ICT usage in enterprises (isoc_e)

National Reference Metadata in SIMS structure for INFOSOC Enterprises

Compiling agency: Federal Statistical Office of Germany


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Federal Statistical Office of Germany

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Dep. E34

1.5. Contact mail address

Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 11

65189 Wiesbaden

Germany


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 08/03/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 08/03/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 08/03/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) usage and e-commerce in enterprises are survey data. They are collected by the National Statistical Institutes or Ministries and are in principle based on Eurostat's annual model questionnaires on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

Large part of the data collected is used to measure the progress in the implementation of one of the main political priorities of the European Commission for 2019 to 2024 – A Europe fit for the digital age. Part of this is the "European strategy for data", envisioning a single market for data to ensure the EU's global competitiveness and data sovereignty, in which context a comprehensive set of new rules for all digital services was proposed: the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, which are centrepieces of the EU digital strategy. Furthermore, the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy presented a new “EU cybersecurity strategy”, which is intended to bolster the EU's collective resilience against cyber threats, safeguard a global and open internet and protect EU values and the fundamental rights of its people. Furthermore, data will allow monitoring the progress towards  A Europe fit for the digital age, one of the six priorities for the period 2019-2024 of the von der Leyen European Commission.

The aim of the European survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises is to collect and disseminate harmonised and comparable information at European level.

 

Name of data collection
German: Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien in Unternehmen 2023
3.2. Classification system

 NACE Rev.2 2008

3.3. Coverage - sector

All economic activities in the scope of Annex I of the Commission Regulation are intended to be included in the general survey, covering enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons. These activities are: NACE Rev. 2 sections C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M and N, division 95.1.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.3.1. Coverage-sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - All NACE Rev. 2 categories are covered
3.3.2. Coverage sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - If not all activities were covered, which ones were covered?
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The model questionnaire on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides a large variety of variables covering among others the following areas:

-          Access to and use of the Internet

-          E-commerce and e-business

-          Use of cloud computing services

-          Artificial Intelligence

-          Other topics: Data utilisation, sharing, analytics and trading, Invoicing.

The annual model questionnaires and the European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises comprise definitions and explanations regarding the topics of the survey.

3.5. Statistical unit

Legal unit

3.6. Statistical population

Target Population

As required by Annex of the Commission Implementing Regulation, enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons shall be covered by the survey.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.6.1. Coverage of micro-enterprises
Yes
3.6.2. Breakdown between size classes [0 to 1] and [2 to 9]
Yes
3.6.3. If for micro-enterprises different size delimitation was used, please indicate it.
3.7. Reference area

The entire territory of Germany is covered.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Years 2022 and 2023.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable


4. Unit of measure Top

Percentages of enterprises, Percentages of turnover, Percentages of employees and self-employed persons, Million euro.


5. Reference Period Top

The reference period corresponds to the one in the model questionnaire: January 2023. For certain variables (sales, turnover, employees) the reference periode was 2022.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Complementary national legislation constituting the legal basis for the survey on the use of ICT in enterprises:

- Informationsgesellschaftsstatistikgesetz (InfoGesStatG)

- Regulation (EU) 2019/2152

- Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1344

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

The data are collected by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. The Statistical Offices of the Länder receive the data for their specific region when the survey is finished.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

At national level : 

"Bundesstatistikgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 20. Oktober 2016 (BGBl. I S. 2394), das zuletzt durch Artikel 5 des Gesetzes vom 20. Dezember 2022 (BGBl. I S. 2727) geändert worden ist"

According to §16 BStatG individual indication are kept in principal confidential. Exceptions need to be expressly regulated. 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data are transmitted via eDamis (encrypted) and delivered to a secure environment where they are treated. Flags are added for confidentiality in case results must not be disclosed.

At national level : 

The minimum number of enterprises for breakdowns is 10. Otherwise breakdowns are flagged.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

National results are released in November/December the same year that the survey is conducted. The release date is documented in a internal calendar.

8.2. Release calendar access

The release dates are not publicly accessible.

8.3. Release policy - user access

The results of the ICT survey are usually published in November/December. The publication in our data base is combined with a press release. On our webpage there is a weekly preview available, listing all press releases of the current week.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

 

National dissemination of results

 

We plan a press release in November/December. Our press releases can be found here: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Unternehmen/IKT-in-Unternehmen-IKT-Branche

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

 

Our results will be published in our data base in November/December. The link to the data base is: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online (Search for 52911 to view results from the ICT survey)

 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See detailed section 10.3.1.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Results for selected variables collected in the framework of this survey are available for all participating countries on Digital economy and society of Eurostat website.

