Archive:Weekly absences from work
Data extracted in July 2020
Planned article update: October 2020
Highlights
To respond to the need for a more thorough analysis of the labour market situation during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, Eurostat developed a new experimental indicator “Weekly absences from work”. This indicator focuses on employed persons who are temporarily absent from work in a reference week.
This article presents the main results from this new indicator and complements the article Absences from work - quarterly statistics. Both articles are part of the publication Labour market in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The current version of the article focuses on the first quarter of 2020. In autumn, the article will be reviewed and data on the second quarter will be added.
Full article
Weekly absences four times higher in March 2020
Weekly absences from work in the EU usually peak in weeks 33 and 52 of the year, corresponding to mid-August and late December (Figure 1). However, from the second week of March 2020 (week 11) onwards, weekly absences sharply increased as a consequence of the first confinement measures against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic taken by governments. The number of people absent from work was four times higher between the beginning and the end of March 2020, from 10.8 million in week 10 to 41.2 million in week 13, and 14.7 million in week 11 and 33.1 million in week 12. Weekly absences consequently increased by 30.4 million in March 2020 (from week 10 to week 13). The number of people absent from work in the last week of March represents more than three quarters of last year’s peaks of mid-August and late December, where 53.4 million and 51.9 million people respectively were absent from work.
_new.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
Figure 2 compares absences from work in the EU in the first 13 weeks of 2020 with the average of the corresponding weeks in the period 2015-2019. It is visible that the number of weekly absences in January, February and early March 2020 (weeks 1 to 10, 2020) had been very similar, or even smaller, compared with the previous years. However, the last three weeks of March 2020 (weeks 11 to 13, 2020) are significantly different from previous years. Absences from work in week 11 of 2020 represented 3.9 million more absences (corresponding to 35.7 % more absences) compared with both the previous week of 2020 and the average over the last five years for week 11 (14.7 million vs. in both cases 10.8 million). In the following two weeks, absences continued to increase and represented three times the average over the last five years. In weeks 12 and 13 of 2020 (mid to late March), people absent from work were respectively 21.4 and 28.5 million more compared with the same weeks of the previous years (33.1 million vs. 11.7 million for week 12, and 41.2 million vs. 12.7 million for week 13).
_new.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
Weekly absences more substantial for men than for women
Figure 3 describes the development of absences from work for men and women by comparing March 2020 with March 2019 (weeks 10 to 13, 2019 and 2020). For both men and women, absences from work were lower during the first week of March 2020 (week 10, 2020) than in the same week of 2019. The decrease between 2019 to 2020 corresponds to 16.1 % for men and 14.9 % for women. On the other hand, absences from work were higher in last three weeks of March 2020 compared with the same weeks of 2019, for both men and women, but substantially more for men. During the second week of March (week 11, 2020) absences from work increased by 41.3 % for men and by 26.9 % for women. The increase in the next two weeks was even larger. In weeks 12 and 13 of 2020, women were three times more absent from work in comparison with the same period of 2019. More precisely, their number amounted to 6.2 and 6.0 million respectively for the last two weeks of March 2019, compared with 17.3 and 20.8 million for the same weeks of 2020. Absences from work for men also increased threefold in week 12 of 2020 compared with the same week in 2019; their number rose from 4.6 to 15.9 million. But the largest increase was recorded for men in the last week of March (week 13), when the number of absences from work for men was five times more in 2020 compared with 2019; 20.4 million in week 13 of 2020 compared with 4.3 million in week 13 of 2019.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
The breakdown of the weekly absences from work by sex in the EU in the first 13 weeks of 2020 shows that, with the exception of the first week, women outnumbered men (Figure 4). The first week of 2020 recorded a high number of absences, especially for men (21.4 million for men and 19.8 million for women). In the following weeks, the number of women absent from work was higher than men, especially in late February and at the beginning of March (weeks 9 and 10, 2020), with 6.8 and 6.5 million absences for women against 4.5 and 4.3 million absences for men. However, starting from week 11 of 2020, the number of men being absent from work increased more sharply than women, leading to a reduction in the gender gap. In the last week of March (week 13, 2020), 20.8 million women and 20.4 million men were absent from work (gender gap of 2.4 %).
.png)
Absences started to increase in different weeks across countries
All EU Member States for which data are available experienced a rise in weekly absences from work towards the end of March 2020. Even if this rise did not start from the same week for all countries, weekly absences started to increase steeply from the second or third week of March (weeks 11 or 12, 2020) in the majority of countries. A reproduction of Figure 2 at country level demonstrates this finding, and the illustration for Slovakia and Spain can be found in Figures 5 and 6.
