Income and living conditions (ilc)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Croatian Bureau of Statistics


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Croatian Bureau of Statistics

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Living Conditions Statistics Unit

1.5. Contact mail address

Branimirova 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

25 April 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

25 April 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

25 April 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) is a survey-based instrument aiming at collecting timely and comparable cross-sectional and longitudinal multidimensional microdata on income, poverty, social exclusion and living conditions. In addition, it collects module variables every three years, six years or ad-hoc new policy needs modules.

The EU-SILC instrument provides two types of data:


- Cross-sectional data pertaining to a given time or a certain time period with variables on income, poverty, social exclusion and other living conditions;


- Longitudinal data pertaining to individual-level changes over time, observed periodically over four‐or more year rotation scheme (Annex III (2) of 2019/1700).
Social exclusion and housing condition information is collected mainly at household level while labour, education and health information is obtained for persons aged 16 and over. The core of the instrument is income information at very detailed component level and mainly collected at personal level.

 

 

3.2. Classification system

• International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED'2011);

• International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08);

• Classification of Economic Activities (NACE Rev.2);

• Common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS 2);

• SCL - Geographical code list;

• The recommendations made by the United Nations in the Canberra Group Handbook on Household Income Statistics should also be taken into account.

For more details on the classification used please, see Eurostat webpage.

3.3. Coverage - sector

Data refer to all private households and individuals living in the private households in the national territory at the time of data collection.

The EU-SILC survey is a key instrument for the European Semester and the European Pillar of Social Rights, providing information on income distribution, poverty and social exclusion, as well as various related living conditions and poverty EU policies, such as on child poverty, access to health care and other services, housing, over indebtedness and quality of life. It is also the main source of data for microsimulation purposes and flash estimates of income distribution and poverty rates.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Statistical concepts and definitions for EU-SILC are specified in Regulation (EU) 2019/1700, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2181, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2242. Additional information is available in the EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology and in the methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables.

Further details are provided in items 5, 15.1.1.1, 15.2.2 and 18.3.

3.5. Statistical unit

Statistical units are private households and all persons living in these households who have usual residence in the Member State. Annex II of the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2242 defines specific statistical units per variable and specifies the, content of the quality reports on the organization of a sample survey in the income and living conditions domain pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

3.6. Statistical population

The target population is private households and all persons composing these households having their usual residence in the Member State. Private household means a person living alone or a group of persons who live together, providing oneself or themselves with the essentials of living.

3.6.1. Reference population

Definitions of reference population, household and household membership

Reference population

Private household definition

Household membership

 The reference population of EU-SILC is all private households and their current members residing in the territory of Croatia at the time of data collection.

Persons living in collective households and in institutions are excluded from the target population.

No differences between the national and the standard EU-SILC concept.

 Household is every family or other community of individuals who live together and jointly spend their income in order to meet the basic existential needs (accommodation, food etc.).

A household is also considered every person who lives alone (one-person household).

No differences between the national and the standard EU-SILC concept.

 No differences between the national and the standard EU-SILC concept.

3.6.2. Population not covered by the data collection

The sub-populations that are not covered by the data collection includes: those who moved out of the country’s territory; or those with no usual residence; or those living in institutions or who have moved to an institution compared to the previous year.

3.7. Reference area

Republic of Croatia

3.8. Coverage - Time

EU-SILC survey data for Republic of Croatia are available from 2010 onwards.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

The data involves several units of measure depending upon the variables. Income variables are transmitted to Eurostat in national currency. For more information, see methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables.


5. Reference Period Top

Description of reference period used for incomes

Period for taxes on income and social insurance contributions

Income reference periods used

Reference period for taxes on wealth

Lag between the income ref period and current variables

 Calendar year 2023

 Calendar year 2023

 Calendar year 2023

 Four to six months


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 was publish in OJ on 10 October 2019, establishing a common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households, based on data at individual level collected from samples (IESS). The Annex to the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2180 of 16 December 2019 specifies the detailed arrangements and content for the quality reports pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2019/2242.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Confidential microdata are not disclosed by Eurostat. Access to confidential microdata for scientific purposes may be granted on the  basis of Commission Regulation 557/2013 and Regulation 223/2009 of  the European Parliament and the Council on European statistics.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

For more information see Eurostat data protection policy.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

For more information see Eurostat statistical confidentiality and data protection policy.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The released calendar can be found in HR statistical website.

