Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Business Statistics Directorate / Agricultural Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic

Lamačská cesta 3/C

P.O.BOX 17

840 05 Bratislava 45

Slovak Republic


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 23/02/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 23/02/2022
2.3. Metadata last update 23/02/2022


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organised in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2019/2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and rural development module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1.

The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2.

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable.

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
The main building for production
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

Not available.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2001 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in (1000) heads or LSU (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWU (annual working units), standard output in Euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

The 12-month period for the land variables ending on 31th of October within the reference year 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown.

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period for the total irrigable area ending on 31th of October within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day 31th of October within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 31th of October 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 31th of October within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31th of December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day 31th of October within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

Act No 540/2001 on State Statistic, Section 16 Integrated farm survey.

Decree of the Statistical Office No 250/2017, which issues the Program of state statistical surveys for the years 2018 -2020

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2001/540/

https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2017/250/20200101 

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

2002 for the Act 540/2001 on State Statistic

2018 for the Decree of the Statistical Office No 250/2017.

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

The Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic is the central state administration body for state statistics; it is responsible for its development, production and dissemination. It is established a Coordination Council for State Statistics to ensure the performance of the tasks related to the official state statistics. The members of the Coordination Council shall be representatives of all bodies carrying out state statistics. The Chairperson of the Coordination Council shall be the President of the Office. Other bodies carrying out state statistics shall perform the tasks of state statistics to the extent resulting for them from the programme of state statistical surveys. In the production of state statistics, another body carrying out state statistics shall be guided by the methodological instructions of the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. 

To the extent necessary to achieve the statistical purpose and within the scope of its subject matter competence, the body carrying out state statistics shall have the right of access to data from all administrative data sources. The administrator of the administrative data source shall provide the data from the administrative data source to the bodies carrying out state statistics without delay and free of charge in electronic form and in the required structure on the basis of a written request. The administrator of the administrative data source shall provide metadata for the data provided together with the data from the administrative data source. 
 
Furthermore, there was concluded the agreement between the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic and other state organisations in order to secure the mutual data exchange.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Data protection is governed by the following legislative act, internal directives (SME) and methodological direction (MET) of the Statistical Office of the SR:

  • Act No. 540/2001 Coll. on State Statistics (sections 29-33);
  • SME- 1/2021 - Protection of personal data within the scope of the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic;
  • SME 1/2015 - Protection of confidential statistical data
  • MET-4/209 - Protection of confidential statistical data.
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold)
Secondary confidentiality rules
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells)
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

Data in output tables is disclosed if the data are the result of a sum of at least three non-zero values from at least three statistical units.

7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
No
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
None
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

The Act on State Statistics does not allow an access to confidential data for usual users. The Statistical Office of the SR may provide confidential data for scientific purposes to legal persons, who carry out scientific research as their basic mission and are able to ensure conditions for the data protection.

Data are provided in the form:

a) complete confidential data; those are provided only to the state authorities (for example ministries, national bank etc.) based on the mutual contract and within the data exchange through the secured FTP server,

b) anonymised data which do not allow direct identification of legal or physical persons; to other organisations than the state authorities.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Yes.

8.2. Release calendar access

Release Calendar

8.3. Release policy - user access

Policy on dissemination of the statistical information of the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic (hereinafter referred to as “Policy on dissemination”) is a fundamental document in the field of statistical information dissemination. It represents a set of principles applied by the Statistical Office of the SR in dissemination of the statistical information.

The Policy on dissemination is defined in accordance with the Act on State Statistics, the development strategy of the Statistical Office of the SR, the information dissemination strategy of Eurostat and European Statistics Code of Practice.

The principles of dissemination policy are reflected in the Principles of Publication and Provision of Statistical Information, which establish binding principles and procedures for the publication and provision of statistical information and the compilation of the Catalogue of Publications, taking into account existing requirements of the quality management system of the Statistical Office. The main principles of the dissemination policy are: we guarantee equal access to statistical information for all users. We provide standard statistical information free of charge. We publish timely statistical information according to the time schedule / calendar of the first issue. Only statistical criteria are decisive for the assessment of objectivity.

We have sole responsibility for deciding on statistical methods, standards and procedures, as well as on the content and timing of the publication of statistical information. We guarantee the protection of confidential data provided by survey units. Confidential data shall be provided exclusively under the conditions laid down by the  Act on the State Statistics in a form that does not allow direct or indirect identification of reporting agents. We communicate with users about the value of statistical information. The same principles apply to the publication of IFS2020 data.

