|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Statistical Service of Cyprus (CYSTAT) |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Demographic, Social and Tourism Statistics |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Statistical Service of Cyprus CY-1444 Nicosia Cyprus |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 16/01/2024 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 16/01/2024 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 16/01/2024 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The Adult Education Survey (AES) covers adults’ participation in education and training (formal - FED, non-formal - NFE and informal learning - INF). The 2022 AES focuses on people aged 18-69. The reference period for the participation in education and training is the twelve months prior to the interview. Information available from the AES is grouped around the following topics:
For further information see the 2022 AES legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology). |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
- Classification of Learning Activities (CLA, 2016 edition) |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
AES covers all economic sectors. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology). |
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
Individuals, non-formal learning activities. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
Individuals aged 18-69 living in private households. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
Government controlled areas of the Republic of Cyprus. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
AES data are available for 2006, 2011, 2016 and 2022. |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
Number, EUR. |
|
|||
The fieldwork period for AES 2022 was 28/11/2022-10/03/2023. The reference period for the AES 2022 is 12 months prior to the interview. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
At European level: Basic legal act: Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 Implementing act: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/861 At national level: Article 3 of the national Official Statistics Law, No. 25(I) of 2021 defines the functions of the Statistical Service of Cyprus regarding the production and dissemination of official statistics. Moreover, Article 13, explicitly stipulates the mandate for data collection and introduces a mandatory response to statistical enquiries by stipulating the obligation of respondents to reply to surveys and provide the data required. This relates not only to national but also to European statistics which, by virtue of Article 8 of the said Law, are incorporated in the annual and multiannual programmes of work without any further procedure. |
|||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Official statistics are released in accordance to all confidentiality provisions of the following:
Annexes: Official Statistics Law No. 25(I) of 2021 Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (consolidated text) European Statistics Code of Practice Guidelines for the Protection of Confidential Data |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
The treatment of confidential data is regulated by Guidelines for the Protection of Confidential Data. Annexes: Guidelines for the Protection of Confidential Data |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
According to the Dissemination and Pricing Policy of the Statistical Service of Cyprus (section 2.3) CYSTAT΄s main channel for dissemination of statistics is the web portal, which offers the same conditions to everyone and is updated at the same time every working day (12:00 noon). No privileged pre-released access is granted. In addition to the annual release calendar, users are informed of the various statistical releases through the “Alert” service provided by CYSTAT. Annexes: Dissemination and Pricing Policy of the Statistical Service of Cyprus |
|
|||
Every 6 years. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
No regular news release for the dissemination of AES 2022 results. When the results are ready to be disseminated, an announcement is uploaded in CYSTAT's web portal, informing the users on the new publication. |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Statistical micro-data from CYSTAT’s surveys are accessible for research purposes only and under strict provisions as described below: Under the provisions of the Official Statistics Law, CYSTAT may release microdata for the sole use of scientific research. Applicants have to submit the request form "APPLICATION FOR DATA FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES" giving thorough information on the project for which micro-data are needed. The application is evaluated by CYSTAT’s Confidentiality Committee and if the application is approved, a charge is fixed according to the volume and time consumed for preparation of the data. Micro-data may then be released after an anonymization process which ensures no direct identification of the statistical units but, at the same time, ensures usability of the data. The link for the application is attached below. Annexes: Link to the application for access to microdata on CYSTAT's website |
|||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
Not available. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
The quality of statistics in CYSTAT is managed in the framework of the European Statistics Code of Practice which sets the standards for developing, producing and disseminating European Statistics as well as the ESS Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). CYSTAT endorses the Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System. In addition, CYSTAT is guided by the requirements provided for in Article 11 of the Official Statistics Law No. 25(I) of 2021 as well as Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics, which sets out the quality criteria to be applied in the development, production and dissemination of European statistics. Additionally, all the interviewers were trained for 1 week and all the supervisors/coders were trained for 2 weeks. All of the variables and the modalities in the questionnaire were detailed explained. Throughout the data collection phase, the interviewers visited once a week their supervisors at the office for delivering the completed questionnaires as well as for checking their progress and quality of their work. Supervisors made frequently call-back to the households, randomly checked some of the answers given and they also made clarifications were needed. Annexes: European Statistics Code of Practice ESS Quality Assurance Framework (QAF) Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System Official Statistics Law No. 25(I) of 2021 Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (consolidated text) |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The quality of the survey is of a desirable high standard. The response rate was high, thus securing reliable results. The validation and consistency checks were incorporated in the electronic questionnaire, securing the minimisation of field work errors. Additionally, the data collection phase was closely monitored and checked while the post checking and coding was performed by trained supervisors. The weaknesses of the survey were:
|
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The main users of the Adult Education Survey (besides EUROSTAT) include Policy makers at European level (e.g., European Commission, European Parliament, other European agencies), national authorities (e.g. Ministry of Education, Sport and Youth, Human Resource Development Authority of Cyprus), academics/researchers/students, trade unions, and enterprises. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Since 2008 (with the exception of 2010, 2013 and 2020) CYSTAT carries out an annual online “Users Satisfaction Survey”. The results of the surveys are available on CYSTAT’s web portal at the link attached below. Overall, there is a high level of satisfaction of the users of statistical data published by CYSTAT. Annexes: Results of CYSTAT’s User Satisfaction Surveys |
|||
12.3. Completeness | |||
