|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Statistics Estonia |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Economic and Environmental Statistics Department |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Tatari 51, 10134 Tallinn, Estonia |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 05/10/2021 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 05/10/2021 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 05/10/2021 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications. The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding. The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:
|
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups: - A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops - A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops - A.01.3: Plant propagation - A.01.4: Animal production - A.01.5: Mixed farming or - The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity. Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex. Annexes: 3.6.1 Thresholds of agricultural holdings |
|||
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1. The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020. |
|||
3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management” | |||
The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding | |||
The main building for production The most important parcel by physical size The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm Other |
|||
3.7.4. Additional information reference area | |||
Within criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding, 'other' means the location which is reported by the holder (on the level of settlement) as the main location of the holding. This information is based on IACS and it is used as additional information while determining the geographical location of the holding. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2001 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports). |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output. |
|
|||
Two kinds of units are generally used:
|
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
5.1. Reference period for land variables | |||
The use of land refers to the reference year 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown. |
|||
5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices | |||
The 12-month period ending on 1 September within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing | |||
The reference day is 1 September within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management | |||
The 12-month period ending on 1 September 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing. |
|||
5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force | |||
The 12-month period ending on 1 September within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures | |||
The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020. |
|||
5.7. Reference day for all other variables | |||
The reference day is 1 September within the reference year 2020. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements | |||
Legal act | |||
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
Official Statistics Act Government Regulation "List of Statistical Activities of Statistics Estonia for 2020-2024" |
|||
6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements | |||
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/506012015002/consolide/current https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/311022020006 (in Estonian) |
|||
6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
Official Statistics Act - 2010 Government Regulation "List of Statistical Activities of Statistics Estonia for 2020-2024" - 2020 |
|||
6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents | |||
Yes | |||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Subsection 28 (4) of Official Statistics Act: At the request of a producer of official statistics, controllers of databases shall submit the data collected in the administrative records and databases specified in subsection 29 (1) of this Act. Section 29 of Official Statistics Act. Use of administrative records and databases (1) Upon the performance of statistical activities, a producer of official statistics shall primarily use data collected in administrative records and databases as well as data generated or collected in the course of the activities of state and local government authorities, legal persons in public law and private law, if such data allow the performance of statistical activities complying with the quality criteria of official statistics. (2) A producer of official statistics has the right to make proposals for amending the composition of data and the classifications used in the administrative records and databases, if the coverage of data and the composition, level of detail and quality of data in the administrative records and databases do not allow the production of official statistics complying with the quality criteria of official statistics. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Data that permit direct or indirect identification of a statistical unit, thereby disclosing individual information, are confidential data. The treatment of confidential data is regulated by the Procedure for Protection of Data Collected and Processed by Statistics Estonia: http://www.stat.ee/dokumendid/19410. The producer of official statistics disseminates data collected for the production of official statistics for public use only in a form that precludes the possibility of direct or indirect identification of a statistical unit. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1. Aggregated data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells | |||
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold) Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total) Secondary confidentiality rules |
|||
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells | |||
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells) | |||
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods | |||
The data are published and transmitted without characteristics that permit identification of respondents, and are classified into groups of at least three holdings. Also, the data are not published if the share of data relating to a particular holding in the aggregate data is too high. |
|||
7.2.2. Microdata | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination | |||
No | |||
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation | |||
Removal of variables | |||
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology | |||
The dissemination of data collected for the purpose of producing official statistics is guided by the requirements provided for in sections 34 and 35 of the Official Statistics Act. Scientists can, under special contracts, use confidential microdata for research purposes at the safe centre on Statistics Estonia's premises or through remote access. They can make the analysis but only an employee of Statistics Estonia can send the research results to the user's e-mail address after the disclosure control has been performed. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
