Deliverables

D6.6 - SIMPATICO Evaluation Report v2

  • OPR coordinator... profile
    OPR coordinator...
    16 January 2019 - updated 2 years ago
  • 5 comments
    Total votes: 1
Closed since 17/02/19
Document(s): 
PDF icon simpatico_d6-6_simpaticoevaluationreportv2_v1-0.pdf
Year of publication: 
2018

This report provides the evaluation of the second iteration of the SIMPATICO validation activities, assessing both the effectiveness of the proposed SIMPATICO solution and the level of achievement of the project KPIs. A list of lessons learned and of recommendations is also included that will be used to drive the exploitation of the SIMPATICO results, also after the end of the project.

Comments

Log in to post comments
Tommaso Federici's picture
Tommaso Federici,
18/02/2019 00:07

I fully subscribe both Gemma's observations and Antonio's comment about the lack of Sheffield pilot.

I also resonate with Antonio, when he says that results not fully in line with expectations in a complex innovative project could be accepted.

Total votes: 0
Antonio De Nicola's picture
Antonio De Nicola,
16/02/2019 17:57

The deliverable presents the results of the evaluation. As the expected outcomes of the project were quite ambitious not all the results were in line with expectations (see, for instance, Citizenpedia evaluation results). However this can be accepted due to the overall complexity addressed by the project.

Evaluation of the Sheffield pilot is missing. There are several “Error! Reference source not found“ throughout the paper.

 

Total votes: 1
Francisco Santarremigia's picture
Francisco Santa...,
08/02/2019 18:08

The time for administrative processes has not been drastically improved and this is one of the most relevant KPI to engange citizens to use SIMPATICO. More details should be added in the deliverable about how to improve this KPI in further developments.

Total votes: 1
Antonio OPROMOLLA's picture
Antonio OPROMOLLA,
06/02/2019 08:07

The main lack of this deliverable consists in the involved target for the validation. A not coherent strategy has been adopted.

However, it presents wery structured contents, with the identification of a structured plan, with specific objectives to reach and the success criteria and the identification of specific elements to validate for each target. Very appreciated are the "lesson learned".

Total votes: 0
Gemma Molero's picture
Gemma Molero,
04/02/2019 19:14
  • The validation of SIMPATICO tool in Sheffield is pedent.
  • Some references should be corrected (see pg. 55, pg. 60, 61, 65)
  • The selection of sizes should be better justified. Why for CPD evaluation 42 citizens are considered in Trento and 22 in Galicia?
  • Why nobody Elder than 50 years old has been taken into account in the CPD evaluation in the case of Galicia?
  • The point 3.2 is repeated in the deliverable 6.4. A reference to this deliverable should be enought.
  • A deeper analysis should be done about the gap of the time spent for administrative processes with SIMPATICO after results obtained for this KPI during the evaluation.
Total votes: 2