ICT usage in enterprises (isoc_e)

National Reference Metadata in SIMS structure for INFOSOC Enterprises

Compiling agency: Bundesanstalt Statistik Österreich ("STATISTICS AUSTRIA")


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Bundesanstalt Statistik Österreich ("STATISTICS AUSTRIA")

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Directorate Social Statistics,
Unit Research and Digitalisation

1.5. Contact mail address

Guglgasse 13, 1110 Vienna, Austria


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 28/02/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 28/02/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 28/02/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) usage and e-commerce in enterprises are survey data. They are collected by the National Statistical Institutes or Ministries and are in principle based on Eurostat's annual model questionnaires on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

Large part of the data collected is used to measure the progress in the implementation of one of the main political priorities of the European Commission for 2019 to 2024 – A Europe fit for the digital age. Part of this is the "European strategy for data", envisioning a single market for data to ensure the EU's global competitiveness and data sovereignty, in which context a comprehensive set of new rules for all digital services was proposed: the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, which are centrepieces of the EU digital strategy. Furthermore, the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy presented a new “EU cybersecurity strategy”, which is intended to bolster the EU's collective resilience against cyber threats, safeguard a global and open internet and protect EU values and the fundamental rights of its people. Furthermore, data will allow monitoring the progress towards  A Europe fit for the digital age, one of the six priorities for the period 2019-2024 of the von der Leyen European Commission.

The aim of the European survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises is to collect and disseminate harmonised and comparable information at European level.

 

Name of data collection
IKT-Einsatz in Unternehmen 2023 – Erhebung über den Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien
(ICT usage in enterprises 2023 – Survey on the usage of information and communication technologies)
3.2. Classification system

 NACE Rev.2 2008

3.3. Coverage - sector

All economic activities in the scope of Annex I of the Commission Regulation are intended to be included in the general survey, covering enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons. These activities are: NACE Rev. 2 sections C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M and N, division 95.1.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.3.1. Coverage-sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - All NACE Rev. 2 categories are covered
3.3.2. Coverage sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - If not all activities were covered, which ones were covered?

Micro-enterprises are not included in the survey.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The model questionnaire on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides a large variety of variables covering among others the following areas:

-          Access to and use of the Internet

-          E-commerce and e-business

-          Use of cloud computing services

-          Artificial Intelligence

-          Other topics: Data utilisation, sharing, analytics and trading, Invoicing.

The annual model questionnaires and the European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises comprise definitions and explanations regarding the topics of the survey.

3.5. Statistical unit

Enterprise

3.6. Statistical population

Target Population

As required by Annex of the Commission Implementing Regulation, enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons shall be covered by the survey.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.6.1. Coverage of micro-enterprises
No
3.6.2. Breakdown between size classes [0 to 1] and [2 to 9]
No
3.6.3. If for micro-enterprises different size delimitation was used, please indicate it.

Not applicable.

3.7. Reference area

All territories of Austria.

Data for a specific set of variables were delivered on NUTS 2 regional level.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Years 2022 and 2023.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable


4. Unit of measure Top

Percentages of enterprises, Percentages of turnover, Million euro, Percentages of employees and self-employed persons.


5. Reference Period Top

The reference period of the Model Questionnaire is followed completely.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Complementary national legislation constituting the legal basis for the survey on the use of ICT in enterprises:

There is no complementary national legislation.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

At national level : 

The strict confidentiality provisions of the Austrian Federal Statistics Act 2000 regulate the handling of sensitive data relating to individuals and organisations.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data are transmitted via eDamis (encrypted) and delivered to a secure environment where they are treated. Flags are added for confidentiality in case results must not be disclosed.

At national level : 

Data is transmitted via eDamis (encrypted) and delivered to a secure environment where they are treated. National Statistical Institutes are requested to add flags for confidentiality in case results must not be disclosed.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Dates of the release of the ICT in enterprises results (press release and website) are preannounced in the release calendar of Statistics Austria which is publicly accessible.

8.2. Release calendar access

Release calendar of Statistics Austria

8.3. Release policy - user access

Results are disseminated to all users at the same time via a press release and standardized tables via the website of Statistics Austria for free.

Specific data is provided to everyone with a specific request. Feasibility of the request and payment of possible expenses are checked in advance.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

A press release was published on 17 October 2023 ("11% of Austrian enterprises use artificial intelligence").