8.2. Release calendar access

Please refer to the Release calendar - Eurostat (europa.eu) publicly available on the Eurostat’s website.

8.3. Release policy - user access

In line with the Community legal framework and the European Statistics Code of Practice, Eurostat disseminates European statistics on Eurostat's website (see section 10 - 'Accessibility and clarity'), respecting professional independence and in an objective, professional and transparent manner in which all users are treated equitably. The detailed arrangements are governed by the Eurostat protocol on impartial access to Eurostat data for users. Additional information about microdata access is available in EU statistics on income and living conditions - Microdata - Eurostat.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not applicable.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

For more information please see the HR website.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Data and access avaliable in the HR website.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

(Optional)

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Microdata is available (e.g. for researchers) on the basis of a request specifying the method or persons who will access the data.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

For more information please see the HR website.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

(Optional)

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Državni zavod za statistiku - Metodologija subnacionalnih statistika

Državni zavod za statistiku - Subnational statistics methodology

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

All requested concepts are provided, 100%.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Quality reports available in the HR website.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Principles of the Code of Practice of European Statistics is available online.

Quality assessment is mainly carried out by self-assessment and revision by colleagues (e.g. a superior colleague). They take place during the Quality report production itself and after the completion of the production (assessment and control).

Improvement in quality assurance procedures is continuously being worked on through various courses (e.g. SAS program education), education and self-education. Also, through the improvement of the questionnaire itself.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Chapters 12., 13., 14., 15., in this Quality report are chapters where the results are presented in more detail.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of EU-SILC statistical data are policy makers, research institutes, media, and students.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Eurostat carried out an online general User Satisfaction Survey (USS) in the period between April and July 2019 (repeated in June-July 2022) to obtain better understanding about users’ needs and satisfaction with the services provided by Eurostat. The survey has shown that EU-SILC is of very high relevance for users. For the majority, both aggregates and microdata were important or essential in their work, irrespective of the purpose of their use. The use of the ad-hoc modules was less widespread than the use of the nucleus variables. Users emphasized their strong need for more detailed microdata.

For more information, please consult the User Satisfaction Survey.

12.3. Completeness

All necessary statistics are available and all requirements are met in accordance with laws, regulations and guidelines. Nucleus and module variables are collected in accordance with methodological guidelines and descriptions of EU-SILC variables.

Optional variables we did not collect:

RL080: Remote education

HI130G: Interest expenses [not including interest expenses for purchasing the main dwelling]

HI140G: Household debts

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Information provided in the point 12.3.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

According to Reg. (EU) 2019/1700 Annex II, precision requirements for all data sets are expressed in standard errors and are defined as continuous functions of the actual estimates and of the size of the statistical population in a country or in a NUTS 2 region. For the income and living conditions domain, the estimated standard errors of the following indicators are examined according to certain parameters set:

  •  Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population;
  •  Ratio of at‐persistent‐risk‐of‐poverty over four years to population;
  •  Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population in each NUTS 2 region.

Further information is provided in section 13.2 Sampling error.

13.2. Sampling error

EU-SILC is a complex survey involving different sampling designs in different countries. In order to harmonize and make sampling errors comparable among countries, Eurostat (with the substantial methodological support of Net-SILC2) has chosen to apply the "linearization" technique coupled with the “ultimate cluster” approach for variance estimation.

Linearization is a technique based on the use of linear approximation to reduce non-linear statistics to a linear form, justified by asymptotic properties of the estimator. This technique can encompass a wide variety of indicators, including EU-SILC indicators. The "ultimate cluster" approach is a simplification consisting in calculating the variance taking into account only variation among Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) totals. This method requires first stage sampling fractions to be small which is nearly always the case. This method allows a great flexibility and simplifies the calculations of variances. It can also be generalized to calculate variance of the differences of one year to another.

The main hypothesis on which the calculations are based is that the "at risk of poverty" threshold is fixed. According to the characteristics and availability of data for different countries, we have used different variables to specify strata and cluster information. 

