Archive:European Neighbourhood Policy - East - agriculture statistics

Data extracted in December 2017. Most recent data: Further Eurostto information, Main tables and Database. Planned article update: February 2019.

This article is part of an online publication and provides a description of the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector in the European Union (EU) and in the six countries that together form the European Neighbourhood Policy-East (ENP-East) region, namely, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Note that data shown in this article for Georgia exclude the regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia over which the government of Georgia does not exercise effective control, and data for Moldova exclude areas over which the government of the Republic of Moldova does not exercise effective control. The latest data for Ukraine generally exclude the territories which are not under effective control of the Ukrainian government and the illegally annexed Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol (see specific footnotes for precise coverage).

The article focuses on several aspects: the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to the total economy (in terms of gross value added and employment), the utilised agriculture area (UAA), the production of cereals, livestock populations, meat production and international trade in food and live animals.

Figure 1: Share of gross value added from agriculture, forestry and fishing, 2006 and 2016
(%)
Source: Eurostat (nama_10_a10)

Figure 2: Share of agriculture, forestry and fishing in total employment, 2006 and 2016
(%)
Source: Eurostat (lfsa_egana) and (lfsa_egan2)

Figure 3: Utilised agricultural area as a share of the total area, 2006, 2011 and 2016
(%)
Source: Eurostat (apro_acs_a) and (demo_r_d3area)

Table 1: Cereal production
(including rice), 2006-2016
(thousand tonnes)
Source: Eurostat (apro_acs_a)

Table 2: Livestock population, December 2006, 2011 and 2016
(thousand heads)
Source: Eurostat (apro_mt_lscatl), (apro_mt_lspig), (apro_mt_lssheep) and (apro_mt_lsgoat)

Table 3: Dairy cows, 2006, 2011 and 2016
Source: Eurostat (apro_mt_lscatl)

Table 4: Slaughtered production, 2006, 2011 and 2016
(thousand tonnes)
Source: Eurostat (apro_mt_pann)

Table 5: Imports of food and live animals, 2006-2016
(million EUR)
Source: Eurostat (ext_st_eu28sitc)

Table 6: Exports of food and live animals, 2006-2016
(million EUR)
Source: Eurostat (ext_st_eu28sitc)

Main statistical findings

Gross value added and employment

The share of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector in both total value added and employment is considerably higher in ENP-East countries than in the EU-28 as a whole

Between 2006 and 2016, the gross value added and employment shares of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector declined in all ENP-East countries, except for an increase in the value added share in Ukraine and a modest increase in the employment share in Moldova. Despite such reductions, these activities continued to account for a relatively high proportion of total economic activity in the ENP-East countries. While the output of agriculture, forestry and fisheries in the EU-28 accounted for 1.5 % of total gross value added in 2016, its share ranged from 6.0 % in Azerbaijan to 17.4 % in Armenia (see Figure 1).

In 2016, the employment share of the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector in the total workforce was just under 10 % in Belarus — the lowest proportion among the ENP-East countries — while it was more than one third of those in work in Armenia, Moldova and Azerbaijan and close to half in Georgia. As such, the proportion of people working in agriculture, forestry and fisheries in Georgia was more than 12 times as high as in the EU-28 where 4.0 % of the working population were employed in these activities (see Figure 2).

Land use

The area within each country that is used for farming varies according to climate, terrain and soil type, while the level of economic development and population density may also play a role in determining land use. Within the EU-28 roughly equal proportions of land (around 40 % of the total land area) are used for farming and for forest and woodland, with the remainder of the land being built-up areas (villages, towns and cities), infrastructure (such as roads or railways), scrub or waste land.

The proportion of land that is given over to agriculture in several ENP-East countries was substantially higher than the proportion observed in the EU-28 (see Figure 3). For example, nearly 70 % of the total area of Ukraine and Armenia was used for agriculture in 2016. This was particularly noteworthy in Ukraine which is a relatively large country in terms of its total area: indeed, some 42 million hectares of land were used for agricultural activities in Ukraine, equivalent to just under one quarter of the total utilised agricultural area of the EU-28.

