Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Statistics Netherlands)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Statistics Netherlands)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Statistiekproductie Bedrijfseconomische Statistieken

1.5. Contact mail address

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek
Postbus 4481
6401 CZ  HEERLEN
The Netherlands


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 17/01/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 17/01/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 17/01/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 N/A.  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Hospitals and clinics  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  N/A.
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
External R&D personnel  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Clinical trials  N/A.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  Yes, however, national foreign governments and international organisations are not separate categories.
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Yeshowever, national foreign governments and international organisations are not separate categories.
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage   Yes, with the ability to afterwards distinguish between foreign-controlled and domestic enterprises by linking UCI data.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes.
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  There is a separate question on the survey asking for the expenditure on outsourced R&D (with domestic and foreign as separate categories).
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  N/A.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar years.
Source of funds  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Type of R&D  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Type of costs  As recommended by Frascati Manual.
Economic activity of the unit  The main economic activity of the enterprise conducting the R&D.
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)  N/A.
Product field  N/A.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  N/A.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  Calendar years.
Function  R&D personnel can be divided into researchers and other R&D staff. Technicians cannot be separated.
Qualification  N/A.
Age  N/A.
Citizenship  N/A.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar years.
Function  R&D personnel can be divided into researchers and other R&D staff. Technicians cannot be separated.
Qualification  N/A.
Age  N/A.
Citizenship  N/A.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Not calculated afterwards but explicitly asked on questionaire.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 N/A.    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  All enterprises in the business sector of the Netherlands.  All enterprises in the business sector of the Netherlands.
Estimation of the target population size    
Size cut-off point  Enterprises with 10 or more persons employed.  Enterprises with 0-9 persons employed.
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)  All size classes except for 0 and 1-9.  Size classes 0 and 1-9.
NACE/ISIC classes covered  NACE rev. 2; 01-99.  NACE rev. 2; 01-99.
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  The frame population is based on the national business register of the Netherlands.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer  Data survey for enterprises with 10 or more persons employed, supplemented with external data source (WBSO; tax creditfor R&D) for enterprises with less than 10 persons employed.
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  A stratified sampling design is used to take a random sample. Sampled enterprises may perform R&D but they might also not perform R&D.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  N/A.
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  Enterprises with less than 10 persons employed are excluded from the survey population and estimated based on Dutch WBSO (tax credit for R&D) data.
Estimation of the frame population  

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Thousands of Euros, number of persons/FTE.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations Mandatory.
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  The production of R&D statistics in the Netherlands is covered by the general Dutch national statistical legislation.
Legal acts  Wet op het Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Statistics Netherlands Act).
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes.
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes, and for enterprises that are sampled it is obligatory to provide data.
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes.
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes, but restricted to a limited number of research institutes and under certain restrictions (e.g. anonymisation of data).
Planned changes of legislation  N/A.
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 Information about individual firms can never be disclosed.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 Confidentiality agreements regarding the data we work with are signed by all employees of Statistics Netherlands.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Our general rules of confidentiality apply to all data and are implemented by using TauArgus software (p%-rule with P = 15% and N = 2).


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Data is published according to the deadlines set by Eurostat: preliminary data in October of year T+1 and definitive data in June of year T+2.

8.2. Release calendar access

N/A.

8.3. Release policy - user access

Statistics are published on the website of Statistics Netherlands and a select group of users can access the corresponding microdata through remote access facilities.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly; StatLine - Datasets by themes (cbs.nl) - R&D, Innovation and Patents.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  No.  
Ad-hoc releases  No.  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 No.  
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 No.  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Tables are available in the online database of Statistics Netherlands: StatLine - Datasets by themes (cbs.nl) - R&D, Innovation and Patents.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Microdata is available for research purposes only and under restrictions. External researchers have access to our microdata on-site or through remote access facilities. They cannot export any microdata from that environment, only aggregated data and statistical/analytical output. Information that outside users publish from our microdata is checked by Statistics Netherlands experts first in order to get permission to export the results.
Access cost policy  N/A.
Micro-data anonymisation rules  N/A.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Yes.  Aggregate figures.  
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Yes.  Aggregate figures.  
Other  No.  N/A.  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

A description of the statistical process is avalable on the Statistics Netherlands website (only in Dutch): Research & Development (cbs.nl).

