Scientific Committees
Scientific Steering Committee
(former MDSC)
Outcome of discussions
Opinion on
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in a second UK animal born
after 1 august 1996 (Case confirmed in Northern Ireland)
adopted by the Scientific Steering Committee at its meeting
of 29-30 March 2001
I. The questions
The Scientific Steering Committee (SSC)
is invited to express its appreciation on the information
provided on 14 February 2001 by the UK Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to the European Commission
services, on the BSE case confirmed in an animal born after
1 August 1996 in Northern Ireland.
II. Background
1. On 14 February 2001, the UK Ministry
of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food informs the European
Commission services, on a BSE case confirmed in an animal
born after 1 August 1996 in Northern Ireland. The case
history and epidemiological inquiry into possible sources
of infection (including maternal and feed borne
transmission) were provided to the EC services and are also
publicly available on the MAFF Internet site.
The animal was born on 10 September 1996
in Northern Ireland. The dam survived for 23 months after
giving birth to the BSE case and was slaughtered for
management reasons. The case itself entered and was killed
under the emergency / casualty slaughtering arrangements of
the Overt Thirty Months Scheme (OTMS). The presence of
infection was detected in the course of a survey of 2.546
casualty / emergency slaughtered animals entering the OTMS
using a rapid
post mortem test.
At this stage no firm conclusions can be
drawn as to the source of the BSE infection. However, from
the farming and feeding practices and case history, it
would look that the route of infection was unlikely
maternal and most likely feedborne, although maternal
infection cannot be definitively excluded. The
epidemiological investigations are continuing and the BSE
case's birth cohort is being monitored.
2. Given the facts that:
(1) the recommendations of the SSC in
relation to the UK-DBES scheme were based on the assumption
of a fully effective feed ban as from August 1996 and
accepted the occurrence of a number of BSE cases born after
that date due to maternal transmission alone;
(2) the SSC has the permanent mandate to
monitor the evolution of the BSE epidemic in the UK
and
(3) the exemption for the removal of
vertebral column from UK cattle on the basis of an
effective feed ban foreseen to enter into force on 1 April
2001,
the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC)
is invited to express its appreciation on the information
provided on 14 February 2001 by the UK Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to the European Commission
services, on the BSE case confirmed in an animal born after
1 August 1996 in Northern Ireland.
III. Opinion
1. On 27 June 2000, BSE was confirmed in a
Holstein/Friesian dairy cow born on 25 August 1996. In its
opinion of 14-15 September 2000 on
Export from the UK of bone-in veal, the SSC considered
that "this [first] case did not affect its risk assessments
with regard to the DBES, because the animal would not have
been eligible under the DBES
1
and because it had been accepted that
(small) numbers of BSE cases would occur in animals born
after 1 August 2000 as a result of vertical transmission.
(...)".
2. In its opinions of 29 October 1999 and
14 April 2000
2
the SSC accepted that a (very small and
decreasing) number of BARB cases would occur, attributable to
vertical risk enhancement. A BARB case where vertical risk
enhancement can be excluded, may therefore be indicative for
a failing feed ban and / or for other routes of transmission.
In its Report and Opinion of 14-15 September 2000 on the
Export from the UK of bone-in veal the SSC stated:
"However, should the origin be attributable to a
contaminated feed source, then this would imply the need to
improve the feed-ban and the control system. These issues are
beyond the scope of the mandate of the EC's Scientific
Committees." Whether there is a need to improve the
feed-ban and the control system would appear from inspections
to be carried out by the appropriate services.
The Scientific Steering Committee
considers that the occurrence so far of 2 BARB cases does
not call for an immediate revision of the SSC's various
opinions on the UK Date Based Export Scheme and related
issues. Whilst these opinions indeed consider feed and
maternal transmission as the only possible routes of
infection of cattle with BSE and assume that the feed ban
is fully complied with, one must nevertheless accept that
it is unrealistic to assume that under field conditions no
single feed-borne case would occur. The SSC considers that
the number of BARB-cases recorded so far is surprisingly
low.
The SSC considers that the question
whether or not a revision of the DBES-opinions is needed
would depend upon the outcome of an [inspection] exercise
verifying the current feed ban enforcement and upon the
confirmation that the number of BARBS is indeed as low as
currently reported.
In its Opinion of 7-8 December 2000 on
Monitoring Some Important aspects of the evolution of the
Epidemic of BSE in Great-Britain, the SSC also addressed
the question
How should BSE cases born after 1 August 1996 be
investigated?
The SSC wishes to confirm the answer
given to the question on 8 December 2000 and the
recommendation that, ideally, surviving dams of BARBs (and
controls) and their calves born in the calving seasons
before and after birth of the BARB should be bought in and
kept on ministry farms so that their definitive BSE status
can be established.
They are attached in Annex, for ease of
reference.
Annex: Extract from the SSC Opinion of 7-8
December 2000 on Monitoring Some Important aspects of the
evolution of the Epidemic of BSE in Great-Britain.
"Question 4: How should BSE cases born after 1 August
1996 be investigated?
Investigations of BSE cases born after 1
August 1996, so-called BARBs, should follow an agreed
protocol. A special BARB-controls database should be
defined to facilitate investigation of feed-based exposure,
maternal or other transmission.
Investigation of feed-based-exposure
means recording the suppliers of feed for cattle or other
species to all farms at which the BARB was located from
birth to onset. For each such farm, a record should be
reconstructed, if possible, of feed quantities and numbers
of other species on farm at the same time as the BARB was
located there.
Investigation of maternal transmission
requires the identifier(s), disposal/survival status (e.g
as fallen stock, emergency slaughter, OTMS or routine
slaughter for human consumption) and BSE status of the
BARB's dam. The dam's calving history should include the
identifier(s), disposal/ survival status and BSE status of
calves born to it in the calving seasons before and after
birth of BARB.
BARBs born more than 24 months before
BSE onset in the dam are less likely to have been infected
"maternally" BARBs born more than 24 months before BSE
onset in the dam are therefore of particular interest
because they either challenge our understanding of maternal
transmission, or were not maternally-infected. BARBs whose
dam was known to have survived for 7.5 years without
developing BSE are also of particular interest because a
non-maternal transmission route should be
considered.
Ideally, surviving dams of BARBs (and
controls) and their calves born in the calving seasons
before and after birth of the BARB should be bought in and
kept on ministry farms so that their definitive BSE status
can be established.
Investigation of veterinary transmission
ideally requires a record of any invasive procedure(s) and
the identity of the veterinary practitioner/other person
providing them."
----------------------------------------
1
The animal was 44 months old, its dam had
not survived for at least six months after birth.
2
See the following SSC opinions:
- 28-29 October 1999 on the Scientific
Grounds of the Advice of 30 September 1999 of the French
Food Safety Agency (the Agence Française de Sécurité
Sanitaire des Aliments, AFSSA), to the French Government on
the Draft Decree amending the Decree of 28 October 1998
establishing specific measures applicable to certain
products of bovine origin exported from the United
Kingdom.
- 13-14 April 2000 on the UK decision to
lift the ban on the consumption of meat on the bone.
Scientific Committees
Scientific Steering Committee (former
MDSC)
Outcome of discussions
FOOD SAFETY |
PUBLIC HEALTH
|
CONSUMER
PROTECTION |
DIRECTORATE
GENERAL "HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION"
|