Crop production

Ukraine is a significant cereal producer

Compared with the other ENP-East countries, Ukraine had by far the highest level of cereals production (see Table 1). Indeed, Ukraine produced more cereals (65 million tonnes) in 2016 than any of the EU Member States. Georgia and Armenia were the smallest producers of cereals among the ENP-East countries in 2016, recording a level of output in the range of 300-450 thousand tonnes. Cereals production in 2016 was higher than in 2006 in all of the ENP-East countries. A particularly large increase was recorded for Armenia, as output (of wheat) more than doubled.

Animal production

The structure of livestock populations in the ENP-East countries is presented in Table 2. Collectively, there were more cattle than pigs in the ENP-East countries in 2016, while in the EU-28 the opposite pattern was observed. Farmers in Belarus and Georgia were specialised in raising cattle, while in Armenia and Azerbaijan the most common form of livestock was sheep and goats. Ukraine was an exception insofar as it was the only ENP-East country to report a higher number of pigs than any other type of livestock. Some of these differences between countries may reflect religious practices.

In Armenia and Azerbaijan the combined livestock population of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats was around one tenth higher in 2016 than it had been in 2006. The livestock population was broadly stable in Belarus (down 1 %) and Moldova (down 3 %, excluding sheep and goats). In the other two ENP-East countries a larger fall in livestock numbers was observed between 2006 and 2016, with reductions of 8 % in Georgia and 26 % in Ukraine, although the change in the latter may at least in part be due to the narrower geographical coverage of the 2016 data.

Dairy cows represent a higher share of the cattle population in the ENP-East countries than in the EU

The proportion of dairy cows among the cattle population was considerably higher in the ENP-East countries than in EU-28 (see Table 3). Dairy cows accounted for just over one quarter of the EU-28’s total cattle population in 2014, while in the ENP-East countries this share ranged from 35 % in Belarus (the share of all cows in the total cattle population, not just dairy cows) to more than two thirds in Moldova. The total population of dairy cows in the ENP-East countries was 18 % lower in 2016 than it had been in 2006, with reductions in Moldova (-41 %) and Ukraine (-36 %), as well as smaller reductions in Georgia, Armenia and Belarus, far outweighing the increase recorded in Azerbaijan (11 %).

The structure of animal output — as measured by the quantity of slaughtered production — differs from the structure of the animal populations in each country, in large part due to the fact that a proportion of cattle, sheep and goats are reared for milk rather than for meat. In Armenia and Azerbaijan, cattle accounted for the highest quantity of slaughtered production in 2016, while in Moldova the largest quantity of slaughtered production was from pigs and in Belarus, Georgia and Ukraine from poultry (see Table 4).

Trade in food and live animals

The value of international trade in food and live animals has grown at a rapid pace over the last decade in the ENP-East countries; note this may, in part, be due to increased prices as the values shown in Tables 5 and 6 are presented in current prices. Fluctuating prices for raw and processed foodstuffs may have a considerable impact on the trade position of a country, while climatic conditions can affect yields and determine if there is a surplus of food for export.

The EU-28 consistently ran a trade deficit in food and live animal products over the period 2006-2016; note that the trade data presented for the EU-28 in Tables 5 and 6 concern extra-EU trade. Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia also recorded trade deficits during this 10-year period; whereas the EU-28’s trade deficit in these products was lower in 2016 than it had been in 2006 the reverse was true for these three ENP-East countries. By contrast, Ukraine recorded a trade surplus for food and live animals throughout the period shown, rising from a surplus of EUR 514 million in 2006 to a surplus of EUR 6.1 billion by 2016. Belarus moved from deficits for food and live animals between 2006 and 2008 to a surplus between 2009 and 2016, while Moldova moved from a very small surplus in 2006, through deficits between 2007 and 2013, back to surpluses between 2014 and 2016.

Collectively, the exports of food and live animals from ENP-East countries were valued at EUR 13.4 billion in 2016, equivalent to about around 16.0 % of the EU-28 total, while the value of imports of these goods into the ENP-East countries was EUR 8.4 billion, equivalent to 8.3 % of the EU-28 total.

