Archive:Absences from work - quarterly statistics
Data extracted in October 2020
Planned article update: December 2020
Highlights
Absences from work can be classified in two groups: on one side, the planned, desired absences (e.g. annual holidays) and on the other side, the unplanned, undesired absences (e.g. illnesses, lay-offs). While the first type of absences could be easily “absorbed” by the companies as their effect could be mitigated by for example rescheduling the work priorities or recruiting temporary staff, the second type could lead to disruption of the production cycles and lead to material losses to both employers and employees.
It is worth noting that sometimes this distinction could be not so easy to make. Usually, annual leaves are guaranteed by the legislation, which may lead some employers to encourage their employees to take holidays when the enterprise is facing economic difficulties. This means that holidays sometimes may mask actual lay-offs.
The beginning of 2020 was marked by an outbreak of worldwide pandemic - COVID-19, leading almost all governments around the globe to take restrictive measures, of which the social distancing had a pivotal role. To prevent the spread of the virus and to ensure distancing of people, many businesses were temporarily shut down and many employees confined at their homes. Whereas worker protection laws may imply that employment, specifically of employees, will not be affected, at least at the beginning of the pandemic, one may expect over time a sharp rise of absences from work which falls under the aforementioned second category of undesired, unplanned absences.
This article aims to depict the absences from work in the European Union (EU) as a whole, for all EU Member States individually (except Germany for which data is not yet available), as well as for the United Kingdom, two EFTA countries (Norway and Switzerland) and three candidate countries (North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey). Please note that the presented data is seasonally adjusted.
The article is a part of the online publication Labour market in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic - quarterly statistics.
Full article
Sharp increase in the number of absences from work in the second quarter of 2020
Over the last fourteen years, until the end of 2019, the total number absences from work varied from 14.6 to 18.6 million (Figure 1). Over this period, a couple of sharp peaks stand out. Namely, in the first quarter of 2009 absences accounted for 18.0 million and increased by 2.3 million in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2008. Also, in the first quarter of 2015, absences increased by 1.2 million, compared to the preceding quarter, and reached 18.1 million.
However, in the first two quarters of 2020, absences from work recorded unprecedented levels since the beginning of the time series, both in terms of increase in comparison to the previous quarter and absolute number in comparison to the whole time span since 2006. At the beginning of 2020, i.e. the first quarter of the year, 22.3 million people were absent from their job, which represents 3.8 million more compared to the last quarter of 2019. In the second quarter of 2020, the volume of absent from work people saw an even more striking increase, it almost doubled its size from the previous quarter and reached 40.9 million.
.png)
The rise of absences form work in the second quarter of 2020 is primarily due to the increase of temporary lay-offs, as shown in Figure 2. The levels of temporary lay-offs had been relatively stable in the period before the fourth quarter of 2019, with the exception of the first quarter of 2009 when they rose by 0.3 million, and their number never exceeded 0.5 million after the second quarter of 2015. However, in the first quarter of 2020, 2.4 million people were absent from work because of temporary lay-off, an increase of 2.1 million in comparison to the previous quarter. In the second quarter of the year, these people increased by nearly eight times to reach 19.3 million, which represented almost half of all absent workers (47.2 %). Looking at the other reasons for absence from work in the second quarter of 2020, the following largest was of people being on holidays (23.2 %), although their number declined with 1.6 million from the previous three months, followed by those having “other” reason for being absent (19.0 %) and those absent due to their own illness or disability (10.7 %). The last two groups experienced an increase in the second quarter of 2020 of 2.8 and 0.5 million respectively.
Figure 3 compares overall absences from work as a percentage of employment in the last two quarters (fourth quarter of 2019 and first quarter of 2020). At EU level, absences accounted for 9.7 % of employment at the end of 2019 and reached 12.0 % at the beginning of 2020, corresponding to an increase of 2.3 percentage points (p.p.). Among the Member States for which data are available, the highest rates of absences from work in the first quarter of 2020 were observed in France (18.1 %), Sweden (16.2 %) and Austria (15.0 %), and the lowest rates in Romania (2.5 %), Malta (3.3 %), and Bulgaria (4.4 %). All EU Member States except Finland experienced a rise of this rate compared to the last quarter of 2019. Most prominent increases could be observed in Italy (from 7.6 % to 13.4 %), Cyprus (from 7.5 % to 12.8 %) and Greece (from 3.3 % to 8.3 %).
