Adult Education Survey 2022

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: STATEC (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques - Luxembourg).


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

STATEC (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques - Luxembourg).

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Unit: SOC2 - Labour market and education

1.5. Contact mail address

13 Rue Erasme, 1468 Luxembourg


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 04/01/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 04/01/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 04/01/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Adult Education Survey (AES) covers adults’ participation in education and training (formal - FED, non-formal - NFE and informal learning - INF). The 2022 AES focuses on people aged 18-69. The reference period for the participation in education and training is the twelve months prior to the interview.
Information available from the AES is grouped around the following topics:

  • Participation in formal education, non-formal education and training and informal learning
  • Volume of instruction hours
  • Characteristics of the learning activities
  • Reasons for participating
  • Obstacles to participation
  • Access to information on learning possibilities and guidance
  • Employer financing and costs of learning
  • Self-reported language skills

For further information see the 2022 AES legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.2. Classification system

- Classification of Learning Activities (CLA, 2016 edition)
- International Standard Classification of Education 2011 (ISCED 2011)
- Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO 08)
- Classification of economic activities Rev. 2 (NACE Rev. 2)

3.3. Coverage - sector

AES covers all economic sectors.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.5. Statistical unit

Individuals, non-formal learning activities.

3.6. Statistical population

Individuals aged 18-69 living in private households.

3.7. Reference area

Luxembourg (country) (LU0).

3.8. Coverage - Time

Reference period: 12 months before the interview.

Fieldwork has taken place:

- AES2011-12: from 01/02/2012 to 30/06/2012

- AES2016-17: from 23/09/2016 to 31/03/2017

- AES2022-23: from 26/09/2022 to 28/02/2023

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Number, EUR.


5. Reference Period Top

Reference period: 12 months before the interview.

Fieldwork has taken place:

- AES2011-12: from 01/02/2012 to 30/06/2012

- AES2016-17: from 23/09/2016 to 31/03/2017

- AES2022-23: from 26/09/2022 to 28/02/2023


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

At European level:
Basic legal act: Regulation (EU) 2019/1700
Implementing act: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/861

At national level:
/

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Eurostat's policy for dissemination will be followed.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Not applicable.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

News releases linked to AES data will be made available on http://www.statistiques.public.lu/en/index.html as soon as possible.

No specific release calendar is applicable.

8.2. Release calendar access

Not applicable.

8.3. Release policy - user access

News releases linked to AES data will be made available on http://www.statistiques.public.lu/en/index.html


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 6 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

News releases linked to AES data will be made available on http://www.statistiques.public.lu/en/index.html

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Publications with analyses linked to AES data will be made available on http://www.statistiques.public.lu/en/index.html

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Online tables of main AES data will be made available on http://www.statistiques.public.lu/en/index.html

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not applicable.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Not applicable.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not applicable.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The AES has been conducted mainly using a web questionnaire (and incidentally on paper), so the respondent had to fill in the questionnaire on his own.

In order to guarantee the quality of the answers provided,

  • clear definitions and examples had been provided in the online questionnaire
  • collaborators of the national statistical office answered the questions of the respondents on the phone and by mail
  • answers were crosschecked for inconsistencies and eventually discarded or corrected on a case-by-case basis.
11.2. Quality management - assessment

Overall quality of the 2022-23 AES should be of good.

Strong points:

  • The sample has been drawn on a random basis from the register.
  • Response rate has been 60%.

Weak points:

  • as the survey was based on a web questionnaire, there might be a slight bias as persons having low computer skills might have been negatively selected (although a paper version has been proposed too)
  • the questionnaire was considered to be very long by respondents
  • despite the effort we put into clarifying these questions and adopting a step-by-step-approach, many seem to have had difficulties with questions about HATLEVEL, JOBISCO and LOCNACE
  • the difference between formal, non-formal and informal still seems to be very difficult to grasp for many respondents
  • instruction hours and cost of activities also seem to be difficult for respondents; these variables should be used with caution
  • as the survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire, respondents may have encountered other problems without giving us any feedback


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Main Users:

  • Policy makers at European and national level
  • Social actors, international organisations
  • Media

Their main needs are

(X ) Access to information on learning possibilities and guidance
(X ) Participation in education and training by type, characteristics of the activity (field, distance learning, etc.)
(X ) Reason, use and outcomes of FED and NFE
(X ) Share of job-related or employer-sponsored NFE
(X ) Volume of instruction hours for FED and NFE
(X ) Cost of learning for NFE
(X ) Obstacles to participation in education and training
(X ) Self-reported language skills

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

There are no measures available at national level to analyse user satisfaction.

