Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry for Higher Education and Research (MESR)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry for Higher Education and Research (MESR)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

SIES - Sub-Directorate for Information Systems and Statistical Studies

Department of statistical studies on research

1.5. Contact mail address

Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur, de la recherche et de l'innovation
DGESIP/DGRI – SIES – Département des études statistiques de la recherche
1 rue Descartes, 75231 Paris Cedex 05


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 10/12/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 10/12/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 10/12/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 None  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  The target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consists of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  All the fields are covered. There is no breakdown of intranural & extramural expenditures and funds by FORD. They can be estimated with a breakdown by activity and by the main research area of researchers belonging to the enterprise.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  All the SEO are covered. There is no breakdown of R&D indicators by SEO.
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector This sector includes private and public sector enterprises, research companies (including those working under contract), research centres and non-profit industrial technology centres working for commercial firms.
The national survey does not entirely cover the services: NACE divisions 68 Real Estate and 75 veterinary activities are excluded according to the Frascati Manual; covered however are transport, communications, and services to enterprises among which computer services and engineering services.
Hospitals and clinics  Non-governmental hospital and clinics belong to the scope.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  No
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities R&D administration and other support activities: no deviations from FM §2.122.
External personnel:
Clinical trials: Information on whether they are included (see FM §2.61), in which sector(s) and how has R&D been separated should be provided.
External R&D personnel The treatment of external personnel in R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is compliant with FM §5.20-5.24, Table 5.2. Included categories of external personnel are R&D personal working into the enterprise without being paid directly by the society (temporary workers, consultancy activities, doctoral/master's students).
Clinical trials Compliant with Frascati manual. Clinical trials in Phase 1, 2 and 3 are included.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability The following categories can be distinguished :
- receipts from EU
- from international organisations
- from foreign enterprise of the same enterprise group
- from foreign enterprises not in the same group
- foreign national organisations.
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  The following categories can be distinguished :
- Receipts from foreign enterprise of the same enterprise group into the EU and outside the EU
- to foreign enterprises not in the same group, into the EU and outside the EU
- international organisations
- foreign national organisations.
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage   No specific question. Foreign-controlled enterprises are taken into account in the aggregate category "foreign enterprise of the same enterprise group".
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure External R&D expenditures correspond to subcontracting and collaboration in R&D tasks. It is the tax-free expenditure on complete or partial R&D programs carried out by a third party on behalf of one company, excluding orders for supplies or simple services related to the R&D work carried out by this company and taken into account as domestic expenditure.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  In case of consulting activities, the companies may have doubts on how to fill out the questionnaire, and these doubts are considered with the R&D survey responsible.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Source of funds For business enterprises, the sources of funds by R&D branch are collected on the basis of total expenditure (intramural + extramural R&D expenditure). For the purposes of the OECD tables, supplementary information on the funding of sub-contracted R&D allows the funding of intramural R&D expenditure to be allocated by R&D branch.
The data by industry in 1979 are broken down on the basis of intramural + extramural R&D expenditure, whereas the data in this sector, with regard to the GERD, are assigned on the basis of intramural expenditure only.
Type of R&D  All 3 types of R&D are collected.
Type of costs  Labour costs, other current costs (icld costs for external R&D personnel), capital expenditures (breakdown by lands and buildings, instruments and equipments, capitalised computer softwares, capitalised personnel costs).
Economic activity of the unit The data are classified according to "branches" and not according to main economic activity of the enterprise. The R&D resources of the enterprise are assigned to one or more economic branches. Each R&D unit is classified according to the branch of economic activity benefiting from the R&D work, known as the R&D branch. This expenditure is then re-aggregated in accordance with the NACE classification. In this way, supposing Renault had three branches: automobiles, tractors, and machine-tools. Its R&D would be classified according to the branches where the R&D is performed (for example: 70% in the automobile industry, 30% to the machinery industry, split 10% for tractors and 20% for machine-tools). Consequently, there are some discrepancies with the OECD classification concerning principal economic activity of the firm, but concerning the heterogeneous companies from the point of view of their economic activities, this procedure is in conformity with paragraph 156 of the Frascati Manual.
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)  No specific data for NACE 72 as data R&D are collected by branch of R&D (see above).
Product field  Not available
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure Data are available but are not fully detailed: defence GERD by type of cost and type of R&D, detailed breakdown of personnel, etc. Due to specific defense confidentiality, we cannot be sure of exhaustivity in this area.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years 31st December of the reference year
Function The R&D personnel of the business enterprise sector is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects.
Qualification Researchers data are broken down by higher degree of qualification.
Age Less than 25, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, more than 65.
Citizenship France, EU except FR, UK, Europe except EU, USA, Americas except USA, Asia, Africa, other countries, unknown.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function The R&D personnel of the business enterprise sector is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects.
Qualification Not available
Age Not available
Citizenship Not available
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Full-time equivalents consist of average figures for the year that take account of departures and arrivals during the year and also of the time devoted to research in cases where the activity does not consist solely of R&D. The data collected are used to calculate the number of paid employees and personnel working in agencies.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 Cross-classifications by occupation and qualification are available, in FTE and HC.  Headcounts and FTE  Every two years (uneven calendar years)
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  The target population is made of all companies located in France (including overseas departments and territories) likely to carry out R&D activity, regardless of their size and sector of activity.  
Estimation of the target population size For 2021, 8.000 enterprises were surveyed from 24.000 enterprises representing the target population.  
Size cut-off point  Cut-off at 80% of the total of the BERD in an enterprise.  
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)  All classes, no threshold is used.  
NACE/ISIC classes covered  All classes.  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  Every year, the frame population is defined by using the frame population of the last R&D survey, and administrative files or statistical surveys which include supposed new R&D performers
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer The frame population is updated every year thanks to the following administrative files or statistical surveys :
- Companies benefiting from the research tax credit, tax incentive for research (source : MESRI),
- Companies receiving support from business incubators (source : MESRI),
- Companies benefiting from the young innovative companies scheme (source : Central Agency of Social Security Associations - Acoss),
- CIS (Community innovation survey) (source : The French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies - Insee).
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  No
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  9% of the total population in legal unit
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  As far as possible, the holdings are excluded from the process of updating the frame population.
Estimation of the frame population  4 105 094 enterprises in 2021

