ICT usage in enterprises (isoc_e)

National Reference Metadata in SIMS structure for INFOSOC Enterprises

Compiling agency: National Bureau of Statistics


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Bureau of Statistics

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department of education, culture and information society

1.5. Contact mail address

Branimirova 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/02/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/02/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 27/02/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) usage and e-commerce in enterprises are survey data. They are collected by the National Statistical Institutes or Ministries and are in principle based on Eurostat's annual model questionnaires on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

Large part of the data collected is used to measure the progress in the implementation of one of the main political priorities of the European Commission for 2019 to 2024 – A Europe fit for the digital age. Part of this is the "European strategy for data", envisioning a single market for data to ensure the EU's global competitiveness and data sovereignty, in which context a comprehensive set of new rules for all digital services was proposed: the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, which are centrepieces of the EU digital strategy. Furthermore, the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy presented a new “EU cybersecurity strategy”, which is intended to bolster the EU's collective resilience against cyber threats, safeguard a global and open internet and protect EU values and the fundamental rights of its people. Furthermore, data will allow monitoring the progress towards  A Europe fit for the digital age, one of the six priorities for the period 2019-2024 of the von der Leyen European Commission.

The aim of the European survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises is to collect and disseminate harmonised and comparable information at European level.

 

Name of data collection

Primjena informacijskih i komunikacijskih tehnologija u poduzećima

ICT usage and E-commerce in enterprises

3.2. Classification system

 NACE Rev.2 2008

3.3. Coverage - sector

All economic activities in the scope of Annex I of the Commission Regulation are intended to be included in the general survey, covering enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons. These activities are: NACE Rev. 2 sections C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M and N, division 95.1.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.3.1. Coverage-sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - All NACE Rev. 2 categories are covered
3.3.2. Coverage sector economic activity for micro-enterprises - If not all activities were covered, which ones were covered?

Micro-enterprises are not in the scope of the survey.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The model questionnaire on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides a large variety of variables covering among others the following areas:

-          Access to and use of the Internet

-          E-commerce and e-business

-          Use of cloud computing services

-          Artificial Intelligence

-          Other topics: Data utilisation, sharing, analytics and trading, Invoicing.

The annual model questionnaires and the European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises comprise definitions and explanations regarding the topics of the survey.

3.5. Statistical unit

Enterprise

3.6. Statistical population

Target Population

As required by Annex of the Commission Implementing Regulation, enterprises with 10 or more employees and self-employed persons shall be covered by the survey.

For micro-enterprises see the sub-concepts below.

3.6.1. Coverage of micro-enterprises
No
3.6.2. Breakdown between size classes [0 to 1] and [2 to 9]
No
3.6.3. If for micro-enterprises different size delimitation was used, please indicate it.

Not applicable.

3.7. Reference area

Whole territory of the country is covered. Data for a specific set of variables were delivered on NUTS 2 regional level.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Years 2023 and 2024.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable


4. Unit of measure Top

Percentages of enterprises, Percentages of turnover, Percentages of employees and self-employed persons, Million euro.


5. Reference Period Top

Referenced year is 2023, except for e-commerce questions which are referenced to 2022.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Complementary national legislation constituting the legal basis for the survey on the use of ICT in enterprises:

National law on Statistics, 2020

Program of statistical activities of the Republic of Croatia 2021-2027, 2023



Annexes:
National law on Statistics
Program of statistical activities
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Data sharing procedure is established with International Telecommunication Union.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

At national level : 

Confidentiality protocol is the one used in SBS survey. If there are less than 3 enterprises within particular aggregate, data is considered confidential.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data are transmitted via eDamis (encrypted) and delivered to a secure environment where they are treated. Flags are added for confidentiality in case results must not be disclosed.

At national level : 

If there are less than 3 enterprises within particular aggregate, data is considered confidential.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

There is a release calendar and is publicly available at CBS website.



Annexes:
Release calendar
8.2. Release calendar access

Release calendar is publicly available at CBS website.



Annexes:
Release calendar
8.3. Release policy - user access

Not available.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not available.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Publication on ICT data for 2023 will be released on 06/12/2023. 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See detailed section 10.3.1.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Results for selected variables collected in the framework of this survey are available for all participating countries on Digital economy and society of Eurostat website.