All the variables requested by the legislation and included in the "2022 AES manual Methodological guidelines for the adult education survey" were collected. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
According to Reg. (EU) 2019/1700 Annex II, precision requirements for all data sets are expressed in standard errors and are defined as continuous functions of the actual estimates and of the size of the statistical population in a country or in a NUTS 2 region. For the Adult Education Survey, the estimated standard errors of the following indicators are examined according to certain parameters set:
Additionally other measures were also taken in order to obtain results with high accuracy, such as providing good and thorough training to interviewers and supervisors, establishing a well-organised supervision process and conducting quality checks to data during the fieldwork period. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
The sampling frame for the AES 2022 was the list of households from the 2021 Census of Population. Then the households were divided in two categories. One category was the households with at least one person aged 18-24 and the other category was households with at least one person aged 25-69. Two different samples were then drawn, that would assist in meeting the precision requirements set by the regulation. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
The coefficients of variation, the standard errors and the confidence intervals were calculated using the procedure PROC SURVEYMEANS in SAS, taking into account the sampling design and the weights. See table 13.2.1 “Sampling errors - indicators for 2022 AES key statistics” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
Non-sampling error is the error in estimates, which cannot be attributed to sampling fluctuations. The term summarises errors not attributed to sampling fluctuations. These errors can be: (i) Non-response error due to the missing or wrong values of the Variables in the data. (ii) Processing errors arising from faulty implementation of correctly planned implementation methods. (iii) Coverage errors due to Over-coverage or Under-coverage of the population represented by the data. (iv) Model errors due to the use of wrong measurement methods, for example an error caused by application of a wrong model in the Estimation. (v) Random errors occurring during data collection, for example errors due wrong measurement or due to the time when the Administrative source is compiled. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
Coverage errors include over-coverage, under-coverage and misclassification:
As previously reported, the sampling frame for the AES 2022 was the list of households from the 2021 Census of Population. Since the period between the Census of the Population 2021, reference date 1/10/2021, and the beginning of the AES 2022 fieldwork was close, the frame was considered adequate and no supplementary list was necessary. Only housing units built after the 1st of October 2021 were not included in our sampling frame. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
See table 13.3.1.1 “Over-coverage - rate” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
Source of measurement errors Possible sources of measurement errors are the questionnaire (design, content and wording), the method of data collection, the interviewers and the respondents. As most of the interviewers had previous experience with other surveys, the quality of the data was adequate. Building process of questionnaire The questionnaire for AES 2022 was developed on the basis of the 2022 AES Manual. Even though the questionnaire was tested, some questions were still difficult to be answered with precision. Difficulties due to memory lapses were encountered in questions regarding reporting all the Non-formal activities during the last 12 months. As the method of data collection was Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) many validation and consistency checks were implemented in the electronic questionnaire. This had a positive impact on the quality of the data collected. Additionally, problems usually accounted to the routing of the questionnaire were avoided. Interview training In order to reduce interviewer effects, a week training session for all the interviewers was organised. The training was conducted by permanent staff, the Statistics Officer responsible for the AES 2022 survey. The aim of the training was to ensure that all interviewers were uniformly trained both in regards to the content of the questionnaire, as well as their behaviour during the interview. Also, the interviewers had intensive sessions on working with their laptops and the electronic questionnaires in the environment of BLAISE. An interviewer manual was prepared explaining each and every single question of the questionnaire as well as their respective possible answers. Quality control Apart from the interviewers, the training sessions were attended by the supervisors. Each one of them was responsible for a group of maximum 4 interviewers. The supervisors had an additional week of training. During the fieldwork, supervisors had meetings with each one of the interviewers once a week. During these meetings, apart from discussing problems or questions raised, the supervisors also collected (from the interviewers´ laptops) all completed questionnaires. Their main duty during the data collection period was to examine the interviewers’ work and refer back to them for inconsistencies or for problems identified in connection with terminology. Furthermore, the supervisors had to double check some of the answers with respondents by telephone, especially in the case of inconsistent answers or missing data. |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
Non-response errors are errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:
The non-response rate of 7.5% in households could be considered as very satisfactory. It was much lower than the non-response rate for 2016 AES. The households were informed through a notifying letter, explaining the purpose of the Survey. The letter was sent to them by post. In case that for any reason the letter was not delivered, the interviewers handed one at their first visit and informed the household for the purpose of the Survey. According to the guidelines provided to the interviewers, the first contact with the households selected in the sample had to be in person. If the residents of the household were available, the interviewer proceeded with the interview. If there was no communication during the first visit, the interviewer made the necessary arrangements so to proceed with the interview. The minimum number of visits in order to contact the household was three, but in several cases the interviewers overpass that number. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
See table 13.3.3.1 “Unit non-response - rate” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
See table 13.3.3.2 “Item non-response rate” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
Processing errors were reduced to the minimum, since the questionnaires were completed directly in electronic form at the interviewer’s laptop using BLAISE software (CAPI). The validation and consistency checks were implemented during the data collection phase in BLAISE. The completed questionnaires were then transferred to the supervisor’s laptop for checking and coding (Household type, Field of higher education completed, Occupation, Economic activity, Field of higher education of the most recent formal educational activity, Field of selected non formal activity). The coding was performed using drop down lists to avoid mistakes. Editing involved checking for any deficiencies or logical inconsistencies. Any issues raised were solved after consultation with the interviewers at first and then the respondents, when required. Part of the edited questionnaires were re-examined by the responsible Statistics Officer. After the completion of the data collection the data was exported in excel files for further checks and then imported in SAS for the final editing and analysis. |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
Not applicable.