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

France, including overseas departments and territories.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

R&D expenditures are given in Keuros (1.000 euros).
R&D personnel is given in headcounts and in FTE (with one decimal place).


5. Reference Period Top

2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  Yes
Legal acts National council for statistical information, Visa n°2022A070RE form JORF 24/10/2022, survey of general interest and statistical quality with obligation.
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Planned changes of legislation  No
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

According to national law, data may only be published in a way that no conclusions on individual units can be drawn. Data for aggregates where less than 3 units contribute to the figures are not published. Data for aggregates where 1 unit contributes to more than 85% to the figures are not published.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 Every individual staff member is obliged by internal rules and by the European Statistics Code of Practice to a strict confidential treatment of information.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Categories containing information from less than 3 enterprises or 1 enterprise contributing more than 85% cannot be disclosed. In order to prevent indentifcation of these celles by simple substractions from total, at least one additional category must be suppressed.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Preliminary results : April N+2

Final results : September N+2 and December N+2 (more detailed)

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/calendrier-2023-des-publications-statistiques-du-sies-46592

8.3. Release policy - user access

Official calendar

Publications

Press releases

Users are treated according to the national statistical system rules, i.e. all users have access to the information at the same time.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

yearly and every two years for additional information on R&D personnel.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  N  
Ad-hoc releases  Y  press release on the ministry website when the publication is disseminated

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y

 https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/en-2021-l-effort-de-recherche-des-entreprises-revient-son-niveau-d-avant-la-crise-sanitaire-90605

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/la-depense-de-recherche-et-developpement-experimental-en-2021-92628

https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/16/FR/

Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

  Y, online and paper for other institutions  https://bpifrance-creation.fr/entrepreneur/actualites/rapport-levolution-pme-2020

https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/5758762?sommaire=5759063

