Back to top

International supply of services by modes, type of product (EBOPS 2010) and partner country (ext_ser_mos)

DownloadPrint

Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: European Commission - DG Eurostat

Need help? Contact the Eurostat user support

Statistics on international supply of services (ISS) by modes of supply (MoS) show how and where services are supplied internationally, namely by answering the question of 'how' services are exchanged across countries and 'where' services are supplied to foreign customers.  Detailed information on international supply of services statistics by services category, mode of supply and partner country help policymakers carry out the ongoing and future trade negotiating agenda with facts and strong, evidence-based arguments. ISS data allow to monitor the impact of services trade agreements.

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), the first multilateral agreement to cover trade in services, defines trade in services as the supply of a service through any of the four modes of supply:

  • Mode 1 - cross-border supply: from the territory of one country into the territory of another country;
  • Mode 2 - consumption abroad: in the territory of one country to the service consumer of another country;
  • Mode 3 - commercial presence: by a service supplier of one country, through a commercial presence in the territory of another country. The FATS framework is designed to provide information on the activities of enterprises located in foreign markets;
  • Mode 4 - presence of natural persons: by a service supplier of one country, through the presence of natural persons of that country in the territory of any other country.

26 March 2025

 The product breakdown follows the Extended Balance of Payments Services Classification 2010 (EBOPS 2010) and covers the EBOPS 2010 main and detailed components, and complementary groupings as defined in the Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services 2010 (MSITS 2010) and further explained in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, Annex VI, Section 2, Table 1. 

 Product breakdown by EBOPS 2010 main and detailed components, and complementary groupings

EBOPS 2010 Main Components  EBOPS 2010 Detailed components
1. Manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others   
2. Maintenance and repair services n.i.e.  Optional: 2.a Of which: goods 

3. Transport

    Optional: Valuation of freight transport services on a transaction-basis

3.1. Sea transport 
  3.2. Air transport 
  3.3. Other modes of transport 
  3.4. Postal and courier services
4. Travel 4.a. Of which: goods
5. Construction 5.a. Of which: goods
6. Insurance and pension services  
7. Financial services  
8. Charges for the use of intellectual property n.i.e.  

9. Telecommunications, computer, and information
services

9.1. Telecommunications services
  9.2. Computer services
  9.3. Information services
10. Other business services  10.1. Research and development services
  10.2. Professional and management consulting services
  Optional items:
 

10.2.1. Legal, accounting, management consulting, and public
relations services;

 

10.2.2. Advertising, market research, and public opinion polling
services

 

10.3. Technical, trade-related, and other business services

  Optional items:
 

10.3.1. Architectural, engineering, scientific, and other technical
services;

 

10.3.2. Waste treatment and de-pollution, agricultural and
mining services;

  10.3.3. Operating leasing services;
  10.3.4. Trade-related services;
  10.3.5. Other business services n.i.e.
11. Personal, cultural and recreational services  11.1. Audiovisual and related services
  11.2. Other personal, cultural and recreational services
12. Government goods and services, n.i.e 12.a Of which goods

EBOPS 2010 complementary grouping
C. Total trade-related transactions (optional item)
C.a Trade-related services (item 10.3.4 – optional item)
C.b Distribution services

 

Product breakdown according to CPA classification is voluntary.

 

Mode of supply breakdown is defined in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, Annex VI, Section 2:

  • Total international supply of services (total of modes 1, 2, 3 and 4)
  • Mode 1 (‘cross border transactions’),
  • Mode 2 (‘consumption abroad’),
  • Mode 3 (‘commercial presence’), and
  • Mode 4 (‘presence of natural persons’).

Not applicable

Total international supply of services by all four modes of supply.

The data currently cover the European Union, EU Member States, and Norway. Two EU MSs have a derogation for the first three years of implementation (Cyprus and Slovakia). Data for this two countries are estimated by Eurostat and added to the EU aggregate.

In terms of partner country the geographical breakdown covers Geo level 5 as defined in an implementing act in accordance with Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2152.

Calendar year.

The Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 on European business statistics gives the data providers the choice of data sources. Eurostat validates the MoS data transmitted by the countries for their consistency and plausibility.

The structural and content validations of the transmitted data sets are authomatically checked in the Eurostat's data transmission program EDAMIS (a tool used for delivery of data to Eurostat) via the automatic validation process performed with tools, called Struval and Conval.

If any problems (e.g. inconsistencies or omissions) are detected during the data processing/validation, Eurostat contacts the relevant country for verification of the figures and/or confirmation of the introduced corrections/updates.

Countries report data to Eurostat in national currency (thousands).

Eurostat disseminates data in million euro.

The European business statistics compilers guide for European statistics on international supply of services by mode of supply (2023 edition) describes how the ISS by modes could be estimated using already available data and empowering the Eurostat-WTO model.

The Eurostat-WTO model is an operational version of the MSITS 2010 simplified approach; it can be used to produce first estimates on the international supply of services based on existing statistics. In most countries already available international trade in services (ITS) and foreign affiliates (FATS) data are used. The model uses data from ITSS (based on the EBOPS services classification) and FATS (based on the activities of the affiliates, reported according to the NACE classification). The estimations are complemented with other data sources (such as tourism statistics, trade by enterprise characteristics (TEC), services trade by enterprise characteristics (STEC) and structural business statistics (SBS). The model allocates each EBOPS item in one or more modes. As a first step, several adjustments are needed for certain items: (e.g. travel, construction and government goods and services items are adjusted by removing the value of goods, and distribution services traded through mode 1 are estimated). Each EBOPS item is then assigned to one or more modes based on the MSITS 2010 suggestions and an expert assessment of how specific service items are most likely to be supplied to consumers.