At national level :

Not available.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not available.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not requested

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Not publicly available.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not publicly available.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The European businesses statistics compliers’ manual for ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises provides guidelines and standards for the implementation of the surveys. It is updated every year according to the changed contents of the model questionnaires.

At national level :

The Methodological Manual provides guidelines and standards for the implementation of the surveys in the Member States. It is updated every year according to the changed contents of the model questionnaires. The methodological manual is provided to CBS staff before survey conduct. Quality assurance procedures described in manual are strictly followed through training courses and use of best practices.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

European level :

At European level, the recommended use of the annual Eurostat model questionnaire aims at improving comparability of the results among the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Moreover, the Methodological Manual provides guidelines and clarifications for the implementation of the surveys.

National level :

Quality management is currently work in progress. There are several ongoing projects through which quality management system will be developed. Pilot programme is completed resulting in development of quality indicators database for different statistical domains within NSI. Goal is to link several different sources of data to create unified data source for quality indicators and metadata information.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

European level : 

At European level, European Commission users (e.g. DG CNECT, DG GROW, DG JUST, DG REGIO, DG JRC) are the principal users of the data on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises and contribute in identifying/defining the topics to be covered. Hence, main users are consulted regularly (at hearings, task forces, ad hoc meetings) for their needs and are involved in the process of the development of the model questionnaires at a very early stage.

User needs are considered throughout the whole discussion process of the model questionnaires aiming at providing relevant statistical data for monitoring and benchmarking of European policies.

National level :

Central agency for Development of Digital Society

Ministry of Regional Development and EU funds

Researchers

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

European level : 

At European level, contacts within the Commission, the OECD and other stakeholders give a clear picture about the key users' satisfaction as to the following data quality aspects: accuracy and reliability of results, timeliness, satisfactory accessibility, clarity and comparability over time and between countries, completeness and relevance. Overall users have evaluated positively (good, very good) the data quality on the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises.

National level :

At present moment, there are no tools to measure user satisfaction.

12.3. Completeness

Detailed information is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested. 


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Comments on reliability and representativeness of results and completeness of dataset

These comments reflect overall standard errors reported for the indicators and breakdowns in section 13.2.1 (Sampling error - indicators) and the rest of the breakdowns for national and European aggregates, as well as other accuracy measurements. The estimated standard error should not exceed 2pp for the overall proportions and should not exceed 5pp for the proportions related to the different subgroups of the population (for those NACE aggregates for the calculation and dissemination of national aggregates). If problems were found, these could have implications for future surveys (e.g. need to improve sampling design, to increase sample sizes, to increase the response rates).

More detailed information is available in “ Annex II. _ Accuracy “ excel file - related to European aggregates, comments on reliability and use of flag.

13.2. Sampling error

For calculation of the standard error see 13.2.1.1.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Standard error (for selected indicators and breakdowns)

Precision measures related to variability due to sampling, unit non-response (the size of the subset of respondents is smaller than the size of the original sample) and other (imputation for item non-response, calibration etc.) are not (yet) required from the Member states for all indicators.  Eurostat will make basic assumptions to compute these measures for all indicators produced (e.g. stratified random sampling assuming as strata the crossing of the variables “Number of employees and self-employed persons” and “Economic Activity” as it was defined in the 3 tables of section 18.1).

More detailed information is available in“ Sample and standard error tables 2023 “ excel file – worksheets starting with “Standard error".

13.2.1.1. Sampling error indicator calculation

Calculation of the standard error

Various methods can be used for the calculation of the standard error for an estimated proportion. The aim is to incorporate into the standard error the sampling variability but also variability due to unit non-response, item non-response (imputation), calibration etc. In case of census / take-all strata, the aim is to calculate the standard errors comprising the variability due to unit non-response and item non-response.

a) Name and brief description of the applied estimation approach
 Taylor linearisation approach was used, incorporated in SAS surveymeans procedure.

 

b) Basic formula
  See statistical computation section of SURVEYMEANS procedure in SAS user's guide, available at URL provided in annex.

 

c) Main reference in the literature
 Cochran, W. G. (1977), Sampling Techniques, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons.

 

d) How has the stratification been taken into account? 
 Stratification was taken into account by listing the strata in the SURVEYMEANS procedure (STRATA statement).