Notifications about the dissemination of statistics are published in the release calendar, which is available on the website. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
All users have been granted equal access to official statistics: the dissemination dates of official statistics are announced in advance and no user category is provided access to official statistics before other users. Official statistics are first published in the statistical database. If there is also a news release, it is published simultaneously with data in the statistical database. Official statistics are available on the website at 8:00 a.m. on the date announced in the release calendar. |
|||
8.3.1. Use of quality rating system | |||
Yes, the EU quality rating system | |||
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system | |||
The methodology is described in the Integrated farm statistics manual. |
|
|||
Data are disseminated at the national level every 3-4 years. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
Yes | |||
10.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
https://www.stat.ee/en/uudised/eesti-pollumajandustootmine-koondub-suurettevotetesse https://www.stat.ee/en/uudised/pollumajandust-iseloomustab-koondumine-kontsernidesse-ja-osaajatoo |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.2.1. Production of paper publications | |||
No | |||
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications | |||
No | |||
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
The online data tables of the Farm Structure Survey / Integrated Farm Survey were used 9,852 times during the period 1 January 2020 to 27 June 2021. |
|||
10.3.2. Accessibility of online database | |||
Yes | |||
10.3.3. Link to online database | |||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata | |||
Yes | |||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
The data serve as input for other statistical activities, such as Crop Production and Economic Accounts for Agriculture. |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata | |||
The quality report is published on Eurostat's webpage. ESMS metadata are published at https://www.stat.ee/en/find-statistics/methodology-and-quality/esms-metadata/21210. |
|||
10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology | |||
No | |||
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers | |||
No | |||
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
The quality report is delivered to Eurostat. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Quality management system | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures | |||
Training courses Use of best practices Quality guidelines Designated quality manager, quality unit and/or senior level committee Compliance monitoring Self-assessment |
|||
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures | |||
Statistics Estonia is guided by the requirements stipulated in section 7 “Principles and quality criteria of producing official statistics” of the Official Statistics Act. Statistics Estonia performs all statistical activities according to an international model (Generic Statistical Business Process Model – GSBPM). According to the GSBPM, the final phase of statistical activities is overall evaluation using information gathered in each phase or sub-process; this information can take many forms, including feedback from users, process metadata, system metrics and suggestions from employees. This information is used to prepare the evaluation report which outlines all the quality problems related to the specific statistical activity and serves as input for improvement actions. |
|||
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures | |||
Validation rules will be improved, as well as the software for describing questionnaires. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
In general, the data quality is good. |
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
Eurostat performs the consultations with EU-level and international users. At the national level, the main user of these data is the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The Ministry of the Environment is also a user of environment-related data. |
|||
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes | |||
The national characteristics are mostly not used in this survey. Still, land use data are collected in more detail than required by the IFS legislation in order to fulfil the requirements of crop statistics legislation. The sown areas of the following crops were surveyed: separately, winter wheat and spring wheat (instead of CLND 004), winter barley and spring barley (instead of CLND 007), field peas and field beans (instead of CLND 015), winter rape and turnip rape and spring rape and turnip rape (instead of CLND 022), fresh vegetables outdoor or under low protective cover and strawberries outdoor or under low protective cover (instead of CLND 043), black fallow and green fallow (instead of CLND 049). These characteristics were added as they are required by Regulation (EC) No 543/2009. The reason is that it is not possible to request the data twice – separately for the IFS and then in more detail for the Crop Production Survey. |
|||
12.1.2. Unmet user needs | |||
There is no information about unmet user needs. |
|||
12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Statistics Estonia conducts reputation and user satisfaction surveys. |
|||
12.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
Yes | |||
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
2021 |
|||
12.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
Satisfied | |||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
See categories below. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex. Annexes: 13.2.1. Sampling errors - indicators |
|||
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
We do not have cases where estimated RSEs are above threshold. |
|||
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors | |||
Information about the method used for the estimation of relative errors is presented in the annex. Annexes: 13.2.3. Formulas applied for estimation methods |
|||
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted. Annexes: 13.3.1.1. Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate |
|||
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Below thresholds during the reference period Ceased activities Merged to another unit |
|||
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error | |||
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units Other |
|||
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error | |||
