Focus Groups evaluation form

As the EIP-AGRI Network has become part of the EU CAP Network, this website will no longer be updated after 1 April 2023. It will remain available in a static form as a reference of all previous EIP-AGRI activities. All interactive features such as the login, the main search function of the website, and the advanced filtering of the databases (e.g. project database and collaborative areas) will no longer be available. You will find all the new and up-to-date information on the EU CAP Network website.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Dear Focus Group expert,

To improve future EIP-AGRI Focus Groups, we would appreciate your feedback regarding your experience of participating in this Focus Group. In answering the following questions, please consider both FG meetings and the time between/after the meetings.

Kind regards

Task Managers of the Focus Groups

Please indicate the Focus Group you were involved in *

The composition (mix of attendees)

1. Do you think the Focus Group had the right composition for reaching the proposed objectives? *

Yes

Comments to the previous question

Maximum 1000 characters

2. Would you change the composition of the FG in any way (e.g. in terms of experts' profiles)? If yes, what other criteria would you include for the selection of experts? *

Yes

Current criteria that are used to evaluate technical and professional capacity: * Proven professional experience that is relevant for the FG at stake: examples that link experience to the specific FG questions. * The expert’s motivation or reasoning to be a member of the FG. * The expert’s potential contribution to the FG: the candidate should clearly state how and what he/she can contribute to the FG.. * Relevant educational and professional qualifications: this includes practical experience that should be clearly linked to specific questions for the FG.

Comments if the answer to the previous question is yes

Maximum 1000 characters

3. Do you think the right proportion of practitioners (farmers and advisors) was included? Were they involved enough? If not, how could this be improved? *

Yes

Comments if the answer to the previous question is no

Maximum 1000 characters

Working together

13. How would you evaluate the communication among the experts in between meetings? *

14. How would you evaluate the contributions of the experts during and in between meetings? *

15. How would you evaluate the communication between the experts and the EIP-AGRI Service Point in between the meetings? *

16. What´s your opinion about the balance between the presentations and the group work (interactive sessions) during the meetings? *

Specify other options

Maximun 300 characters

17. What is your opinion about the "homework" provided? Do you find it suitable and reasonable? If not, please explain the reasons. *

Comments to the previous question

Maximum 1000 characters

18. Was the involvement of all experts during the FG enough? If not, please explain the reasons. *

Yes

Comments to the previous question

Maximum 1000 characters

The venue and your trip

19. What did you think about the location of the meetings? *

20. How was the communication with the travel agent, to make your travel and hotel arrangements? *

21. Was your travel time reasonable, taking into account the place of departure and the destination? *

Yes

Comments to the previous question

Maximum 1000 characters

22. Were the departure and arrival times of your trip reasonable, taking into account the starting and ending times of the meeting? *

Yes

Comments to the previous question

Maximum 1000 characters

Some final thoughts

23. Name 3 things that you really appreciated about this FG

Maximum 1000 characters

24. Name 3 main points for improvement

Maximum 1000 characters

Leave this field blank

EIP-AGRI SUPPORT FACILITY
innovation-knowledge@eucapnetwork.eu