Standardized tables of the results of the ICT usage in enterprises 2023 were updated and provided on the website of Statistics Austria.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

A standard publication is established covering the results on the ICT usage in enterprises 2023, available on the website of Statistics Austria.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See detailed section 10.3.1.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Results for selected variables collected in the framework of this survey are available for all participating countries on Digital economy and society of Eurostat website.

At national level :

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access
Due to national regulation Statistics Austria has to provide microdata results in case of a specific request by selected scientific organisations. Therefore, information on the questionnaire, indicators and codes are provided to the public via the website of Statistics Austria. The dissemination of microdata will be checked in case of a specific data request and it will meet the quality requirements regarding confidentiality and flagging specified in the Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not requested

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested

10.6. Documentation on methodology

A national standard documentation is updated on a yearly basis to cover the latest information of each reference year and is published on the website of Statistics Austria. The detailed standard documentation is published in German only. A short summary is available in English.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested

10.7. Quality management - documentation

A national standard documentation is updated on a yearly basis to cover the latest information of each reference year and is published on the website of Statistics Austria. The detailed standard documentation is published in German only. A short summary is available in English.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides guidelines and standards for the implementation of the surveys. It is updated every year according to the changed contents of the model questionnaires.

At national level :

Statistics Austria is committed to ensuring the highest quality with respect to the compilation of statistical information. In accordance with the Federal Statistics Act (Article 24), Statistics Austria has to use statistical methods and processes in compliance with internationally recognised scientific principles and standards, conductongoing analyses of the statistics with a view to quality improvements and ensure that statistics are as up to-date as possible. This commitment to quality is also specified in Statistics Austria’s mission statement. In adopting the European Statistics Code of Practice, Statistics Austria has committed to adhering to principles and standards forthe production and dissemination of high-quality statistics. As part of the European Statistical System (ESS),Statistics Austria recognises the Quality Declaration of the ESS. The Statistics Council has set up a QualityAssurance Committee, a primary focus of which is the ongoing examination of potential quality improvements. The Methodological Manual provides guidelines and standards for the implementation of the surveys in the Member States. It is updated every year according to the latest content of the model questionnaire.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

European level :

At European level, the recommended use of the annual Eurostat model questionnaire aims at improving comparability of the results among the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Moreover, the Methodological Manual provides guidelines and clarifications for the implementation of the surveys.

National level :

In cooperation with the Statistic Committee’s Quality Assurance Committee, feedback meetings concerning the quality of the different statistical products are held regularly within the framework of Statistics Austria’s quality management programme. In addition internal quality audits are carried out by the quality management team. The content and objectives concern critical examination of the quality aspects of statistics with particular consideration of the methods and processes used; identification of quality improvement potential; development of recommendations for improvement measures; and improvement of the standard documentation relating to the statistics in question, with special attention to the views of users and external experts.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

European level : 

At European level, European Commission users (e.g. DG CNECT, DG GROW, DG JUST, DG REGIO, DG JRC) are the principal users of the data on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises and contribute in identifying/defining the topics to be covered. Hence, main users are consulted regularly (at hearings, task forces, ad hoc meetings) for their needs and are involved in the process of the development of the model questionnaires at a very early stage.

User needs are considered throughout the whole discussion process of the model questionnaires aiming at providing relevant statistical data for monitoring and benchmarking of European policies.

National level :

At national level, the Federal Ministeries (e.g. BMF – Bundesministerium für Finanzen) are the main users of the data on ICT usage in enterprise. Statistics Austria is closely collaborating with ministeries to interpret different results on the survey, to observe the goals in regard to European and national benchmarks and to identify new developments on digitalisation which are shared in task force and working group meetings. Several other national users (e.g. public organisations, universities, private enterprises) regularly request data on ICT usage in enterprises.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

European level : 

At European level, contacts within the Commission, the OECD and other stakeholders give a clear picture about the key users' satisfaction as to the following data quality aspects: accuracy and reliability of results, timeliness, satisfactory accessibility, clarity and comparability over time and between countries, completeness and relevance. Overall users have evaluated positively (good, very good) the data quality on the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

National level :

Not available.

12.3. Completeness

Detailed information is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested. 


