Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Estonia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Estonia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Economic and Environmental Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

Tatari 51, 10134 Tallinn, Estonia 


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 05/10/2021
2.2. Metadata last posted 05/10/2021
2.3. Metadata last update 05/10/2021


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organised in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and manure management module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1 Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1.

The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry.

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable.

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
The main building for production
The most important parcel by physical size
The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm
Other
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

Within criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding, 'other' means the location which is reported by the holder (on the level of settlement) as the main location of the holding. This information is based on IACS and it is used as additional information while determining the geographical location of the holding.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2001 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in (1,000) heads or LSUs (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWUs (annual working units), standard output in euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

The use of land refers to the reference year 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown.

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period ending on 1 September within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day is 1 September within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 1 September 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 1 September within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day is 1 September within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

Official Statistics Act

Government Regulation "List of Statistical Activities of Statistics Estonia for 2020-2024"

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/506012015002/consolide/current

https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/311022020006 (in Estonian)

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

Official Statistics Act - 2010

Government Regulation "List of Statistical Activities of Statistics Estonia for 2020-2024" - 2020

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Subsection 28 (4) of Official Statistics Act: At the request of a producer of official statistics, controllers of databases shall submit the data collected in the administrative records and databases specified in subsection 29 (1) of this Act.

Section 29 of Official Statistics Act. Use of administrative records and databases

(1) Upon the performance of statistical activities, a producer of official statistics shall primarily use data collected in administrative records and databases as well as data generated or collected in the course of the activities of state and local government authorities, legal persons in public law and private law, if such data allow the performance of statistical activities complying with the quality criteria of official statistics.

(2) A producer of official statistics has the right to make proposals for amending the composition of data and the classifications used in the administrative records and databases, if the coverage of data and the composition, level of detail and quality of data in the administrative records and databases do not allow the production of official statistics complying with the quality criteria of official statistics.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Data that permit direct or indirect identification of a statistical unit, thereby disclosing individual information, are confidential data. 

The treatment of confidential data is regulated by the Procedure for Protection of Data Collected and Processed by Statistics Estonia: http://www.stat.ee/dokumendid/19410.

The producer of official statistics disseminates data collected for the production of official statistics for public use only in a form that precludes the possibility of direct or indirect identification of a statistical unit.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold)
Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total)
Secondary confidentiality rules
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells)
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

The data are published and transmitted without characteristics that permit identification of respondents, and are classified into groups of at least three holdings. Also, the data are not published if the share of data relating to a particular holding in the aggregate data is too high. 

7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
No
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
Removal of variables
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

The dissemination of data collected for the purpose of producing official statistics is guided by the requirements provided for in sections 34 and 35 of the Official Statistics Act.

Scientists can, under special contracts, use confidential microdata for research purposes at the safe centre on Statistics Estonia's premises or through remote access. They can make the analysis but only an employee of Statistics Estonia can send the research results to the user's e-mail address after the disclosure control has been performed. 


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Notifications about the dissemination of statistics are published in the release calendar, which is available on the website.

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.stat.ee/en/calendar

8.3. Release policy - user access

All users have been granted equal access to official statistics: the dissemination dates of official statistics are announced in advance and no user category is provided access to official statistics before other users. Official statistics are first published in the statistical database. If there is also a news release, it is published simultaneously with data in the statistical database. Official statistics are available on the website at 8:00 a.m. on the date announced in the release calendar.

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
Yes, the EU quality rating system
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

The methodology is described in the Integrated farm statistics manual.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Data are disseminated at the national level every 3-4 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

https://www.stat.ee/en/uudised/eesti-pollumajandustootmine-koondub-suurettevotetesse

https://www.stat.ee/en/uudised/pollumajandust-iseloomustab-koondumine-kontsernidesse-ja-osaajatoo

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
No
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
No
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

Not applicable.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

The online data tables of the Farm Structure Survey / Integrated Farm Survey were used 9,852 times during the period 1 January 2020 to 27 June 2021.

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
Yes
10.3.3. Link to online database

https://andmed.stat.ee/en/stat

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

The data serve as input for other statistical activities, such as Crop Production and Economic Accounts for Agriculture.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
Yes
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

The quality report is published on Eurostat's webpage. ESMS metadata are published at https://www.stat.ee/en/find-statistics/methodology-and-quality/esms-metadata/21210.

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable.

