Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Lithuania


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Lithuania

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Agricultural, Environmental and Energy Statistics Division

1.5. Contact mail address

29 Gedimino Ave.

LT-01500 Vilnius, Lithuania


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 25/03/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 25/03/2022
2.3. Metadata last update 25/03/2022


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organised in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and rural development module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
Yes
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The subset of population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1 which falls in the main frame i.e. above at least one of the thresholds set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry.

If during the AC 2020 it was clarified that some farms had no animals of the above mentioned species at the time of the census, these farms were monitored comprehensively anyway and all collected data of these farms for this module were sent to Eurostat.

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
The main building for production
The most important parcel by physical size
The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

Not available

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2003 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in (1000) heads or LSU (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWU (annual working units), standard output in Euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

The use of land refers to the reference year 2020 or 12-month period ending on 1 June 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown.

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period ending on  1 June within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day is 1 June within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 1 June 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 1 June within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day 1 June within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

Law on official statistics

Official Statistics Programme 2020, Part I, which includes the statistical surveys conducted by Statistics Lithuania and other bodies managing official statistics.

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

Law on official statistics

Official Statistics Programme 2020 (in Lithuanian only)

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

Law on official statistics - 12 October 1993, as last amended on 29 September 2020.

Official Statistics Programme 2020 - 2020

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

In Article 5 of the Law on Official Statistics it is stated that in implementing the Official Statistics Programme, the bodies managing official statistics shall have the right to obtain free of charge from the sources of official statistics referred to in Article 10 of this Law required statistical data, including personal data, which cover also special categories of personal data, and data which allow direct or indirect identification, also to combine them with other statistical data.

In Article 10 it is stated that sources of official statistics shall be as follows: 1) statistical data provided by or collected from respondents; 2) administrative data; 3) data of legal or natural persons lawfully obtained by the bodies managing official statistics and accessible to the public and/or data accumulated and managed by legal persons; 4) statistical data of international organisations lawfully obtained by the bodies managing official statistics.

The exchange of statistical data required for the implementation of the Official Statistics Program is also defined in Article 13 of the Law on Official Statistics.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

In the process of statistical data collection, processing and analysis and dissemination of statistical information, Statistics Lithuania fully guarantees confidentiality of the data submitted by respondents (households, enterprises, institutions, organisations and other statistical units), as defined in the Confidentiality Policy Guidelines of Statistics Lithuania.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold)
Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total)
Secondary confidentiality rules
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells)
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

If there was any confidential information in aggregated data, special symbols were inserted instead of the exact value. Symbol  "•" was inserted if:

  • statistical information was prepared using data obtained from less than of three respondents;
  • statistical data from one respondent represent more than 70 per cent of the total volume of statistical indicator;
  • aggregated statistical data of two respondents represent more than 85 per cent of the volume of whole statistical indicator.
7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
No
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
Reduction of information
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

Statistics Lithuania actually provides access to microdata for scientific purposes.

Confidential statistical data may be provided for use for scientific purposes if scientific institutions ensure the protection of the data in the way that it is not possible to directly identify respondents.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Statistical information is published on the Official Statistics Portal according to the Official Statistics Calendar.

8.2. Release calendar access

Official Statistics Calendar

8.3. Release policy - user access

Statistical information is prepared and disseminated under the principle of impartiality and objectivity, i.e. in a systematic, reliable and unbiased manner, following professional and ethical standards (the European Statistics Code of Practice), and the policies and practices followed are transparent to users and survey respondents.

All users have equal access to statistical information. All statistical information is published at the same time – at 9 a.m. on the day of publication of statistical information as indicated in the calendar on the Official Statistics Portal. Relevant statistical information is sent automatically to news subscribers.

The President and Prime Minister of the Republic of Lithuania, their advisers, the Ministers of Finance, Economy and Innovation, as well as Social Security and Labour or their authorized persons, as well as, in exceptional cases, external experts and researchers have the right to receive early statistical information. The specified persons are entitled to receive statistical reports on GDP, inflation, employment and unemployment and other particularly relevant statistical reports one day prior to the publication of this statistical information on the Official Statistics Portal. Before exercising the right of early receipt of statistical information, a person shall sign an undertaking not to disseminate the statistical information received before it has been officially published.