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
No
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

The frequency of dissemination of the agricultural census data is every 10 years. Every 3 - 4 years are disseminated the data on farm structural survey / integrated farm survey which are not collected on the census basis.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

No news releases.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
Yes, in English also
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
Yes, in English also
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

1) Integrated Farm Survey 2020 - complete results

2) Integrated Farm Survey 2020 - farm typology

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

We do not have online data tables. The results are published at our website in the form of publications. The potential questions are replied in the moment when they come to the responsible department. 

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
No
10.3.3. Link to online database

Not applicable yet.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
No
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

Not applicable.

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable.

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
No
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not available.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
Yes
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
Quality guidelines
Designated quality manager, quality unit and/or senior level committee
Compliance monitoring
External review or audit
Certification
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

The SOSR management commits to follow the Quality Policy based on requirements of users of statistics, on rules, principles, recommendations and requirements of the ISO 9001 standard for Quality Management Systems.

 For the successful implementation of this commitment, the management of the SO SR will ensure the following tasks:

  • to set-up and maintain the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives of the SOSR,
  • to ensure permanent maintenance and periodic review of the efficiency and effectiveness of the Integrated Quality Management System implemented in order to achieve these objectives,
  • to ensure availability of all necessary resources,
  • to make decisions on activities for improving the Quality Management System.
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

The improvement in the quality procedures is managed in compliance with the Code of Practice for the European Statistics

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The results of the IFS 2020 are very important for the following users:

  • DG AGRI - the collection of the structural data will contribute to the improving of the decision-making process concerning the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and its future development. This data collection will  also provide the  framework  for  harmonised, comparable and  coherent agricultural statistics in the EU;
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic - the data are necessary for the main agricultural policy maker at the national level, who needs to be informed about the recent development in the agricultural sector and for the purposes of the FADN;
  • agricultural professional associations - the data from the IFS will contribute to their better information as regards their member, which are the subject of this survey;
  • research and development institutions in the agricultural sector - the data from the IFS2020 will serve as a basis for scientific purposes.
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

For national purposes, we have included into the IFS 2020 some variables concerning the vegetable categories and fruit trees grown by households (self-supply farms). 

12.1.2. Unmet user needs

All user needs are met.

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

The Statistical Office of the SR conducts surveys on a regular basis focused on the key customers, where the aim is concentrated on their satisfaction with the released products and data. Based on the results of this surveys we take follow-up measures in the area of content and quality of published data.

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
Yes
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

2020

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Satisfied
12.3. Completeness

Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.



Annexes:
13.2.1. Relative Standards Errors
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

We do not have cases where estimated RSEs are above thresholds.

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

For the purpose of the IFS2020 we did not calculate the relative standard error. In our case (census) it is not applicable.

13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
None
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings to the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Temporarily out of production during the reference period
Ceased activities
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Not available.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

8,00%

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Other
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

In the case of self-sufficient farms, we strived for obtaining more information from local authorities before IFS 2020 data collection.

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

As regards the types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame, there were the farms that refused to submit a questionnaire or could not be contacted due to inaccuracies in their addresses.

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
No
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

Not applicable.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
Yes
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

See the point 13.3.1.3.3.

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
None
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

Measurement errors may concern the employment characteristics of farms. These are mainly items related to hours worked in  the part LAFO: WH_Hld_AWU_PC, WH_MAN_AWU_PC, FLF_D_RFAM ......, FLF_D_RNFAM ...

The elimination of such errors was secured in two ways. In the first place, we embedded control algorithms to the software for recording data in order to detect the most important errors arising from relationships between workers on the farm. During the creation of the file for Eurostat, we built in further algorithms in order to help detect also other possible errors.

All data errors have been corrected, but the error rate cannot be documented.

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
Other
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
None
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

The controls in software during the data processing and direct data validation with the survey units, which is extremely demanding.

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Failure to make contact with the unit
Refusal to participate
Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence)
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Follow-up interviews
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

We analysed variables such as agricultural area and numbers of animals based on available data. As regards the unit non-response, the highest rate of non-response concerned the small and very small (family) farms.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

We do not calculate item non-response. We tried to collect all the data concerning all pertinent variables that the survey units could provide us.

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Not applicable
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
Follow-up interviews
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
None
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

Not available.

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
Data processing
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
Other
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

During the data processing we used the built-in checks and after data uploading we compared the data to available registers. Identified errors during processing have been removed.

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

As regards making correction, authorisation for this activity was given to the main expert responsible for the IFS2020 at the Agricultural Statistics Department and the authorised staff at the regional offices. We did not use the software solutions for the error corrections.

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
None
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

As regards the other imputation, we used the data from the official registers - Farm Animal Central Register, orchard register, vineyard register and IACS.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

There will be no preliminary data (first results) published, only the final data.

