The project website has been developed 2 and made ready at an early stage of the project in order to reach the highest number of stakeholders. The project website has been, and will be, constantly updated including information about dissemination activities to be carried out by the Consortium and public deliverables.
This deliverable gives preview of Simpatico web site. The deliverable is very well structured as well as web site. Web site is developed in order to present results of the project and preview ongoing events. Partners plan to improve web site during project lifecycle since they consider them as a flexible and dynamic tool.
The website of the project is good. The kind of sections and contents present in the website are exhaustive. The website architecture is appropriate. However, considering its aims, that is to say communicating the general elements of the project, my opinion is that the contents present in each section could be summarized and better represented (for example with a large use of pictures and graphics).
The website looks beautiful. It is well structured, user-friendly and it is fully responsive (fits well in different screens and devices).
In most of cases the content is well presented. However, here are my comments in some specific points:
In 1.1.3 in the pilots area it could be make sense to present briefly (1-2 sentences max), what the pilot plan to do during the project time.
Also, I did not understand why the Components are being placed under Pilots? I think that it could be better to be placed under a different section
(for example under Brief section). I could not find the Public repository and Calendar at the current version of the Website.
Some further suggestions for improvement can be found below:
1. Probably a better resolution (or on click to be displayed a bigger one image) is required in order the Figure 5 to display more clearly all the text which is contained inside the boxes.
2. Also a UML sequence diagram could be used in order to denote explicitly the order of procedures and the communication between different layers.
3. In the brief section you can put later a short video that describes the project motivation or the project goals, outcomes etc.
4. In the future probably you will need a demos-videos section for presenting the respective promotional content in order to maximize dissemination.
5. Furthermore, it could be nice if you can add some Frequently Asked Questions that could be written in a non-formal way in order to describe the project with simple words and giving this way to the wide public the general picture of how citizens can be involved in the bottom-up community contribution strategy.
6. Categories of publication can be placed in submenu items under Publication and probably in different pages as long as their number increases.
7. The website is not fully secured despite the fact that it has installed Let's Encrypt certificate. You could recheck it (i.e check for links that still starting with http:// instead of https//)
Finally, to sum-up I did not find any serious problems, so in my opinion this site could be used as a basic tool of dissemination for the project outcomes.