Core indicators were surveyed as a census, no re-weighting was used and therefore ineligible units were just not taken into account when calculating totals. For modules surveyed through a sample, ineligible units were also not taken into account and weights of all units were recalculated considering the corrected population. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not requested. |
|||
13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate | |||
Under-coverage is estimated to be very low as the quality of the statistical farm register is good (most units are registered in administrative registers). |
|||
13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Units with outdated information in the frame (variables below thresholds in the frame but above thresholds in the reference period) | |||
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error | |||
Under-coverage is estimated to be very low as the statistical farm register is regularly updated on the basis of many sources. |
|||
13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error | |||
Not available. |
|||
13.3.1.4. Misclassification error | |||
Yes | |||
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error | |||
The misclassification error is estimated to be low as all stratification variables are updated before compiling the survey frame. |
|||
13.3.1.5. Contact error | |||
Yes | |||
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error | |||
The contact error was low as contact data were updated before data collection on the basis of many sources. |
|||
13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors | |||
The most difficult questions were MAHM 047 "Net export of slurry/liquid manure from the farm" and MAHM 048 "Net export of solid manure from the farm". The reason is that holders do not have information about these quantities, and if they try to give an estimate, these estimations may not be accurate. The data were checked using the number of livestock, manure coefficients and area of utilised agricultural land. The data were checked also on the aggregated level. Difficult questions are also those related to manure storage facilities and capacity (from MAHM 057 to MAHM 070). If there is more than one manure storage facility, it may be difficult to provide the percentages of manure stored in different storage facilities. Data about capacity also seem difficult as holders tend to state the months the manure is actually stored (the time is shorter) and not the capacity. Information about other major measurement errors is not known. The questionnaires were carefully designed, they were in the electronic format and included several arithmetical and logical checks. The majority of the information was collected by trained interviewers. |
|||
13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors | |||
Complexity of variables | |||
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error | |||
Pre-testing questionnaire Pre-filled questions Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents On-line FAQ or Hot-line support for enumerators or respondents Training of enumerators Other |
|||
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error | |||
Several validation rules are used during data collection and data processing in order to minimise the risk of measurement errors. |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted. |
|||
13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response | |||
Failure to make contact with the unit Refusal to participate Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence) |
|||
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Reminders Imputation |
|||
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis | |||
The unit non-response rate was very low and no special analysis was made. |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
Item non-responses cannot exist as only electronic questionnaires were used and they were designed so that it was not possible to proceed without answering the necessary questions. There were only a few cases where respondents were not able/ready to estimate the quantities of exported/imported manure and then a special code was agreed to be inserted in order to be able to continue with the questionnaire. |
|||
13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate | |||
MAHM 047 "Net export of slurry/liquid manure from the farm" and MAHM 048 "Net export of solid manure from the farm". |
|||
13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response | |||
Farmers do not know the answer | |||
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response | |||
Imputation | |||
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error | |||
Not available. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors | |||
None | |||
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods | |||
Nearest neighbour imputation Previous data for the same unit Other |
|||
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors | |||
Due to several arithmetical and logical checks, it is practically impossible for processing errors to exist in the data. |
|||
13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections | |||
Only specialists from the Data Acquisition and Processing Department and the Economic and Environmental Statistics Department, who were directly involved in data processing, were authorised to make corrections. |
|||
13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error | |||
Units were imputed if their lands or livestock were registered in administrative registers. So the most important information used during imputation was the data on crops and livestock (of the same unit) available from the administrative register. |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
Preliminary results were released on 27 January 2021, i.e. about 1 month from the last day of the reference year. |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
All results were published at T+5 months. Still, the results will be final only after their final acceptance by Eurostat. |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery | |||
Not requested. |
|||
14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication | |||
Data are published according to the planned timetable. |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics. |
|||
15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
There are no differences in the definition of an agricultural holding when compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. |
|||
15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met | |||
While compiling the frame, the threshold of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 was used. It means that the smallest units were not covered. Approximately 0.7% of utilized agricultural area and 0.3% of livestock units were not covered. |
|||
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat | |||