Statistical information is published following the Official Statistics Dissemination Policy Guidelines and Statistical Information Dissemination and Communication Rules of Statistics Lithuania approved by Order No DĮ-176 of 2 July 2021 of the Director General of Statistics Lithuania.

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
Yes, the EU quality rating system
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

The methodology is described in the EU Handbook


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Data are disseminated at the national level every 3-4 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

Preliminary results of the Farm Sructure Survey

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
No
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
Yes, in English also
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

Results of the Agricultural Census 2020 (edition 2022), Statistics Lithuania, was published in 2022. 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

We do not monitor and record the number of consultations of data tables in the field of farm structure.

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
Yes
10.3.3. Link to online database

https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize#/ (Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing -> Agriculture -> Farming structure and agricultural censuses).
The page of Database of Indicators is for viewing and analyzing statistical information. For more information on the Indicators Database, see the Database of Indicators User Guide.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
Yes
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

Farming structure and agricultural census indicators, Statistics Lithuania, metadata are published at Farming structure and agricultural census indicators.

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable.

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
No
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The quality report is delivered to Eurostat.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
Yes
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
Training courses
Use of best practices
Quality guidelines
Designated quality manager, quality unit and/or senior level committee
Compliance monitoring
Self-assessment
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

Quality of statistical information and its production process is ensured by the provisions of the European Statistics Code of Practice and ESS Quality Assurance Framework.

In 2007, a quality management system, conforming to the requirements of the international quality management system standard ISO 9001, was introduced at Statistics Lithuania. The main trends in activity of Statistics Lithuania aimed at quality management and continuous development in the institution are established in the Quality Policy.

Monitoring of the quality indicators of statistical processes and their results and self-evaluation of statistical survey managers is regularly carried out in order to identify areas which need improvement and to promptly eliminate shortcomings.

More information on assurance of quality of statistical information and its preparation is published in the Quality Management section on the Statistics Lithuania website.

11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

Validation rules will be improved.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The quality of the statistical results meets the requirements of accuracy, timeliness and punctuality, comparability and consistency. 

In 2019, the review of the Agricultural Census 2020 statistical forms was carried out, recommendations received have been implemented.

Quality of the obtained statistics is analysed during the evaluation of the indicators. Outstanding values of indicators are identified and analysed. In case of significant deviations, the data provider is contacted and the reasons for the deviation are clarified.

At the micro level, data are compared with the data of declarations of agricultural and other areas, the Farm Animal Register, Database of the State Social Insurance Fund Board, other agricultural statistical surveys (crop production, animal production, etc.). Differences, if significant, are identified and farms are contacted. Differences are mainly due to inconsistencies in definitions and methodological provisions.

Additional quality control of statistics is performed at the macro level. Results of the calculation are compared with the results of the previous Farm Structure Surveys, Agricultural Censuses and other agricultural statistical surveys (crop, animal, etc.). Results of the calculation are also compared with administrative data: the Register of Agricultural and Rural Business (Holdings' Register). If significant differences in indicators are identified, microdata are analysed in more detail.

Quality of the statistical information has not been affected by COVID-19.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of statistical information are state and municipal institutions and establishments, international organizations, the media, representatives of business and science, students whose needs are met without violating the principle of confidentiality.

12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

Core structural data as well as data for modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’, ‘Rural development’ and ‘Animal housing and manure management’ were collected according to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on integrated farm statistics and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1166/2008 and (EU) No 1337/2011.

Also, some data for national needs were collected:

  • data on having a loan to acquire capital
  • data on direct sales (do the direct sales to consumers account for more than 50% of the total sales?)
  • data on irrigation
  • data on soil cover in winter
  • data on tillage methods
  • data on use of renewable energy sources (equipment)
12.1.2. Unmet user needs

There is no information about unmet user needs.

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Since 2005, user opinion surveys have been conducted on a regular basis. Official Statistics Portal traffic is monitored, website visitor opinion polls, general opinion poll on the products and services of Statistics Lithuania, target user group opinion polls and other surveys are conducted.

In 2007, the compilation of a user satisfaction index was launched. The said surveys are aimed at the assessment of the overall demand for and necessity of statistical information in general and specific statistical indicators in particular.

