International trade in medicinal and pharmaceutical products
Data from May 2019
Planned update May 2020
EU-28 exports, imports and trade balance in medicinal and pharmaceutical products, 2002-2017
This article is part of an online publication providing recent statistics on international trade in goods, covering information on the EU's main partners, main products traded, specific characteristics of trade as well as background information.
An increasing trade surplus
Figure 1 shows that extra-EU exports and imports in medicinal and pharmaceutical products grew almost every year between 2002 and 2018, reaching EUR 169 and 78 billion, respectively. Imports were dropping slightly only in 2003 and 2013 and exports only in 2008 and 2016. Even the financial crisis, which affected trade in many other products, caused exports to fall by only EUR 473 million (0.6%) in 2008, while imports even grew that year. With exports growing more than imports, the trade surplus grew from EUR 22 billion in 2002 to a record high of EUR 91 billion in 2018.
Between 2002 and 2008 the share of medicinal and pharmaceutical products in total extra-EU trade remained fairly stable (Figure 2). In 2009, the share of exports increased by 1.1 percentage point (pp) and imports by 1.8 pp. This was not caused by an increase in trade in medicinal and pharmaceutical products but rather by the decline in total trade. Since 2009, the shares have been fluctuating but there is a clear overall growth. Since 2002, the share for exports has grown by 1.0 pp, while the share for imports has grown by 3.1 pp.
United States and Switzerland remain the top EU partners
The United States stands out as the EU’s main trading partner for medicinal and pharmaceutical products in 2018 (Figure 3). Exports to the United States (34 %) are almost a third of all EU exports and are followed at some distance by Switzerland (12 %), China (6%), Japan (5 %), Russia (4 %) and Canada (3 %). Imports to the EU are dominated even more by the United States (37 %) and Switzerland (35 %). The other top six import partners are China (5 %), Singapore, Israel (both 4 %) and South Korea (3 %). Because the United States and Switzerland are the two largest trade partners, the development of their trade in medicinal and pharmaceutical products with the EU is shown in the next two figures.
Trade with the United States between 2002 and 2018
Figure 4 shows the development of trade in medicinal and pharmaceutical products between the EU and the United States from 2002 to 2018. In this period, exports grew by EUR 39 billion, falling only in 2008, 2013 and 2016. In 2015, there was an exceptionally high increase of EUR 14 billion, accounting for more than a third of the growth in the whole period. Imports in this period grew by EUR 16 billion, falling in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2013, 2017 and 2018. Similarly to exports, there was a particularly high increase of EUR 7 billion in 2015. Measured as average annual growth over the period 2002 to 2018, exports grew by 7.2 % per year and imports grew by 4.9 % per year. Since 2002, the EU has had a trade surplus with the United States, peaking at EUR 29 billion in 2018.
Trade with Switzerland between 2002 and 2018
Figure 5 shows the development of trade in medicinal and pharmaceutical products between the EU and Switzerland from 2002 to 2018. In this period, exports grew by EUR 14 billion, which was much less than for the United States. It dropped only in 2003, 2008 and 2018. The largest increase (EUR 5 billion) occurred in 2017. Imports in this period grew by EUR 18 billion, which was EUR 2 billion more than the increase of imports from the United States. Only in 2003 was there a decrease in imports. Measured as average annual growth exports grew by 7.9 % per year, while imports grew by 7.0 % per year. Since 2002, the EU had a trade deficit with Switzerland, peaking at EUR 10 billion in 2016, which dropped to EUR 7 billion in 2018.
Main partners by Member State
The United States and Switzerland dominate extra-EU imports (Figure 6). Switzerland appeared 26 times as one of the top 3 partners and the United States 19 times. China appeared thirteen times as a top 3 partner, India 7 times and Singapore 6 times. No other country appeared in the top 3 more than three times. In total 13 different countries are among the top 3 partners.
There is more variety in the top 3 export partners (Figure 7) where we find 21 different partners. Four countries appear more than 10 times as a top 3 partner. These are the United States (18 times), Russia (13 times), Switzerland and China (both 11 times). Proximity and historical ties seem to play an important role, with Russia being the top partner for a number of Member States in the eastern part of Europe. Similarly, we find Belarus for Lithuania, Serbia for Bulgaria and Slovenia, and Angola for Portugal.