Several countries have fine-tuned the model to their economic reality, by further evidence from surveys or companies' interviews.

According to the compilation methodology for estimating the modes of supply under the ISS, the values of the goods in the EBOPS items Maintenance and repair (SB, on a voluntary bases), Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL) must be decucted from the respective ITS items and the distribution services must be estimated and added to mode one.

For the first reference year under the Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 on European business statistics (reference year 2023) not all countries managed to make the above adjustments in the source ITS data.

Country code Country name Distribution services included in mode 1         Goods values excluded
AT Austria Yes No
BE Belgium Yes No
BG Bulgaria Yes No
CY Cyprus Derogation  
CZ Czech No No
DE Germany Yes

Yes

An estimate of the goods values included in some EBOPS items (Maintenance and repair (SB), Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL)) has been excluded/subtracted.

DK Denmark Yes No
EE Estonia No No
ES Spain Yes

Yes

Spain has removed the share of goods from selected EBOPS items: Maintenance and repair, Travel, Construction and Government goods and services n.i.e.

With the QITSS questionnaire respondents were directly asked for the share of goods on Maintenance and repair, Construction and Government goods and services n.i.e.

For Travel item, the removal of goods value is made indirectly through the information gathered by EGATUR and ETR (basic sources used in the estimation of BoP_Travel item) on the share of expenditure for goods to total tourist expenditure.

FI Finland Yes

Yes

The goods values are excluded from the EBOPS item Travel (SD).

FR France Yes

Yes

Goods included in Travel services and Government goods and services n.i.e. are currently not excluded from total international supply of services.

Concerning the goods included in Construction services, the estimation is the result of an ad hoc survey in which the biggest French companies were asked about the part of goods included in the construction services they declare for the balance of payments. 

GR Greece Yes

Yes

An estimate of the goods values included in some EBOPS items (Maintenance and repair (SB), Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL)) has been excluded/subtracted.

HR Croatia Yes

Yes

Travel (SD) and Construction (SE) are adjusted for the estimated value of goods included under EBOPS items.

Maintenance and repair (SB) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL) services are not adjusted for the value of goods reported under EBOPS items.

HU Hungary No No
IE Ireland Yes No
IT Italy No 

Yes

An estimate of the goods value only for Travel (SD) has been subtracted. In particular, Italy did not subtract the full goods value, but 85% of this by attributing to 15% the value of the distribution services that must remain inside.

LT Lithuania Yes

Yes

The goods value was eliminated from Travel (SD) and Construction (SE) items, for Maintenance and repair (SB) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL), the goods value has been retained as it is considered negligible.

LU Luxembourg Yes

Yes

An estimate of the goods value for Travel (SD) has been subtracted, using Tourism Satellite Accounts to determine the percentage. For construction services (SE), the percentage is considered to be insignificant.

LV Latvia Yes

Yes

An estimate of the goods values included in some EBOPS items (Maintenance and repair (SB), Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL)) has been excluded/subtracted.

MT Malta No information No information 
NL Netherlands Yes

Yes

The goods value included in some EBOPS items, specifically for construction services and travel, have been accounted for.

  • For Construction services (SE), multiple data sources were analyzed and it was estimated that 19% of the total trade value of construction in regular ITSS originates from the value of goods/services acquired in the country where the project is carried out. This corresponding trade value has been excluded from the construction item.
  • For Travel (SD), the estimation of the goods component is based on multiple data sources and assumptions, with specific percentages allocated to cross-border workers, seasonal workers, students, and tourists. Surveys and existing studies are used to determine spending patterns. The analyses for the travel component align with the Dutch methodology described in Section 13.2.3 of the MoS Compilers Guide, with updated information incorporated into the estimates for the goods component.
  • For Maintenance and repair services (SB) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL), no goods value has been estimated or subtracted.
NO Norway No No
PL Poland No

Yes

The values of goods iwere deducted from the ITS values of Travel (SD) and Construction services (SE). All recommended adjustments to ITS data will be applied in the final MoS data.

PT Portugal Yes

Yes

Portugal has exclude the goods value which is included in the EBOPS items Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL).

The goods value for Maintenance and repair (SB) was not single out, as it is considered negligible in most cases.

RO Romania No No
SE Sweden Yes

Yes

An estimate of the goods values included in some EBOPS items (Maintenance and repair (SB), Travel (SD), Construction (SE) and Government goods and services n.i.e (SL)) has been excluded/subtracted.

Regarding Government goods and services n.i.e (SL), the exclusion of the goods value is handled in accordance with the Eurostat-WTO model.

SI Slovenia No

Yes

The goods values are excluded from the EBOPS item Travel (SD).

SK Slovakia Derogation  

 

Eurostat compiles the aggregated EU figures by consolidating the EU Member States' transactions vis-à-vis non-residents of the EU. 

Further details on the data compilation are provided in the ITSS metadataOutward FATS metadata and Inward FATS metadata under point 18.5.

Every year the national statistical authorities provide Eurostat with data according to a defined requierements stipulated in the respective legal acts. Methods used for the collection and compilation of statistics differ among countries. In general, the main data sources are ITSS, FATS, SBS, TEC, and dedicated enterprise surveys. 

Annual.

Annual MoS data for the modes 1,2 and 4 are reported 10 months after the end of the reference period and 22 months after the end of the reference period for mode 3 and totals. 

The underlying methodological framework ensures a high degree of comparability across countries. The detailed data requierements are specified in the Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 on European business statistics and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197

To assess the inter-temporal comparability of MoS data, it should be investigated whether the same concepts and methods were applied. In case data are not comparable there might be a break in time series. 

The source data are generally considered highly comparable over time.