 

e) Which strata have been considered? 
 Enterprise size and NACE activity groups.
13.3. Non-sampling error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See concept 18.1.1. A) Description of  frame population.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Over-coverage rate is 0,8%.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested

13.3.2. Measurement error

No errors were found.

13.3.3. Non response error

See detailed sections below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See detailed sub-concepts below.

13.3.3.1.1. Unit response

The following table contains the number of units (i.e. enterprises), by type of response to the survey and by the percentage of these values in relation to the gross sample size.

 

Type of response Enterprises
0-9 employees and self-employed persons 10 or more employees and self-employed persons
Number % Number %
Gross sample size (as in section 3.1 C)   100% 4498  100%
1. Response (questionnaires returned by the enterprise)     2924  65,0% 
1.1 Used for tabulation and grossing up (Net sample or Final Sample; as in section 3.1 D)     2840  63,1% 
1.2 Not used for tabulation     84  1,9% 
1.2.1 Out of scope (deaths, misclassified originally in the target population, etc.)     35  0,8% 
1.2.2 Other reasons (e.g. unusable questionnaire)     49  1,1% 
2. Non-response (e.g. non returned mail, returned mail by post office)     1574  35,0% 

 

Comments on unit response, if unit response is below 60%
Not applicable.
13.3.3.1.2. Methods used for minimizing unit non-response

Advance notifications were sent to all enterprises by e-mail and by postal service before the start of the data collection. Reminders were sent by e-mail to enterprises which did not complete the questionnaire. Reminders were sent 4 times. Non-responders were also tried to be contacted by telephone.

13.3.3.1.3. Methods used for unit non-response treatment
1. No treatment for unit non-response  
2. Treatment by re-weighting
2.1 Re-weighting by the sampling design strata considering that non-response is ignorable inside each stratum (the naïve model)  X
2.2 Re-weighting by identified response homogeneity groups (created using sample-level information)  
2.3 Re-weighting through calibration/post-stratification (performed using population information) by the groups used for calibration/post-stratification  X
3. Treatment by imputation (done distinctly for each variable/item)  
4. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of unit non-response. (e.g. Re-weighting using Horvitz-Thompson estimator, ratio estimator or regression estimator, auxiliary variables )
Not available.
13.3.3.1.4. Assessment of unit non-response bias

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Item non-response rate was 0,9%.

13.3.3.2.1. Methods used for item non-response treatment
1. No treatment for item non-response  
2. Deductive imputation
An exact value can be derived as a known function of other characteristics.
 X
3. Deterministic imputation (e.g. mean/median, mean/median by class, ratio-based, regression-based, single donor nearest-neighbour)
Deterministic imputation leads to estimators with no random component, that is, if the imputation were to be re-conducted, the outcome would be the same
 
4. Random imputation (e.g. hot-deck, cold-deck)
Random imputation leads to estimators with a random component, that is, if the imputation were re-conducted, it would have led to a different result
 
5. Re-weighting  
6. Multiple imputation
In multiple imputation each missing value is replaced (instead of a single value) with a set of plausible values that represent the uncertainty of the right value to impute. Multiple imputation methods offer the possibility of deriving variance estimators by taking imputation into account. The incorporation of imputation into the variance can be easily derived based on variability of estimates among the multiply imputed data sets.
 
7. Method(s) and the model(s) corresponding to the above or other method(s) used for the treatment of item non-response.
Item non-response was very small. In rare cases when enterprises did not respond to some question, missing variables were deducted by known variables, if possible. If deduction was not possible enterprises were contacted to provide missing data. Cases included in this treatment cover submission of incomplete web questionnaires and in very rare instances paper questionnaires.
13.3.3.2.2. Questions or items with item response rates below 90% and other comments

Other comments relating to the item non-response

Additional issues concerning "non-response" calculation (e.g. method used in national publications).
Not available.

 

Questions and items with low response rates (cut-off value is 90% ) and item non-response rate.
 No items were found to have response rates below 0,90. 
13.3.4. Processing error

No errors were found.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See detailed section below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

European level : 

Data are to be delivered to Eurostat in the fourth quarter of the reference year (due date for the finalised dataset is 5th October). European results are released before the end of the survey year or in the beginning of the year following the survey year (T=reference year, T+0 for indicators referring to the current year, T+12 months for other indicators referring to the previous year e.g. e-commerce).

