Adult Education Survey 2022

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: National Institute of Statistics


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Institute of Statistics

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Population and external migration unit.

Demography and Social Statistics Directorate.

1.5. Contact mail address

16th Libertăţii Avenue, District 5

Bucharest

Romania

Postcode: RO-050706


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 04/01/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 04/01/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 04/01/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Adult Education Survey (AES) covers adults’ participation in education and training (formal - FED, non-formal - NFE and informal learning - INF). The 2022 AES focuses on people aged 18-69. The reference period for the participation in education and training is the twelve months prior to the interview.

Information available from the AES is grouped around the following topics:

  • Participation in formal education, non-formal education and training and informal learning
  • Volume of instruction hours
  • Characteristics of the learning activities
  • Reasons for participating
  • Obstacles to participation
  • Access to information on learning possibilities and guidance
  • Employer financing and costs of learning
  • Self-reported language skills

For further information see the 2022 AES legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.2. Classification system

- Classification of Learning Activities (CLA, 2016 edition)
- International Standard Classification of Education 2011 (ISCED 2011)
- Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO 08)
- Classification of economic activities Rev. 2 (NACE Rev. 2)

3.3. Coverage - sector

AES covers all economic sectors.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.5. Statistical unit

Individuals, non-formal learning activities.

3.6. Statistical population

Individuals aged 18-69 living in private households.

3.7. Reference area

The entire country was covered.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Fieldwork was carried out during 17/10/2022 - 31/12/2022.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Number, EUR.


5. Reference Period Top

12 months prior to the interview.

Fieldwork period: 17/10/2022 - 31/12/2022.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

At European level:

Basic legal act: Regulation (EU) 2019/1700

Implementing act: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/861

At national level:

Annual National Statistical Plan - approved by Government Decision 913/2022

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

According to the national statistical law (no. 226/2009) and statistical standard rules on confidentiality, which are in line with European legislation (Council Regulation no. 223/2009 and Commission Regulation no. 557/2013).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

According to the national statistical law (no. 226/2009) and statistical standard rules on confidentiality, which are in line with European legislation (Council Regulation no. 223/2009 and Commission Regulation no. 557/2013).


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Both, press release and publication are announced in advance on INS website.

8.2. Release calendar access

Publications catalogue - on INS website:

https://insse.ro/cms/files/catalog/Catalogul_publicatiilor_INS_2023.pdf

https://insse.ro/cms/files/catalog/calendar-comunicate-de-presa-2023.pdf

Press release calendar - on INS website:

https://insse.ro/cms/ro/comunicate-de-presa-view

https://insse.ro/cms/ro/publicatii-statistice-in-format-electronic

8.3. Release policy - user access

Both, press release and publication are available in electronic format on INS Website.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 6 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Press release scheduled for 8th of December 2023.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

National publication scheduled for 20th of December 2023.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Tables will be included in INS website.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Anonymized data files for researchers will be available on request.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Quality report will be available to INS website.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Press release, publication and online tables will be accompanied by methodological description.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

https://insse.ro/cms/files/eurostat/Ghid%20de%20calitate%20al%20statisticii%20oficiale.pdf


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Quality guidelines for Romania Official Statistics are applied in all phases of statistical production process.

https://insse.ro/cms/files/eurostat/Ghid%20de%20calitate%20al%20statisticii%20oficiale.pdf

11.2. Quality management - assessment

One of the most important drawbacks of the survey is the high number of questions (which results in a very long questionnaire) and questions asking for detailed information for which answers are likely to be affected by memory recall problems (for example number of hours spent in education in the past 12 months; amount paid for education).

Compared to AES 2016, in AES 2022 several changes were implemented – among them: data collection method (2016 - PAPI, 2022 – CAPI) and the questionnaire (which is connected to change of the collection method) which can explain large differences between the two of them.

As regards comparability with the same indicators from LFS, main reasons are - different sample and weighting, different questionnaire and main focus of the survey.

However, the quality of data is considered to be reasonable. Response rate was good (85.4%) and the data collection was carried out in accordance with the set time schedule.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

In Romania, official statistics is under the responsibility of National Institute for Statistics. In order to ensure the objectivity, transparent and scientific character of the methodologies, indicators and classifications used in statistics, and to ensure that statistical programme cover all user requirements, the National Statistics Council was established.