In Slovakia (Figure 5), absences from work during the first 10 weeks of 2020 followed the same pattern as for the previous five years, with the exception of the beginning of January and late February (weeks 1 and 8, 2020). From the second week of March (week 11, 2020) onwards, the number of absences began to increase significantly, both in comparison with the preceding weeks since the beginning of 2020 and to the average of the corresponding weeks in 2015-2019. At the end of March 2020 (week 13, 2020), 1.0 million people were absent from work in Slovakia. Compared with the beginning of March (week 10, 2020), this number rose by 0.9 million. By contrast, the average number of people absent from work in Slovakia in week 13 of the year for the period 2015-2019 had been 91 300.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
In Spain (Figure 6), the weekly pattern of absences in 2020 was similar to that of the last five years until the second week of March (week 11, 2020), although weekly absences were higher in 2020. From mid-March (week 12, 2020), absences began to substantially increase. Indeed, while 1.1 million people were absent from work in Spain in the second week of March (week 11, 2020), this number was four times higher in the following week and reached 4.5 million. And in the last week of the month (week 13, 2020), absences accounted for 6.0 million people. By comparison, the average of absences for the same period (week 13) for the last five years accounted for 1.2 million.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
Two Member States, namely, the Netherlands and Italy, differ substantially from the others in terms of starting point of the increase of absences. In the Netherlands (Figure 7), the number of people absent from work started to increase only in the last week of March (week 13, 2020), so quite later than for the other Member States. Absences from work in the Netherlands since the beginning of 2020 closely followed the same pattern as the last five years, with the exception of the second week of January (week 2, 2020). Nevertheless, at the end of March (week 13, 2020) weekly absences from work increased by 65.3 % compared with the previous week and doubled in size in comparison with the average for the same period in the previous years. The number of Dutch people absent from work reached 1.1 million in the last week of March 2020, which corresponds to 0.6 million more than the average of week 13 computed over the five preceding years.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
By contrast, Italy is the country where the increase in the number of people absent from work began to increase exponentially already at the end of February 2020 (Figure 8). While 0.9 million Italian people were away from their jobs mid-February (week 8, 2020), this number almost doubled in the following week, reaching 1.6 million, and continued to increase until the end of March (week 13, 2020). In that last week, 8.2 million people were absent from work in Italy, ten times more than the average of the absences for week 13 in the last five years.
.png)
Source: Eurostat (lfsi_abs_w)
Similar graphs for all other countries with data available for more than 50% of the weeks can be found 
here.
Although all countries experienced an increase in absences from work in March 2020, the increase was sharper for some than for the others. If comparing the average number of all people who were absent from work in weeks 10 to 13 during the period 2015-2019 with the absences for the same weeks in 2020, the largest increases can be found in Greece and Cyprus; from 0.3 to 3.2 million absences in Greece, and from 0.04 to 0.3 million absences in Cyprus. On the other hand, the smallest increase can be observed in Finland (from 0.9 to 1.1 million), followed by the Netherlands (from 2.5 to 3.2 million).
Source data for tables and graphs
Data sources
All figures in this article are derived from the European labour force survey (EU-LFS).
Source: The European Union labour force survey (EU-LFS) is the largest European household sample survey providing mostly quarterly and annual results on labour participation of people aged 15 and over as well as on persons outside the labour force. It covers residents in private households. Conscripts in military or community service are not included in the results. The EU-LFS is based on the same target populations and uses the same definitions in all countries, which means that the results are comparable between countries.
The notion of temporary absence from work refers to situations in which a period of work is interrupted by a period of absence. This implies that persons are generally to be considered as having been temporarily absent from work and therefore employed if they had already worked at their current activity and were expected to return to their work after the period of absence. Persons without work who had made arrangements to take up paid employment or to engage in some self-employment activity at a date subsequent to the reference period, but who had not yet started work, are not to be considered as temporarily absent from work.
For more information on absences from work, please consult pages 22 to 28 from the EU Labour Force Survey Explanatory Notes
Context
The COVID-19 virus hit Europe in January and February 2020, with the first cases confirmed in Spain, France and Italy. COVID-19 infections have now been diagnosed in all European Union (EU) Member States.
To fight the pandemic, EU Member States have taken a wide variety of measures.
From the second week of March, most countries closed retail shops apart from supermarkets, pharmacies and banks. Bars, restaurants and hotels have also been closed. In Italy and Spain, non-essential production was stopped and several countries imposed regional or even national lock-down measures which further stifled the economic activities in many areas.
In addition, schools were closed, public events were cancelled and private gatherings (with numbers of persons varying from 2 to 50) were banned in most Member States.
The large majority of the prevention measures were taken during mid-March 2020 and most of the prevention measures and restrictions were kept for the whole of April and May 2020.
The first quarter 2020 is consequently the first quarter in which the labour market across the EU has been affected by COVID-19 measures taken by the Member States.
Employment and unemployment as defined by the ILO concept are, in this particular situation, not sufficient to describe the developments taking place in the labour market. In this first phase of the crisis, active measures to contain employment losses led to absences from work rather than dismissals, and individuals could not search for work or were not available due to the containment measures, thus not counting as unemployed.
Direct access to
<maintables>
Main tables
<maintables>