Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Iceland


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Iceland

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Business trends and structure

1.5. Contact mail address

Borgartun 21a

150 Reykjavik

Iceland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 24/03/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 24/03/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 24/03/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Higher Education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

3.2. Classification system
  • The local unit for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) are based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
   
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge. e. For an activity to be an R&D activity, it must satisfy five core criteria. The activity must be: novel, creative, uncertain, systematic, transferable and/or reproducible.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) Breakdown by field of R&D by six main fields: natural sciences, engineering and technology, medical sciences, agricultural sciences, social sciences, humanities.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO)  -
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector  
     Tertiary education institution  
          University and colleges: core of the sector  Included
     University hospitals and clinics  Included
     HE Borderline institutions  Included
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to HES  
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  No intentional deviation from manual.
External R&D personnel  Included in total personnel
Clinical trials  Clinical trials not excluded.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from Rest of the world by sector - availability  Not collected.
Payments to Rest of the world by sector - availability  Not collected.
R&D expenditure of foreign affiliates - coverage  Not collected.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No) N
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  Clear instructions on which cost to specify.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Source of funds  In accordance with FM.
Type of R&D  In accordance with FM.
Type of costs  In accordance with FM.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  n/a
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years    Calendar year.
Function  Data available by breakdown: researchers; other.
Qualification N/A
Age N/A 
Citizenship N/A 
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years    Calendar year.
Function  Data available by breakdown: researchers; other.
Qualification  N/A
Age N/A 
Citizenship N/A 
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

"Average % of time spent on R&D" asked in survey, then turned into FTE.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 N/A    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

Higher education institutions (department level), incl. university hospitals. 

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  All universities and university hospitals  
Estimation of the target population size    
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Expenditures: ISK (thousands)

Personnel: HC and FTE


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year of the reference year: 2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Legal acts / agreements

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  N/A
Legal acts  N/A
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  
Planned changes of legislation  N/A
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

          Section III of regulation 'Lög um Hagstofu Íslands og opinbera hagskýrslugerð, nr. 163, 21. desember 2007' establishes that any information concerning identifiable individuals or legal units has to be treated as confidential.

  

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

           All survey staff is bound by the data confidentiality.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data cells that are considered confidential are flagged as such.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Release calendar is updated on a year-to-year basis. The R&D data is typically released nationally before the end of October.

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.statice.is/publications/

8.3. Release policy - user access

A link to 'rules on statistical releases':

statice.is/rules-on-statistical-releases/


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly dissemination.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Yes  In accordance with the code of conduct of Statistics Iceland, release of official statistics included a press release
Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Yes  Statice website: http://www.statice.is/statistics/business-sectors/science-and-technology/rd/
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

   

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Statice website: http://www.statice.is/statistics/business-sectors/science-and-technology/rd/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  N/A
Access cost policy  https://statice.is/services/data-for-scientific-research/
Micro-data anonymisation rules  https://statice.is/services/data-for-scientific-research/
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Yes    
CD-ROMs  No    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Yes    
Other  No    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

http://hagstofan.s3.amazonaws.com/media/public/2021/aef7bf6a-75ea-4302-9b60-10628ee03ea7.pdf

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Description of methodology not available in English for the time being
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Not directly.
Measure to increase clarity  Not at this point.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Clarity does not seem to be a problem.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Centralization of tasks and responsibilities: a single expert in the unit of Business Enterprise Statistics has duties and responsibilities over every aspect of the statistical production. By minimizing the number of personnel involved in the process, organizational complications are kept to a minimum. This is both manageable and feasibly considering the small scale and scope of the R&D industry in Iceland.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The methodology is tailored to the scene which is characterised by a low number of R&D performing units on the University level


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Various ministries  R&D expenditures: types of exp., fields of science, and source of funds.
 1  Universities  R&D expenditures: types of exp., fields of science, and source of funds.
     
     

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  We haven't done a user satisfaction survey; results have been presented to some of the ministries.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  Not applicable
Short description of the feedback received  The data collected, as published by Statistics Iceland seems to have met user needs.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, the breakdowns and whether they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y  Yearly        
Type of R&D  Y  Yearly        
Type of costs  Y  Yearly        
Socioeconomic objective  Y  Yearly        
Region  N          
FORD  Y-1995  Yearly        
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1999  Yearly        
Function  Y  Yearly        
Qualification  Y  Yearly        
Age  N  
       
Citizenship  N  
       
Region  N          
FORD  Y-1995  Yearly        
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1993  Yearly        
Function  Y  Yearly        
Qualification  Y  Yearly        
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  N          
FORD  Y-1995  Yearly        
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
           
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  1  3  4  2    +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  3  2  4  1    +/-
Researchers in FTE  3  2  4  1    +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  X        
Total R&D personnel in FTE  X        
Researchers in FTE  X        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

No method, as there was no sampling

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  
Government  
Higher education  
Private non-profit  
Rest of the world  
Total  
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Occupation Researchers  
Technicians  
Other support staff  
Qualification ISCED 8  
ISCED 5-7  
ISCED 4 and below  
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors :

Not known, assumed to be small. 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Detailed instructions accompany the survey questionnaire, respondent support by phone and email. 

