Health
Scientific Committees
Scientific Steering Committee (former MDSC)
Outcome of discussions
Opinion on the
Safety of Gelatine adopted at the Scientific Steering
Committee at its plenary meeting of 26-27 March 1998
following a public consultation on the preliminary opinion
adopted on 19-20 February 1998 (
Version updated
on 3.04.98
) -
Background
The mandate of the Scientific Steering
Committee was to advise the Commission on the risk exposure
of humans and animals to BSE from gelatine and its
co-product dicalcium-phosphate. For humans special
attention should be focused on the use of gelatine in the
food chain, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics including
parenteral use.
As stated in the opinion of 9 April 1996
of the Scientific Veterinary Committee, there are three
major factors that influence the risk of exposure from
animal by-products in relation to BSE:
(1) The titre of infectivity likely to
be found in the tissue used in its manufacture.
(2) The effectiveness of the process
used for the inactivation (or the elimination) of the
agent.
(3) The kind of application (e.g. food,
cosmetics and medicinal products).
The Scientific Veterinary Committee
stressed also "that the full data on all gelatine
manufacturing processes have not been published, hence a
full risk analysis cannot be carried out for gelatine."
By-products, such as gelatine, aminoacids and
dicalciumphosphate were recognised as giving the best
possible guarantees of safety if produced in a process
which ensures that all material is subjected to degreasing,
followed by acid and/or alkaline treatment followed by
heating to 120° and these up to 138-140°C for 4 seconds.
The product should be labelled to show the process to which
it has been subjected. The Scientific Veterinary Committee
emphasised also that: "
the specified bovine offals from UK cattle (brain,
spinal cord, thymus, spleen, intestine and tonsils) as well
as vertebral column and any tissues resulting from trimming
carried out in accordance with EC and UK legislation on
BSE, should not be used for any purpose (food, feed,
medical, pharmaceutical or cosmetic use), whatever the
process to which they are subjected."
A similar procedure should also be
carried out for material originating from other countries
with native cases of BSE.
The preceding opinion differs largely
from the 1992 and 1994 opinions expressed by the Scientific
Veterinary Committee, stating that "
whatever the tissue source, there is a negligible risk
from trading in gelatine for technical use, for consumption
or in cosmetics additional guarantees are therefore not
necessary".
In its opinion of 15 April 1996 on
products derived from bovine tissues, especially gelatine,
tallow and di-calcium-phosphate in relation with Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy, the Scientific Committee Food
concluded
: "Based upon current incomplete knowledge regarding BSE
and its possible transmission to humans and the uncertainty
about the inactivation of the infective agent, the
Committee at present is only able to advise that bovine
source materials for these products are to be taken only
from geographical areas where BSE does not occur in
epidemic conditions. The Committee urges that data required
for a scientifically based risk assessment be generated by
relevant bodies. Further research is needed especially to
develop specific, sensitive and rapid methods for detection
of the causative agent in biological materials."
At its meeting of 16 April, 1996, the
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) of the
European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products
(EMEA) endorsed the following conclusion on the potential
risk of gelatine in relation to Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy (BSE): "Three cumulative factors contribute
to the safety of gelatine used in pharmaceuticals:
- Manufacturers of gelatine used for
pharmaceutical use should not use tissues derived from
bovine animals, slaughtered in the UK .
- The additive effects of washing, acid
decalcification followed by acid and/or prolonged alkaline
treatment, filtration and sterilisation are sufficient to
eliminate any possible risk.
- Source tissues used in the manufacture
of gelatine are classified as having no detectable
infectivity.
On the 3rd of April, 1997, the
Multidisciplinary Scientific Committee (MDSC) expressed a
similar opinion ato that of the Scientific veterinary
Committee on 9 April, 1996, stressing especially:
"That at the moment no production method can be
considered as safe for gelatine and related products if the
base material used is potentially infectious." The
opinion further states: "The control of the nature, the
geographical origin and the quality of the starting
material is currently the only means to assure the
protection of public health. The control applied to the
starting materials must be subjected to intensive
monitoring." The MDSC also confirms its view that
"the following tissues should not be used as starting
materials: skull, vertebral column, brain, spinal cord,
eye, tonsil, thymus, intestine and spleen. (SEE Commission
decision of 11th June, 1996, 96/362/EC). The Committee
urgently recommends to establish an effective system for
the monitoring and the surveillance of TSEs (especially BSE
and scrapie)."