The highest value of exports of food and live animals among the ENP-East countries was recorded in Ukraine (EUR 8.4 billion in 2016), which was more than double the level of exports from Belarus which recorded the second highest level. Armenia had the lowest level of exports of food and live animals among the ENP-East countries, some EUR 166 million in 2016.

Exports of food and live animals from Armenia were 6.3 times as high in 2016 as their level in 2006, whereas exports from Georgia, Ukraine (despite the change in geographical coverage) and Belarus were more than three times as high. For comparison, exports from the EU-28 more than doubled during the period 2006-2016, as was also the case in Moldova and Azerbaijan.

Data sources and availability

The data for ENP-East countries are supplied by and under the responsibility of the national statistical authorities of each country on a voluntary basis. The data that are presented in this article result from an annual data collection cycle that has been established by Eurostat. These statistics are available free-of-charge on Eurostat’s website, together with a range of different indicators covering most socio-economic areas.

The utilised agricultural area describes the area used for farming. It includes arable land, permanent grassland, permanent crops (such as orchards and vineyards) and other agricultural land such as kitchen gardens.

Statistics on crop production relate to harvested production. Cereals include wheat (common wheat and spelt and durum wheat), rye, maslin, barley, oats, mixed grain other than maslin, grain maize, sorghum, triticale, and other cereal crops such as buckwheat, millet, canary seed and rice. Meat production is based on the activity of slaughterhouses regarding meat fit for human consumption.

The trade data for the EU-28 presented in this article come from Eurostat‘s online database, including trade data from Comext.

Tables in this article use the following notation:

Value in italics	data value is forecasted, provisional or estimated and is therefore likely to change;
:	not available, confidential or unreliable value;
–	not applicable.

Context

Agriculture was one of the first sectors of the economy (following coal and steel) to receive the attention of EU policymakers, and statistics on agriculture were initially designed to monitor the main objectives of the Common agricultural policy (CAP). While the CAP remains one of the EU’s most important policies there has been a widespread evaluation, which has led to a range of new objectives designed to correct imbalances and overproduction.

In December 2013, the latest reform of the CAP was formally adopted by the European Parliament and the Council. The main elements of the CAP post-2013 concern: a fairer distribution of direct payments (with targeted support and convergence goals); strengthening the position of farmers within the food production chain (such as through: the promotion of professional and inter-professional organisations; changes to the organisation of the sugar and wine sectors; revisions to public intervention and private storage aid; and new crisis management tools); and continued support for rural development, safeguarding the environment and biodiversity.

In January 2015, the European Commission initiated a review of the legal basis related to agriculture in order to identify the potential for simplification. A broad range of interested bodies were invited to put forward simplification proposals and more than 1 500 proposals were submitted and examined based on the following three principles:

simplification should be predominantly for the benefit of the CAP beneficiaries;
the political decisions of the 2013 reform should not be questioned;
simplification should not jeopardise the sound financial management of the CAP.

A number of actions have been taken, for example introducing more flexibility, providing greater guidance, or introducing preliminary cross checks of aid applications to reduce the risk of penalties.

On 18 November 2015, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission jointly presented a review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (SWD(2015) 500 final) which underlined a new approach for the EU in relation to its eastern and southern neighbours, based on stabilising the region in political, economic, and security-related terms.

In cooperation with its ENP partners, Eurostat has the responsibility ‘to promote and implement the use of European and internationally recognised standards and methodology for the production of statistics, necessary for developing and monitoring policy achievements in all policy areas’. Eurostat undertakes the task of coordinating EU efforts to increase the statistical capacity of the ENP countries. Additional information on the policy context of the ENP is provided here.

Further Eurostat information

Publications

Database

Eastern European Neighbourhood Policy Country (ENP-East) (enpr), see:

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries (enpr_ag)

Dedicated section

Methodology / Metadata

Eastern European Neighbourhood Policy countries (ENP-East) (ESMS metadata file — enpr_esms)

Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)

European Neighbourhood Policy - East countries — agriculture: tables and figures

External links