|
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
The timing for the 2022 AES is defined as follows:
The timing was largely met. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
8 months after the end of the reference period. |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
The end of the national fieldwork period was in March 2023 and the pre-checked microdata was sent to Eurostat in October 2023. The data were published in Eurostat's website on the 14th of November 2023. See table 14.2 “Project phases - dates” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
See table 15.1 “Deviations from 2022 AES concepts and definitions” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. No additional variables related to COVID-19 were collected. |
|||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
The overall changes between 2016 and 2022 AES are described in the 2022 AES manual, annex 10. Apart from these, there were no other changes in Cyprus AES 2022 implementation. See table 15.2 “Comparability - over time” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
See table 15.3 “Coherence - cross-domain” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
AES results for a given data collection round are based on the same microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent. |
|
|||
For the completion of the AES 2022 fieldwork there were 1 Statistical officer involved on a full-time basis, 25 enumerators and 8 supervisors. For the data analysis and the quality report, there was 1 Statistics officer. The mean interview duration per person was calculated as the sum of the duration of all personal interviews, divided by the number of questionnaires completed. Only persons accepted for the database were considered. Mean (average) interview duration per person was 56 minutes. |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
Sampling frame The list of households from the 2021 Census of Population was used as sampling frame. Then the households were divided into two categories. One category was the households with at least one person aged 18-24 and the other category was households with at least one person aged 25-69. Sampling design The sampling design was one-stage stratification for the urban areas and two-stage stratification for the rural areas. This design was applied for both categories of the sampling frame. For the urban areas households are the primary sampling unit. For the rural areas, villages are the primary sampling units, while households are the secondary sampling units. Neighbouring villages with a small number of households are merged in order to create complexes with a minimum number of households. In rural areas, the sample of villages is selected with probability proportional to the size of the village (PPS). Then, a simple random sample of households is selected from each village. Geographical stratification criteria were used (district and area, urban/rural) for the sample selection. The households were stratified in 9 strata based on District (Urban & Rural), i.e. 1=Lefkosia urban, 2=Lefkosia Rural, 3=Ammochostos Rural1, 4=Larnaka Urban, 5=Larnaka Rural, 6=Lemesos Urban, 7= Lemesos Rural, 8=Pafos Urban, 9=Pafos Rural. (1) Ammochostos Urban is an area not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. Sample selection schemes Two different samples were selected using the same method. The first sample was from the frame including at least one person aged 18-24 and the second sample was selected form the frame including at least one person aged 25-69. The sample was selected from each stratum with simple random sampling. At the time of the interview, up to two individuals were selected from each household randomly, using the birth date as a criterion, depending on which sample their household belonged to. The two persons aged 18-24 (or 25-69) having his/her birthday first after the interview date, were those selected to proceed with the interview. See also table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
Every 6 years. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
The questionnaire was designed according to the instructions of the AES 2022 manual. The primary data collection mode was CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview), i.e. the questionnaires were completed by the interviewer. When required, CATI was also used. See also table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. Annexes: CY - AES 2022 - INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS CY - AES 2022 - Questionnaire EL CY - AES 2022 - Questionnaire EN |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
The questionnaires were completed using the computer assisted (CAPI) module in Blaise. Automatic checks and validations were embedded during collection phase to assure the correctness of the data. The completed questionnaires were then transferred to the supervisor’s laptop for editing and coding the questions that were not pre-coded (Field of the highest level of education or training successfully completed, Occupation, Economic activity, Field of the most recent formal education activity, Field of the 1st non-formal learning activity, Field of the 2nd non-formal learning activity). Editing for any deficiencies or logical inconsistencies was also performed by supervisors. The edited data from the supervisors was randomly rec-examined by the responsible Statistics Officers. At the end of the data collection the data was exported in excel files which were later imported in the Statistical Package SAS. All the necessary variables were constructed according to the requirements of the Regulation. Additional consistency checks as well as range checks and skip checks were performed in order to verify the correctness of the data, despite the fact that most of the checks referring to the range of the variables and skip checks were embedded in the electronic questionnaire from the beginning. The data was analysed with the Statistical Package SAS, including the calculation and assignment of the weights. |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
A description of the weighting procedure is available in the annex "CY - Data compilation AES 2022".
Annexes: CY - Data compilation AES 2022 |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
See table 18.5.1 “Imputation - rate” in annex “CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
No further comments. |
|
|||
|
|||
CY - QR tables 2022 AES (excel) |