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Comments on reliability and representativeness of results and completeness of dataset

These comments reflect overall standard errors reported for the indicators and breakdowns in section 13.2.1 (Sampling error - indicators) and the rest of the breakdowns for national and European aggregates, as well as other accuracy measurements. The estimated standard error should not exceed 2pp for the overall proportions and should not exceed 5pp for the proportions related to the different subgroups of the population (for those NACE aggregates for the calculation and dissemination of national aggregates). If problems were found, these could have implications for future surveys (e.g. need to improve sampling design, to increase sample sizes, to increase the response rates).

More detailed information is available in “ Annex II. _ Accuracy “ excel file - related to European aggregates, comments on reliability and use of flag.

13.2. Sampling error

For calculation of the standard error see 13.2.1.1.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Standard error (for selected indicators and breakdowns)

Precision measures related to variability due to sampling, unit non-response (the size of the subset of respondents is smaller than the size of the original sample) and other (imputation for item non-response, calibration etc.) are not (yet) required from the Member states for all indicators.  Eurostat will make basic assumptions to compute these measures for all indicators produced (e.g. stratified random sampling assuming as strata the crossing of the variables “Number of employees and self-employed persons” and “Economic Activity” as it was defined in the 3 tables of section 18.1).

More detailed information is available in“ Sample and standard error tables 2023 “ excel file – worksheets starting with “Standard error".

13.2.1.1. Sampling error indicator calculation

Calculation of the standard error

Various methods can be used for the calculation of the standard error for an estimated proportion. The aim is to incorporate into the standard error the sampling variability but also variability due to unit non-response, item non-response (imputation), calibration etc. In case of census / take-all strata, the aim is to calculate the standard errors comprising the variability due to unit non-response and item non-response.

a) Name and brief description of the applied estimation approach
 Horvitz-Thompson estimator for stratified sampling

 

b) Basic formula
 See e.g. Cochran for stratified sampling

 

c) Main reference in the literature
 E.g. Cochran

 

d) How has the stratification been taken into account? 
 Fully

 

e) Which strata have been considered? 
 NACE x Size x NUTS
13.3. Non-sampling error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See concept 18.1.1. A) Description of  frame population.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

79 out of 11 007 sampled units were identified, which were classified as "out of scope" during field phase (mainly due to becoming inactive units during that period). The over-coverage rate was therefore 0.7%.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested

13.3.2. Measurement error

Not applicable.

13.3.3. Non response error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See detailed sub-concepts below.

13.3.3.1.1. Unit response

The following table contains the number of units (i.e. enterprises), by type of response to the survey and by the percentage of these values in relation to the gross sample size.

 

Type of response Enterprises
0-9 employees and self-employed persons 10 or more employees and self-employed persons
Number % Number %
Gross sample size (as in section 3.1 C)   100% 11 007 100%
1. Response (questionnaires returned by the enterprise)     7 157 65.0%
1.1 Used for tabulation and grossing up (Net sample or Final Sample; as in section 3.1 D)     6 938 63.0%
1.2 Not used for tabulation     219 2.0%
1.2.1 Out of scope (deaths, misclassified originally in the target population, etc.)     79 0.7%
1.2.2 Other reasons (e.g. unusable questionnaire)     140 1.3%
2. Non-response (e.g. non returned mail, returned mail by post office)     3 850 35.0%

 

Comments on unit response, if unit response is below 60%
 National calculation of unit response is as follows: 6 938/(11 007-79)=63.5%
13.3.3.1.2. Methods used for minimizing unit non-response
  • A new designed covering letter was established.
  • Electronic questionnaire via Internet (eQuest-Web)
  • A new designed information sheet on how to use the electronic questionnaire was sent out and an information sheet about the current privacy policy as well.
  • A telephone hotline for the respondents was established.
  • Two written reminders were sent out. The paper questionnaire was enclosed to the reminders as well as a stamped addressed envelope for returning the questionnaire.
  • Wrong mail addresses were investigated to send the questionnaire once again.
  • Last year's respondents were addressed (if available) to ensure a direct contacting to the responsible person.
  • Responding enterprises will receive the main results after the survey for free.
13.3.3.1.3. Methods used for unit non-response treatment
1. No treatment for unit non-response  
2. Treatment by re-weighting
2.1 Re-weighting by the sampling design strata considering that non-response is ignorable inside each stratum (the naïve model) X
2.2 Re-weighting by identified response homogeneity groups (created using sample-level information)  
2.3 Re-weighting through calibration/post-stratification (performed using population information) by the groups used for calibration/post-stratification  
3. Treatment by imputation (done distinctly for each variable/item)  
4. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of unit non-response. (e.g. Re-weighting using Horvitz-Thompson estimator, ratio estimator or regression estimator, auxiliary variables )
 Re-weighting using Horvitz-Thompson estimator and based on the base weights weighting with auxiliary information on turnover and number of employees and self-employed persons inside each stratum.
13.3.3.1.4. Assessment of unit non-response bias