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://data.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/explore/dataset/fr-esr-publications-statistiques/information/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Micro-data access for researchers is possible, with legal constraints.
Access cost policy  Provisioning costs have to be paid.
Micro-data anonymisation rules   No anonymisation, due to the confidentiality rules applied to researchers (see https://www.casd.eu/en/)
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    ministry website : https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/FR/
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y    Specific requests from government bodies (inspections, Cour des comptes) and Insee
Other  Y  Y   For researchers only : https://www.casd.eu/en/

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiKp7mKvoyCAxU3T6QEHe6fCRUQFnoECBMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.insee.fr%2Ffr%2Fstatistiques%2Ffichier%2F2838097%2F8-correction-de-la-non-reponse-par-reponderation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3RGGxWfW4ZAln5kD9xz27I&opi=89978449

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Methodological documents are provided when individual data are released (to researchers). These include questionnaires, explanatory notes and a methodological guide presenting the survey population and sample, as well as the adjustments made, the results (and confidence intervals) and variables description.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Clarifications requested between R&D branches and activity codes.
Measures to increase clarity  A training for researchers is planned on Autumn 2023.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Additional information is provided to researchers when requested.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The R&D survey has obtained the Label of general interest and compliance to the rules of public statistic:https://www.cnis.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AC_2022_Sies_RD_entreprises.pdf

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Every 3 or 5 years, a board of experts from the National Council of statistical information examines the quality of the survey and asks for clarifications and improvements which are assessed at the next session.

2021 response rate is 82%.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1   Eurostat STI regulation  
1  Eurostat Fats regulation  
1  OCDE - MSTI database
1 Insee - national accounts and CIS survey  detailed data
1 Ministries : R&D, Agriculture, Industry, Environement  national aggregates, breakdown by activity
1 Regional bodies  Regional data
 3  Media   Disseminated data
 4  Researchers   Micro-data
 6  Cour des comptes, inspections générales de l'adminisatration, des finances ou de l'éducation nationale   Specific questions

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  No
Short description of the feedback received  Each year, the companies surveyed receive a link to the Ministry's website with a summary of the main results of the survey.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

100%

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  100%          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure   100%          
Optional data on R&D expenditure   100%          
Obligatory data on R&D personnel   100%          
Optional data on R&D personnel   100%          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel   100%          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y   yearly from 1970  N      
Type of R&D  Y   yearly from 1970  N      
Type of costs  Y   yearly from 1970  N      
Socioeconomic objective  N          
Region  Y   yearly from 1970  N      
FORD  N          
Type of institution  Y   yearly from 1970        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y   every two years        
Function  Y   every two years        
Qualification  Y   every two years        
Age  Y   every two years        
Citizenship  Y   every two years        
Region  Y  yearly        
FORD  N          
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  Y  yearly        
Product field  N          
Employment size class  Y  yearly        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  N          
Function  Y  yearly        
Qualification  N          
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Y  yearly        
FORD  N          
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  Y  yearly        
Product field  N          
Employment size class  Y  yearly        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
  Extramural R&D expenditure   from 1970  yearly  

- domestic R&D organisations

- domestic companies from the same group / from another group

- foreign enterprise of the same enterprise group into the EU and outside the EU

- to foreign enterprises not in the same group, into the EU and outside the EU

- international organisations

- foreign national organisations.
   
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  4  1  3  -  4    -
Total R&D personnel in FTE  4  1  3  -  4    -
Researchers in FTE  4  1  3  -  4    -

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    X      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

The variance is calculated only once, for the sampling.

The sampling method is a stratified sampling with two variables : region and R&D branch.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  5.531078  3.188891  5.71535
R&D personnel (FTE)  4.271676  2.339412  3.98793

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  1.68761  1.342335  1.53797  1.55921  5.71535
R&D personnel (FTE)  1.60339  1.31336  1.07394  1.36322  3.98793
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  The number of unknown R&D performing enterprises, their R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is considered negligible.  The number of unknown R&D performing enterprises, their R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is considered negligible.  The number of unknown R&D performing enterprises, their R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is considered negligible.
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  

The number of potential borderline institutions is considered negligible.