In its "Note for Guidance on minimising
the risk of transmitting animal spongiform encephalopathy
agents via medicinal products" (Revised draft 14 - rev.1 of
2nd September 1997), the CPMP concludes that the risk of
transmission of infectious agents can be greatly reduced by
controlling a number of parameters which include:
- the source of the animals (including
on the basis of their age);
- the nature of animal tissue
used;
- the production and transformation
processes,
The European Commission Decision N°
97/534/EC of 30 July 1997 confirms the conditions for the
manufacture of gelatine from bone raw material. In the 15
E.U. member states as well as for third countries exporting
to the E.U. (the general rule applies to all: both for
human consumption and for pharmaceutical and cosmetic use),
the following risk materials should be excluded: skull,
brain, eye, spinal cord, tonsils. The decision also
excludes the use of the vertebral column of cattle, sheep
and goats of over 12 months of age for mechanically
recovered meat for human consumption.
So far, bones, a raw material for the
production of gelatine, have been considered as a material
with no detectable infectivity. Bovine bone marrow, by
analogy with bone marrow from sheep with scrapie, was
classified as belonging to the category of low potential
infectivity materials. In its opinion adopted on 8-9
December 1997, the Scientific Steering Committee
states:
(on) dorsal root ganglia. New (unpublished)
evidence shows that the dorsal root ganglia - located
within the general structure of the vertebral column -
should be considered as having an infectivity for BSE
equivalent to that of the spinal cord. The dorsal root
ganglia proved infective at the same time after infection
as the spinal cord, i.e. 32 months. The trigeminal
ganglia were also infective, but so far no autonomic
nervous system tissue has been found to be infective. The
dorsal root ganglia cannot be removed without extreme
difficulty. This therefore means that as a precautionary
proposal the removal of the whole vertebral column (other
than the coccyx) is now appropriate. Care needs to be
taken to ensure that the removal of the vertebral column
incorporates the lateral aspect of the vertebral bodies.
This dissection may sometimes be difficult in practice
unless the musculature is selectively removed from the
vertebral bones for selling as bone-free meat.
(on) Bone marrow :
1. Early studies with mice intracerebrally injected
with bone marrow from cattle with spontaneous clinical
BSE has not demonstrated infectivity (SEAC, 1994).
However, studies on calves, experimentally infected by
feeding 100g of BSE infected brain tissue, have now shown
bone marrow infectivity in cattle studied at 38 months
after feeding the BSE infected brain. These animals were
clinically affected by BSE. (MAFF, unpublished evidence
3.12.1997). This has wide-ranging implications because it
implies that long bones as well as vertebral columns must
be considered potentially infective. The concerns on
contamination and the dorsal ganglia mean that on these
grounds alone the vertebral columns of older animals
should be included in the category of specified risk
material.
2. Several issues now emerge from the new report on
bone marrow infectivity. First the apparent infectivity
of bone marrow might need to be redefined. Bone marrow
(on the basis of scrapie studies) was placed in Category
III, i.e. as showing low infectivity. In previous bone
marrow studies on clinical cases of BSE infected cattle,
no infectivity was detected which might have suggested
that the WHO classification was inappropriate in
persisting with a Category III, rather than a Category
IV, rating, i.e. no demonstrable infectivity. However,
new evidence shows 2 of 18 mice developing late clinical
disease after having been injected with marrow from
cattle of 38 months post infection. Another 3 mice also
show immunocytological evidence of the presence of PrP
Sc, having been injected with the same bone
marrow extract. Given the late development of this
demonstrable infectivity in cattle bone marrow despite
the substantial infective dose (100 g untreated BSE
infective brain) it now seems appropriate to maintain the
WHO classification for BSE as well as for scrapie. This
signifies that BSE is increasingly being revealed as
having a tissue based infectivity which seems similar to
that of scrapie.
3. This conclusion reinforces the concepts [...] that
the different levels of infectivity do reflect a graded
phenomenon and that it is unwise to consider the BSE
agent as either present or absent in particular
tissues.
4. The bone marrow findings also raise the issue of
whether bones from older animals, e.g. >30 months,
should be removed from the human food chain."
As far as infectivity of bone marrow is
concerned, the working group on gelatine of the Scientific
Steering Committee noted that the above statements referred
to infectivity resulting from a single group of
experimentally challenged cattle. However, infectivity of
the bone marrow of naturally infected bovines has, to
present knowledge, not been detected. According to Hadlow
et al. (1982), infectivity has been reported in bone marrow
of Suffolk sheep with natural, clinical scrapie but (Hadlow
et al., 1980) not in goats with natural scrapie.
DOWNLOAD / VIEW THE COMPLETE
DOCUMENT :
[
©]
- [
HEALTH] - [
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEES] - [
SCIENTIFIC STEERING COMMITTEE] -
[
OUTCOME OF DISCUSSIONS]
|