This site has been archived on 27/01/17

Navigation path

The website of the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs has moved.

You will find all publications issued after July 2015 on the new web presence.

470 - The performance of simple fiscal policy rules in monetary union

Author(s): Lukas Vogel, Werner Roeger, Bernhard Herz

The performance of simple fiscal policy rules in monetary unionpdf(818 kB) Choose translations of the previous link 

Summary for non-specialistspdf(23 kB) Choose translations of the previous link 

The paper analyses the stabilising potential of simple fiscal policy rules for a small open economy in monetary union in a 2-region DSGE model with nominal and real rigidities. We consider simple fiscal instrument rules for government purchases, transfers, and consumption, labour and capital taxes in analogy to interest rate rules in monetary policy. The paper finds a dichotomy in the welfare effects of fiscal policy for liquidity-constrained and intertemporal optimising households, i.e. policies enhancing the welfare of one group tend to reduce the welfare of the other one. Moderate average welfare gains from optimal policy contrast with large losses from non-optimal policy. Fiscal rules that respond to employment fluctuations may be preferred to rules responding to indicators of price competitiveness, because optimal policy in the former corresponds more closely to the idea of countercyclical stabilisation. The paper also emphasises the strong impact of the budgetary closure rule on the welfare effects of business cycle stabilisation.

(European Economy. Economic Papers 470. November 2012. Brussels. PDF. 45pp. Tab. Graph. Ann. Free.)

KC-AI-12-470-EN-N (online)
ISBN 978-92-79-22991-6 (online)
doi: 10.2765/27699 (online)

JEL classification: E37, E62, F41

Economic Papers are written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The Papers are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by staff and to seek comments and suggestions for further analysis. The views expressed are the author’s alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission.

Additional tools

  • Print version 
  • Decrease text 
  • Increase text