 The number of potential borderline institutions is considered negligible.  The number of potential borderline institutions is considered negligible.
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)          Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)          Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
Misclassification rate         Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)          Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)          Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
Misclassification rate          Does not apply. Legal units are classified into a size class and an industry after the survey. The preliminary classification at the beginning of the survey can be different, but is irrelevant as not used for data dissemination.
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 No errors known.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  1698  2470  2100  1603  7871
Total number of units in the sample  3344  3424  2778  2405  11951
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  49,2%  27,9%  24,4%  33,3%  34.1%
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)   Does not apply.   Does not apply.   Does not apply.   Does not apply.   Does not apply.
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  2911  4960  7871
Total number of units in the sample  4029  7922  11951
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  72,3%  62,7%  
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)      

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

After the launch mail, one additional letter is sent by ordinary mail, and 2 other letters are sent with return receipt.

Emails are sent before the mails, in order to reduce the number of mails.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  Does not apply.
Data collection method employed  Does not apply.
Response rate of this type of survey  Does not apply.
The main reasons of non-response identified   Heavy response burden and confidentiality of the topic.
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  8,9%  33,4%  33,4%
Imputation (Y/N)  Y  Y  Y
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used  Depending on the company's profile: N-1 answer or stratified hotdeck with crossover between employment and research branch  Depending on the company's profile: N-1 answer or stratified hotdeck with crossover between employment and research branch  Depending on the company's profile: N-1 answer or stratified hotdeck with crossover between employment and research branch
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  Practically 0.
Total R&D personnel in FTE  Practically 0.
Researchers in FTE  Practically 0.
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Insee website dedicated to business surveys collection
Estimates of data entry errors  
Variables for which coding was performed  Department
Estimates of coding errors  none
Editing process and method  
Procedure used to correct errors   Direct questions to companies, additional sources of informations, estimations
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period:2021

b) Date of first release of national data:September 2022

c) Lag (days):270

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period:2021

b) Date of first release of national data:September 2023

c) Lag (days):635

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  19
Delay (days)     
Reasoning for delay      reingenering of the dissemination application


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No issues.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  N  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.  N  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25    
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  N  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59.  N  
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   N  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  N  
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   N  
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   N  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities  N  
Data collection method  N  
Cooperation with respondents  N  
Follow-up of non-respondents  N  
Data processing methods  N  
Treatment of non-response  N  
Data weighting  N  
Variance estimation  O  not calculated
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  N  
Survey type  N  
Sample design  N  
Survey questionnaire  N  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)     2004, 2001, 1998, 1992        2004: In 2007, the sampling method in the BE sector was modified and the 2004 data revised according to the new methodology.
2001: Coverage of the BE sector was expanded, and the data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1998: The new estimates for 1998 also resulted in 1997 corrections to R&D personnel with an increase of 2257 FTE in the business enterprise sector.
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D personnel (FTE)     2004, 2001, 1998, 1992   2004: In 2007, the sampling method in the BE sector was modified and the 2004 data revised according to the new methodology.
2001: Coverage of the BE sector was expanded, and the data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1998: The new estimates for 1998 also resulted in 1997 corrections to R&D personnel with an increase of 2257 FTE in the business enterprise sector.
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure     2001, 1997, 1992, 1981   2004: In 2007, the sampling method in the BE sector was modified and the 2004 data revised according to the new methodology.
2001:Coverage of the BE sector was expanded, and the data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1997: Modifications to the boundary between R&D and other activities conducted by some very large enterprises resulted in a FRF 2.6 billion adjustment to domestic expenditure by business enterprises. BERD increased to FRF 113854 million from 111278 before revision. The new estimates for 1998 also resulted in 1997 corrections to R&D personnel with an increase of 2257 FTE in the business enterprise sector
1992:The data related to the business enterprise and government sectors are not comparable with the corresponding data for 1991 due to the transfer of agencies (France Télécom and GIAT Industries) from the government sector to the business enterprise sector, in accordance with the change in their legal status.- account has been taken of the repayment of reimbursable aid in the distribution of R&D expenditure by source of funding in the data supplied to the OECD. - the method used for the survey of the private non-profit sector has been modified
1981:The evaluation of R&D expenditure was modified to take account of: - a reassessment of the proportion of time devoted to research by lecturers. The Ministry of Education currently estimates this share to amount to 50% on average, whereas the coefficients previously supplied by the Ministry and applied until 1980 (natural sciences 65%, medicine 30% and social sciences 10%) amounted on average to approximately 35%; - the cost of research and development work by the Ministry of Defence in connection with the FOST (Strategic Ocean Force), which previously was not included under R&D; - the impact of levying VAT on public research bodies.
Source of funds    1992   Account has been taken of the repayment of reimbursable aid in the distribution of R&D expenditure by source of funding.
Type of costs      
Type of R&D      
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Same way every year.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Survey results are the input for national accounts, there is no other source for R&D.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
           CIS does not publish R&D statistics in France
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