At national level :

The link to the data base is https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online (Search for 52911 to view results from the ICT survey). The number of accesses is not available.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not applicable

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not requested

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Each year we publicate a quality report which is available here: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/Qualitaet/Qualitaetsberichte/Unternehmen/einfuehrung.html

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not available


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides guidelines and standards for the implementation of the surveys. It is updated every year according to the changed contents of the model questionnaires.

At national level :

The above mentioned measures also account for quality measures at national level. Besides, there are plausibility checks defined and embedded in the data acquisition process. If unplausible or incomplete answers occur it is tried to check the unplauibilities with the enterprises.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

European level :

At European level, the recommended use of the annual Eurostat model questionnaire aims at improving comparability of the results among the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Moreover, the Methodological Manual provides guidelines and clarifications for the implementation of the surveys.

National level :

The above mentioned measures also account for quality measures at national level. Besides, there are plausibility checks defined and embedded in the data acquisition process. If unplausible or incomplete answers occur it is tried to check the unplauibilities with the enterprises.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

European level : 

At European level, European Commission users (e.g. DG CNECT, DG GROW, DG JUST, DG REGIO, DG JRC) are the principal users of the data on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises and contribute in identifying/defining the topics to be covered. Hence, main users are consulted regularly (at hearings, task forces, ad hoc meetings) for their needs and are involved in the process of the development of the model questionnaires at a very early stage.

User needs are considered throughout the whole discussion process of the model questionnaires aiming at providing relevant statistical data for monitoring and benchmarking of European policies.

National level :

Not available

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

European level : 

At European level, contacts within the Commission, the OECD and other stakeholders give a clear picture about the key users' satisfaction as to the following data quality aspects: accuracy and reliability of results, timeliness, satisfactory accessibility, clarity and comparability over time and between countries, completeness and relevance. Overall users have evaluated positively (good, very good) the data quality on the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

National level :

Not available

12.3. Completeness

Detailed information is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested. Any relevant qualitative information is available in the column “Any deviation from question / item in model questionnaire” in the “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Comments on reliability and representativeness of results and completeness of dataset

These comments reflect overall standard errors reported for the indicators and breakdowns in section 13.2.1 (Sampling error - indicators) and the rest of the breakdowns for national and European aggregates, as well as other accuracy measurements. The estimated standard error should not exceed 2pp for the overall proportions and should not exceed 5pp for the proportions related to the different subgroups of the population (for those NACE aggregates for the calculation and dissemination of national aggregates). If problems were found, these could have implications for future surveys (e.g. need to improve sampling design, to increase sample sizes, to increase the response rates).

More detailed information is available in “ Annex II. _ Accuracy “ excel file - related to European aggregates, comments on reliability and use of flag.



Annexes:
Annex II Accuracy
13.2. Sampling error

For calculation of the standard error see 13.2.1.1.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Standard error (for selected indicators and breakdowns)

Precision measures related to variability due to sampling, unit non-response (the size of the subset of respondents is smaller than the size of the original sample) and other (imputation for item non-response, calibration etc.) are not (yet) required from the Member states for all indicators.  Eurostat will make basic assumptions to compute these measures for all indicators produced (e.g. stratified random sampling assuming as strata the crossing of the variables “Number of employees and self-employed persons” and “Economic Activity” as it was defined in the 3 tables of section 18.1).

More detailed information is available in“ Sample and standard error tables 2023 “ excel file – worksheets starting with “Standard error".



Annexes:
Sample and standard error tables 2023
13.2.1.1. Sampling error indicator calculation

Calculation of the standard error

Various methods can be used for the calculation of the standard error for an estimated proportion. The aim is to incorporate into the standard error the sampling variability but also variability due to unit non-response, item non-response (imputation), calibration etc. In case of census / take-all strata, the aim is to calculate the standard errors comprising the variability due to unit non-response and item non-response.

a) Name and brief description of the applied estimation approach
 The calculation of the standard error is based on the clan-macro in SAS.

 

b) Basic formula
 See annex 'basic formula Germany'.

 

c) Main reference in the literature
   No special reference in the literature.

 

d) How has the stratification been taken into account? 
  The stratification was fully taken into account by estimating the sampling error for proportions according to the unbound extrapolation for each stratum (“i” in basic formula above).

 

e) Which strata have been considered? 
 In total there were 1803 strata taken into account for grossing up. The difference in number of strata compared to the sample is due to empty strata that have been compiled. Depending on the considered breakdown a different number of strata were used for the   estimation of the respective standard error.


Annexes:
Basic formula
13.3. Non-sampling error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See concept 18.1.1. A) Description of  frame population.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

No over-coverage

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested

13.3.2. Measurement error

No measurement errors detected.