The final data on IFS 2020 will be published in April 2022, that is 16 months after the reference period.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

The final data will be published in April 2022, that is 16 months after the reference period.

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

220 days for the publication of the publication "Integrated Farm Survey 2020 - complete results"

334 days for the publication of the publication "Integrated Farm Survey 2020 - typology of farms"


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

For the purpose of the IFS 2020 we use the same definition as defined in the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met
  Total Covered by the thresholds Attained coverage Minimum requested coverage
1 2 3=2*100/1 4
UAA excluding kitchen gardens  1 900 612  1 862 342  98 98%
LSU  617 366  606 129 98  98%
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

No differences.

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

Not applicable.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

There are no deviations in definitions and classification of variables compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874 and EU handbook.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex. 
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job correspond to one annual working unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual working units are used to calculate the farm work on the agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

For the purpose of the IFS 2020 we used the same livestock coefficients as the ones set in the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

There are no differences between the types of livestock we included under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook.

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

We used the same reference periods/days as the ones set up in the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land does not exist
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Not applicable
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable.

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

Not applicable.

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

Not applicable.

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

No deviations in the national standards and rules for certification of organic products from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

There are no differences in the methods used across regions within the country.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The data are comparable since 2010, the change in the threshold values in 2020 will not significantly affect comparability.

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However even if our country raises fur animals, holdings with only fur animals are not included in our data collection because they do not meet the thresholds.  The thresholds for animals are expressed in livestock units (LSU) and fur animals are not associated LSU coefficients. We did not add thresholds related to fur animals; there is no reason for it (fur animals do not contribute towards 98% of the total LSU).

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

As regards the thresholds in FSS 2016, they were lower for UAA (1 ha) without any further conditions for ARA. Change to 5 ha in IFS2020 affected that farms with lower permanent grassland area fell out from the frame.

As for vineyards, the threshold in FSS2016 was higher (0,5 ha). The change to 0,1 ha slightly affected the area but significantly increased the number of respondents.

As for orchards, the threshold in FSS2016 was 0,5 ha. The change to 0,3 ha had no influence on the area neither the number of respondents. The result is more influenced by the high age of orchards.

As for vegetables, the threshold in FSS2016 was lower (0,1 ha) than in IFS2020 (0,5 ha). The impact on this variable is very difficult to assess because the area on the open land is decreasing and the area in greenhouses is increasing. The threshold for greenhouses in FSS2016 was higher (0.1 ha). The change to 0.01 ha in IFS2020 does not have a big impact on the result, the area increased due to higher cultivation efficiency.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

 

Other livestock n.e.c.

In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately.

Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

 

Livestock units

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

 

Organic animals

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat

Among the sharp variations of aggregates over time, it can be pointed out:

- The increase in area for cultivated mushrooms (U1000) is high but the total area is small (the increase is due to the fact, that former coal mines found their new business orientation in mushroom growing.

- Other wine (W1190T) is reported in accordance with the vineyard register.

- Other oilseeds (I1190T), in recent years there is a large interest in growing pumpkins solely for the purpose of pressing oil. 

15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
No
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
Yes
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

We made the analysis where we compared the results from IFS2020 with the annual crop statistics and animal production statistics. The results of the analysis confirms the coherence between the statistical surveys conducted in the crop, animal and farm structural sector.

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

As regards the items at the regional level: comparability at the regional level is affected by different methods of statistical survey and aggregating data.
Regular statistical surveys are carried out at the regional level. The survey units (farms) submit data for every district in which they farm.
In the Eurobase aggregated data are based on the data reported by districts, in the IFS2020 are data aggregated by the prevailing place of farming.
Data reported to Eurostat (Table4 – Land use) for 2020 were assembled to represent overall agriculture data in the Slovak Republic.

The data also includes data for small farms below the threshold values, which is significantly reflected in the area of K0000-kitchen gardens and C0000-cereals, which are cultivated most often of all crops.
IFS2020 data contains data for farms that meet the threshold values for the farm and at the same time to meet the conditions enshrined in Article 3 “Coverage” in the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.
As regards the item N0000 - this is an incorrectly reported figure in T4. The area of flowers and ornamental plants (excluding nurseries) in 2020 was 163,78 ha. We will send the revised data.