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not available.

13.3.3.2.1. Methods used for item non-response treatment
1. No treatment for item non-response  
2. Deductive imputation
An exact value can be derived as a known function of other characteristics.
X
3. Deterministic imputation (e.g. mean/median, mean/median by class, ratio-based, regression-based, single donor nearest-neighbour)
Deterministic imputation leads to estimators with no random component, that is, if the imputation were to be re-conducted, the outcome would be the same
 
4. Random imputation (e.g. hot-deck, cold-deck)
Random imputation leads to estimators with a random component, that is, if the imputation were re-conducted, it would have led to a different result
X
5. Re-weighting  
6. Multiple imputation
In multiple imputation each missing value is replaced (instead of a single value) with a set of plausible values that represent the uncertainty of the right value to impute. Multiple imputation methods offer the possibility of deriving variance estimators by taking imputation into account. The incorporation of imputation into the variance can be easily derived based on variability of estimates among the multiply imputed data sets.
 
7. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of item non-response.
 Deductive imputation is used where exact value can be derived directly from known information. Nearest-Neighbour imputation based on a distance function is used for imputing missing items (only for e-commerce values).
13.3.3.2.2. Questions or items with item response rates below 90% and other comments

Other comments relating to the item non-response

Additional issues concerning "non-response" calculation (e.g. method used in national publications).
Not applicable.

 

Questions and items with low response rates (cut-off value is 90% ) and item non-response rate.
Not applicable.
13.3.4. Processing error

No processing errors were detected.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See detailed section below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

European level : 

Data are to be delivered to Eurostat in the fourth quarter of the reference year (due date for the finalised dataset is 5th October). European results are released before the end of the survey year or in the beginning of the year following the survey year (T=reference year, T+0 for indicators referring to the current year, T+12 months for other indicators referring to the previous year e.g. e-commerce).

At national level : 

A final and validated dataset was delivered to Eurostat on 28 September 2023. Final results were released on 17 October 2023 on the website of Statistics Austria (press release and website).

14.2. Punctuality

 See detailed section below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

The final and validated dataset was transmitted to Eurostat on 28 September 2023 (T-7).


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

The model questionnaire is generally used by the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Due to (small) differences in translation, in the used survey vehicle, in non-response treatment or different routing through the questionnaire, some results for some countries may be of reduced comparability. In these cases, notes are added in the data.

Detailed information on differences in the wording of the questions in the national questionnaires is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

Data for specific set of variables were delivered on NUTS 2 regional level. There is no problem of comparability across the country’s regions.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable

15.2. Comparability - over time

See section below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The length of comparable time series depends on the module and the variable considered within each survey module. Additional information is available in annexes attached to the European metadata.

Not applicable.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not applicable


16. Cost and Burden Top
Restricted from publication


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Statistics Austria has in place a general data revision policy (available in German only), which corresponds to the Quality Assurance Framework of the European Statistical System.

17.2. Data revision - practice

The pracitces of possible data revisions are followed completely, based on the general data revision policy of Statistics Austria, which corresponds to the Quality Assurance Framework of the European Statistical System.

Only final results were published. No data revision was needed.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

 Not requested


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

A) Frame population description and distribution

For more information see concept 18.1.1.