More information on user opinion surveys and results thereof are published in the User Surveys section on the Statistics Lithuania website.

However, user satisfaction survey regarding AC 2020 was not conducted.

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
No
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

Not applicable.

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Not applicable
12.3. Completeness

Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.



Annexes:
13.2.1. Relative standard errors
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The precision requirements set in the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 are all met. 

However, there are two indicators whose RSEs are high:

  1. F0000_T0000T (Fruits, berries, nuts and citrus fruits (excluding grapes and strawberries)), LT01, LAFO, RSE= 7.57%
  2. A4000_LSU (Sheep and goats), LT01, LAFO, RSE= 9.95%

There is a small amount of farms with fruit and berries as well as with sheep and goats in this NUTS region (LT01) of Lithuania. Area of fruits and berries and number of sheep and goats are relatively small as well.  However, a sample design is one for all indicators of a certain module and a small amount of farmers (respondents) leads to higher RSEs.

In the future, more farms with areas of fruit and berries as well as more farms with sheep and goats will be selected to the sample with a selection probability equal to 1.

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

See annex.



Annexes:
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
Low
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings to the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-responce rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Below thresholds during the reference period
Ceased activities
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units
Other
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Core indicators were surveyed as a census. Therefore, ineligible units were just not taken into account when calculating totals. No re-weighting was used.

The modules were surveyed through a sample, but ineligible units were also not taken into account and weights of all units were recalculated considering the corrected population.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

Under-coverage is very low (less than 1 %)

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
New births
New units derived from split
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

The population was checked via various administrative data sources.

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

It was tried to survey all holdings belonging to the population. However, in some cases new births and new units derived from split may have not been included to the population. This could have happened if a new farm appeared after the public procurement procedure, when lists of farms already were delivered to subcontractor which was responsible for census fieldwork.  

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
Yes
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

There were several misclassification errors caused by change of municipality by units during the period between the moment of the sampling design and the reference period. Some of these changes were incorrect, therefore they were not taken into account and these units were left in the previous strata. But some of changes were addressed and municipality as well as strata was changed. Misclassification of units' size was not addressed. 

Misclassification errors are estimated to be minimal.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
Yes
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

Some farmers and family farms were not surveyed, as were not found by the interviewers, because some addresses were incorrect or some people did not live all the time at the place they were searched (only seasonally, temporarily). Contact errors counted 2.8 %.

If the farmer was not found in his registration address, another address from the IACS Crop Declaration Database was taken if it was possible and the interviewers had to contact the farmer on the new address.

Incorrect phone numbers were corrected by updating them with the information taken from the IACS, telecommunication companies and other statistical surveys. Also, Statistics Lithuania has received e-mails (e-mails were taken from the IACS, other governmental institutions), therefore it was possible for the interviewers to contact farmers by e-mail.

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
Low
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

Most questions in the questionnaire were clear for the farmers or clarified by the interviewers. However, some errors occurred.

Mainly characteristics from module Animal housing and manure management were caused measurement errors:

- MAHM 008 “Dairy cows always outdoors”. A big amount of cows was indicated by farmers as always outdoors. Data were corrected by contacting farmers repeatedly.

- MAHM 047 „Net export of slurry/liquid manure from the farm“ and MAHM 048 „Net export of solid manure from the farm“. The main reason - holders do not have information about these quantities. The data were checked using the number of livestock and manure coefficients.  In some cases, farmers were contacted repeatedly.  

MAHM 047 “Organic and waste-based fertilisers other than manure used on the agricultural holding “. There were a lot of cases, when farmers filled in the amount of solid manure. Data were corrected by contacting farmers repeatedly.

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Complexity of variables
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Pre-testing questionnaire
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
On-line FAQ or Hot-line support for enumerators or respondents
Training of enumerators
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
Low
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

It was tried to correct these errors during data collection. Both, interviewers and farmers, were consulted by phone.

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Failure to make contact with the unit
Refusal to participate
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Reminders
Imputation
Weighting
Other
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

Farms which refused to render information or was not contacted due to other reasons were analysed and checked in the administrative data sources. 

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Item non-response was not calculated. Only electronic questionnaires were used, some specific navigation was applied and answering of all relevant questions was mandatory.