In particular, countries have been split into 3 groups:

1) BE, BG, CZ, IE, EL, ES, FR, HR, IT, LV, HU, PL, PT, RO, SI, UK and AL, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a two-stage stratified type we used DB050 (primary strata) for strata specification and DB060 (Primary Sampling Unit) for cluster specification;

2) DK, DE, EE, CY, LT, LU, NL, AT, SK, FI, CH whose sampling design could be assimilated to a one stage stratified type we used DB050 for strata specification and DB030 (household ID) for cluster specification;

3) MT, SE, IS, NO, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a simple random sampling, we used DB030 for cluster specification and no strata.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The concept of accuracy refers to the precision of estimates computed from a sample rather than from the entire population. Accuracy depends on sample size, sampling design effects and structure of the population under study. In addition to that, sampling errors and non-sampling errors need to be taken into account. Sampling error refers to the variability that occurs at random because of the use of a sample rather than a census and non-sampling errors are errors that occur in all phases of the data collection and production process.

Indicators and standard errors are filled in the tables in Annex A (tab 13.2.1.).

Persistent-risk-of-poverty is calculated and filled in (third table in the tab 13.2.1. of HR_2024_Annex A EU-SILC - content tables).

 

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors are basically of 4 types:

  • Coverage errors: errors due to divergences existing between the target population and the sampling frame.
  • Measurement errors: errors that occur at the time of data collection. There are a number of sources for these errors such as the survey instrument, the information system, the interviewer and the mode of collection.
  • Processing errors: errors in post-data-collection processes such as data entry, keying, editing and weighting.
  • Non-response errors: errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:
    • Unit non-response: refers to absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample.
    • Item non-response: refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all required information has been obtained.
13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors include over-coverage, under-coverage and misclassification:

  • Over-coverage: relates either to wrongly classified units that are in fact out of scope, or to units that do not exist in practice.
  • Under-coverage: refers to units not included in the sampling frame.
  • Misclassification: refers to incorrect classification of units that belong to the target population
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Coverage error

Main problems

Population (sub-population)

Size of error

Comments

Over-coverage

186 

 

3,33% (DB120=23) 

 Population units refers to addresses

Under-coverage

Not applicable 

Not applicable  

 

Misclassification

Not applicable  

Not applicable  

 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

 Measurement error for cross-sectional data

Cross-sectional data

Source of measurement errors

Building process of questionnaire 

Interview training

Quality control

 

1. the (design, content and wording)

2. the interviewer (experience, data entry errors)

3. the respondent ( sensitive questions, proxy

Measurement errors include all kind of errors that can appear during the data collection or data entry phase. This kind of errors can be minimised by using an apropriate form for design of questionnaire, interview training, methods for data collection and control and editing procedures. For EU-SILC 2024 data the CAPI and CATI mode of data collection has been used. Most of required information has been collected from the respondent. Administrative sources has been used for collection of PIN numbers (Ministry of Internal Affairs), ISCO-08 occupation codes and NACE REV.2 codes (Croatian Pension Institute), social benefits income (Ministry of Labour and Pension System, Family and Social Policy) and income data Mnistry of Finance - Tax Administration.

The electronic questionnaire for 2024 was developed and updated within BLAISE system. Basic questionnaire structure follows the content of the survey with two main parts:

Personal questionnaire: each household member aged 16 and over (age at 31 December 2023) filled in this part of questionnaire. It contains information on education, activity status and employment, some part of components from income at personal level, health and childcare  variables at personal level.

In order to obtain all required information for households and persons, two types of  data entry form has been developed: questionnaire for the households and persons that are for the first time in the survey and questionnare for the households and persons that are for the second, third or fourth time in the survey.

Logical sequencing of the questions are diferent between these two types of questionnaires and some permanent variables (date of birth, sex, citizenship...) are predefined for the repeated sub-sample of the households and persons.

In the first phase, Living Conditions and Economic Activity of the Population Statistics Department studied the relevant methodological documents and national regulations and wrote requirements for adapting data entry software (e.g. new variables for modules 2024, some variables were removed and new variables are added in the questionnaire, etc.). In the second phase, IT staff (Blaise experts) updated the electronic questionnaire according to the written requirements and adapted the data entry application. This was followed by testing the updated electronic questionnaire. Part of the questions are no longer in the questionnaire (interviewers don't ask these questions), since part of the data is taken from administrative sources such as income data.