Data comparability is affected by several factors such as:

- the CROPS statistic values are harvest areas and the values for IFS are sown or planted areas;
- in regular crop statistics, the part of production for small farms and for subsistence farms is estimated, the data collection would be costly and inefficient, so this can also be a source of some inaccuracies;
- for permanent crops such as vineyards (W1000) and orchards (F0000), a comparison to the Table 4 (land use) under Regulation 543/2009 on crop statistics would be more accurate instead of the Table 3, which contains data only for production areas;
- The area of hemp (I2200) is difficult to estimate - there is no processing industry in the Slovak Republic and there are interest organisations that deal with folk art growing hemp for this purpose. The total area is insignificant;
- Tobacco area (I3000) - there is no processing industry in the Slovak Republic, these are small areas and some farms did not meet the threshold values for the farm. The total area is insignificant;
- Forage area: there is a wrong exchange in the database between items G9900 and G9100, we will correct the data in Crop production statistics and send it to Eurostat.

The regular statistical surveys (animal production statistics) are carried out at the regional level. Farms submit data for each district in which they farm separately.
In the Eurobase, aggregated data are based on data reported by districts, in the IFS according to the specified predominant place. Comparability is also worsened by the date of the animal survey. In the regular surveys, the number of animals present the situation in December, in the IFS it is the October situation.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

We analysed all agricultural statistical surveys and all available administrative data sources. We compiled the questionnaire of the IFS survey in such a way that respondents did not need fill in data which can be obtained from other sources.

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
Increased use of administrative data
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

Not available.

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

1 hour and 32 minutes for the whole questionnaire (the modules "Labour force and other gainful activities" and "Animal housing and manure management" are included).

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

Not available (see the point 16.3.1 Core).

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not relevant. The data on the Rural development were taken over from the administrative source (Agricultural Paying Agency).

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

Not available (see the comment 16.3.1. Core).


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

The revision policy of the Statistical Office of the SR is governed by the internal directive SME-2/2021.

As regards Integrated Farm statistics, in case of changes in concepts, methodologies, classifications, code lists or corrections of fundamental errors, extraordinary (major) revisions are carried out within the deadlines for regular publication of definitive data.

17.2. Data revision - practice

We did not make any revision for Agricultural Census 2020.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18. Timetable_statistical_process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

The Farm Register.

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Continuous
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Not applicable
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

Not applicable.

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available here on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
None
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches and the quality methods applied is available on Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between.

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Paper auto-questionnaire
Postal, non-electronic version
Telephone, non-electronic version
Use of Internet
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Manual
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3. Questionnaire
18.3.3. Questionnaire_Slovak
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Data format checks
Completeness checks
Range checks
Relational checks
Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
Staff from local departments
Staff from central department
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

We used the tools involved directly in the electronic data collection system (controls, control questions, colour highlighting etc.) and the manual validation of the staff (at the headquarters and in the regional branches) directly participating in the IFS2020. For this purpose we used the documents and datasets received from the Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic, Agricultural Paying Agency, State veterinary and food service, Central control and testing institute in agriculture and the data from the previous FSS surveys.

18.5. Data compilation

We worked with the one data file. We did not apply the compilation of more data files.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate
CODE Name Imputation rate in %

UAAT

Utilised agricultural area - outdoor

1

ARAT

Arable land - outdoor

0.8

C0000T

Cereals for the production of grain (including seed) - outdoor

0.7

P0000T

Dry pulses and protein crops for the production of grain (including seed and mixtures of cereals and pulses) - outdoor

0.5

R0000T

Root crops - outdoor

1

I0000T

Industrial crops - outdoor

0.8

I1100XI1150T

Oilseeds except cotton - outdoor

0.8

G0000T

Plants harvested green from arable land - outdoor

0.9

V0000_S0000T

Fresh vegetables (including melons) and strawberries - outdoor

0.9

Q0000T

Fallow land - outdoor

2.1

J0000T

Permanent grassland - outdoor

1.4

F0000T

Fruits, berries and nuts (excluding citrus fruits, grapes and strawberries) - outdoor

1

W1000T

Grapes - outdoor

1.7

A2010

Bovine animals, less than 1 year old

1.1

A2020 

Bovine animals, 1 to less than 2 years old

1.1

A2120

Male bovine animals, 1 to less than 2 years old

1.4

A2220

Heifers, 1 to less than 2 years old

1

A2130

Male bovine animals, 2 years old or over

2

A2230_2300

Female bovine, 2 years old or over (including all cows)

1.5

A2230

Heifers, 2 years old and over

2.9

A2300

Cows

1.3

A2300F

Dairy cows

0.8

A2300G

Non dairy cows

2.1

A4100

Sheep

2.5

A4200

Goats

5.5

A3110

Piglets, live weight under 20 kg

0.1

A3120

Breeding sows, live weight 50 kg or over

0.1

A3130

Other pigs

0.5

A5140

Broilers

0

A5110O

Laying hens

0

A5000X5100

Live poultry excluding chicken (species)

0

A5230

Turkeys

0

A6710R

Bees (hives)

0.2

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

SO – Standard output

SO SR - Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top