There are no differences between the national threshold and the threshold of agricultural holdings used for the data sent to Eurostat. Still, within the module "Animal housing and manure management", the topics "Nutrient use and manure on the farm" and "Manure application techniques" covered all holdings, not only those with bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats or poultry. |
|||
15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences | |||
The reason for differences in the coverage of the topics "Nutrient use and manure on the farm" and "Manure application techniques" is that an important part of nutrients are used in holdings without livestock. |
|||
15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook | |||
There are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and the EU handbook. |
|||
15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job | |||
The information is available in the annex. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.1. AWU |
|||
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers | |||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||
15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups | |||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||
15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients | |||
No national livestock coefficients are used. |
|||
15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.” | |||
There are no differences between the types of livestock included under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook. |
|||
15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.5. Reference periods/days | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
In case of reference periods/days, there are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. |
|||
15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.6. Common land | |||
The concept of common land does not exist | |||
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 | |||
There are no national standards and rules for certification of organic products that deviate from Council regulation (EC) No 834/2007. |
|||
15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country | |||
There are no differences in methods across regions within the country. |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
1 |
|||
15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.2.2. Description of changes | |||
Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However, even if fur animals are raised in our country, holdings with only fur animals are not included in our data collection because they do not meet the thresholds. The thresholds for animals are expressed in livestock units (LSU) and fur animals are not associated with LSU coefficients. We did not add thresholds related to fur animals; there is no reason to do so (fur animals do not contribute towards 98% of the total LSU). |
|||
15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission | |||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.3.2. Description of changes | |||
Due to the changes in thresholds, the smallest holdings are excluded. Therefore, all numbers of holdings are affected. The impact on total utilised agricultural area and number of livestock units is minor, but the impact on some crops and livestock species is remarkable. |
|||
15.2.4. Geographical coverage | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.4.2. Description of changes | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.5.2. Description of changes | |||
Legal personality of the agricultural holding In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings. Other livestock n.e.c. In FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c." Livestock units In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001. Organic animals While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included. Oil seeds of hemp In IFS, they are included under “Other oil seed crops” while in FSS 2016 they were included under “Hemp”. |
|||
15.2.6. Reference periods/days | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.6.2. Description of changes | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.2.7. Common land | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.7.2. Description of changes | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
Area of vegetables and strawberries grown in rotation with non-horticultural crops changes by years and there is an increasing trend. The reason is that there is a need to use crop rotation, it also increases yields. |
|||
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time | |||
Partially | |||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture. |
|||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts. |
|||
15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level | |||
Yes | |||
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level | |||
IFS micro level data were compared to the other data collections in agriculture, namely “Annual Crop Statistics” and “Animal Production Statistics”. The reasons for differences were as follows: a) related to the differences in units (in IFS, parts of units may be merged); b) differences with animal production statistics occurred due to the different reference dates. |
|||
15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level | |||
Yes | |||
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level | |||
During the process of validation of IFS data, Eurostat made a cross-domain analysis between IFS micro data and Crops and Animals annual statistics, on both relative and absolute terms. The results of this cross-domain analysis are presented here: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in relative terms Discrepancies were found for variables F0000 fruits, berries and nuts outdoors, I1190 other oil seed crops - outdoor and I9000 other industrial crops n.e.c. Estonia explained that the areas of fruits and berries are the same in crop statistics and IFS. In crop statistics, F0000 in table 3 refers to the production areas, i.e areas that can potentially be harvested in the reference harvest year (according to the methodology and handbook). All of the non-producing areas such as new plantations that have not yet started to produce, are excluded. In crop statistics, in table 4, under permanent crops, the whole area of permanent crops is taken into account. What concerns I1190 and I9000, in IFS, I1190 includes both hemp oilseeds and also few other industrial crops of which main part are oilseeds crops, like mustard etc. IFS data are correct and Estonia has to correct relevant crop statistics tables, i.e to move the hectares of hemp for oil from "other industrial crops n.e.c" to "other oil seed crops". As regards the cross-domain checks on IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in absolute terms and IFS vs ANIMAL POPULATION in relative terms the checks made did not reveal any value out of threshold. |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics | |||
