Search Evaluation Publications

Total results: 270.

Since 2016, the range of water protection advice, which was previously restricted to drinking water catchment areas, has been extended to areas that are in a poor chemical condition according to the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The WFD advice is aimed at agricultural businesses and is free of charge for them. The evaluation shows that the WFD advice is organizationally and structurally targeted. 

This report covers the evaluation of the National Rural Network of Spain.
This document aims to:
Quantify the achievements of the RRN with regard to its productivity, result and impact indicators and in those cases, in which the above is not possible, carry out a qualitative evaluation.
This report further provides conclusions and recommendations to improve the operations and achievement of the objectives of the RRN.
 

The funding measure ‘Creating transparency - from the shop counter to the producer’ (EAFRD code 16.9) is intended to support both the cooperation and networking of different actors in rural areas and the development of a knowledge base. In this report, the first implementation period, in which from November 2016 to June 2018 a total of 43 regional educational institutions (two of them in Bremen) were funded, is examined in more detail. The focus is on the recognised regional educational institutions and their (network) activities as well as the farmers who open their business as a ‘learning place farm’.

This case study report is based on the evaluation of funding documents and data as well as supplementary case studies in eight selected municipalities. As of mid-2019, around 66% of the originally planned EU funds were committed. 

This report provides a follow-up of how things are going in the Swedish RDP 2014-2020 in terms of energy efficiency, renewable energy and reduced greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. The report contains a compilation of statistics and analyses the situation. 

This first report on sustainable effects from locally led development analyses what is meant by sustainable effects and how to design intervention logic at the program, strategy and application levels.

This first report in the multi-year evaluation on sustainable effects from CLLD analyses what is meant by sustainable effects and how the intervention logic has been designed at program, strategy and application level.

This analysis examines the extent to which Regional Development Strategies (RES) for the implementation of LEADER in Thuringia correspond to the intentions and objectives of the RDP and to what extent the design of the RES is coherent with objectives and identified needs of the RDP. The study captures quantitative and qualitative aspects. The report covers the SWOT and needs assessments included in the RES, as well as the LEADER-specific target indicators of the EU's Joint Monitoring and Assessment System (CMES). In addition, the provisions of the RAG for monitoring and evaluation is also included in the analysis.

Thus, the present analysis is a building block for evaluation of LEADER in the context of the evaluation of the RDP.

Pages