The representatives of the Council meet quarterly or more frequently as necessary in working groups by statistical fields. During these meetings National Institute for Statistics is receiving a strong feed-back from the users in terms of the results already disseminated (including the level of detail, breakdowns etc.) and the requests for further needed information to be included in next statistical inquiries.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

User satisfaction survey is conducted by INS but it refers to broad domains rather than specific surveys.

12.3. Completeness

The final dataset covers all mandatory variables as requested in the 2022 AES legislation.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Measures were taken in order to minimise measurement errors, like good and extensive training to interviewers, a good supervision process and quality checks performed during data collection. 

13.2. Sampling error

Standard error, coefficient of variation and confidence interval were computed for main indicators of the survey.

For the main indicators, coefficient of variation was 4.1% for participation rate in formal education and training, age 18-24 and 4.3% for participation rate in non-formal education and training, age 25-69.

The estimation of the sampling variance considers the sampling design. Taylor linearization technique for variance estimation was performed, using the ReGenesees package.

For details on sampling and weighting, see sections 18.3 and 18.5 below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

See table 13.2.1 “Sampling errors - indicators for 2022 AES key statistics” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors are covered by items 13.3.1 - 13.3.5 below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Household surveys carried out by NSI-Romania are based on the repeated use of a master sample EMZOT, i.e. the Multifunctional Sample of Territorial Areas designed after the 2011 Census. Due to the lack of appropriate information, new dwellings, built after 2011 Census of the Population and Dwellings, have not been taken into account.

On the other side, some dwelling listed in the sample frame were, at the time of the survey, impossible to locate or became unoccupied or seasonal. But most of the over-coverage was due to out of scope household (all household members under 18 or over 69 years old).

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

See table 13.3.1.1 “Over-coverage - rate” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Interviewer training takes place at the territorial offices.

In order to ensure a good understanding of the concepts behind the questions a survey handbook was developed. This Handbook included the information of the AES survey manual (designed by Eurostat) and also provided explanations (that took into account national circumstances) and examples.

It was stressed that the information should be collected from each individual and proxy answers should be avoided if possible. The rate of proxy answers was 19.9%.

13.3.3. Non response error

In order to minimize non-response, advance notification was sent to each household selected in the sample.

If contact with the household at the first visit was successful, the interviewer conducted the interview. Otherwise, the interviewer left a notice scheduling a new visit. In case of repeated non-contact, several attempts were done by the end of data collection period (at least 3).

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See table 13.3.3.1 “Unit non-response - rate” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

See table 13.3.3.2 “Item non-response rate” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

13.3.4. Processing error

Validation rules were included directly in the questionnaire, thus most of the errors were identified and corrected during data collection. Supervisors (at the territorial offices) and statistician (at the central office) also reviewed the questionnaires in order to accept or reject them.

One error may need several variables to be corrected or, if the figures correspond to reality due to unusual phenomena, figures were accepted as such and no correction was made.

For the correctness of the data and the correlations between variables, a large number of tests were applied.

Most frequent errors refers to the correlation between level of education graduated and the one attended during the 12 months/level of education dropped; relationships between the members of the household; number of instruction hours.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See 14.1.1 and 14.1.2 below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

06/30/2023

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

07/14/2023

14.2. Punctuality

First data transmission took place 6 months after the end of the data collection. The final transmission took place two weeks later, after minor revisions.

See table 14.2 “Project phases - dates” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not applicable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See table 15.1 “Deviations from 2022 AES concepts and definitions” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

No additional variables related to COVID-19 were collected.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

For the AES 2022, several changes were implemented – among them: data collection method (2016 - PAPI, 2022 – CAPI) and changes to the questionnaire (which is connected to change of the collection method). These changes explain most of the changed visible in the data, i.e. there is a break in series.

See table 15.2 “Comparability - over time” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See table 15.3 “Coherence - cross-domain” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

AES results for a given data collection round are based on the same microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Average duration of the interview: 19 min per person.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Adult Education Survey, see table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Every 6 years.

18.3. Data collection

Data collected by face to face computer assisted interview.

Questionnaire was designed following closely Eurostat model.