Detailed data about crops were collected in order to avoid duplicate data collection in the Crop Production Survey. In order to reduce costs, all holdings could provide their data electronically. In order to reduce the burden, administrative data were used as much as possible. |
|||
16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
Further automation | |||
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains | |||
Efficiency gains are related to output tables which were partly compiled by using R software. |
|||
16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes) | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.3.1. Core | |||
The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate durations for core and modules. |
|||
16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘ | |||
The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules. |
|||
16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’ | |||
Not relevant (data were collected from the administrative register). |
|||
16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’ | |||
The average duration of collection of the IFS 2020 questionnaire was 30 minutes. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules. |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
There are no planned revisions of published data. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
There are no planned revisions of published data. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
|||
Annexes: 18. Timetable_statistical_process |
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1. Population frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1.1. Type of frame | |||
List frame | |||
18.1.1.2. Name of frame | |||
Statistical Farm Register |
|||
18.1.1.3. Update frequency | |||
Continuous | |||
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.2.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Sample | |||
18.1.4.2. Sampling design | |||
The stratification variables were standard output, type of farming and type of production (organic/conventional), same as in FSS 2016. |
|||
18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Stratified one-stage random sampling | |||
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Unit size Unit specialization Other |
|||
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
No | |||
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Within the full coverage strata were holdings with: a) SO >= 100,000 euros; b) farming types 2 and 3 and SO >= 25,000 euros; c) farming type 5 and SO >= 4,000 euros; d) farming type 9; e) new holdings. |
|||
18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
The sample size was decided on the basis of the relevant analysis made using FSS 2016 data. |
|||
18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Proportional allocation | |||
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5. Module “Rural development” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.5.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Sample | |||
18.1.6.2. Sampling design | |||
The same sample was used as for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities". Only the data of holdings that have cattle, pigs, sheep, goats or poultry are sent to Eurostat. |
|||
18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Stratified one-stage random sampling | |||
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Unit size Unit specialization Other |
|||
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
No | |||
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Within the full coverage strata were holdings with: a) SO >= 100,000 euros; b) farming types 2 and 3 and SO >= 25,000 euros; c) farming type 5 and SO >= 4,000 euros; d) farming type 9; e) new holdings. |
|||
18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
The sample size was decided on the basis of the relevant analysis made using FSS 2016 data. |
|||
18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Proportional allocation | |||
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection | |||
The software tool used for sample selection was SAS. |
|||
18.1.13. Administrative sources | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them | |||
The information is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annex. Annexes: 18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources |
|||
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used | |||
None | |||
18.1.14. Innovative approaches | |||
The information on innovative approaches and the quality methods applied is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.3.1. Methods of data collection | |||
Telephone, electronic version Use of Internet |
|||
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.3.3. Questionnaire | |||
Please find the questionnaire in the annex. Annexes: 18.3.3. Questionnaire in English 18.3.3. Questionnaire in Estonian |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.4.1. Type of validation checks | |||
Data format checks Completeness checks Range checks Relational checks Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics |
|||
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation | |||
Interviewers Supervisors Staff from central department |
|||
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation | |||
Validation rules were used in the questionnaires and within special data processing software. Additional validations were done through special queries. |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
The weights of the module's sample were adjusted for non-response. Holdings outside the scope (over-coverage) were not taken into account. |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
For core variables (like UAA etc.), the unweighted imputation rate was 1.9%. The total number of agricultural holdings was 11,369 and the number of units that did not respond to the questionnaire was 212. While imputing data on land and animals, the current year’s administrative data on these holdings were used. For variables in the sample-based modules, the unweighted imputation rate was only 0.4%. The total size of the modules was 4,798 and imputation was used only for units which belong to the 100% stratum and which did not respond to the questionnaire. The number of such holdings was 20. |
|||
18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor | |||
Non-response adjustment | |||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Covered under Data compilation. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
19.1. List of abbreviations | |||
CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CAPI – Computer Assisted Personal Interview CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview FSS – Farm Structure Survey IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics LSU – Livestock units NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview SO – Standard output UAA – Utilised agricultural area |
|||
19.2. Additional comments | |||
No additional comments. |
|
|||
|
|||