 

B) Sampling design - Sampling method

Description of the sampling method used (e.g. stratified random sample, quota sampling, cluster sampling; one-stage or two-stage sampling) and information which variables were used to stratify, the categories of those variables, in particular for the NACE Rev. 2 categories related to the "possible calculation of European aggregates", and the final number of strata: 

Sampling was carried out as stratified random sampling. Three dimensions were used as stratification variables (33 x 3 x 9 = 891 strata):

Main economic activity (33 strata)
10–12
13–15
16–18
19
20
21
22–23
24–25
26.1–26.4+26.8
26.5–26.7
27
28
29–30
31–33
35
36–39
41–43
45
46
47
49–53
55
56
58–60
61
62–63
68
69–71
72
73–75
77–78+80–82
79
95.1

Size classes (3 strata)
10–49 employees
50–249 employees
250 or more employees

Region NUTS2 (9 strata)
Burgenland
Kärnten
Niederösterreich
Oberösterreich
Salzburg
Steiermark
Tirol
Vorarlberg
Wien

Other surveys were not considered during the sampling process, but the two previous ICT surveys have an influence. If a unit was in the sample in one of the two previous years, the probability to be in the sample again is decreased compared to the other units in the same strata. This is only valid for non-complete sample strata.

C) Gross sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: GROSS SAMPLE)

 

D) Net sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: NET SAMPLE)

18.1.1. Population frame

A) Description of frame population

a) When was the sample for the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprise survey drawn? February 2023
b) When was the last update of the Business register that was used for drawing the sample of enterprises for the survey? February 2023 
c) Please indicate if the frame population is the same as, or is in some way coordinated with, the one used for the Structural Business Statistics (different snapshots) Different snapshots, e.g. the frame for SBS 2022 is drawn in summer 2023 
d) Please describe if different frames are used during different stages of the statistical process (e.g. frame used for sampling vs. frame used for grossing up): Not applicable. 
e) Please indicate shortcomings in terms of timeliness (e.g. time lag between last update of the sampling frame and the moment of the actual sampling), geographical coverage, coverage of different subpopulations, data available etc., and any measures taken to correct it, for this survey. Not applicable. 

 

 B) Frame population distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: FRAME POPULATION)

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual

18.3. Data collection

See detailed sections below.

18.3.1. Survey period
Survey / Collection Date of sending out questionnaires Date of reception of the last questionnaire treated
General survey 27 February 2023 14 July 2023
Micro-enterprises  Not included  Not included
18.3.2. Survey vehicle – general survey
General survey - Stand-alone survey
18.3.3. Survey vehicle – micro-enterprises
The collection of micro-enterprises was integrated with the general survey
18.3.4. Survey type
  • Web questionnaire
  • Paper questionnaire
18.3.5. Survey participation
Voluntary
18.4. Data validation

Plausibility checks are carried out during the field phase in order to detect incorrect or missing information in the filled-in questionnaires (using the web questionnaire with incorporated checks).

As far as possible, phone calls or mails are carried out to clarify open issues with the respondents. After the field phase, the dataset is checked again on consistency and plausibility in order to gain a valid dataset.

The grossing-up of indicators is done according to the transmission format by Eurostat.

For validating the final data file, the validation process by Eurostat is used (using the test version of eDamis to receive the validation report). Validation errors detected were corrected by Statistics Austria. In case a correction is not possible, a comment in the notes of the dataset is provided (e.g. due to rounding or non-responses).

18.5. Data compilation

Grossing-up procedures

After the survey was performed, grossing up took place simply by (Nh/nh) where Nh represents the number of enterprises in the sampling frame (Austrian Business Register) in a certain stratum h and nh denotes the number of enterprises which responded in that stratum.
 
The additional weights by employment and turnover were calculated in a similar way, so that total employment (and total turnover, resp.) equals the totals in the sampling frame for each stratum.
 
Altogether, three weighting factors were calculated for each of the strata:
  • by number of enterprises,
  • by employment,
  • by turnover.
18.5.1. Imputation - rate

No imputation was carried out for the vast majority of variables.

Only for e-commerce values imputation was done if the requested value couldn't be provided, even after further inquiry. As only 1 unit had to be imputed, the imputation rate is about 0.01%.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable


19. Comment Top

Problems encountered and lessons to be learnt: 

19.1. Documents
Questionnaire in national language  X
Questionnaire in English (if available)  
National reports on methodology (if available)  
Analysis of key results, backed up by tables and graphs in English (if available)  X
Other Annexes  


Annexes:
Austrian questionnaire
Austrian press release


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
Annex II._ Accuracy 2023
Annex I._Copmleteness 2023
Sample and standard error tables 2023