Sampling plan:

Because of the lack of appropriate registers (dwelling register, population register etc.), the household surveys carried out by NSI-Romania are based on the repeated use of a master sample (EMZOT - i.e. the Multifunctional Sample of Territorial Areas), which involves further the use of multi-stage sampling designs.

The sampling plan is a two-stage probability sampling of clusters of housing units.

In the first stage, a stratified random sample of 792 areas, Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), was designed after the 2011 Census, using as stratification criteria the residence area and county (corresponding to NUTS 3 level).

This is the Multifunctional Sample of Territorial Areas, so called the master sample EMZOT. The EMZOT sample has 450 PSUs selected from urban area and 342 PSUs selected from rural area.

In the second stage, 18216 dwelling units were systematically selected from the initial sample of PSUs. All households in the selected dwellings were included in the survey and all persons in the target population (18-69 years old) were interviewed.

Stratification concerns only the first stage sampling. There are 88 strata, the criteria used being the area where a certain PSU is located (urban or rural area) and county (NUTS 3 level).

The primary sampling unit, corresponding to the selection of the master sample, is a group of census sections.

The secondary (ultimate) sampling unit, corresponding to the selection of the survey sample, has been the dwelling.

18.4. Data validation

Most of the validation rules were included in the electronic questionnaire.

During data collection phase, supervisors in the territorial offices were in charge of reviewing data collected by interviewers as well as with the codification of certain variables such as: occupation (ISCO 08), economic activity (NACE Rev. 2), country of birth, the fields of education training. 

After data collection, validation procedures were run at central level and data were edited/ imputed if necessary.

18.5. Data compilation

Survey weights were calculated in four steps.

1. The first step assigns the inverse of the selection probabilities to each sampled dwelling unit.

2. The second step adjusts for non-response, categorizing the responding dwelling units by the following characteristics: county (NUTS 3) and urban/rural residency.

3. The third step consists in re-adjusting the weight with the inverse of the probability of selecting the two persons aged 18-69 from a household. In the calibration process, this step is crucial for adjusting the sample weights to better match the population parameters. The aim is to make the sample as representative as possible of the larger population from which it was drawn. The adjustment is described above.

3.1. Inverse probability of selection: First, calculate the inverse of the probability of selecting the two individuals from the household. For example, if 2 persons from a household of 5 have been selected, the inverse of the selection probability is 5/2.

3.2. Adjusted weight: The weight of each sampled individual, already adjusted for non-responses, is further modified by multiplying it with the calculated inverse probability (5/2 in this case).

4. The fourth and final step consists of calibrating the secondary weights to the population totals by region (NUTS 2), urban-rural residency, gender, age groups (18-24 years; 25-34 years; 35-44 years; 45-54 years; 55-64 years and 65-69 years), education level (low, medium, high) and the number of households by region. The objective of these calibration steps is to correct the sample weights to ensure that the sample is as representative as possible of the general population, considering these multiple demographic and socio-economic factors.

The calibration procedure is performed in R statistical software (R Core Team, 2023). The package used is ReGenesees (Zardetto, 2015, 2022). The calibrated weights computed by the implementation of ReGenesees ensures that the calibration estimators of the auxiliary variables exactly match the corresponding known population totals.

The package offers also facilities for calibration process diagnostics. The global calibration problem gets split into as many sub-problems as the number of subpopulations defined and the package gives a diagnosis in terms of convergence.

Variance estimation:

The estimation of the sampling variance considers the sampling design i.e. the stratification. Taylor linearization technique for variance estimation was performed, using the ReGenesees package developed by Zardetto (2015, 2022) in the R statistical environment (R Core Team, 2023).

References:

  • R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Zardetto D (2015). “ReGenesees: an Advanced R System for Calibration, Estimation and Sampling Error Assessment in Complex Sample Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 31(2), 177 - 203. https://sciendo.com:443/article/10.1515/jos-2015-0013.
  • Zardetto D (2022). “ReGenesees: R Evolved Generalized Software for Sampling Estimates and Errors in Surveys.” R package version 2.2.
18.5.1. Imputation - rate

See table 18.5.1 “Imputation - rate” in annex “RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

None.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
RO - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)
RO - 2022 AES questionnaire