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   - Table explanations in the online database.
 - Metadata documentation for researchers using the microdata.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  N/A.
Measures to increase clarity  N/A.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   The accompanying information is sufficiently clear to users.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Statistics Nethertlands is an ISO-certified insitution and the R&D statistics are produced under the same standards.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

We consider our R&D methodology to be of sufficient quality.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 Institutions.  Ministries and local governments.  Indicators for setting and assessing policy goals.
 Media.  Newspapers, television programmes, websites and other media outlets.  Primarily microdata for analyses/research.
 Researchers and students.  Universities/higher education insitutions.  Output based on relevant and up-to-date data.
 Enterprises or businesses.  Enterprises/enterprise groups.  Indicators for market assessment.

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  N/A.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  N/A.
Short description of the feedback received  N/A.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

All required, obligatory data cells are provided.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  X          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  X          
Optional data on R&D expenditure      X     Not enough funds/capacity within Statistics Netherlands for producing and delivering optional data.
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  X          
Optional data on R&D personnel      X      Not enough funds/capacity within Statistics Netherlands for producing and delivering optional data.
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel    X        

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Yes.  Annual.        
Type of R&D  Yes.  Annual.        
Type of costs  Yes.  Annual.        
Socioeconomic objective  No.          
Region  Yes.  Annual.        
FORD  Yes.  Annual.        
Type of institution  No.          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Yes.  Annual.        
Function  Yes.  Annual.        
Qualification  No.          
Age  No.          
Citizenship  No.          
Region  Yes.  Annual.        
FORD  Yes.  Annual.        
Type of institution  No.          
Economic activity  Yes.  Annual.        
Product field  No.          
Employment size class  Yes.  Annual.        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Yes  Annual.        
Function  Yes.  Annual.        
Qualification  No.          
Age  No.          
Citizenship  No.          
Region  Yes.  Annual.        
FORD  Yes.  Annual.        
Type of institution  No.          
Economic activity  Yes.  Annual.        
Product field  No.          
Employment size class  Yes.  Annual.        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 N/A.          
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  3  -  2  -  1    +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  3  -  2  -  1    +/-
Researchers in FTE  3  -  2  -  1    +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    X      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

N/A.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.
R&D personnel (FTE)  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.
R&D personnel (FTE)  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 N/A.

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 N/A.

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  N/A.    
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  N/A.    
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  0  868  1035  432  2335
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  0  0  0  0  0
Misclassification rate  0  0  0  0  0
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  0  1229  1341  1416  3986
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  0  0  0  0  0
Misclassification rate  0  0  0  0  0
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Difficulty to fill in the right values by respondents (e.g. distinguishing intramural from extramural R&D, making a regional division etc.)

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Via predefined rules the data are automatically subjected to a first error check. Then the data are manually checked for plausibility. In many cases contact with the respondent follows in order to verify and or clarify the data.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample    1573  2131  1829  5533
Total number of units in the sample    2097  2376  1848  6321
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)    25  10  1  12
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)    28  11  1  24
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  2049  3484  5533
Total number of units in the sample  2335  3986  6321
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  12  13  12
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  22  25  24

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Enterprises in the sample can receive up to three reminders. The first is sent via a letter, six weeks after sending the original questionnaire. The second is also sent as a letter, eight weeks after the original invitation to participate. The third reminder is done by means of a phone call.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No.
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  N/A.
Data collection method employed  N/A.
Response rate of this type of survey  N/A.
The main reasons of non-response identified  N/A.
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  0%  0%  0%
Imputation (Y/N)  N/A.  N/A.  N/A.
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used      
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  N/A.
Total R&D personnel in FTE  N/A.
Researchers in FTE  N/A.
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Electronic online questionnaires only.
Estimates of data entry errors  N/A.
Variables for which coding was performed  N/A.
Estimates of coding errors  N/A.
Editing process and method  Via predefined rules the data are automatically subjected to a first error check. Then the data are manually checked for plausibility.
Procedure used to correct errors  In many cases contact with the respondent follows in order to verify and or clarify the data.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31 December of year T.

