Go to top button
Back to top

Material footprints

PrintDownload

Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union

Need help? Contact the Eurostat user support

The datasets:

  • Material footprints - main indicators (env_ac_rme)
  • Material footprints - details by final use of products (env_ac_rmefd)

provide model-based estimates of material flow accounts in raw material equivalents (MFA-RME) to complement the dataset ´Material flow accounts' (env_ac_mfa), also referred to as economy-wide material flow accounts (EW-MFA).

Both data sets include the indicator raw material consumption (RMC) – also referred to as material footprint. It shows the amount of extraction required to produce the products demanded by final users in the geographical reference area, irrespective of where in the world the extraction of material from the environment took place. 

The dataset env_ac_rme includes:

  • domestic material extraction by material, directly taken from the EW-MFA dataset (env_ac_mfa), see also Section 15.3 and 17.2 below,
  • estimates of the imports and exports in raw material equivalents (RME) by material
  • derived indicators, namely raw material input (RMI) and raw material consumption (RMC), by material, see also Section 3.2 below.
  • for individual countries and the aggregated EU economy.

 

The dataset env_ac_rmefd presents RMC in more detail by:

  • material
  • final products
  • types of final uses
  • for the aggregated EU economy


The estimates for the aggregated EU economy in the two MFA-RME datasets are compiled using the same model and are fully consistent. The estimates for individual countries in the data set env_ac_rme are either done and reported by the respective national statistical institutes or estimated by Eurostat. Notably, additivity is not given, i.e., the sum of the 27 EU Member States does not match with the aggregated EU economy.

 For more information on the complete set of material flow accounts see also the dedicated website on material flows and resource productivity.

14 April 2025

Material flow accounts follow concepts and definitions defined in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) and are closely related to concepts and definitions as set out in the System of National Accounts (SNA) and the European System of Accounts (ESA).

 

The following specific concepts are used:

  • Domestic extraction (DE): total amount of material extracted for further processing in the economy, by resident units from the natural environment. The data originates from Eurostat's dataset 'Material flow accounts (env_ac_mfa)' the production of which is under legal coverage: Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 on European Environmental Economic Accounts - Annex 3: Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts. The module is conceptually related to the international statistical standard System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 (SEEA).
  • Raw material equivalents (RME): conversion factors to express a unit of product traded into the amount of material extraction needed, anywhere in the world, to produce the traded product. The conversion factors for the EU are obtained from a hybrid input-output model. More information on these conversion factors and the methodology can be found in the documentation listed in Section 10.6 below.
  • Raw material input (RMI): the amount of material in terms of RME available to the economy for use in production and consumption activities. It is the sum of domestic extraction and imports in RME (calculated at the aggregate product level, by material).
  • Raw material consumption indicator (RMC): the amount of material in terms of RME needed (or, the amount of extraction, domestic and abroad, required directly and indirectly) to produce the products consumed in the geographical reference area. It is calculated as RMI minus exports in RME (calculated at the aggregate product level, by material).

The break-down of RMC in dataset env_ac_rmefd is classified by final uses as defined in the System of National Accounts. An explanation of final uses in national accounts can be found in Chapter 5 of the OECD's publication 'Understanding National Accounts', second edition. In the MFA-RME by final uses dataset, these final uses are expressed in thousand tonnes of raw material equivalent and tonnes of raw material equivalent per capita.

The data refer to direct and indirect material use by all resident economic units in the sense of SEEA Central Framework 2012 and the European System of Accounts (ESA), including households.

Not applicable, because the data are modelling estimates.

The data refer to the European Union and to national economies as defined in the system of national accounts.

The data refer to the calendar year.

The EW-MFA dataset (env_ac_mfa) is compiled on the basis of observable information coming from surveys and registration systems. In contrast, the estimates of datasets env_ac_rme and env_ac_rmefd are not directly observable. Eurostat country level estimates are calculated with the Python country RME tool (see section 3). This implies that assumptions and modelling techniques are determining the results. References to documentation on the EU RME model and the country RME tool can be found in Section 10.6.

The material flow accounts in raw material equivalents are published in thousand tonnes and tonnes per capita.

The aggregate EU estimates are obtained with environmentally-extended input–output modelling, see Section 10.6.

For information on the input data compilation see the FIGARO input-output tables metadata and the material flow metadata.

Countries may use Eurostat's country RME tool (see Section 19) or a country specific model to estimate country level MFA-RME.

Annexes:
FIGARO input-output tables metadata

The main input data for the EU RME model are:

For an overview of the other datasets used as input to the model, see the documentation listed in Section 10.6.

Country level estimates are collected via the EW-MFA questionnaire.

Eurostat estimates at country level are derived by the Python country RME tool, which closely follows the methodology of the RME country tool. However, a few modifications of the methodological approach are explained in the ‘Handbook country RME tool

Annexes:
FIGARO input-output tables

1) Dataset env_ac_rme:

  • EU data updated once a year, in November
  • Country data twice a year, in July (country reported data) and in November (Eurostat estimates)

2) Dataset env_ac_rmefd: updated once a year, in November

(see also Section 17.2)

EU RME model calculations are usually undertaken in August. Results are usually published in September, 21 months after the end of the last reference year. Country level estimates are published in June after validation of the data collected via the EW-MFA questionnaire and Eurostat estimates at country level have been updated.

The estimation models to obtain the EU and country-level estimates produced by Eurostat have harmonized methodologies. The same applies to the data reported by countries utilising Eurostat’s country RME tool. On the other hand, there are countries reporting using their own estimation models. This can potentially hamper comparability across countries.

Additionally, some bias may be assumed from Eurostat’s country RME model itself due to application of average EU RME coefficients, which might be suboptimal for in particular smaller economies.

For the aggregate EU estimates, the comparability over time is good because the model has remained relatively stable. Results for earlier years are recalculated each year using the latest input data available. The input data have clear statistical concepts and definitions. With the use of the FIGARO input-output tables, the data availability limits the publication of the full set of modelling results to years from 2010 onwards. Results for 2000-2009 are only published for the total and main material categories, because these values are estimated by chain-linking the 2010 results backwards using change rates from the previous Nace Rev. 1.1 dataset. 

For country-level data, comparison over time is considered good, certainly better than cross-country comparability.