 

Data collection for SILC 2024 data was carried out by trained interviewers (external and internal interviewers; total of 144 interviewers). Most of them already had experience with this survey from the previous years. The data collection was preceded by one training day for the interviewers who are included in the EU-SILC data collection for the first time in 2024. In general, the main parts of the training were: use of new Case Management System - CMS, use of Blaise system, interviewer’s skills as well as methodological explanations and detailed instructions for questions in the SILC questionnaire.

Methodological guidelines for interviewers (instructions) are developed with methodological explanations and detailed instructions for each question in the questionnaire. Printed guidelines before data collection – for training purposes and fieldwork preparation given to each interviewer, supervisor and some research/supporting/management staff.

The fieldwork was organized and controlled by 46 supervisors. Supervisors were experienced statisticians in regional offices of Croatian Bureau of Statistics (CBS). In each regional office (20 offices across the country) supervisor maintained personal contact with interviewers and provided methodological explanations, help and assistance according to the CBS`s central office guidelines.

 

 

 

Logical checks and logical sequencing of the questions are automatically adjusted in the questionnaire.  The standardized question wording includes all information necessary to answer the question. If respondents or interviewers need further information to answer the question, additional definitions and explanations are shown in the electronic questionnaire and written remarks for each question are allowed.

Controls regarding SILC data collected by interviewers (logical and mathematical controls for SILC 2024) were updated in 2024.

 

Cross-sectional information year 2024

Number and percentage of Proxy interview

 

Obs

PB010

PB020

proxy

total

proxy_rate

1

2024

HR

7654

19442

39.4

13.3.3. Non response error

 

Non-response errors are errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:

1) Unit non-response which refers to the absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample. According to Annex VI of the Reg.(EU) 2019/2242

  • Household non-response rates (NRh) is computed as follows:

NRh=(1-(Ra * Rh)) * 100

Where Ra is the address contact rate defined as:

Ra= Number of address/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) successfully contacted/Number of valid addresses/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) selected

and Rh is the proportion of complete household interviews accepted for the database

Rh=Number of household interviews completed and accepted for database/Number of eligible households at contacted addresses (including phone, mail if applicable)

• Individual non-response rates (NRp) is computed as follows:

NRp=(1-(Rp)) * 100

Where Rp is the proportion of complete personal interviews within the households accepted for the database

Rp= Number of personal interview completed/Number of eligible individuals in the households whose interviews were completed and accepted for the database

• Overall individual non-response rates (*NRp) is computed as follows:

*NRp=(1-(Ra * Rh * Rp)) * 100

For those Members States where a sample of persons rather than a sample of households (addresses, phones, mails etc.) was selected, the individual non-response rates will be calculated for ‘the selected respondent.

2) Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Cross-sectional information year 2024

Response and Non response rate

Address (including phone, mail if applicable) contact rate

Complete household interviews

Complete personal interviews

Household Non-response rate

Individual non-response rate

Overall individual non-response rate

(Ra)

(Rh)

(Rp)

(NRh)

(NRp)

(NRp)*

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

 91,89

81,65

99,85

84,20 

68,04

 95,07

100,00 

 100,00 

100,00  

22,63 

44,44 

5,07 

0,00 

0,00 

0,00 

22,63 

44,44 

 5,07

where

A=total (cross-sectional) sample,

B =New sub-sample (new rotational group) introduced for first time in the survey this year,

C= Sub-sample (rotational group) surveyed for last time in the survey this year.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

The computation of item non-response is essential to fulfil the precision requirements. Item non-response rate is provided for the main income variables both at household and personal level.

Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate by indicator

Annex 2 – Item non-response attached.

13.3.4. Processing error

 Description of data entry, coding controls and the editing system

Data entry and coding

(if any used)

Editing controls

 

Many logical checks have been implemented in the electronic questionnaire:  the lowest value, the highest value, inconsistences between the answers.

These kinds of checks are indicated to interviewers during the interview.

That way the interviewer can repeat the question, re-enter the answer or suppress the first answer and comment on the problem in the remark field.  