At national level : 

Data are to be delivered to Eurostat in the fourth quarter of the reference year (due date for the finalised dataset is 5th October). European results are released before the end of the survey year or in the beginning of the year following the survey year (T=reference year, T+0 for indicators referring to the current year, T+10 months for other indicators referring to the previous year e.g. e-commerce).

14.2. Punctuality

 See detailed section below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Data was delivered on 9th October.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

The model questionnaire is generally used by the countries that conduct the survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Due to (small) differences in translation, in the used survey vehicle, in non-response treatment or different routing through the questionnaire, some results for some countries may be of reduced comparability. In these cases, notes are added in the data.

Detailed information on differences in the wording of the questions in the national questionnaires is available in “ Annex I _ Completeness “ excel file - related to questionnaire, coverage, additional questions.

Data for specific set of variables were delivered on NUTS 2 regional level. There is no problem of comparability across the country’s regions.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable

15.2. Comparability - over time

See section below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The length of comparable time series depends on the module and the variable considered within each survey module. Additional information is available in annexes attached to the European metadata.

There were no changes in the survey since implementation of SU enterprise.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

 Not applicable

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not applicable


16. Cost and Burden Top
Restricted from publication


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Although the CBS employees make maximum efforts to reduce errors prior to the data release, some might occur occasionally. It is important to preserve the confidence in the official statistics, as well as in the CBS as the institution whose highest goal is dissemination of official statistics. For that reason, it is crucial that the CBS acknowledges and documents the error, and that a candid and professional explanation is given.

Given that there is a high risk of users retrieving and using the data before errors have been detected and corrected, the errors must be published in the shortest period possible, and users must be enabled to see clearly what has been corrected.

Having all of this in mind, corrections of material errors in the CBS statistics shall always be indicated with a note pointing out the amendments and that the incorrect data released must not in any case be replaced with the revised version without providing prior access to both versions. This note must never be removed. If errors occur in larger publications (this includes all except First Releases), the CBS is obliged to issue a list of all required corrections (corrigenda) which clearly indicates which publication has an error and where exactly the amends have been made: on which pages of the original publication and in which tables. The corrigenda are published in an electronic format together with the publication. If they are available on the CBS website, they will be accompanied by a notice stressing it being a case of a revised version, and the release date of the corrections. Printed corrigenda are inserted into the printed publications available for sale, and to all copies of publications available for use in the CBS library.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Procedures for handling errors of the released data are adapted to the gravity of error. Excluding proofing/printing errors, the basic procedure following detection of an error is as follows:

1. a correction of a detected error, and reissuing the data/publications or corrigenda only in case of a larger publication on the CBS website in shortest period of time possible

2. a notice stating the case of an amendment next to the link with the revised data or a notice stating availability of the corrigenda in cases of larger publications together with the release data of amended data

3. an e-mail to the subscribers of the data/publications in which an error has been detected containing electronic version or the revised data or corrigenda in cases of larger publications, together with an apology letter and explanation as to why the error/errors occurred

4. sending printed version of the revised data to the subscribers, regardless of whether it was the case of data processing, purchase of publications, or just the corrigenda, if it is a larger publication together with an apology letter and explanation of the error 

In the case of a serious error that requires a period longer than one working day to correct, the incorrect data/publication shall be removed from the CBS website, and a message stating when the corrected version or corrigenda will be posted on the homepage. With the release of the amended version of the data/publication or corrigenda, the first released version is released simultaneously, in which the amendment is displayed clearly. In other words, released data containing an error shall never be replaced by the correct version, without being clearly
displayed.

If an error is detected and corrected on the day of the release, the correction notice must state precise release time of the correction. Corrections of proofing/printing errors shall be made without issuing a correction notice. The errors that are discovered in released publications must be conveyed to the relevant statistics department without any delay, to correct the error in the shortest period possible. Apart from the statistics department in charge of the statistics, the Information, Services and Publications Directorate must be involved as well in all stages of preparation and issuing of the amendment or corrigenda. The employees of the specialist department in charge of the statistical area in which the error was detected, must, first of all, focus on correcting the detected error, while the ISPD employees are in charge of giving a notice to internal and external users and informing the Director General of the CBS.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

 Not requested


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

A) Frame population description and distribution

For more information see concept 18.1.1.