13.3.3. Non response error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Response and non-response

13.3.3.1.1. Unit response

The following table contains the number of units (i.e. enterprises), by type of response to the survey and by the percentage of these values in relation to the gross sample size.

 

Type of response Enterprises
0-9 employees and self-employed persons 10 or more employees and self-employed persons
Number % Number %
Gross sample size (as in section 3.1 C)  24981 100% 57746 100%
1. Response (questionnaires returned by the enterprise)   5000   20% 15000   26%
1.1 Used for tabulation and grossing up (Net sample or Final Sample; as in section 3.1 D)   5000   20% 15000   26%
1.2 Not used for tabulation        
1.2.1 Out of scope (deaths, misclassified originally in the target population, etc.)        
1.2.2 Other reasons (e.g. unusable questionnaire)        
2. Non-response (e.g. non returned mail, returned mail by post office)  19981   80%  42746    74%

 

Comments on unit response, if unit response is below 60%
  Low response rate is due to voluntary survey.
13.3.3.1.2. Methods used for minimizing unit non-response

The survey on ICT usage is voluntary. Enterprises receive a second notification to remind them of the survey.

13.3.3.1.3. Methods used for unit non-response treatment
1. No treatment for unit non-response  
2. Treatment by re-weighting
2.1 Re-weighting by the sampling design strata considering that non-response is ignorable inside each stratum (the naïve model)  
2.2 Re-weighting by identified response homogeneity groups (created using sample-level information)  
2.3 Re-weighting through calibration/post-stratification (performed using population information) by the groups used for calibration/post-stratification  X
3. Treatment by imputation (done distinctly for each variable/item)  
4. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of unit non-response. (e.g. Re-weighting using Horvitz-Thompson estimator, ratio estimator or regression estimator, auxiliary variables )
 Empty strata - due to voluntariness of the ict survey in Germany - are corrected for using the so called "Verfahren der multiplikativen Ergänzung" (~Procedure of multiplicative completion). 
13.3.3.1.4. Assessment of unit non-response bias

To measure a possible unit non-response bias, response rates are compared between size classes and economic sectors. There is no significant variance in response rates between different economic sectors. Concerning size classes, very small enterprises (0-9 persons employed) have a higher non-response rate.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not available. 

13.3.3.2.1. Methods used for item non-response treatment
1. No treatment for item non-response  
2. Deductive imputation
An exact value can be derived as a known function of other characteristics.
 
3. Deterministic imputation (e.g. mean/median, mean/median by class, ratio-based, regression-based, single donor nearest-neighbour)
Deterministic imputation leads to estimators with no random component, that is, if the imputation were to be re-conducted, the outcome would be the same
X
4. Random imputation (e.g. hot-deck, cold-deck)
Random imputation leads to estimators with a random component, that is, if the imputation were re-conducted, it would have led to a different result
 
5. Re-weighting  
6. Multiple imputation
In multiple imputation each missing value is replaced (instead of a single value) with a set of plausible values that represent the uncertainty of the right value to impute. Multiple imputation methods offer the possibility of deriving variance estimators by taking imputation into account. The incorporation of imputation into the variance can be easily derived based on variability of estimates among the multiply imputed data sets.
 
7. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of item non-response.
  For quantitative variables related to turnover and persons employed  the mean/mode imputation within classes is applied.  
13.3.3.2.2. Questions or items with item response rates below 90% and other comments

Other comments relating to the item non-response

Additional issues concerning "non-response" calculation (e.g. method used in national publications).
  No additional issues regarding item non-response.

 

Questions and items with low response rates (cut-off value is 90% ) and item non-response rate.
  No additional issues regarding item non-response.
13.3.4. Processing error

No processing errors were detected.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See detailed section below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

European level : 

Data are to be delivered to Eurostat in the fourth quarter of the reference year (due date for the finalised dataset is 5th October). European results are released before the end of the survey year or in the beginning of the year following the survey year (T=reference year, T+0 for indicators referring to the current year, T+12 months for other indicators referring to the previous year e.g. e-commerce).

At national level : 

 No deviation.

14.2. Punctuality

 See detailed section below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

 In 2023 data on ict usage and e-commerce in enterprises have been transmitted punctually to Eurostat (05.10.2023).


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

The model questionnaire is generally used by the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Due to (small) differences in translation, in the used survey vehicle, in non-response treatment or different routing through the questionnaire, some results for some countries may be of reduced comparability. In these cases, notes are added in the data.

Detailed information on differences in the wording of the questions in the national questionnaires is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable

15.2. Comparability - over time

See section below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The length of comparable time series depends on the module and the variable considered within each survey module. Additional information is available in annexes attached to the European metadata.