 

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Not known, assumed to be small.  

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Detailed instructions accompany the survey questionnaire, respondent support by phone and email.

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 9 10  10% 
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 R&D expenditure    In practice non-existent. All the units reporting yes to the R&D question do provide basic information on the R&D expenditure, FTE and personnel.
 R&D personnel in FTE    In practice non-existent. All the units reporting yes to the R&D question do provide basic information on the R&D expenditure, FTE and personnel.
 Researchers in FTE    In practice non-existent. All the units reporting yes to the R&D question do provide basic information on the R&D expenditure, FTE and personnel.
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

Follow-up emails & phone calls.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied   Data collected through questionnaire sent to respondents via email. 
Estimates of data entry errors   The only data entry errors that we have become aware of had to do with reported expenditures not being entered as the right amount. All responses were reviewed in light of that. Follow-up phone calls were made for the confirmation of amounts for every case where it wasn't clear whether the amounts had been entered correctly. So the issue was addressed and beyond that we are not aware of any data entry errors.
Variables for which coding was performed   No coding was required for variables that were sent to Eurostat and OECD.
Estimates of coding errors  No coding errors
Editing process and method  Any editing done to the data would involve checking with the respondents.
Procedure used to correct errors  Phone calls to respondents.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 17.11.2022

c) Lag (days): 332 days.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 03.03.2023

c) Lag (days): 427 days.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)                            11                      14 
Delay (days)                             17 days   
Reasoning for delay  Delay in the release of administrative data that was needed for the data processing.  


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

All data produced are harmonized with OECD norms and therefore international comparability is ensured.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 or Frascati manual paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).    
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.    
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25    
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).    
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with the  Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).     
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  N/A  
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.18-9.27 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).    
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.3.    
Reference period Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6.    
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method  No deviation  
Survey questionnaire / data collection form No deviation   
Cooperation with respondents No deviation   
Coverage of external funds  No deviation  
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF  No deviation  
Data processing methods  No deviation  
Treatment of non-response  No deviation  
Variance estimation  No deviation  
Method of deriving R&D coefficients  No deviation  
Quality of R&D coefficients    
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  No deviation  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)      
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D personnel (FTE)      
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure      
Source of funds      
Type of costs      
Type of R&D      
Other    2013 R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

All data is collected on a  yearly basis.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
           
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

--

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  
23229151
 1240 1078
Final data (delivered T+18)  
23229151
1234  1072 
Difference (of final data)  0 6 6
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  Internal personnel are not excluded from external personnel and therefore this data is not available. 
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  Internal personnel are not excluded from external personnel and therefore this data is not available. 

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs    
Data collection costs    
Other costs    
Total costs    
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)    
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1    
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)    
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Rannsókna- og þróunarstarf háskólastofnana 2021
Type of survey  Census survey, panel of known or supposed R&D performers
Combination of sample survey and census data  -
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Not applicable.
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)
    Sub-population B (covered by census)
Variables the survey contributes to   The survey contributes to produce information about the main variables and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail as specified in Commission Regulation 2020/1197.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation N/A 
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  Higher education institutions (department level), incl. university hospitals.     
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size 10 (census)    
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame HES sector includes all known R&D performers or potential R&D performers in universities and teaching hospitals. The method used to define the HES population is based  on information from the previous R&D survey (all R&D performing units are surveyed) and information available from the central departments and administration services.     
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source   N/A
Description of collected data / statistics   N/A
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to   N/A
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider   All units.
Description of collected information   The information collected is R&D expenditure and R&D personnel.
All the variables requested by EU Regulation No 2020/1197.
Data collection method  Questionnaire sent to respondents via email.
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  N/A
Realised sample size (per stratum) N/A 
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  Data collected in excel files through email
Incentives used for increasing response No 
Follow-up of non-respondents Yes 
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) No 
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 90% 
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) N/A 
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  R&DQuestionnaireHES
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  


Annexes:
R&DQuestionnaireHES
18.4. Data validation

1) comparison of the responses against the previous year, checking any inconsistencies 
2) checking the outliers in respect to overall distributions

3) If any inconsistencies they are brought up in conversation with respondents

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

10%

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  HES data collected annually. Data available T+10. 
Data compilation method - Preliminary data HES data collected annually. Data available T+10.  
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation.  N/A
Revision policy for the coefficients N/A 
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc). N/A 
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  N/A
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items N/A 
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures N/A 
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”  N/A 
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics N/A 
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  No weighting
Description of the estimation method  Previous year
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top