Back to top

Environmental protection expenditure accounts (env_ac_epea)

DownloadPrint

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: National Statistical Institute of Spain

Need help? Contact the Eurostat user support

Environmental protection expenditure accounts (EPEA) describe transactions related to preventing, reducing and eliminating pollution and any other degradation of the environment. The main aggregate resulting from EPEA is national expenditure on environmental protection (NEEP), which measures the resources dedicated by resident businesses, households and government to protecting the natural environment. This aggregate covers uses of environmental protection services, investment (gross fixed capital formation) for environmental protection activities, and net transfers to the rest of the world for environmental protection. Countries are required to report on:   output, consumption, imports and exports of environmental protection services,  investment (gross fixed capital formation and acquisitions less disposals of non-produced non-financial assets) for the production of EP services, transfers for environmental protection.

26 December 2024

The construction of the EPEA closely follows the concepts, definitions and accounting rules of the core national accounts. The SEEA-CF 2012 (section 4.2) identifies environmental protection activities as those activities whose primary purpose is the prevention, reduction and elimination of pollution and other forms of degradation of the environment. These activities include, but are not limited to, the prevention, reduction or treatment of waste and wastewater; the prevention, reduction or elimination of air emissions; the treatment and disposal of contaminated soil and groundwater; the prevention or reduction of noise and vibration levels; the protection of biodiversity and landscapes, including of their ecological functions; monitoring of the quality of the natural environment (air, water, soil and groundwater); research and development on environmental protection; and the general administration, training and teaching activities oriented towards environmental protection.proposes to use the primary purpose criterion, recognising that many economic activities are undertaken for a variety of purposes, environmental and non-environmental ones.

Environmental protection expenditure accounts present data, in a way that is compatible with the data reported under ESA, on the expenditure for environmental protection, i.e. the economic resources devoted by resident units to environmental protection. EPEA use statistical units from national accounts. National accounts define and use various statistical units and groupings of units that interact economically (see ESA 2010, §§ 1.54-1.56, 2.01-2.03).

The statistical population is the national economy as defined in SEEA CF 2012 and the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010). It includes all economic activities undertaken by resident units to produce environmental protection specific services. While some economic activities may be undertaken only for a single purpose, many activities are undertaken for a variety of purposes. Following general principles of classification, activities are deemed to be environmental activities only if the primary purpose of the activity is consistent with the definitions of the environmental protection.

The reference area of the statistics is the economic territory of Spain. The economic territory as defined in the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010). A unit is said to be a resident unit of a country when it has its centre of economic interest in the economic territory of that country, that is, when it engages for an extended period (1 year or more) in economic activities in that territory.

The reference period for EPEA data is the calendar year.

Coherence with Spanish National Accounts ensures a high level of accuracy for the EPEA data reported. There are no general deficiencies in the data. Quality is always subject to improvements, but in general, main indicators are accurate.

Macro economic variables (output, intermediate consumption, investment etc.) are measured in million units of national currency.

Data compilation consists of a complex system, which incorporates row data obtained from the data sources mentioned in 18.1, which are applied to the different institutional sectors as described in 18.3.

In order to run a data compilation process that is coherent, comprehensive and compatible with other statistics, each variable must be compiled for each individual environmental domain and institutional sectors, separately, but then put together.

  •  For Sectors S13 and S15, all variables can be obtained directly from COFOG function 05 data. In theory, COFOG 05 and CEPA domains are linked. Estimations for the General Government are based on this assumption. This assumption must be taken with caution, though. (See 4.2.3 in COFOG´s handbook). These data is later summed up with estimations for NPISH, which are obtained from the annual reports of the main ones.
  • For Sectors S11 and S12 as specialised producers, the starting point is National Accounts, combining information from Supply and Use Tables and Main aggregates by NACE. NACE 37-39 and CPA 37-39 are the main codes taking into account. Deduction of activities linked to resource management is applied to all variables and addition of other environmental protection expenditure linked to specialised producers is added.
  • For Sectors S11 and S12 as ancillary producers information is obtained from the surveys mentioned in 18.1 and 18.3. Values from this survey do not require additional calculation, since those values were previously released at national level and passed through all the quality checks. Nonetheless, there is the exception of Total intermediate consumption (for EP services ancillary production and other production). See below, in NEEP bullet point.
  • For Sector S14, it is simply taking the values from COICOP.
  • Former table 6 (corresponding to Transfers) variables are now spread out all tables. Transfers are compiled as follows: from EU funds (transfers from the rest of the world), analysing which funds are received by Corporations, assuming the rest is for the General Government (Households equal to 0); from COFOG for transfers paid by the General Government combined with information from NPISH reports to deduct transfers received by them (consolidation principle); internal calculations between the two previous ones in order to allocate them to the different sectors (Corporations and Households).
  • Other variables, such as imports, exports and taxes less subsidies, which are needed to check internal coherency between supply and use are compiled following a similar approach as in Specialised producers.
  • Finally, NEEP aggregate is estimated. It may be obtained using as starting point production and analysing used of it, or it may be done only focusing on the uses. Both ways must be reconciliated. To do so, Total intermediate consumption by ancillary producers is used a a bridge variable, being necessary adaptations to the row value obtained from the survey.

Variables for table specialised producers and secondary producers of EP services  are within the borders of the output of characteristic EP services covered in National Accounts (SUT and A64 main aggregates). The output of EP services is then allocated to General Government based on COFOG and ad-hoc inventory of NGOs; Specialised producers based SBS data; Ancillary producers is mainly based on the Statistics on Environmental Protection Activities; Household´s data are taking from COICOP; The rest of variables (transfers, taxes less subsidies, exports and imports) are estimated combining all aforementioned data sources (COFOG, SBS, NGOs, etc)

Data are disseminated annually

The estimates of the Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts are sent to Eurostat, at most 24 months following the end of the reference year, in compliance with EU Regulation Nº 538/2014, amending EU Regulation Nº 691/2011, regarding European economic environmental accounts, regulating the periods for transmitting data.

The EU Member States use the same methodology for the compilation of estimates, which allows comparability among Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts estimates.

The basic methodology for the compilation of the estimates has not changed since the first estimates of Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts as a pilot study.

Nonetheless, the appearance of a new breakdown of environmental domains in the EPEA questionnaire for ancillary producers triggered a break in series. From 2019 and backwards, CEPA 7+8+9 contains also any potential value related to CEPA 4 and 5. Spain expects to correct it in the next data collection subject to resources availability.