive was to achieve integrated prevention and control of pollution arising from several categories of industrial activities. Among these are installations for the intensive rearing of poultry or pigs with more than 40 000 places for poultry, 2 000 places for production pigs (over 30 kg), or 750 places for sows. The indicative list of main polluting substances to be taken into account if they are relevant for fixing emission limit values includes oxides of nitrogen and substances which contribute to eutrophication (phosphates and nitrogen). The Commission has adopted a new Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) in 2010.
  • Habitats Directive (Directive 1992/43/EEC) and Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC): The main purpose of these Directives is to ensure biological diversity through the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna within the European territory, while taking into account economic, social, cultural and regional requirements. Farmers who have agricultural land in Natura 2000 sites and face restrictions due to the requirements of the Habitats and Birds Directives are eligible to receive rural development payments for the management of these sites. Depending on the specific conditions of a certain area, Natura 2000 management plans may include measures to reduce the use of pesticides and fertilisers, measures to mitigate the effects of soil compaction, e.g. limitations on the use of machinery or the setting of stocking limits, or measures aiming to regulate the irrigation of agricultural land.
  • The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. During the first commitment period, 37 industrialized countries and the European Community committed to reduce GHG emissions to an average of five percent against 1990 levels. During the second commitment period, Parties committed to reduce GHG emissions by at least 18 % below 1990 levels in the eight-year period from 2013 to 2020. The major distinction between the Protocol and the Convention is that while the Convention encouraged industrialised countries to stabilize GHG emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O, PFCs, HFCs, SO2, NOx, CO and NMVOC), the Protocol commits them to do so. Reporting is done by the countries through the submission of annual emission inventories and national reports under the Protocol at regular intervals. Items to be reported under the Protocol include mineral nitrogen fertilisers' application by agriculture, livestock excretion, emission factors etc. In December 2015 the parties of UNFCCC adopted the Paris Agreement (which entered into force in November 2016), aimed at limiting global warming to less than two degrees Celsius, and pursue efforts to limit the rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
  • UNECE Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution: parallel to the development of the EU NEC Directive, the EU Member States together with Central and East European countries, the United States of America and Canada have negotiated the "multi-pollutant" protocol under the so-called Gothenburg protocol, agreed in November 1999. The emission ceilings in the protocol are equal or less ambitious than those in the NEC Directive.

Agri-environmental context

The gross nitrogen balance indicates the total potential risk to the environment (air, water and soil). The output side of the balance presents the nutrient uptake by harvested (and grazed) crops and fodder and crop residues removed from the field; i.e. the agricultural production from the soil. The input side of the balance counts all N supplied to the soil. Sustainability could be defined by preserving and/or improving the level of production without degrading the natural resources. The harvest and grazing of crops and fodder means that nutrients are removed from the soil. To sustain soil fertility this removal of nutrients in principal should be compensated by supplying the same amount of nutrients. Fertilisers and manure are therefore necessary to supply the crops with the necessary N for growing. There are certain complications however; not all of N in fertilisers and manure reaches the crop. A part of the N in fertilisers and manure is lost due to volatilisation in animal housing, storage and with the application to the land. Organic N in manure first needs to be mineralized before it is available to the crop which means that part of the N may need different time-lag for being available to plant (depending on soil characteristics and climate conditions –temperature and precipitations). Yield and therefore the uptake of N by crops is not only determined by inputs but also by uncontrollable factors like weather. Furthermore, the risk of N leaching and run-off does not only depend on the N excess, but also on the type of soil, precipitation rates, soil saturation, temperature etc. Abating measures to reduce N emissions directly impact the amount of N in manure and fertilisers applied to the soil. A higher emission rate means lower N content of manure/fertilisers applied to the soil, but means a higher contribution to environmental problems related to GHG and NH3 emissions. Lowering the emission rate means increasing the rate of N in manure/fertilisers, and therefore increasing the potential risk of leaching and run-off.

The estimated N surplus on its own therefore does not tell so much on the actual risks to the air, water and soil. The actual risk depends on many factors including climate conditions, soil type and soil characteristics, soil saturation, management practices such as drainage, tillage, irrigation etc. The actual risks to the environment are better represented by the indicators AEI 18 - Ammonia emissions, AEI 19 - GHG emissions and AEI 27.1 - Water quality (nitrate pollution). These indicators however do not present a link between the agricultural activities and the environmental impact. The nitrogen balance presents this link, identifies the factors which determine the N surplus and shows the change over time.

Further Eurostat information

Publications

Database

Pressures and risks (aei_pr)
Gross Nutrient Balance (aei_pr_gnb)

Dedicated section

Methodology / Metadata

Source data for tables and figures on this page (MS Excel)

Other information

Legislation: Commission Staff working document accompanying COM(2006)508 final

External links

  • European Commission - Agriculture and Rural Development
  • European Commission – Environment
  • European Commission – Climate Action

Notes

  1. Mark A. Sutton, et al (eds). Nitrogen in Europe - The European Nitrogen Assessment, Cambridge, 2011
  2. Sutton M.A. et al. Our Nutrient World. The challenge to produce more food, energy with less pollution. Key Messages for Rio+20. Centre for Ecology; Hydrology, 2012.
  3. Mark A. Sutton, Oene Oenema, Jan Willem Erisman, Adrian Leip, Hans van Grinsven; Wilfried Winiwarter. Too much of a good thing. Nature, Volume: 472, Pages: 159–161, 2011