TOPIC : FET-Open Challenging Current Thinking
|Publication date:||27 October 2017|
|Types of action:||RIA Research and Innovation action|
|DeadlineModel: Opening date:||multiple cut-off 07 November 2017||Cut-off dates:||
16 May 2018 17:00:00
24 January 2019 17:00:00
18 September 2019 17:00:00
13 May 2020 17:00:00
|Time Zone : (Brussels time)|
Topic DescriptionSpecific Challenge:
to lay the foundations for radically new future technologies of any kind from visionary interdisciplinary collaborations that dissolve the traditional boundaries between sciences and disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities. This topic also encourages the driving role of new actors in research and innovation, including excellent young researchers, ambitious high-tech SMEs and first-time participants to FET under Horizon 2020 from across Europe.Scope:
proposals are sought for cutting-edge high-risk / high-impact interdisciplinary research with all of the following essential characteristics ("FET gatekeepers"):
- Radical vision: the project must address a clear and radical vision, enabled by a new technology concept that challenges current paradigms. In particular, research to advance on the roadmap of a well-established technological paradigm, even if high-risk, will not be funded.
- Breakthrough technological target: the project must target a novel and ambitious science-to-technology breakthrough as a first proof of concept for its vision. In particular, blue-sky exploratory research without a clear technological objective will not be funded.
- Ambitious interdisciplinary research for achieving the technological breakthrough and that opens up new areas of investigation. In particular, projects with only low-risk incremental research, even if interdisciplinary, will not be funded.
The inherently high risks of the research proposed shall be mitigated by a flexible methodology to deal with the considerable science-and-technology uncertainties and for choosing alternative directions and options.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of up to EUR 3 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.Expected Impact:
- Scientific and technological contributions to the foundation of a new future technology
- Potential for future social or economic impact or market creation.
- Building leading research and innovation capacity across Europe by involvement of key actors that can make a difference in the future, for example excellent young researchers, ambitious high-tech SMEs or first-time participants to FET under Horizon 2020.
First time participation here refers to the individuals involved, not their institution or organisation.
Topic conditions and documents
1. Eligible countries: described in Annex A of the Work Programme.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Proposal page limits and layout: please refer to Part B of the FET-Open RIA specific proposal template in the submission system.
- Evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex H of the Work Programme.
- Submission and evaluation processes are described in the Online Manual.
The following specific page limits apply. Sections 1 to 3 of the part B of the proposal should consist of a maximum of 15 A4 pages. The limits will be clearly shown in the "proposal templates" in the Participant Portal electronic submission system. Sections that are not subject to limits will be indicated.
A proposal that, according to the evaluator's assessments, does not convincingly satisfy all FET gatekeepers as described under this topic will be declared out of scope. The communication to the applications will include the evaluators' assessments, or relevant extracts from them.
At consensus stage, the consensus score for each evaluation criteria will be the median of the corresponding scores attributed by the individual evaluators. The consensus report will comprise a collation of the comments from individual reports, or extracts from them. The final review panel will decide on the final score based on its consensus discussions. The panel will also decide on any additional comments, possibly including advice not to resubmit the proposal.
Adherence to the "FET gatekeepers" as described in the call text:
- Clarity of the radical vision of a science-enabled technology and its differentiation from current paradigms.
- Novelty and ambition of the proposed science-to-technology breakthrough that addresses this vision.
- Range of and added value from interdisciplinarity for opening up new areas of research; non-incrementality of the research proposed.
- High-risk, plausibility and flexibility of the research approach.
Threshold: 4/5, Weight: 60%
- The extent to which the outputs of the project would contribute to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under this topic.
- Effectiveness of measures and plans to disseminate and use the results (including management of IPR) and to communicate about the project to different target audiences.
Threshold: 3.5/5, Weight: 20%
Quality and efficiency of the implementation
The following aspects are taken into account:
- Coherence and effectiveness of the research methodology and work plan to achieve project objectives and impacts, including adequate allocation of resources to tasks and partners.
- Role and complementarity of the participants and extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise.
Threshold: 3/5, Weight: 20%
4. Indicative time for evaluation and grant agreements:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
5. Proposal templates, evaluation forms and model grant agreements (MGA):
Research and Innovation Action:
6. Additional provisions:
Members of consortium are required to conclude a consortium agreement, in principle prior to the signature of the grant agreement.
7. Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions.
Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Open access to research data
The Open Research Data Pilot has been extended to cover all Horizon 2020 topics for which the submission is opened on 26 July 2016 or later. Projects funded under this topic will therefore by default provide open access to the research data they generate, except if they decide to opt-out under the conditions described in Annex L of the Work Programme. Projects can opt-out at any stage, that is both before and after the grant signature.
Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they plan to open or share their data, and will not be penalised for opting out.
Open research data sharing applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan.
Projects need to create a Data Management Plan (DMP), except if they opt-out of making their research data open access. A first version of the DMP must be provided as an early deliverable within six months of the project and should be updated during the project as appropriate. The Commission already provides guidance documents, including a template for DMPs. See the Online Manual.
Eligibility of costs: costs related to data management and data sharing are eligible for reimbursement during the project duration.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
8. Additional documents:
To access the Electronic Submission Service of the topic, please select the type of action that is most relevant to your proposal from the list below and click on the 'Start Submission' button. You will then be asked to confirm your choice of the type of action and topic, as these cannot be changed in the submission system. Upon confirmation you will be linked to the correct entry point.
To access existing draft proposals for this topic, please login to the Participant Portal and select the My Proposals page of the My Area section.
|Type of Action||Research and Innovation action [RIA]|
|Topic||FET-Open Challenging Current Thinking - FETOPEN-01-2018-2019-2020|
|Guidance on proposal submission:||H2020 online manual|
H2020 Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Participant Portal FAQ – Submission of proposals.
National Contact Points (NCP) - contact your NCP for further assistance in your national language(s).
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk - contact the Participant Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues
CEN and CENELEC, the European Standards Organisations, advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal. Contact CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk at firstname.lastname@example.org
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.