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
No
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The quality report is delivered to Eurostat. 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
Yes
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
Training courses
Use of best practices
Quality guidelines
Designated quality manager, quality unit and/or senior level committee
Compliance monitoring
Self-assessment
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

Statistics Estonia is guided by the requirements stipulated in section 7 “Principles and quality criteria of producing official statistics” of the Official Statistics Act.

Statistics Estonia performs all statistical activities according to an international model (Generic Statistical Business Process Model – GSBPM). According to the GSBPM, the final phase of statistical activities is overall evaluation using information gathered in each phase or sub-process; this information can take many forms, including feedback from users, process metadata, system metrics and suggestions from employees. This information is used to prepare the evaluation report which outlines all the quality problems related to the specific statistical activity and serves as input for improvement actions.

11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

Validation rules will be improved, as well as the software for describing questionnaires.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

In general, the data quality is good.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Eurostat performs the consultations with EU-level and international users. At the national level, the main user of these data is the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The Ministry of the Environment is also a user of environment-related data.

12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

The national characteristics are mostly not used in this survey. Still, land use data are collected in more detail than required by the IFS legislation in order to fulfil the requirements of crop statistics legislation. The sown areas of the following crops were surveyed: separately, winter wheat and spring wheat (instead of CLND 004), winter barley and spring barley (instead of CLND 007), field peas and field beans (instead of CLND 015), winter rape and turnip rape and spring rape and turnip rape (instead of CLND 022), fresh vegetables outdoor or under low protective cover and strawberries outdoor or under low protective cover (instead of CLND 043), black fallow and green fallow (instead of CLND 049). These characteristics were added as they are required by Regulation (EC) No 543/2009. The reason is that it is not possible to request the data twice – separately for the IFS and then in more detail for the Crop Production Survey.

12.1.2. Unmet user needs

There is no information about unmet user needs.

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Statistics Estonia conducts reputation and user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
Yes
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

2021

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Satisfied
12.3. Completeness

Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.



Annexes:
13.2.1. Sampling errors - indicators
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

We do not have cases where estimated RSEs are above threshold.

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

Information about the method used for the estimation of relative errors is presented in the annex. 



Annexes:
13.2.3. Formulas applied for estimation methods
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
Low
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings in the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated based on the holdings in the main frame for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Below thresholds during the reference period
Ceased activities
Merged to another unit
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units
Other
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Core indicators were surveyed as a census, no re-weighting was used and therefore ineligible units were just not taken into account when calculating totals.

For modules surveyed through a sample, ineligible units were also not taken into account and weights of all units were recalculated considering the corrected population.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

Under-coverage is estimated to be very low as the quality of the statistical farm register is good (most units are registered in administrative registers).

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Units with outdated information in the frame (variables below thresholds in the frame but above thresholds in the reference period)
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

Under-coverage is estimated to be very low as the statistical farm register is regularly updated on the basis of many sources.

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

Not available.

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
Yes
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

The misclassification error is estimated to be low as all stratification variables are updated before compiling the survey frame.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
Yes
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

The contact error was low as contact data were updated before data collection on the basis of many sources.

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
Low
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

The most difficult questions were MAHM 047 "Net export of slurry/liquid manure from the farm" and MAHM 048 "Net export of solid manure from the farm". The reason is that holders do not have information about these quantities, and if they try to give an estimate, these estimations may not be accurate. The data were checked using the number of livestock, manure coefficients and area of utilised agricultural land. The data were checked also on the aggregated level. 

Difficult questions are also those related to manure storage facilities and capacity (from MAHM 057 to MAHM 070). If there is more than one manure storage facility, it may be difficult to provide the percentages of manure stored in different storage facilities. Data about capacity also seem difficult as holders tend to state the months the manure is actually stored (the time is shorter) and not the capacity.

Information about other major measurement errors is not known. The questionnaires were carefully designed, they were in the electronic format and included several arithmetical and logical checks. The majority of the information was collected by trained interviewers.  

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Complexity of variables
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Pre-testing questionnaire
Pre-filled questions
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
On-line FAQ or Hot-line support for enumerators or respondents
Training of enumerators
Other
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
Low
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

Several validation rules are used during data collection and data processing in order to minimise the risk of measurement errors.

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings in the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated based on the holdings in the main frame for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Failure to make contact with the unit
Refusal to participate
Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence)
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Follow-up interviews
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

The unit non-response rate was very low and no special analysis was made.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Item non-responses cannot exist as only electronic questionnaires were used and they were designed so that it was not possible to proceed without answering the necessary questions. There were only a few cases where respondents were not able/ready to estimate the quantities of exported/imported manure and then a special code was agreed to be inserted in order to be able to continue with the questionnaire.