Imports and exports by Member State
Table 1 shows that, amongst the EU Member States, Germany accounted for a quarter of all extra-EU exports (EUR 40 billion) followed at some distance by Ireland (EUR 25 billion), Belgium (EUR 20 billion), France (EUR 15 billion), the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (both EUR 14 billion) and Italy (EUR 11 billion). Four countries had shares higher than 10 % for medicinal and pharmaceutical products in their total extra-EU exports. These were Ireland (36 %), Denmark (25 %), Belgium (19 %) and Slovenia (16 %).
The Netherlands and Belgium (both EUR 14 billion) and Germany were the largest importers of medicinal and pharmaceutical products in 2018. . Ireland (12 %), Malta, Austria and Belgium (all three 11 %) had high shares of medicinal and pharmaceutical products in their total extra-EU imports.
Source data for tables and graphs
A code (such as ‘DS_018995’) is inserted as part of the source. This code allows the reader to easily access the most recent EU data on the Eurostat website. Note that data on the website is frequently updated and may also be more detailed or have a different measurement unit. It should also be noted that European statistics on international trade in goods are compiled according to the EU concepts and definitions and may, therefore, differ from national data published by Member States.
Division 54 'Medicinal and pharmaceutical products' of the Standard international trade classification revision 4 (SITC Rev. 4), is made up of the sub-groups:
- 5411 ‘Provitamins and vitamins (not put up as medicaments)’;
- 5413 ‘Antibiotics (not put up as medicaments)’;
- 5414 ‘Vegetable alkaloids (not put up as medicaments)’;
- 5415 ‘Hormones, prostaglandins, thromboxanes and leukotrienes’;
- 5416 ‘Glycosides; glands or other organs; antisera, vaccines;
- 5419 ‘Pharmaceutical goods, other than medicaments’;
- 5421 ‘Medicaments containing antibiotics’;
- 5422 ‘Medicaments containing hormones, etc., but not antibiotics’;
- 5423 ‘Medicaments containing alkaloids, but not containing hormones etc. or antibiotics’;
- 5429 ‘Medicaments not elsewhere specified’.
Unit of measure
Trade values are expressed in millions (106) of euros. They correspond to the statistical value, i.e. to the amount which would be invoiced in case of sale or purchase at the national border of the reporting country. It is called a FOB value (free on board) for exports and a CIF value (cost, insurance, freight) for imports.
A bias in the geographical allocation of extra-EU flows
Extra-EU imports and exports are reported by the Member State where the customs declaration is lodged, usually the place where the goods cross the EU external frontier (here referred to as the exit/entry Member State). This is not necessarily the Member State of actual import or export. The geographical allocation of an extra-EU flow is biased in the case where the entry/exit Member State is not the actual importing/exporting Member State. In such a case, the extra-EU trade will be allocated to the entry/exit Member State and the actual importing/exporting Member State will report only intra-EU flows with the exit/entry Member State. This issue particularly impacts the extra-EU imports of Member States having important ports for transhipment of goods like Antwerp in Belgium and Rotterdam in the Netherlands. This is why it is known as the ‘Rotterdam effect’.
Pharmaceutical products are among the most important products within the chemicals sector (SITC section 5). Today, the pharmaceutical sector is extensively regulated at EU level in the dual interest of ensuring the highest possible level of public health and patient confidence in safe, effective and high-quality medicinal products, while continuing to develop a single EU market for pharmaceuticals in order to strengthen the European pharmaceutical industry's competitiveness and research capability.
The most common trade impediments faced by pharmaceutical exporters are a range of burdensome and costly registration, licensing and certification procedures. The EU aims to redress these through its bilateral trade agreements or by tackling individual barriers as part of its market access partnership.
- International trade data (t_ext)
- International trade long-term indicators (t_ext_lti)
- International trade short-term indicators (t_ext_sti)
- International trade data (ext)
- International trade long-term indicators (ext_lti)
- International trade short-term indicators (ext_sti)
- International trade detailed data (detail)
- International trade in goods statistics - background
- International trade in goods (ESMS metadata file — ext_go_agg_esms)
- User guide on European statistics on international trade in goods
- Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of 6 May 2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries
- Regulation (EU) No 92/2010 of 2 February 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009, as regards data exchange between customs authorities and national statistical authorities, compilation of statistics and quality assessment
- Regulation (EU) No 113/2010 of 9 February 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 , as regards trade coverage, definition of the data, compilation of statistics on trade by business characteristics and by invoicing currency, and specific goods or movements.
- Dutch and Belgian imports can be overestimated due to the so-called "Rotterdam effect" (See section Data sources for more details)