 

In this phase checks included in questionnaire are repeated and additional checks are applied.

Additional checks consist of checking that the interviews are fully completed, identifying duplications, logical checks within the questionnaire and between the answers, ranges of values, implausible values and frequency checks of income variables.

Interviewer's comments in remark field are taken into account. In some cases the entered value is deleted and in the next phase of process imputed. 

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

The number of months from the last day of the reference period to the day of publication of complete and final results: T+3 (March 2025)

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

First results from SILC 2024 are final.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

The number of months from the last day of the reference period to the day of publication of complete and final results: T+3 (March 2025).

14.2. Punctuality

Time lag between the actual delivery of the data and the target date when it should have been delivered. No time lag.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality is the time lag between the delivery/release date of data and the target date for delivery/release as agreed for delivery or announced in an official release calendar, laid down by Regulations or previously agreed among partners.

Final delivery date according to Regulation 2019/1700 is set for 28th February of the year N+1.

P3=dact-dsch

P3=11 March - 28 February

P3=11 days


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

According to the Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning EU-SILC: "Reliable statistics are needed at national as well as at regional level where better comparability is required. It is important that aggregated data be made available for comparable territorial units such as NUTS 2, while taking costs into account and providing Member States with the appropriate financial resources. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9), all Member States’ statistics that are transmitted to the Commission (Eurostat) and that are to be broken down by territorial units should use the NUTS classification. Consequently, in order to establish comparable regional statistics, data on the territorial units should be provided in accordance with the NUTS classification."

Although the best way for keeping the comparability of data is to apply the same methods and definitions of variables, small departures of the definitions given by Eurostat are allowed in EU-SILC.

 

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Information provided in corresponding Annex.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

15 reference periods.

15.2.2. Comparability and deviation from definition for each income variable
Income Identifier   Comparability   Deviation from definition if any 
 Total hh gross income   (HY010)   F  
 Total disposable hh income   (HY020) 

 F

 

 
 Total disposable hh income before social transfers other than old-age and survivors' benefits   (HY022)   F  
 Total disposable hh income before all social transfers   (HY023)   F  
 Income from rental of property or land   (HY040)   F  
 Family/ Children related allowances   (HY050)   F  
 Social exclusion payments not elsewhere classified   (HY060)   F  
 Housing allowances   (HY070)   F  
 Regular inter-hh cash transfers received   (HY080)   F  
 Alimonies received   (HY081)   F  
 Interest, dividends, profit from capital investments in incorporated businesses   (HY090)   F  
 Interest paid on mortgage   (HY100)   F  
 Income received by people aged under 16   (HY110)   F  
 Regular taxes on wealth   (HY120)   F  
 Taxes paid on ownership of household main dwelling   (HY121)   F  
 Regular inter-hh transfers paid   (HY130)   F  
 Alimonies paid   (HY131)   F  
 Tax on income and social contributions   (HY140)   F  
 Repayments/receipts for tax adjustment   (HY145)   F  
 Value of goods produced for own consumption   (HY170)   F  
 Cash or near-cash employee income   (PY010)   F  
 Other non-cash employee income   (PY020)   F  
 Income from private use of company car   (PY021)   F  
 Employers social insurance contributions   (PY030)   F  
 Contributions to individual private pension plans   (PY035)   F  
 Cash profits or losses from self-employment   (PY050)   F  
 Pension from individual private plans   (PY080)   F  
 Unemployment benefits   (PY090)   F  
 Old-age benefits   (PY100)   F  
 Survivors benefits   (PY110)   F  
 Sickness benefits   (PY120)   F  
 Disability benefits   (PY130)   F  
 Education-related allowances   (PY140)   F  

F= Fully comparable; L= Largely comparable; P= Partly comparable and NC= Not collected.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The coherence of two or more statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes, by which they were generated, used the same concepts and harmonised methods. A comparison with external sources for all income target variables and the number of persons who receive income from each ‘income component’ will be provided, where the Member States concerned consider such external data to be sufficiently reliable.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Information provided in the Annex 7 - Coherence.

15.4. Coherence - internal

For each year, any lack of coherence in the EU-SILC data set shall be reported together with explanations for such inconsistencies.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Mean (average) interview duration per household =  48,1 minutes.