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

MAHM 047 "Net export of slurry/liquid manure from the farm" and MAHM 048 "Net export of solid manure from the farm".

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Farmers do not know the answer
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
Imputation
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
Low
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

Not available.

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
None
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
Nearest neighbour imputation
Previous data for the same unit
Other
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

Due to several arithmetical and logical checks, it is practically impossible for processing errors to exist in the data.

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

Only specialists from the Data Acquisition and Processing Department and the Economic and Environmental Statistics Department, who were directly involved in data processing, were authorised to make corrections.

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
Low
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

Units were imputed if their lands or livestock were registered in administrative registers. So the most important information used during imputation was the data on crops and livestock (of the same unit) available from the administrative register.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Preliminary results were released on 27 January 2021, i.e. about 1 month from the last day of the reference year. 

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

All results were published at T+5 months. Still, the results will be final only after their final acceptance by Eurostat. 

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

Data are published according to the planned timetable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

There are no differences in the definition of an agricultural holding when compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met

While compiling the frame, the threshold of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 was used. It means that the smallest units were not covered. Approximately 0.7% of utilized agricultural area and 0.3% of livestock units were not covered.

15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

There are no differences between the national threshold and the threshold of agricultural holdings used for the data sent to Eurostat.

Still, within the module "Animal housing and manure management", the topics "Nutrient use and manure on the farm" and "Manure application techniques" covered all holdings, not only those with bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats or poultry.

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

The reason for differences in the coverage of the topics "Nutrient use and manure on the farm" and "Manure application techniques" is that an important part of nutrients are used in holdings without livestock.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

There are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and the EU handbook.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex. 
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job corresponds to one annual work unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual work units are used to calculate the farm work on agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

No national livestock coefficients are used.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

There are no differences between the types of livestock included under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook.

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

In case of reference periods/days, there are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land does not exist
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Not applicable
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable.

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

Not applicable.

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

Not applicable.

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

There are no national standards and rules for certification of organic products that deviate from Council regulation (EC) No 834/2007.

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

There are no differences in methods across regions within the country.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

1

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However, even if fur animals are raised in our country, holdings with only fur animals are not included in our data collection because they do not meet the thresholds. The thresholds for animals are expressed in livestock units (LSU) and fur animals are not associated with LSU coefficients. We did not add thresholds related to fur animals; there is no reason to do so (fur animals do not contribute towards 98% of the total LSU).

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

Due to the changes in thresholds, the smallest holdings are excluded. Therefore, all numbers of holdings are affected. The impact on total utilised agricultural area and number of livestock units is minor, but the impact on some crops and livestock species is remarkable.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

Other livestock n.e.c.

In FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

Livestock units

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

Organic animals

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.

Oil seeds of hemp

In IFS, they are included under “Other oil seed crops” while in FSS 2016 they were included under “Hemp”.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat

Area of vegetables and strawberries grown in rotation with non-horticultural crops  changes by years and there is an increasing trend. The reason is that there is a need to use crop rotation, it also increases yields.

What concerns rye, there is a trend that area of winter cereals is increasing (mainly due to their larger yield). At the same time area of winter cereals depends on the sowing conditions in autumn and weather conditions in winter, there is also a need to follow crop rotation.

The area of other oilseed crops has increased as it includes now also oilseeds of hemp. Area of hemp has increased a lot. Previously it was included under heading Hemp.

There is also a trend that area of aromatic, medicinal and culinary plants increases.

The number of sheep has decreased from 2016 to 2020 and the number of breeding females has decreased as well. Number of sheep and their breeding females has been received from the Register of Agricultural Animals of the Agricultural Registers and Information Board. Data were prefilled into the questionnaires and it was possible to correct them if necessary. Data have been checked with the Agricultural Registers and Information Board and are correct. Due to the IFS threshold, smaller part of the holdings with breeding female sheep may be also below the threshold.

Number of breeding female rabbits has decreased, as number of holdings keeping them has decreased and important part of holdings have finished keeping breeding female rabbits. It is possible that part of the holdings with breeding female rabbits are also below the threshold, but there is a general trend that smaller holdings finish their activity and production concentrates into larger holdings.

Data of other gainful activities directly related to the holding are collected only from natural persons. The number of regular employees having OGA related to the holding is quite small and therefore their changes in percentages may be quite high. The increase is related also to the fact that in 2016 only holdings where sole holders are also the managers were covered, but in 2020 all sole holder holdings were covered.

