|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Hungarian Central Statistical Office |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Quality of Life Statistics Department/ Education, Culture and Time Use Statistics Section Methodology Department |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Keleti Károly Str. 5–7 H-1024 Budapest Hungary |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 18/01/2024 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 18/01/2024 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 18/01/2024 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The Adult Education Survey (AES) covers adults’ participation in education and training (formal - FED, non-formal - NFE and informal learning - INF). The 2022 AES focuses on people aged 18-69. The reference period for the participation in education and training is the twelve months prior to the interview. Information available from the AES is grouped around the following topics:
For further information see the 2022 AES legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology). |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
- Classification of Learning Activities (CLA, 2016 edition) |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
AES covers all economic sectors. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the 2022 AES implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology). |
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
Individuals, non-formal learning activities. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
Individuals aged 18-69 living in private households. No deviation. The total number of persons in the target population: 6 510 259. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
The whole territory of Hungary. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
1/07/2006-30/09/2006 (ad-hoc module of LFS) 2/01/2012-31/03/2012 1/01/2017-10/04/2017 19/01/2023-31/03/2023 |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
Number, EUR, instruction hours |
|
|||
2022 AES fieldwork period: 19/01/2023-31/03/2023 |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
At European level: Basic legal act: Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 Implementing act: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/861 At national level: Act CLV of 2016 on Official Statistics Government Decree 184/2017 (VII.15.) on implementing Act CLV on Official Statistics Government Decree 388/2017 (XII.15.) on the Mandatory Reporting of the National Statistical Data Collection Program |
|||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Hungarian Act on statistics (CLV/2016) describes the confidentiality requirements for this survey. In the process of statistical data collection, processing and analysis and dissemination of statistical information, Hungarian Central Statistical Office fully guarantees the confidentiality of the data submitted by respondents (households, enterprises, institutions, organisations and other statistical units), as defined in the Confidentiality policy of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office. See https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/avpol_web_eng.pdf. National legislation: Government Decree 288/2009 (15 December) Act CLV of 2016 on Official Statistics https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/act_no_clv_of_2016_on_official_statistics.pdf Government Decree 184/2017 (VII. 5.) on implementing Act CLV of 2016 on Official Statistics |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
HCSO ensures confidentiality for all the data reported by data providers and the exclusive use of the data for statistical purposes. We disseminate only aggregated data in full compliance with the rules of confidentiality. For anonymised micro data, top and bottom coding, removing and global recording are mainly used. Researchers have access to de-identified data sets and to anonymised micro data for scientific purposes with appropriate legal and methodological guaranties in place. As for the employees, they can work with datasets in their competence with registered and controlled access rights. For details see the information on confidentiality for data providers on the website of HCSO. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
The exact AES 2022 dissemination products were not pre-planned, therefore these are not listed in the HCSO's release calendar. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
https://www.ksh.hu/katalogus/#/en |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
The data is disseminated to all users through the Dissemination database and Summary Tables on the website of the HCSO. The database and the summary tables are available in Hungarian and English. Users are informed about the date of release in the public release calendar. |
|
|||
Every 6 years. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
There was no press release. |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Permanent publication: Summary Table (in English) - https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/okt/en/okt0047.html Temporary publication: A diagram on adult education participation was published in HCSO Monitor for 4 weeks in November 2023 - https://www.ksh.hu/hcso-monitor/ |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
Not yet. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Not yet. |
|||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
Dissemination of documentation on methodology and sources used in preparing lifelong learning statistics: the description is available via the website of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office for concepts and definitions; classifications, data production methods, data quality, data sources: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/modsz/okt_meth.html https://www.ksh.hu/apps/meta.objektum?p_lang=EN&p_menu_id=110&p_ot_id=100&p_obj_id=ACCA |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
User-oriented quality reports on statistical domains are prepared in the framework of methodological documentation and are published as meta-information on the HCSO website: http://www.ksh.hu/apps/meta.main?p_lang=EN An internal HCSO regulation is in place regarding the preparation of producer-oriented quality reports for each statistical domain on a yearly basis. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
The HCSO Quality Policy lays out the principles and commitments related to the quality of statistics. The document is consistent with the goals set out in the Mission and Vision statements and with the principles of the European Statistics Code of Practice and is publicly available on the HCSO website. The European Statistics Code of Practice is available on the website of the HCSO. Also, HCSO together with the member-organisations of the Hungarian Official Statistical Service created a National Statistics Code of Practice based on the European Statistics Code of Practice. (Currently the National Statistics Code of Practice is available only in Hungarian on the HCSO website.) HCSO Quality Policy: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/minosegi_iranyelvek_eng.pdf National Statistics Code of Practice: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/hun/gyakorlati_kodex.pdf European Statistics Code of Practice: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4031688/8971242/KS-02-18-142-EN-N.pdf/e7f85f07-91db-4312-8118-f729c75878c7 AES related systematic activities: daily and weekly monitoring of fieldwork progress, interviewer control, data editing and validation. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The HCSO has developed quality guidelines to ensure the quality of the statistical processes. The document has been in place since 2007 (1st revision in 2009, 2nd revision in 2014 and 3rd revision is currently ongoing). The latest version (2014) is available on the HCSO website. As HCSO has been carrying out its core activity as a member of the European Statistical System (ESS) since 2004, organisational improvement in quality matters is also based on EU pillars. It relies on the quality guidelines of international statistical institutes with a proven track record and excellent results of quality management (e.g. Statistics Canada, Statistics Finland, the US Federal Statistical Agencies, UK Office for National Statistics and the Italian National Institute of Statistics) and on the Code of Practice adopted in 2005 and revised in 2011 by the EU Statistical Programme Committee. For more information see HCSO's website: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/minosegi_iranyelvek_eng.pdf Hungarian AES 2022 was the third stand-alone survey on participation of adults in education and training. The main strengths of the survey are:
|
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The survey is organized on the basis of the methodology elaborated by Eurostat, so the international data provision obligation as described in the AES legislation can be fulfilled completely. This survey supports the preparation of educational policy decisions. The most important users are government organizations (ministries), journalists, university students writing their thesis. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Not available. |
|||
12.3. Completeness | |||
All variables required by the legislation are covered. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
The sample design and weighting scheme perform well in general, the net effective sample size is larger by far than required. Non-response rate may indicate some risk of bias which was intended to get reduced by weight adjustment. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
For most of the main indicators the design effect is below 1 or close to it, in this sense the estimators are quite effective. In variance estimation the sample design features, the effects of non-response (and the way of adjustment) as well as calibration was taken into account. Sampling AES sample is stratified two-stage sample of individuals selected from the population register. The 160 largest towns are certainty PSUs. The smaller PSUs were stratified by NUTS 2 region, size, average income per capita (TAX data), Roma population (census data) and population with tertiary level educational attainment (census data and only for implicit stratification). Overall 448 localities were selected. Within selected localities individuals were selected with stratified systematic random selection method. The two strata were defined by age (18-24 and 25-69), within strata individuals in the frame were sorted by date of birth. Different sampling rates were applied: 18-24 population was selected with higher rate. The overall gross sample size is 12349 - 4077 for population 18-24 and 8272 for population 25-69. Weighting Design weights were given by sample design. Weight adjustment for non-response: logistic regression was applied with personal, dwelling unit and area level covariates. Calibration (iterative raking) control totals for the subsample of 18-24 by NUTS 2 region: population by age and gender; population by degree of urbanization; population in households with 1-2 members. Final weights are bounded with interval [120,750]. Calibration (iterative raking) control totals for the subsample of 25-69 by NUTS 2 region: population by 5 year age groups and gender; population by degree of urbanization; population in households with 1-2 members. Final weights are bounded with interval [480,3000]. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
Jackknife method was applied taking stratification, clustered nature of sample, systematic selection of individuals, weighting and calibration effects into account. SAS program was used. Reference: Wolter, Kirk M.: Introduction to Variance Estimation, Springer, 2007 See table 13.2.1 “Sampling errors - indicators for 2022 AES key statistics” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
No additional information. See items 13.3.1 - 13.3.5. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
The frame is the population register (individuals with registered address) which is continuously updated. For the selection of AES sample the frame of October in 2022 was used. Over-coverage is ~4.8% (moved abroad, institution, dead), the estimated under-coverage is ~0.6% (individuals with no registered address). |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
See table 13.3.1.1 “Over-coverage - rate” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
Measures taken to prevent measurement errors:
|
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
The overall weighted unit non-response rate is 0.41. Non-respondents can be characterised by area and individual level data available from sampling frame. The remarkable characteristics are below. Capital Budapest (region HU11) is subject to non-response the most (57%). The other central region (HU12) is also above the average by far with response rate 52%. Other regions are below the average, varying in the range 29-39%. Besides, it can be stated that the more developed or more urbanized the area is, the higher the response rate is. As for individual level, males (44%) and the younger (aged 25-34 with 45%) are harder to reach. Non-response rate may indicate some risk of bias which was intended to get reduced by weight adjustment involving variables related to non-response mentioned above (see 13.2.). |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
See table 13.3.3.1 “Unit non-response - rate” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
See table 13.3.3.2 “Item non-response rate” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
Data entry control via CAPI/CATI. |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
No model was used to handle errors or for estimation. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
No deviation. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
Circa 6 months after the end of the fieldwork period. |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
Not yet. |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
The fieldwork ended as expected. Data transmission to EUROSTAT proceeded as expected. See table 14.2 “Project phases - dates” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
See table 15.1 “Deviations from 2022 AES concepts and definitions” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. National concepts and definitions are in line with the legislation and the implementation manual, so the geographical comparability is complete. Some additional variables/information related to COVID-19 were collected, see table 15.1 “Deviations from 2022 AES concepts and definitions” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
Change in sampling frame. In 2016 the sample was selected from the register of dwellings and each household member was observed. In 2023, due to precision requirement for the unplanned domain (individuals aged 18-24), the sample was selected from population register. See table 15.2 “Comparability - over time” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
See table 15.3 “Coherence - cross-domain” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
AES results for a given data collection round are based on the same microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent. |
|
|||
HCSO office staff: 2 statisticians, 3 IT experts. 231 interviewers for 12330 interviews (6734 completed interviews). No detailed data are available about the cost. |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
The AES 2022 is based on a sample survey at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office. The sample is selected by stratified random sampling. See table 18.1 “Source data” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
Every 6 years. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
The method used for data gathering was CAPI and CATI. The software used for the survey was developed by HCSO. |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
The validation process is based on using CAPI/CATI method during the fieldwork (the questionnaire contained rules, back-checks and warnings). |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
For information on sampling and weighting, see 13.2. |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
No imputation, see table 18.5.1 “Imputation - rate” in annex “HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel)”. |
|||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
None. |
|
|||
|
|||
HU - QR tables 2022 AES (excel) HU - 2022 AES - national questionnaire |