Mean (average) interview duration per person = 16,4 minutes.

Mean (average) interview duration for selected respondents (if applicable) =  (.) minutes (not applicable).

  

Cross-sectional information year 2024

 

Average Interview duration

 

 

Obs

country

duration_HH_22

duration_Per16plus_22

duration_Selectedrespondent_22

1

HR

48,1

16,4

.

 

The average interview duration is improved and accurate thanks to the following improvements:
- Increased number of CATI interviews
- Reduced number of questions in the questionnaire due to the switch to administrative sources
- Application upgrade and improvements with the aim of accurately calculating the average interview duration

 


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

No data revision.

17.2. Data revision - practice

No data revision.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

No data revisions.


18. Statistical processing Top

Detailed information concerning sampling frame, sampling design, sampling units, sampling size, weightings and mode of data collection can be found in this section (please see below). Such information is mainly used for the computation of the accuracy measures.

18.1. Source data

The sampling frame for both stages was the 2021 Census data. The sources of EU-SILC data used: fully interview, interview and registers, registers, full record imputation, interview not completed, administrative sources.

Administrative sources were used for largest part of income data. 

Income variables affected: HY010, HY020, HY022, HY023, HY050G/N, HY060G/N, HY070G/N, PY010G/N, PY090G/N, PY100G/N, PY110G/N, PY130G/N, PY140G/N.

 

 

18.1.1. Sampling Design

The sample design for EU-SILC 2024 was two-stage stratified design. In each stratum primary sampling units (PSUs) were systematically selected with probability proportional to size, and in the second stage 7 addresses (occupied dwellings) were randomly selected in each PSU. The sample was divided into 4 subsamples (rotational groups), each by itself representative of the whole population and similar in structure to the whole sample.

Stratification and sub stratification criteria

The sampling frame of segments for the first stage is divided into 8 strata. 6 strata are defined by 3 groups of counties (NUTS-3) and the types of municipality. The type of municipality can be city or municipality. Separate 2 strata are Grad Zagreb county and city of Rijeka and city of Split together.

In Croatia there are four statistical regions, according to The National Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics 2021 (HR_NUTS 2021. - NUTS-2):

1. Pannonian Croatia

2. Adriatic Croatia

3. City of Zagreb

4. North Croatia

Beside explicit stratification, implicit stratification according to counties (NUTS-3) and municipalities was applied. It means that the list of segments within strata was sorted according to counties and municipalities before selection.

Sample selection schemes

The sampling frame was divided into 8 strata. In the first stage we have selected segments as PSUs. The PSUs were systematically selected with probability proportional to size in each stratum (the measure of size was the number of private households according to the 2021 Census). Before selection of PSUs, segments were sorted according to counties and municipalities. In the second stage 7 addresses (occupied dwellings) were randomly selected from each PSU.

Described selection scheme is not self-weighting because of different sampling fractions between strata and unequal selection probabilities of addresses in the same stratum.  Unequal selection probabilities of addresses were a consequence of differences between the number of households and the number of occupied dwellings in selected segments and other discrepancies in the 2021 Census data. 

Sample distribution over time - Renewal of sample: rotational groups

EU-SILC 2024 sample was divided into 4 rotational groups. One rotational group was selected in 2021, one rotational group was selected in 2022, one rotational group was selected in 2023 and a new rotational group was selected in 2024. All rotational groups are similar in structure.

 

 

Cross-sectional information year 2024

Actual and achieved sample size

 

Obs

DB020

Actual_SSize

Achieved_SSize

1

HR

12569

9410

 

 

Longitudinal information years 2021 - 2024

 Achieved household sample size

 

Obs

country

DB020

wave2324

wave222324

wave21222324

1

HR

HR

6387

3915

1878

 

 

Longitudinal information years 2021 - 2024

 Achieved individual sample size

Obs

RB020

TOTAL2324

SAMPLEPER2324

CORES2324

TOTAL222324

SAMPLEPER222324

1

HR

15211

13257

1954

9001

8044

 

Obs

CORES222324

TOTAL21222324

SAMPLEPER21222324

CORES21222324

1

957

4251

3812

439

18.1.2. Sampling unit

The sampling frame for the new rotational group selected in 2024, for the both stages, was the 2021 Census data. Islands connected with land by bridges were included in the sampling population (the island of Krk, the island of Pag, the island of Murter, the island of Ciovo and the island of Vir). Other islands were excluded from the sampling population. The PSUs are called segments. Segments are area units which consist of 120 to 250 private households according to the Census 2021. They were derived from one or more enumeration districts used in the 2021 Census and belonging in the same municipality.

