European Commission
en English en

European Community of Practice on Partnership (ECoPP)

ECoPP

About ECoPP

The European Code of Conduct on Partnership is a key principle guiding the implementation of cohesion policy across Europe. To further improve the quality of partnership and promote the exchange of good practices, the European Commission has established the European Community of Practice on Partnership (ECoPP) for the programming period 2021-2027. The objectives of ECoPP are:

  • to facilitate exchange of experience with regard to partnership;
  • to stimulate capacity building.
  • to disseminate relevant outcomes, in particular good practice and innovative approaches;
  • to review the application and functioning of the European Code of Conduct and prepare proposals for its possible update.

ECoPP consists of representatives of the managing authorities and partners that are mentioned in Article 8 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR 2021-2027), such as:

  • NGOs at national and sub-national level
  • municipalities
  • regional authorities
  • economic and social partners
  • research organisations

Currently, there are 158 ECoPP members, representing a diverse range of organisations and interests.
ECoPP operates through plenary meetings which are held at least once a year. In between the plenary sessions the members of the community cooperate in thematic sub-groups and task forces where they share their experience, develop best practices on partnership, and discuss and reflect on the effective application of the European Code of Conduct on Partnership (ECCP). Two ECoPP experts support the Commission with the coordination and steering the work of the network.

The number and thematic focus of the sub-groups of the ECoPP are different each year and reflect the focus and the interests of its active members who work mainly in an independent manner.

The ECoPP is a special group and does not fall under the rules set out under Commission rules for expert groups. The outputs presented below, represent solely the views of the members and not those of the Commission.