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_emp_q), (lfsi_abs_q)
Men and women in employment were not equally absent from work in the first quarter of 2020. Among all Member States except Cyprus, shares of absences from work were higher among women than men (Figure 4). This difference was the biggest in Lithuania, where the share of absences among women was more than two and a half times larger than among men (17.1 % for women compared to 6.5 % for men). The gap between the absence rates for men and women was also large in Hungary (13.2 % for women and 5.5 % for men), Poland (12.1 % for women and 5.1 % for men) and Latvia (12.0 % for women and 5.0 % for men).
.png)
Considering the repartition between men and women among the total absences, there was a prevalence of women in all Member States. Cyprus was the only exception, where 52.1 % of those absent from work were men. Women outnumbered men the most in Romania, where 72.8 % of people absent from their job were women. Lithuania and Latvia followed with women accounting for respectively 72.5 % and 70.5 % of all people absent from work. <sesection>
<sesection>
Absences from work due to temporary lay-off
At EU-level, in the first quarter of 2020, 2.3 million people were absent from work due to temporary lay-off, corresponding to 1.2 % of the employed population (Figure 5). Please note that in this article temporary lay-off should not be understood as dismissal but as temporarily leave due to technical or economic reasons.
The share of people absent from work due to temporary lay-off varied significantly across countries. The Member State recording the highest share (among those with data available) is Cyprus, with 4.0 % of absence due to temporary lay-off among the employed people, followed by Italy (3.0 %), Greece (2.8 %), Spain (2.7 %) and France (2.2 %). In contrast, the Netherlands, Hungary, Sweden, Slovakia and Czechia recorded shares of 0.5 % or less.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_emp_q), (lfsi_abs_q)
Looking at the breakdown by sex, the rate of absence from work was higher for women than for men in all EU Member States, except in Cyprus, Finland, France and Belgium where this rate was slightly higher for men than for women and in Czechia where the rate was equal for men and women. The difference between the rates for men and women was the most visible in Cyprus and Greece but in opposite direction for both countries: men in Cyprus absent due to temporary lay-off represented 4.5 % of the male employed population compared to 3.5 % for women, while in Greece, women absent due to temporary lay-off represented 3.4 % of the female employed population compared to 2.4 % for men.
All EU Member States, for which data is available, experienced an increase in the number of people absent from work due to temporary lay-off in the first quarter of 2020, and some even saw a very sharp rise. For example, in Spain, the number of temporary lay-offs rose from 13.9 thousand at the end 2019 to 525.2 thousand at the beginning of 2020. In France this number increased from 22.4 to 575.2 thousand and in Italy from 104.6 to 671.3 thousand.
Absences from work due to own illness or disability
Own illness or disability was the reason for 4.2 million people in the EU to be absent from work in the first quarter of 2020. This represented 2.2 % of the employed population (Figure 6). The share of absences from work because of this reason was the largest in Belgium (3.8 %), Portugal (3.6 %), France and Slovenia (both 3.2 %) and Spain (3.0 %), and the smallest in Hungary (0.9 %), Italy (0.7 %), Bulgaria (0.3 %) and Greece (0.1 %).
In the majority of Member States, this rate was higher for women than for men; exceptions were Greece and Lithuania, where the rates were equal for both sexes. The gender gap was the biggest in Belgium, where employed women absent from work due to own illness or disability amounted for 4.7 %, compared to 3.0 % for the employed men, and in Slovenia, where 4.1 % of employed women were absent due to own illness or disability compared to 2.4 % for men.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_emp_q), (lfsi_abs_q)
Absences from work due to holidays
People absent from work due to holidays were 11.5 million in EU at the beginning of 2020, corresponding to 6.0 % of the employed population (Figure 7). This rate ranged from more than 8 % in France (10.5 %), Sweden (9.2 %), Austria (8.5 %) and Finland (8.1 %) to less than 4 % in Poland (3.1 %), Bulgaria (3.0 %), Latvia (2.7 %), Greece (2.5 %) and Romania (1.3 %).