In each stratum PSUs were systematically selected with propability proportional to size (the mesure of size was the munber of private households in PSU), and in the second stage 7 adresses (occupied dwellings) were selected in each selected PSU. All private households in selected adresses construct a sample of households.

 

 

18.1.3. Sampling frame

Concerning the SILC instrument, three different sample size definitions can be applied:

- the actual sample size which is the number of sampling units selected in the sample

- the achieved sample size which is the number of observed sampling units (household or individual) with an accepted interview

- the effective sample size which is defined as the achieved sample size divided by the design effect with regards to the at-risk-of poverty rate indicator

Given that the effective sample size has been already treated in the section dealing with sampling errors, in this section the attention focuses mainly on the achieved sample size.

The Eurostat’s precision requirements for EU-SILC are expressed in terms of minimum effective sample size required for the measurement of variable ‘the risk of poverty rate’. The cross sectional effective sample size for Croatia calculated by Eurostat is 4,250 households and 9,250 persons aged 16+. The longitudinal effective sample size is 3,250 households and 7,000 persons aged 16+.

The actual sample size has to be larger than the effective sample size to the extent that the design effect for the variable ‘the risk of poverty rate’ exceeds 1.0 and to compensate for ineligible selected units and non-response.

In 2024, in a new rotational group, we selected 788 PSUs and 7 addresses from each PSU. (5,516 new addresses were selected). The regions in Croatia differ greatly in size and we used sample allocation between regions in proportion to square-root of the region size (in terms of the number of private households).  Within regions sample allocation is proportional to the number of private households.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Frequency of data collection is annualy.

 

  Number of addresses %
First interview 5526 43,97
Follow-up interview 7043 56,03
TOTAL 12569 100,0
18.3. Data collection

Mode of data collection

 

1-PAPI

2-CAPI

3-CATI

4-CAWI

5-PAPI proxy

6-CAPI-proxy

7-CATI-proxy

8-CAWI proxy

9-other

% of total

 

49,6

 50,4

 

 

33,92 

44,72 

 

 

 

Description of collecting income variables

The source or procedure used for the collection of income variables

The form (gross, net) in which income variables at component level have been obtained

The method used for obtaining target variables in the required form

 CAPI and CATI interview

net

 CAPI and CATI

Cross-sectional information year 2024

Fieldwork duration

 

Obs

HB010

HB020

start_day

start_month

start_year

end_day

end_month

end_year

1

2024

HR

29

3

2024

7

7

2024

18.4. Data validation

There is a comprehensive validation procedure applied prior to finalisation of the EU-SILC database.

Source data is initially reviewed and controlled at national level. Control of the collected data is carried out in several iterations. First numerical-logical controls (ie. Small RLK) are carried out after the end of the first of the three month period of data collection, where potential errors and discrepancies in the collected survey data are controled and analyzed. The interviewers are contacted if necessary if there is need for some clarification or some additional checking of entered survey data. This procedure is carried out after each month of the three month period during collection of survey data.
After completion of the field work and after the implementation of basic arithmetical-logical controls, it is accessed to extensive and comprehensive numerical-logical controls of collected survey data (ie. Large RLK). In addition, controls of the collected data include control of data consistency, frequency control, ie. an analysis of outliers etc.

National EU-SILC database is subsequently submitted to Eurostat for validation and bilateral contacts are pursued as necessary.

18.5. Data compilation

According to regulation, weighting procedure and imputation were carried out. Details in Annex 6 - Estimation and Imputation and Annex 5 - Weighting procedure.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation rates are part of Annex 6 - Estimation and imputation.

18.5.2. Weighting procedure

The weighting for the SILC 2024 data was based on the 2021 Census data.

 

Design factor

Non-response adjustments

Adjustment to external data

Final cross sectional weights

The design weight (DB080) for all households (respondents and non-respondents) in the sample is inversely proportional to the probability of selection (two-stage design).

