Statistics Explained

Archive:European Neighbourhood Policy - East - agriculture statistics

Revision as of 12:36, 24 March 2015 by Verdodo (talk | contribs)
Data extracted in September 2014. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Planned article update: October 2015.

This article is part of an online publication and provides a description of the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector in the European Union (EU) and in the six countries that together form the European Neighbourhood Policy-East (ENP-E) region, namely, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. The article focuses on several aspects: the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to the total economy (in terms of gross value added and employment), the utilised agriculture area (UAA), the production of cereals, livestock populations, meat production and international trade in food and live animals.

File:Share of gross value added from agriculture, forestry and fishing (NACE Rev 2), 2003 and 2013 (% of total gross value added) ENPE 2014.png
Figure 1: Share of gross value added from agriculture, forestry and fishing (NACE Rev. 2), 2003 and 2013
(% of total gross value added) - Source: Eurostat (nama_nace10_c) and (enpr_ecnabrk)
File:Share of employment in agriculture, forestry and fishing (NACE Rev 2), 2003 and 2013 (% of total employment) ENPE 2014.png
Figure 2: Share of employment in agriculture, forestry and fishing (NACE Rev. 2), 2003 and 2013
(% of total employment) - Source: Eurostat (lfsa_egana), (lfsa_egan2) and (enpr_pslm)
File:Utilised agricultural area, 2003, 2008 and 2013 (% of total area) ENPE 2014.png
Figure 3: Utilised agricultural area, 2003, 2008 and 2013
(% of total area) - Source: Eurostat (apro_cpp_luse), (demo_r_d3area) and (enpr_agmain)
File:Cereal production (including rice), 2003–13 (thousand tonnes) ENPE 2014.png
Table 1: Cereal production
(including rice), 2003–13
(thousand tonnes) - Source: Eurostat (apro_cpp_crop) and (enpr_agmain)
File:Dairy cows, 2003, 2008 and 2013 ENPE 2014.png
Table 3: Dairy cows, 2003, 2008 and 2013 - Source: Eurostat (apro_mt_lscatl) and (enpr_agmain)
File:Slaughtered production, 2003, 2008 and 2013 (thousand tonnes) ENPE 2014.png
Table 4: Slaughtered production, 2003, 2008 and 2013
(thousand tonnes) - Source: Eurostat (apro_mt_pann) and (enpr_agmain)
File:Imports of food and live animals, 2003–13 (million EUR) ENPE 2014.png
Table 5: Imports of food and live animals, 2003–13
(million EUR) - Source: Eurostat (ext_st_eu28sitc) and (enpr_etsitc)
File:Exports of food and live animals, 2003–13 (million EUR) ENPE 2014.png
Table 6: Exports of food and live animals, 2003–13
(million EUR) - Source: Eurostat (ext_st_eu28sitc) and (enpr_etsitc)

Main statistical findings

Gross value added and employment

The share of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector in both total value added and employment is considerably higher in ENP-East countries than in the EU

Between 2003 and 2013, the gross value added (GVA) and employment of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector declined in all ENP-East countries, except for a modest increase in the employment share in Ukraine. Despite these reductions, agriculture, forestry and fisheries continued to account for a relatively high share of total activity in the ENP-East countries. While the output of agriculture, forestry and fisheries in the EU-28 accounted for 1.7 % of total gross value added in 2013, its share ranged from 5.7 % in Azerbaijan to 21.2 % in Armenia (see Figure 1).

In 2013, the employment share of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector in the total workforce was just under 10 % in Belarus — the lowest proportion among the ENP-East countries — rising to more than one third in Armenia and Azerbaijan and to over 50 % in Georgia. As such, the proportion of people working in agriculture, forestry and fisheries in Georgia was more than 10 times as high as in the EU-28 where 4.9 % of the working population were employed in these activities (see Figure 2).