15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
Partially
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
Yes
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

IFS micro level data were compared to the other data collections in agriculture, namely “Annual Crop Statistics” and “Animal Production Statistics”. The reasons for differences were as follows:

a) related to the differences in units (in IFS, parts of units may be merged);

b) differences with animal production statistics occurred due to the different reference dates.

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

During the process of validation of IFS data, Eurostat made a cross-domain analysis between IFS micro data and Crops and Animals annual statistics, on both relative and absolute terms.

The results of this cross-domain analysis are presented here:

IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in relative terms

Discrepancies were found for variables F0000 fruits, berries and nuts outdoorsI1190 other oil seed crops - outdoor and I9000 other industrial crops n.e.c.

Estonia explained that the areas of fruits and berries are the same in crop statistics and IFS. In crop statistics, F0000 in table 3 refers to the production areas, i.e areas that can potentially be harvested in the reference harvest year (according to the methodology and handbook). All of the non-producing areas such as new plantations that have not yet started to produce, are excluded. In crop statistics, in table 4, under permanent crops, the whole area of permanent crops is taken into account.

What concerns I1190 and I9000, in IFS, I1190 includes both hemp oilseeds and also few other industrial crops of which main part are oilseeds crops, like mustard etc.  IFS data are correct and Estonia has to correct relevant crop statistics tables, i.e to move the hectares of hemp for oil from "other industrial crops n.e.c" to "other oil seed crops".

As regards the cross-domain checks on IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in absolute terms and IFS vs ANIMAL POPULATION in relative terms the checks made did not reveal any value out of threshold.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

Detailed data about crops were collected in order to avoid duplicate data collection in the Crop Production Survey.

In order to reduce costs, all holdings could provide their data electronically. In order to reduce the burden, administrative data were used as much as possible. 

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
Further automation
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

Efficiency gains are related to output tables which were partly compiled by using R software.

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate durations for core and modules.

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules.

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not relevant (data were collected from the administrative register).

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

There are no planned revisions of published data. 

17.2. Data revision - practice

There are no planned revisions of published data.  

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18. Timetable_statistical_process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

Statistical Farm Register

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Continuous
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Not applicable
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Sample
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

The stratification variables were standard output, type of farming and type of production (organic/conventional), same as in FSS 2016.

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Stratified one-stage random sampling
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Unit size
Unit specialization
Other
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
No
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Within the full coverage strata were holdings with: a) SO >= 100,000 euros; b) farming types 2 and 3 and SO >= 25,000 euros; c) farming type 5 and SO >= 4,000 euros; d) farming type 9; e) new holdings.

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

The sample size was decided on the basis of the relevant analysis made using FSS 2016 data.

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Proportional allocation
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Sample
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

The same sample was used as for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities". Only the data of holdings that have cattle, pigs, sheep, goats or poultry are sent to Eurostat.

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Stratified one-stage random sampling
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Unit size
Unit specialization
Other
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
No
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

Within the full coverage strata were holdings with: a) SO >= 100,000 euros; b) farming types 2 and 3 and SO >= 25,000 euros; c) farming type 5 and SO >= 4,000 euros; d) farming type 9; e) new holdings.

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

The sample size was decided on the basis of the relevant analysis made using FSS 2016 data.

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Proportional allocation
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

The software tool used for sample selection was SAS.

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
None
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches and the quality methods applied is available on Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. 

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Telephone, electronic version
Use of Internet
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Not applicable
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in the annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3. Questionnaire in English
18.3.3. Questionnaire in Estonian
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Data format checks
Completeness checks
Range checks
Relational checks
Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection
Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
Interviewers
Supervisors
Staff from central department
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

Validation rules were used in the questionnaires and within special data processing software. Additional validations were done through special queries.

18.5. Data compilation

The weights of the module's sample were adjusted for non-response. Holdings outside the scope (over-coverage) were not taken into account.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

For core variables (like UAA etc.), the unweighted imputation rate was 1.9%. The total number of agricultural holdings was 11,369 and the number of units that did not respond to the questionnaire was 212. While imputing data on land and animals, the current year’s administrative data on these holdings were used.

For variables in the sample-based modules, the unweighted imputation rate was only 0.4%. The total size of the modules was 4,798 and imputation was used only for units which belong to the 100% stratum and which did not respond to the questionnaire. The number of such holdings was 20.

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Non-response adjustment
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

SO – Standard output

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top