1. Adoption of the
Agenda
The agenda was adopted.
2. Introduction by the
Commission
The meeting was opened
by M. B. Carsin who welcomed
the Members and congratulated
them on their nomination to the
Scientific Committee for
Cosmetic Products and Non-Food
Products intended for Consumers
as announced in the Commission
Decision dated 4 November 1997.
M. Carsin apologised for the
fact the meeting had been
called at very short notice.
This had been necessary,
because of the urgent need to
elect the Chairpersons of each
committee, who would
automatically be nominated as
members of the Scientific
Steering Committee (SSC), the
first full meeting of which was
scheduled for 21 November 1997.
He recalled that Mr.
Santer, in his address to the
EP in January 97 on the BSE
affair, had undertaken to
introduce a series of
organisational reforms, one of
the most important of which was
the separation of the
Commission's scientific
committees from the services
responsible for the
corresponding policy and
legislation. The eight
scientific committees were now
grouped under common management
in a single Directorate within
Directorate General XXIV -
"Consumer policy and consumer
health".
M. Carsin stressed the
improvements that the new
procedures for establishing the
scientific committees had
brought. The selection
procedure was fully
independent. Members had been
chosen on the basis of
scientific excellence by an
independent panel from
candidates who had responded to
the open call for expressions
of interest. The procedure thus
reinforced the requirements for
independence of the scientific
advice given to the Commission.
Although the Commission
Decision setting up the
scientific committees
(Commission Decision 95/579/EC
of 23 July 1997, OJ N° L 237,
p. 18) allowed for up to 19
Members, the Commission had
decided not to fill all the
places until the needs of the
Committees had been fully
evaluated. If it were shown
that the SCF for example lacked
an important area of expertise,
up to three additional Members
could be nominated at a later
date.
The Commission Decision
emphasised that questions put
to the scientific committees
would not be limited to those
where legal acts made
consultation obligatory, but
could include any problem where
there was a concern for
consumer health. The Decision
also made provision for
scientific committees to draw
the attention of the Commission
to any specific or emerging
problem on matters of consumer
health falling within their
remits.
M. Carsin explained that
the role of the Scientific
Steering Committee (SSC) would
include the examination of
questions that did not fall
within the remits of the
specific committees, to advise
on questions of a
multi-disciplinary nature, and
to resolve any divergence in
the advice from different
specific committees on related
questions.
The role of the
Commission's Secretariat was
essentially to support the
Committees in their work.
Committee Secretariats were
expected to be pro-active and
to provide an interface between
the Commission and the
Committees. Their task thus
goes beyond the mere drafting
of minutes but does not extend
to the formulation of actual
scientific opinion, which was
the exclusive responsibility of
the Committee.
M. Carsin emphasised the
importance of maximum
participation of members in the
work and meetings of the
Committees to ensure that their
heavy work-load was discharged
as efficiently as possible. He
added that the Decision foresaw
the possibility of replacement
of Members in the event that
for any reason they were no
longer able to fulfil their
responsibilities.
3. Information on the
SCCNFP
Mme De Solà introduced a
series of documents summarising
the legislative background to
the Committee's work and the
revised mandate. She explained
that in the case of Community
legislation on cosmetic,
virtually all Community acts
included an obligation for the
Commission to consult the
SCCNFP on proposals for
measures, which may have an
effect on public health. It was
therefore particularly
important that, for reasons of
both scientific and legislative
consistency, new Members were
fully aware of, and had access
to previous Committee opinions
on questions that they would be
asked to examine. The
Secretariat explained that
opinions of the SCCNFP had been
or will be published by the
Commission's Office of
Publications in Luxembourg and
these could be made available
to Members if desired.
4. Rules of procedure
The Secretariat
(XXIV/B.1) explained the
Commission Decision of July
1997 called upon the Committees
to adopt harmonised rules of
procedure in collaboration with
the SSC. The rules would be
designed to clarify the
functioning of the Committee as
concerns, for example, the
election of its officers,
declarations of independence,
confidentiality, the personal
responsibility of Members for
their advice, minimum time for
calling meetings and submission
of documents, the use and role
of ad-hoc experts, structure
and adoption of opinions,
written procedures for adoption
of urgent opinions, structure
and publication of opinions and
the contents of minutes.
The Secretariat would
develop draft rules for
consideration by each specific
committee. It was however
stressed that the harmonised
rules should be adopted as soon
as possible in the life of the
new committees.
The XXIV/B.1 Secretariat
outlined the proposed
modalities for reimbursement of
travel and subsistence costs
and the additional indemnity to
be paid to Members and ad-hoc
experts. In addition to
reimbursement of travel and
subsistence costs, Members and
ad-hoc experts would receive an
indemnity for each day of
participation at a meeting of a
scientific committee. Provision
was also being made for the
payment of an additional
indemnity to a Rapporteur on a
subject specified by a
committee. The Secretariat will
prepare a document setting out
the details of the new
arrangements.