b) Date of first release of national data: T+10 months.

c) Lag (days): 0.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31 December of year T.

b) Date of first release of national data: T+18 months.

c) Lag (days): 0.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months) 10 18
Delay (days)  0 0
Reasoning for delay  N/A.  N/A.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No divergence from Frascati Manual.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  No.  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.  No.  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No.  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No.  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  No.  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  No.  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59.  No.  
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No.  
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No.  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No.  
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  Yes.  Private non-profit organisations are included in GOV, not in BES.
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No.  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No.  Micro enterprises are mainly observed through secondary sources.
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No.  
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No.  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities  No.  
Data collection method  No.  
Cooperation with respondents  No.  
Follow-up of non-respondents  Yes.  No non-response survey.
Data processing methods  No.  
Treatment of non-response  Yes.  
Data weighting  Yes.  
Variance estimation  N/A.  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  No.  
Survey type  No.  
Sample design  No.  
Survey questionnaire  No.  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  2013 - 2021 2013,
2011,
2006,
1996,
1994,
1991
2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

2011: The method for producing data on the business enterprise sector has changed. The most important change is that all observed business enterprises have been used in the final result. In the past (ending with 2010), only enterprises with substantial R&D activities had been included. ("substantial" meaning a minimum number of R&D FTE per business enterprise, with a variable minimum per NACE code). As a result of this method change, the HC will increase by approx. 30%.

2006: In 2006, a large company was reclassified from ISIC/NACE 30 to ISIC/NACE 32, resulting in a break in series for those two industries.

1996: In 1996, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Service sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector.Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1996 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Service sector, for the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1994: In 1994, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Manufacturing sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector. Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1994 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Manufacturing industries, the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1991: From 1991 to 1994, business enterprise SSH R&D, corresponding to R&D by institutes serving business enterprise only, was included in the PNP sector.
  Function  2013 - 2021 2013,
2012
2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

2012: As of 2012 technicians and other support staff are no separate categories anymore for BES and GOV. They are now one category ("other").
  Qualification  N/A.    
R&D personnel (FTE)  2013 - 2021 2013,
2011,
2006,
1996,
1994,
1991
2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

2011: The method for producing data on the business enterprise sector has changed. The most important change is that all observed business enterprises have been used in the final result. In the past (ending with 2010), only enterprises with substantial R&D activities had been included. ("substantial" meaning a minimum number of R&D FTE per business enterprise, with a variable minimum per NACE code). As a result of this method change, the FTE will increase by approx. 20%.

2006: In 2006, a large company was reclassified from ISIC/NACE 30 to ISIC/NACE 32, resulting in a break in series for those two industries.

1996: In 1996, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Service sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector. Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1996 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Service sector, for the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1994: In 1994, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Manufacturing sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector. Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1994 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Manufacturing industries, the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1991: From 1991 to 1994, business enterprise SSH R&D, corresponding to R&D by institutes serving business enterprise only, was included in the PNP sector.
  Function  2013 - 2021 2013,
2012
2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

2012: As of 2012 technicians and other support staff are no separate categories anymore for BES and GOV. They are now one category ("other").
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure  2013 - 2021 2013,
2011,
2006,
1996,
1994,
1991
2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

2011: The method for producing data on the business enterprise sector has changed. The most important change is that all observed business enterprises have been used in the final result. In the past (ending with 2010), only enterprises with substantial R&D activities had been included. ("substantial" meaning a minimum number of R&D FTE per business enterprise, with a variable minimum per NACE code). As a result of this method change, the expenditure will increase by approx. 15%.