 

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

No issues to be indicated

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

 Not applicable

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not applicable


16. Cost and Burden Top
Restricted from publication


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

The Statistical Office of Germany has a guideline for internal data revisions and their communication (download: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/Qualitaet/richtlinie-fehlerbehandlung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile). The guideline classifies publication errors, defines how to deal with them and requires the documentation of the publication error and its treatment.

17.2. Data revision - practice

After classifying the publication error (formal error or content error) the error treatment is undertaken. Depending on the severity of the error there are differences regarding the intensity of informing the users, the point in time of disseminating the corrected data and information, and the involvement of other persons in the error tretament process. Finally, a form on the documentation of publication errors is to be completed in order to derive measures to minimize publication errors. An annual report on publication errors is provided for internal use.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

 Not requested


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

A) Frame population description and distribution

For more information see concept 18.1.1.

 

B) Sampling design - Sampling method

Description of the sampling method used (e.g. stratified random sample, quota sampling, cluster sampling; one-stage or two-stage sampling) and information which variables were used to stratify, the categories of those variables, in particular for the NACE Rev. 2 categories related to the "possible calculation of European aggregates", and the final number of strata: 

For sampling a random stratified sample was used. The variables of stratification were the federal state, the economic activity (according to NACE Rev. 2) and the number of employees (including a „0”-stratum, see annex for further information). The final number of strata amounted to 1962.

The sample of enterprises is selected using a stratified random sampling method. Enterprises are grouped into strata taking into account "Federal state", "economic activity" and size classes of employees. The allocation of sample size to strata is following the optimum allocation (minimizing variance for a fixed cost) in compliance to the quality requirements.  At the end, the sample is reweighted by a calibration approach using updated survey and business register information. For the „0”-stratum in each stratum of the sample (federal state x economic activity) a certain number of enterprises from the “0”-stratum was selected. For most cases this corresponded to an inclusion probability of less than 1%. (Size class 0 to 1 persons employed includes enterprises of the  „0”-stratum; for the exact number of enterprises in the „0”-stratum, see annex.)

 

 

C) Gross sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: GROSS SAMPLE)

 

D) Net sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: NET SAMPLE)



Annexes:
0-stratum further explanations
18.1.1. Population frame

A) Description of frame population

a) When was the sample for the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprise survey drawn? December 2022                               
b) When was the last update of the Business register that was used for drawing the sample of enterprises for the survey? May 2022 
c) Please indicate if the frame population is the same as, or is in some way coordinated with, the one used for the Structural Business Statistics (different snapshots) The frame population of the ICT usage and e-commerce survey is not coordinated with other statistic, incl. the SBS. 
d) Please describe if different frames are used during different stages of the statistical process (e.g. frame used for sampling vs. frame used for grossing up): The same frame is used for sampling and grossing up in the ICT survey. 
e) Please indicate shortcomings in terms of timeliness (e.g. time lag between last update of the sampling frame and the moment of the actual sampling), geographical coverage, coverage of different subpopulations, data available etc., and any measures taken to correct it, for this survey. Timeliness: The sampling was undertaken in December 2022. The time lag regarding administrative variables was corrected for - by information from the business register in January 2023. 

 

 B) Frame population distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: FRAME POPULATION)

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual

18.3. Data collection

See detailed sections below.

18.3.1. Survey period
Survey / Collection Date of sending out questionnaires Date of reception of the last questionnaire treated
General survey  February 2023 30.06.2023
Micro-enterprises  February 2023 30.06.2023
18.3.2. Survey vehicle – general survey
General survey - Stand-alone survey
18.3.3. Survey vehicle – micro-enterprises
Not applicable
18.3.4. Survey type

It is a combination of a self-administered mail and a web survey - respondents can choose either. The web-questionnaire is provided barrier-free.

18.3.5. Survey participation
Voluntary
18.4. Data validation

Data has been validated by server based EDIT validation.  Already during the process of data collection several plausibility checks are conducted.

18.5. Data compilation

Grossing-up procedures

An unbound extrapolation is applied to each stratum. The net sample is grossed up by using the data of the business register. Unit non-response is corrected for by the so called "Verfahren der multiplikativen Ergänzung".Three weighting factors are calculated for each stratum. Depending on the type of indicator one of the following raising factors is chosen for data analysis: raising factor for enterprises, employees or turnover.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not available.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable


19. Comment Top

Problems encountered and lessons to be learnt: 

19.1. Documents
Questionnaire in national language  X
Questionnaire in English (if available)  
National reports on methodology (if available)  
Analysis of key results, backed up by tables and graphs in English (if available)  
Other Annexes  


Annexes:
Questionnaire for enterprises with at least 10 employees
Questionnaire for enterprises with less than 10 employees


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
Annex II._Accuracy 2023
Annex I._Completness 2023
Sample and standard error tables 2023