5. Introduction of
Members
Members were invited to
introduce themselves with a
brief summary of their
professional background,
affiliations and areas of
scientific expertise.
6. Election of the
Chairperson and
vice-Chairpersons
The Secretariat
explained that, in accordance
with the Commission Decision of
July 1997, the Committee was
required to elect a chairperson
and two vice-chairpersons by
simple majority (8+1 votes) of
the Members that make up the
Committee. The Chairperson
would automatically be
nominated as a Member of the
SSC and therefore, Members
wishing to be considered for
chairperson should therefore be
aware of the additional demands
that this role would have on
their time. It was explained
that candidates could either
nominate themselves for
consideration or be nominated
by another member of the
Committee.
Chairperson
Prof. F. Kemper was
unanimously elected as the
Chairperson. The Members voted
by show of hands.
Vice-chairpersons
Prof. N. Loprieno and
Dr. I. White were unanimously
elected as vice-Chairpersons in
two separate votes. The Members
voted by show of hands.
7. Current work
programme
The Secretariat
presented a draft work
programme, which summarised for
each of the principal areas of
activity, active questions and
new subjects that were expected
to emerge during 1998. This
information was important to
allow the Committee to organise
its work effectively and to
allow new Members to identify
the areas to which they could
contribute.
The Chairman described
the working groups structure
that had been developed by the
SCC during previous mandates.
This consisted of six working
groups, three of which
addressed questions arising
from the main areas of cosmetic
products legislation of
relevance to public health
(hair dyes,
preservatives/colourants and
UV-filters). Moreover, the
Chairman explained that in the
future this rigid structure of
permanent sub-committee will be
abandoned and replaced by a
flexible structure of dynamic
working parties, set up for
particular issues.
In accordance with the
draft work programme, the
secretariat proposed, for the
time being, the creation of the
following working parties :
Alternatives to Animal Testing
& Dossier, Hair Dyes,
Inventory,
Preservatives/Colourants &
Fragrances and UV filters. The
Chairperson invited Members to
indicate by means of a form
circulated at the meeting which
working groups they would like
to consider joining in the
light of the information given.
Member's preferences for
working group participation
would be collated by the
Secretariat and distributed in
due course.
The Chairman introduced
a draft schedule of meetings
for 1998 and explained that it
should be the habit of the
Committee to agree the dates of
the Plenary and, if possible,
of the working group meetings
one year in advance so as to
minimise problems of
availability at short notice.
The meeting provisionally
agreed Plenary dates as follows
:
- 21 January 1998
- 20 May 1998
- 23 September 1998, and
- 25 November 1998
The meeting of the
UV-filters Working Group was
agreed for the 16 December
1997. The dates for the other
working group meetings for 1998
would be agreed at the next
Plenary session.
8. Any other business
* Notes of guidance for
testing of cosmetic ingredients
for their safety evaluation
The chairman explained
to the meeting the history and
the meaning of these notes of
guidance. He announced as well
that a copy of the final text
will be available soon.
* Polyacrylamide
Polyacrylamide is used
in cosmetic products. Traces of
the monomer acrylamide remains
in the polymer. Acrylamide is a
category 2 cancerogen. The
Commission was requested to put
the issue of polyacrylamide on
the agenda of the appropriate
working party.
* Fragrances
The Commission was asked
to put the review of the
adverse effects caused by
fragrances on the agenda, and
this was agreed.
The session was closed.
Participants
Present :
Mr K. ANDERSEN, Mr R.
ANTON, Mr P. BLAIN, Mrs Y. DE
ROECK-HOLTZHAUER, Mr J-F. DORE,
Mr P. ELSNER, Mr V. KAPOULAS,
Mr F. KEMPER, Mr B. LINA, Mr N.
LOPRIENO, Mr J. PARRA, Mr C.
POWELL, Mrs V. ROGIERS, Mr T.
SANNER, Mr J. VIVES REGO, Mr I.
WHITE
Commission :
Mr L. BANSIL DG III, Mrs
M. BERNARD DG III, Mr B. CARSIN
DG XXIV, Mr C. DECKART DG XXIV,
Mrs F. DELCOURT DG XXIV, Mrs M.
DE SOLA DG XXIV, Mrs D. HEELS
DG XXIV, Mr J. KREYSA DG XXIV,
Mr A. SANABRIA DG XXIV, Mr S.
SORO DG III, Mrs S. VAN DE LOUW
DG XXIV, Mr A. VAN ELST DG XXIV