Land use

The area within each country that is used for farming varies according to climate, terrain and soil type, while the level of economic development and population density may also play a role in determining land use. Within the EU-28 roughly equal proportions of land (just over 40 % of the total land area) are used for farming and for forestry, with the remainder of the land being built-up areas (villages, towns and cities), infrastructure (roads or railways), scrub or waste land. The proportion of land that is given over to agriculture in several ENP-East countries is substantially higher than the proportion observed in the EU-28 (see Figure 3). For example, about 70 % of the total area of Moldova, Ukraine and Armenia was used for agriculture in 2013. This was particularly noteworthy in Ukraine which is a relatively large country in terms of its total area: indeed, some 43 million hectares of land were used for agricultural activities in Ukraine, equivalent to just under one quarter of the total utilised agricultural area of the EU-28.

Crop production

Ukraine is a significant cereal producer

Compared with the other ENP-East countries, Ukraine had by far the highest level of cereals production (see Table 1). Indeed, Ukraine produced more cereals (63 million tonnes) in 2013 than in any of the EU Member States, other than France (67 million tonnes). Georgia and Armenia were the smallest producers of cereals among the ENP-East countries in 2013, both recording a level of output around 500 thousand tonnes. Cereals production in 2013 was higher than in 2003 in all of the ENP-East countries except for Georgia, while a particularly large increase was recorded for Ukraine, as output more than doubled. A comparison between 2012 and 2013 reveals that cereals production in Moldova more than doubled. This development should be viewed in relation to the comparatively low level of output in 2012, when the production of cereals in Moldova was severely affected by a drought.

Animal production

The structure of livestock populations in the ENP-East countries is presented in Table 2. Collectively, there were slightly more cattle than pigs in the ENP-East countries in 2013, while in the EU-28 the opposite pattern was observed. Farmers in Belarus and Georgia were specialised in raising cattle, while in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Moldova the most common form of livestock was sheep and goats. Ukraine was an exception insofar as it was the only ENP-East country to report a higher number of pigs than any other type of livestock. Some of these differences between countries may reflect religious practices.

In Armenia and Azerbaijan the combined livestock population of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats was around 20 % higher in 2013 than it had been in 2003, while Belarus recorded a smaller increase (5 %) between these two years. In the other three ENP-East countries a fall in livestock numbers was observed between 2003 and 2013, most notably in Moldova (-17 %) and Ukraine (-16 %).

Dairy cows represent a higher share of the cattle population in the ENP-East countries than in the EU

The proportion of dairy cows among the cattle population was considerably higher in the ENP-East countries than in EU-28 (see Table 3). Dairy cows accounted for just over one quarter of the EU-28’s total cattle population in 2013, while in the ENP-East countries this share ranged from 35 % in Belarus to almost 70 % in Moldova. The total population of dairy cows in the ENP-East countries was 22 % lower in 2013 than it had been in 2003, with the largest reductions recorded in Moldova (-49 %) and Ukraine (-41 %), while the dairy cattle population increased in Armenia (by 7 %) and Azerbaijan (by 21 %).

The structure of animal output — as measured by the volume of slaughtered production — differs from the structure of the animal populations in each country, in large part due to the fact that a proportion of cattle, sheep and goats are reared for milk rather than for meat. In Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, cattle accounted for the highest volume of slaughtered production in 2013, while in Belarus and Moldova the largest volume of slaughtered production was for pigs and in Ukraine for poultry (see Table 4).

Trade in food and live animals

The value of international trade in food and live animals has grown at a rapid pace over the last decade in the ENP-East countries; note this may, in part, be due to increased prices as the values shown in Tables 5 and 6 are presented in current prices. Fluctuating prices for raw and processed foodstuffs may have a considerable impact on the trade position of a country, while climatic conditions can determine if there is a surplus of food for export.