Please see Annex 5.

The design weight of responded households is modified by a factor inversely proportional to the weighted response rate within a group of counties ("homogeneous group").

The weighted household response rate was computed for each group (see annex).

The final step of the calculation of the weights was the calculation of the calibration factors.  By the calibration procedure the household weights are adjusted so that they reproduce the totals of external variables. For the calibration of weights we used SAS Macro Calmar. The calibration was performed in an ‘integrative’ way. It means that both household and individual external information used in a single-shot calibration at household level. The new weights were calibrated on the number of persons in private households in gender–age groups by regions / groups of counties. External data were taken from Population estimates of Republic of Croatia 2023 released by the CBS.

Gender-age groups were defined by gender and age groups: 0-15, 16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85 years and over.

The cross-sectional weight for the household (DB090) is equal to the calibrated weight.

Individual weights (RB050) are equal to the corresponding household weights.

            RB050=DB090

The sum of individual weights is equal to the number of persons in private households in Croatia according to Population estimates of Republic of Croatia 2021.

Base weights

The base weights are the back spine for the computation of both cross-sectional weights and longitudinal weights.

The personal base weight (RB060) is defined at wave t=1 is

RB060=RB050

Base weights at subsequent waves (t=2, t=3 and t=4) are obtained from base weights from wave t=1 by adjusting of sample attrition, children born to sample woman and persons moving into sample households from outside the survey population.

Cross-sectional weights for the consecutive waves

The base weights and cross-sectional weights were calculated completely in line with two documents:  docSILC065 (2024 operation) and ‘Cross-sectional and longitudinal weighting in a rotational household panel: applications to EU-SILC ' (Vijay Verma, Gianni Betti, Giulio Ghellini).

18.5.3. Estimation and imputation
Imputation procedure used Imputed rent Company car

Firstly, missing income values at personal level were imputed then at household level. The distributions of all variables were plotted and the relationship between variables was analyzed. Missing filter values and missing information about the periodicity of income were imputed:

  • using information of other variables, logical decisions and previous wave (historical data and logical imputation)
  • derived from legal regulations (logical imputation)

  • the mode (the most frequent response) or random number was imputed

Only net income variables were imputed, missing gross income variables were calculated by the net – gross conversion. Imputed values for some missing income components were  firstly derived from legal regulations (logical imputation) and previous waves (historical imputation). After that, rest and majority of missing income components were imputed by IVEware software. Before imputation by IVEware software, upper and lower limits for all variables had to be determined.

 

At the end, missing personal interviews were fully imputed using sequential hot deck imputation where imputed value is determined by taking the value from one of the ‘clean’ respondent (donor). Hot-deck imputation preserves the distribution and can be used for any type of data (numerical, categorical) but it underestimate the variance of the estimate. CBS experts have used ”nearest neighbour” method where donor unit is chosen by taking the most “similar” unit according to a chosen auxiliary variable.

 

Please see Annex 6.

Imputed rent (HY030G) is part of EU-SILC 2024.  

For calculating this variable we used the indirect approach that is a conversion using tax rules. We asked the following questions: 1.Number of months the company car was used; 2. Kilometres traversed per month. According to the national tax legislation for each kilometre crossed a person realizes 0,18 € net income. Through net-gross conversion we calculated the gross amount of income.

 

Annex 6 attached.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

Information (percentages) of missing values (flag=-1) of variables that are part of the Rolling module are filled in the Annex 9 - Rolling module.

 


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
HR_2024_Annex 1-SILC2024 questionnaire_ENG
HR_2024_Annex 1-SILC2024 questionnaire_HR
HR_2024_Annex 2-Item_non_response_13.3.3.2.1
HR_2024_Annex 3-Sampling_errors_13.2
HR_2024_Annex 4-Data_collection_18.3
HR_2024_Annex 5-Weighting procedure
HR_2024_Annex 6_Estimation and Imputation
HR_2024_Annex 7-Coherence_15.3-15.3.2
HR_2024_Annex 8-Breaks in series_15.2-updated
HR_2024_Annex 9-Rolling module
HR_2024_Annex A EU-SILC - content tables