2006: In 2006, a large company was reclassified from ISIC/NACE 30 to ISIC/NACE 32, resulting in a break in series for those two industries.

1996: In 1996, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Service sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector.Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1996 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Service sector, for the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1994: In 1994, firms with 10 to 49 employees in the Manufacturing sector were included in the scope of the business enterprise sector. Following this enlargement of the scope of the survey in the business enterprise sector, 1994 data on R&D expenditure and personnel in the Manufacturing industries, the BE sector total, as well as the national total, are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

1991: From 1991 to 1994, business enterprise SSH R&D, corresponding to R&D by institutes serving business enterprise only, was included in the PNP sector.
Source of funds  2013 - 2021 2013 2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.
Type of costs  2013 - 2021 2013 2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.
Type of R&D  2013 - 2021 2013 2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.
Other  2013 - 2021 2013 2013: Revision of statistics on R&D.

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Data are produced in the same way in the odd and even years.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

The microdata collected though the R&D survey is used by the department responsible for the System of National Accounts (SNA).

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 N/A.          
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

The microdata collected though the R&D survey is used for producing the inward FATS.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  13032345  124185  74408
Final data (delivered T+18)  13048183  123627  73162
Difference (of final data)  15838  -558  -1246

 

74408
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  € 79.149 per FTE.
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  N/A.

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs    
Data collection costs    
Other costs    
Total costs    
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)    
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1    
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)    
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  R&D survey.
Type of survey  A combination of a census for enterprises with a least 500 persons employed and sample survey for enterprises with less than 500 persons employed, but more than 10. Enterprises with less than 10 persons employed are not surveyed.
Combination of sample survey and census data  Enterprises employing 500 or more employees are all included (cnesus). Enterprises with 10-499 employees are covered by sampling (sample survey). Enterprises with 0-10 employees are estimated by means of a secondary source.
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Combined with CIS for even reference years.
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  
Variables the survey contributes to  All mandatory variables.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  The survey is sent out in April year t+1, data collection is aimed to be completed by September t+1, and preliminary results are published by the end of October t+1.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  Enterprise.    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  NACE, size class.    
Stratification variable classes      
Population size  A minimum of 8 enterprises in each NACE and size class combination is imperative.    
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  Random sample.    
Survey frame  Enterprises with 10 to 499 persons employed are sampled from the general business register. Census for 500 persons employed or more.    
Sample design  Combined sample for BES and GOV. The sampling method used is a random sampling technique according to sizeclass as well as an additional relative weighting factor derived from the number of enterprises occupying each stratum. The population is divided into 606 strata (101 NACE-groups by 6 sizeclasses). Enterprises with more than 500 persons employed are always included in the sample.    
Sample size  6321.    
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  WBSO (Dutch R&D tax credit)
Description of collected data / statistics  WBSO is the legal Act promoting research and development. This Act provides fiscal facilities for companies, knowledge centres and self-employed persons who carry out R&D work. The information is used to estimate the R&D of the smallest enterprises; 0-9 persons employed.
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Year T.
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection  Electronic questionnaire.
Incentives used for increasing response  No.
Follow-up of non-respondents  Up to 3 reminders by mail and/or phone call.
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  No.
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  88%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  No.
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  
18.4. Data validation

Validation is done in EDAMIS Acceptance.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  N/A.  20%  18%  16%  18%
R&D personnel (FTE)  N/A.  20%  18%  16%  18%
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  18%  18%  18%
R&D personnel (FTE)  18%  18%  18%

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  Annual survey.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Annual survey.
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  In the survey, respondents are asked to provide a breakdown of R&D personnel HC by gender and province. This breakdown is used to estimate the other variables by gender and province.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  N/A.
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  N/A.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  N/A.
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  Weights are calculated per stratum (combination of NACE and sizeclass) as the ratio between the number of enterprises in the population and the number of enterprises that responded to the survey.
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)  The number of enterprises in the population per stratum is taken from the National Business Register.
Variables used for weighting  N/A.
Calibration method and the software used  N/A.
Estimation  N/A.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top