Among the Member States, the share of people absent for holidays was higher for women than for men. The only exception was Cyprus where the share of employed people absent from work due to holidays was higher for men than for women (6.7 % compared to 5.7 %). It is worth noticing that the gender gap was the largest in Hungary: 10.6 % of employed women were absent from work due to holidays compared to 4.1 % of employed men.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_emp_q), (lfsi_abs_q)
The number of absences from work due to holidays increased from the fourth quarter of 2019 to the first of 2020 in almost all EU countries; the exceptions were Estonia and Finland. The largest increase could be observed in Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria, where the number of employed persons absent from work because of holidays doubled its size: from 133.1 to 307.5 thousand (Hungary), from 48.6 to 106.5 thousand (Romania) and from 43.5 to 93.3 thousand (Bulgaria) respectively.
Source data for tables and graphs
Data sources
All figures in this article are based on seasonally adjusted quarterly results from European labour force survey (EU-LFS).
Source: The European Union labour force survey (EU-LFS) is the largest European household sample survey providing quarterly and annual results on labour participation of people aged 15 and over as well as on persons outside the labour force. It covers residents in private households. Conscripts in military or community service are not included in the results. The EU-LFS is based on the same target populations and uses the same definitions in all countries, which means that the results are comparable between countries.
The notion of temporary absence from work refers to situations in which a period of work is interrupted by a period of absence. This implies that persons are generally to be considered as having been temporarily absent from work and therefore employed, if they had already worked at their current activity and were expected to return to their work after the period of absence. Persons without work who had made arrangements to take up paid employment or to engage in some self-employment activity at a date subsequent to the reference period, but who had not yet started work, are not to be considered as temporarily absent from work.
This article refers to the following reasons for absence from work: temporary lay-off, holidays, own illness or disability and other. Absence from work is classified as a “temporary lay-off” if it is due to slack work for technical or economic reasons; this category also includes absences due to difficulties such as plant breakdown or materials shortage. Those whom written or unwritten contract of employment, or activity, has been suspended by the employer are also considered as employed and absent from work due to temporary lay-off if they have an assurance of return to work within a period of 3 months or receive at least 50 % of their wage or salary from their employer. “Own illness or disability” includes own illness, injury or temporary disability. The category “other” encompasses absences due to bad weather, labour dispute, school education or training, maternity leave, parental leave, compensation leave and other personal or family reasons.
For more information on absences from work, please consult pages 22 to 28 from EU Labour Force Survey Explanatory Notes
Context
The COVID-19 virus hit Europe in January and February 2020, with the first cases confirmed in Spain, France and Italy. COVID-19 infections have now been diagnosed in all European Union (EU) Member States.
To fight the pandemic, EU Member States have taken a wide variety of measures.
From the second week of March, most countries closed retail shops apart from supermarkets, pharmacies and banks. Bars, restaurants and hotels have also been closed. In Italy and Spain, non-essential production was stopped and several countries imposed regional or even national lock-down measures which further stifled the economic activities in many areas.
In addition, schools were closed, public events were cancelled and private gatherings (with numbers of persons varying from 2 to 50) were banned in most Member States.
The large majority of the prevention measures were taken during mid-March 2020 and most of the prevention measures and restrictions were kept for the whole of April and May 2020.
The first quarter 2020 is consequently the first quarter in which the labour market across the EU has been affected by COVID-19 measures taken by the Member States.
Employment and unemployment as defined by the ILO concept are, in this particular situation, not sufficient to describe the developments taking place in the labour market. In this first phase of the crisis, active measures to contain employment losses led to absences from work rather than dismissals, and individuals could not search for work or were not available due to the containment measures, thus not counting as unemployed.
Direct access to
<maintables>
Main tables
<maintables>