 

B) Sampling design - Sampling method

Description of the sampling method used (e.g. stratified random sample, quota sampling, cluster sampling; one-stage or two-stage sampling) and information which variables were used to stratify, the categories of those variables, in particular for the NACE Rev. 2 categories related to the "possible calculation of European aggregates", and the final number of strata: 

Stratified random sampling was used for small enterprises (with 10-49 employees), NACE Rev. 2 economic activity was used as stratification variable (25 strata in total). In each particular stratum we used random sample selection of units. If allocated number of units is lower than 8, 8 units are allocated to the sample. Census approach was used for medium and large enterprises (50 and more employees). None of the procedures for the coordination or non-overlapping with samples of other surveys were applied. Sample rate by number of enterprises is 32%, sample rate by turnover value is 83%, while sample rate by number of persons employed is 82%.

C) Gross sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: GROSS SAMPLE)

 

D) Net sample distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: NET SAMPLE)

18.1.1. Population frame

A) Description of frame population

a) When was the sample for the ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprise survey drawn? 15/02/2023
b) When was the last update of the Business register that was used for drawing the sample of enterprises for the survey? 31/12/2021
c) Please indicate if the frame population is the same as, or is in some way coordinated with, the one used for the Structural Business Statistics (different snapshots) Frame population is included in SBS data since it is drawn from the same  source, Statistical business register
d) Please describe if different frames are used during different stages of the statistical process (e.g. frame used for sampling vs. frame used for grossing up): Sampling fame is different than the one used for grossing up, since the updated frame for grossing up is completed after the data collection and the updated data from Business register. Recalibration is performed to reflect discrepancies between two frames, sampling frame is adjusted for nonresponse.
e) Please indicate shortcomings in terms of timeliness (e.g. time lag between last update of the sampling frame and the moment of the actual sampling), geographical coverage, coverage of different subpopulations, data available etc., and any measures taken to correct it, for this survey. There is a time lag of 12-15 months between last update of sampling frame and the moment when sampling takes place.

 

 B) Frame population distribution

More detailed information is available in “ Sample and standard error tables 2023  “ excel file (Worksheet: FRAME POPULATION)

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual

18.3. Data collection

See detailed sections below.

18.3.1. Survey period
Survey / Collection Date of sending out questionnaires Date of reception of the last questionnaire treated
General survey 10/04/2023 23/06/2023
Micro-enterprises Not included. Not included.
18.3.2. Survey vehicle – general survey
General survey - Stand-alone survey
18.3.3. Survey vehicle – micro-enterprises
The collection of micro-enterprises was integrated with the general survey
18.3.4. Survey type

Web survey - introduction letters were send by e-mail to enterprises (enterprise managers) with available e­mail contact, all participants were contacted by mail with guidelines for completion of web survey. In extreme situations (e.g. no internet connection available) respondents were allowed to complete survey on printed questionnaire or via CATI interview.

18.3.5. Survey participation
Mandatory
18.4. Data validation

Before sending data was verified on the Acceptance platform of eDAMIS.

18.5. Data compilation

Grossing-up procedures

Grossing-up weights are calculated by performing the three-step approach, usually used in business surveys:

1) Calculation of the design weight as the reverse value of the inclusion probabilities

2) Adjustment for the non-response. The non-response adjustment factors were calculated by assuming missing at random mechanism, meaning that the factors were uniform inside the strata.

3) Weights calibration. Weights were calibrated according to the following two auxiliary variables from the Business register: Turnover and Number of employees. Calibration for Number of employees was performed on the level of NACE Activity group * Size class, while the calibration for Turnover was performed only on the level of Size class.

Calmar software was used to implement the calibration procedure.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable


19. Comment Top

Problems encountered and lessons to be learnt: 

19.1. Documents
Questionnaire in national language X
Questionnaire in English (if available)  
National reports on methodology (if available)  
Analysis of key results, backed up by tables and graphs in English (if available)  
Other Annexes  


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
Annex II. Accuracy 2023
Annex I. Completeness
Sample distribution and standard errors
Local language questionnaire
SURVEYMEANS procedure (SAS user guide)