12.3. Completeness

Data covers all requested variables as in the AES legislation.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable.


13. Accuracy Top

Overall accuracy should be good. Indicators for which a precision threshold is provided in the AES legislation are of good quality.

13.1. Accuracy - overall

The sampling frame used for AES 2022 is the National Population Register (Répertoire National des Personnes Physiques).

The initial sample size was 8000 individuals, of which we received a final 4820 usable responses, which fulfils the precision requirements.

Respondents represent well the population in terms of sex, age and education level.

Overall accuracy should be good.

13.2. Sampling error

The sampling error for 2022 AES is considered fairly low.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

See table 13.2.1 “Sampling errors - indicators for 2022 AES key statistics” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors are covered by items 13.3.1 - 13.3.5 below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

The sample was drawn from the population register on 29/08/2022.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

See table 13.3.1.1 “Over-coverage - rate” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors may occur if actual respondents do not correspond to the persons sampled. Birth dates and sex given in the questionnaire have been compared to information from the sampling frame in order to ensure that the right person has been responding, but we cannot guarantee that no person has filled in the questionnaire as a proxy for the person sampled, as the survey was conducted via a web questionnaire.

Other measurement errors may occur if questions or possible answers are not understood by the respondent. The questionnaire had been made available in the three national languages (French, German and Luxemburgish) as well as in English, and when deemed necessary, the questions from the Eurostat model questionnaire had been adapted to national circumstances in terminology and examples provided. Despite all these efforts, it cannot be ruled out that some respondents did not understand a question or the choice of answers provided. For difficult variables such as HATLEVEL, ISCO and NACE codes, respondents were asked to classify themselves in a list and in parallel to describe their diploma, occupation and sector of activity in writing. In many cases, we had to recode the variable because codes selected did not fit the description, which shows a lack of understanding of the respondent.

Unfortunately, due to budget constraints we did not have the means to run a test survey before the actual survey.

13.3.3. Non response error

See items 13.3.3.1 - 13.3.3.2 below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See table 13.3.3.1 “Unit non-response - rate” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

See table 13.3.3.2 “Item non-response rate” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.4. Processing error

The data collection method was a web questionnaire. The web questionnaire included data filters and checks in order to minimize incoherence in data.

Some variables (HATLEVEL, LOCNACE and JOBISCO) were collected in parallel in two ways: respondents had to choose a value in a list and / or answer the question in an open text field. The variables were recoded afterwards on a case by case basis if the textual answers were not in line with the chosen value in the list or if only textual answers were given.

There has been no imputation of missing values except for some missing mother tongues, imputed on the basis of country of birth and country of birth of the parents.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top

Reference period is the twelve months before the interview.

Interviews took place between 26/09/2022 and 28/02/2023.

14.1. Timeliness

Approximately 6 months.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

4th quarter 2023

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

4th quarter 2023

14.2. Punctuality

See table 14.2 “Project phases - dates” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not applicable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See table 15.1 “Deviations from 2022 AES concepts and definitions” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

Two additional variables related to COVID-19 were collected. 

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See table 15.2 “Comparability - over time” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See table 15.3 “Coherence - cross-domain” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

AES results for a given data collection round are based on the same microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not available.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

A simple random sample (of 8000 individuals) has been drawn directly from the population register ("Répertoire National des Personnes Physiques").

See also table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Every 6 years.

18.3. Data collection

See also table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

18.4. Data validation

Data has been submitted through a web questionnaire.

The questionnaire contained precise descriptions of each variable, internal controls on most variables and coherence control between different variables, allowing to minimize the errors.

Received data was furthermore checked for consistency within the dataset by STATEC and EUROSTAT.

18.5. Data compilation

Weighting factors for individuals (RESPWEIGHT) and for non-formal learning activities (NFEACTWEIGHT_5 and NFEACTWEIGHT_2) are calculated according to the rules laid down in the AES Manual.

The individuals’ weighting factors are based on three variables: age (10 categories), sex (2 categories) and educational attainment level (3 categories), which together define 60 cells (of which some might be empty).

The final weighting factor for the individuals in each cell is equal to the number of persons in the population for that specific cell (N) divided by the number of respondents in that cell (n). (Source for the population data : [lfsa_pgaed])

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

See table 18.5.1 “Imputation - rate” in annex “LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

None.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
LU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)
LU - questionnaire 2022 AES (LU)
LU - questionnaire 2022 AES (FR)
LU - questionnaire 2022 AES (DE)
LU - questionnaire 2022 AES (EN)