The EU-28 consistently ran a trade deficit in food and live animal products over the period 2003–13; note that the trade data presented for the EU-28 in Tables 5 and 6 concern extra-EU trade. Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia also recorded trade deficits during this 10-year period; whereas the EU-28’s trade deficit in these products was lower in 2013 than it had been in 2003 the reverse was true for these three ENP-East countries. By contrast, Ukraine recorded a trade surplus for food and live animals throughout the period shown, rising from a small surplus of just EUR 6 million in 2003 to a surplus of EUR 3.5 billion by 2013. Belarus moved from a trade deficit for food and live animals in 2003 to a surplus of EUR 1.3 billion in 2013, while in Moldova the reverse occurred, moving from a surplus in 2003 to a deficit in 2013.

Collectively the exports of food and live animals from ENP-East countries were valued at EUR 13.2 billion, equivalent to about around 17.5 % of the EU-28 total, while the value of imports of these goods into the ENP-East countries was EUR 9.6 billion, equivalent to just over 11 % of the EU-28 total.

The highest value of exports of food and live animals in 2013 among the ENP-East countries was recorded in Ukraine (EUR 8.1 billion), which was slightly more than double the level of exports from Belarus. Armenia had the lowest level of exports of food and live animals among the ENP-East countries, some EUR 85 million in 2013, while the remaining three ENP-East countries recorded exports of these products valued between EUR 300 million and EUR 500 million.

Exports of food and live animals from Azerbaijan increased sevenfold between 2003 and 2013, whereas exports from Armenia, Belarus and Ukraine increased more than fourfold. Among the ENP-East countries the smallest relative increase in exports of food and live animals was recorded by Moldova, as exports were 68 % higher in 2013 than in 2003, which was nevertheless greater than the equivalent increase for the EU-28 (28 %).

Data sources and availability

The data for ENP-East countries are supplied by and under the responsibility of the national statistical authorities of each country on a voluntary basis. The data that are presented in this article result from an annual data collection cycle that has been established by Eurostat. These statistics are available free-of-charge on Eurostat’s website, together with a range of different indicators covering most socio-economic areas.

The utilised agricultural area describes the area used for farming. It includes arable land, permanent grassland, permanent crops (such as orchards and vineyards) and other agricultural land such as kitchen gardens.

Statistics on crop production relate to harvested production. Cereals include wheat (common wheat and spelt and durum wheat), rye, maslin, barley, oats, mixed grain other than maslin, grain maize, sorghum, triticale, and other cereal crops such as buckwheat, millet, canary seed and rice. Meat production is based on the activity of slaughterhouses regarding meat fit for human consumption.

The trade data for the EU-28 presented in this article come from Eurostat‘s Comext database. The trade data for the ENP-East countries have been compiled from the Comtrade database of the United Nations.

Context

Agriculture was one of the first sectors of the economy (following coal and steel) to receive the attention of EU policymakers, and statistics on agriculture were initially designed to monitor the main objectives of the Common agricultural policy (CAP). While the CAP remains one of the EU’s most important policies there has been a widespread evaluation, which has led to a range of new objectives designed to correct imbalances and overproduction.

In December 2013, the latest reform of the CAP was formally adopted by the European Parliament and the Council. The main elements of the CAP post-2013 concern: a fairer distribution of direct payments (with targeted support and convergence goals); strengthening the position of farmers within the food production chain (such as through: the promotion of professional and inter-professional organisations; changes to the organisation of the sugar and wine sectors; revisions to public intervention and private storage aid; and new crisis management tools); and continued support for rural development, safeguarding the environment and biodiversity.

In cooperation with its ENP partners, Eurostat has the responsibility ‘to promote and implement the use of European and internationally recognised standards and methodology for the production of statistics, necessary for developing and monitoring policy achievements in all policy areas’. Eurostat undertakes the task of coordinating EU efforts to increase the statistical capacity of the ENP countries. Additional information on the policy context of the ENP is provided here.

See also

Further Eurostat information

Publications

Database

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries (enpr_ag)

Dedicated section

Methodology / Metadata

Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)

External links