We make sure the data of the 2 process are consistent.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  36378948  302841.8  206390
Final data (delivered T+18)  36477729  302379.9  205942.5
Difference (of final data)  98781  -461.9  -447.5
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  A control is made by an expert if the mean salary in a unit is superior to 25 000€ per month
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2) No distinction between internal and external R&D personnel available.

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  Not available  
Data collection costs   Not available  
Other costs   Not available  
Total costs   Not available  
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  9801  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  2h20  
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)    
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name   Survey on resources dedicated to research and experimental development in companies
Type of survey   Sample survey and census survey. The target population is made up of two sub-populations :

- the sub-population A which corresponds to the units covered by sampling (sampled stratum)

- the sub-population B which corresponds to the units covered by census (exhaustive stratum)
Combination of sample survey and census data  Yes
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)   Survey on resources dedicated to research and experimental development in companies - Survey on R&D researchers and engineers
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  
Variables the survey contributes to  
Survey timetable-most recent implementation   The survey is mandatory. The survey is launched in March of year n+1, data collection is considered complete in December n+1, first results are available in June n+2 and complete results are available for December n+2.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit      
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame  Only the research and development expenditure of enterprises which have a permanent R&D structure, i.e. those which have employed at least one researcher in FTE on R&D during the period surveyed, are included in the results, which after adjustment amounts to slightly under half of the enterprises surveyed.    
Sample design  The sub-population A (sampled stratum) is made up of 2 strata :

- the first stratum (stratum A.1) is made of all the units of the target population which are in a group,

- the second stratum (stratum A.2) is made of all the units of the target population which are independant

- the entreprises are sampled up to 80% of the BERD inside each group, and the independant LU are sampled to complete a threshold to reach a certain precision.
   
Sample size  8000 enterprises (12 700 LU)    
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  
Description of collected data / statistics  
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection  Webquestionnaire
Incentives used for increasing response  
Follow-up of non-respondents   Email, phone
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  82%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)   There is mostly no non-response for biggest companies.
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  N
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  Y- https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/enquete-rd-aupres-des-entreprises-81718
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  N
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:   https://www.cnis.fr/enquetes/moyens-consacres-a-la-recherche-et-au-developpement-rd-dans-les-entreprises-et-son-volet-biennal-consacre-aux-chercheurs-enquete-annuelle-sur-les-2021a053re/?producer=548
18.4. Data validation

Macro-controliing for the most influent value in each strata.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure          
R&D personnel (FTE)          
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure      
R&D personnel (FTE)      

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  
Data compilation method - Preliminary data   First estimation when all the controls have not been implementing yet.
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  NUTS3 data is used, so NUTS1 or NUTS2 data is calculated by agregation
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  For each stratum, the weight is equal to the ratio of the frame size to the sample size.

Treatment of total non-response:

Total non-response is corrected by reweighting: the response of responding firms, which already have an initial weight established during the draw, is reweighted. The assumption is that non-responding firms behave in the same way as responding firms.
The responses of companies with GERD greater than 400 k€ are not reweighted. For these strata, the response to the survey of year N-1 can be renewed for year N (but this cannot be done two years in a row).
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)   Survey frame and business register.
Variables used for weighting  
Calibration method and the software used  R
Estimation  
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top