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Other
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
Imputation
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
Low
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

In order to avoid non-response as much as possible, an extensive census promotion campaign was conducted. Also, all farms received information letter with information about census, when, how and where they can provide their data.

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
None
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
Previous data for the same unit
Other
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

Data were imported from the electronic questionnaire to the database using a special computer program. Logical and arithmetical control was made. Data were compared with data from other statistical data sources (previous surveys on crop and animal production etc.). Thus, the probability of the processing errors was minimised as much as possible. Statistics Lithuania can assess that most processing errors were discovered.

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

The following computer programs were used to process and analyse the data received:

- ABBYY Form Filler 2.5 software was used for entering statistical data and to fill in the electronic questionnaire for agricultural companies and enterprises;

- ORBEON software was used for entering data for farmers' and family farms and transmitting these data via electronic statistical data preparation and transfer system e-Statistics for the Population to survey database;

- A special program created using ORACLE software was used for statistical data processing at Statistics Lithuania;

- Statistical program SAS was used for linking statistical data of several sources according to the selected criterion and for the calculation of derived statistical indicators;

- The results received were transferred into MS Office Excel worksheet tables. Excel was also used for the comparison of statistical AC 2020 data with statistical data of the previous year and the results of the previous FSS.

Corrections and imputations were made by employees of Agricultural, Environmental and Energy Statistics Division of Statistics Lithuania, which were responsible for the AC 2020.Corrections and imputations were made by employees of Agricultural and Environmental Statistics Division of Statistics Lithuania, which were responsible for the AC 2020.

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
Low
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

Data available from the different data sources for those holdings which were not found or refused to answer to the questions were imputed into the AC 2020 database (prepared using ORACLE software). For the data imputations for non-response units, IACS Crop Declaration Database, Animal Register, State Social Insurance Fund Board Register were used. Also, the AC 2010, FSS 2013 and FSS 2016 data were used for imputation. Data were prepared for imputation using SAS software and Excel tables. All available statistical data were placed to one data file, this file was checked and automatically exported to the survey database (ORACLE). After that logical and arithmetical control was performed for entire AC 2020 database.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

The first provisional results of the AC 2020 were published on 30 November 2021 in the Press release and in the Database of Indicators of Statistics Lithuania, i.e. 11 months from the reference period to the day of publication of first results.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

The final AC 2020 results were published in 17 months from the reference period to the day of publication. First of all, the AC 2020 results were published in the online database (in May 2022). The online publication with the AC 2020 results was prepared and published later, in July 2022. 

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

First results were published according to approved release calendar. Also, we do not expect delays in dissemination of final results.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The definition of agricultural holdings is in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. 

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met

In order to achieve the requirement to cover 98% of the total utilised agricultural area (excluding kitchen gardens) and 98% of the livestock units in the country, the frame was extended. Therefore, the mentioned requirement is fulfilled. Approximately 99.0% of utilised agricultural area and 98.8 % of livestock units were covered.

15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

There are no differences between the national threshold and the threshold of agricultural holdings used for the data sent to Eurostat.

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

Not applicable.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

There are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and the EU handbook.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex. 
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job correspond to one annual working unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual working units are used to calculate the farm work on the agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

The same LSU coefficients as the ones set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 are used.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

There are no differences between the types of livestock that are included under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook.

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

Data are collected, sent to Eurostat and published in compliance with the reference periods/days set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land does not exist
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Not applicable
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable.

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

Not applicable.

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

Not applicable.

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

There are no deviations in the national standards and rules for certification of organic products from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

There are no differences in the methods used across regions within the country.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Time series is comparable since 2003.

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However even if our country raises fur animals, holdings with only fur animals are not included in our data collection because they do not meet the thresholds. The thresholds for animals are expressed in livestock units (LSU) and fur animals are not associated LSU coefficients. We did not add thresholds related to fur animals; there is no reason for it (fur animals do not contribute towards 98% of the total LSU).

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

The thresholds were changed to be in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

Other livestock n.e.c.

In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately.

Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

Livestock units

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

Organic animals

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat
CODE_2020                Difference               2020 vs 2016   NSNE_20  LT Explanation
A2220 -14%   Number of cattle, including heifers, 1 to less than 2 years old, was taken from the Farm Animal Register. 
A3120 -33%   Number of pigs, including breeding sows, was taken from the Farm Animal register and prefilled to the Census Questionnaires with the possibility for farmers to correct the prefilled data. However, farmers corrected data very slightly, therefore we can predicate, that data from Farm Animal Register are correct. 
A6111 -13%   From 2016, number of rabbits is decreasing significantly every year (according to annual livestock statistics)
ARA99T   ARA99T  
C1400T 60%   Areas of oats and spring cereal mixtures were taken from IACS and prefilled to the Census Questionnaires with the possibility for farmers to correct the prefilled data. However, farmers corrected data very slightly, therefore we can predicate, that data from IACS are correct. The same tendency is observed also in the annual crop statistics. 
E0000T 51%   Areas of seeds and seedlings are increasing every year from 2016 (according to annual crop statistics)
F4000T 301%   Areas of nut trees have been steadily increasing every year since 2016 (according to annual crop statistics)
FA9 -27%   Number of farms is decreasing, therefore other areas of farms decreasing as well. 
G9100T+G9900T -57%   Number of farm animals is decreasing, therefore areas of plants harvested green have a tendency to decrease. 
I1140T 244%   Linseeds are increasingly being used for the production of healthy products in Lithuania.
I2100T 9100% I2100T Areas of fibre flax are very small (0.01 in 2016 and 0.92 in 2020).
I4000T -87% I4000T Areas of hops are very small (1.34 in 2016 and 0.18 in 2020). According to IACS, only 0.03 ha of hops are declared in Lithuania in 2020. 
I5000T -31%   Areas of aromatic, medicinal and culinary plants have decreased mainly due to decreased areas of caraway. 
I6000T -49%   Areas of energy crops were taken from IACS and prefilled to the Census Questionnaires with the possibility for farmers to correct the prefilled data. However, farmers corrected data very slightly, therefore we can predicate, that data from IACS are correct. 
I6000T+I9000T -47%   Areas were taken from IACS and prefilled to the Census Questionnaires with the possibility for farmers to correct the prefilled data. However, farmers corrected data very slightly, therefore we can predicate, that data from IACS are correct. 
L0000T 68%   In Lithuania, horticulture in small areas for own pleasure is becoming very popular. Therefore, areas of nurseries are increasing. 
N0000T -38% N0000T Due to unfavorable weather conditions, it is difficult to grow these plants.
V0000_S0000S 71%   The number of greenhouse owners has increased significantly. Greenhouses have become very popular during the COVID-19 quarantine.

Common Polulation

CODE_2020  Difference  2020 vs 2016  LT Explanation
A4210K -16% Number of goats, including breading females, as well as number of goats keepers was taken from the Farm Animal Register. 
A4220 -10% Number of goats, including breading females, as well as number of goats keepers was taken from the Farm Animal Register. 
V0000_S0000S 59% The number of greenhouse owners has increased significantly. Greenhouses have become very popular during the COVID-19 quarantine.

 

From 2016 to 2020, the share of holdings with farm typology FT 16 and FT 61 increased. During last few years such a tendency is observed in Lithuania. More and more farms grow only crops (mainly cereals). Farms with dairy cows, sell their cows due to low purchase prices of milk. Moreover, dairy farms become crop farms. Data on crops were taken from IACS (questionnaires were prefilled), data on farm animals were taken from Animal register (number dairy cows was taken directly, without questioning).

As regards farm typology FT90, the main reason of decrease – most of farms were removed due to the threshold reasons.

As a consequence of a reduction of the number of farms with farm animals, the time manager dedicated to the holding decreased in 2020, compared to 2016. Managers of farms with farm animals usually dedicate more time to holding compared to crop farms.

15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
Yes
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
Yes
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

AC 2020 micro level data were compared to the Annual Crop Statistics 2020 data collection. No significant differences were found.

The comparison with Animal production statistics was not conducted due to the different reference dates.

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

The information on the comparison between IFS2020 and Annual crops and Animal statistics is available here:

Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs MAIN AREA (ACS) in relative terms

VARIABLE_ COMPUTED REL_VALUE Explanations
R0000 -11.34 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
PECR -13.46 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
F0000 -15.5 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
N0000 -17.3 EUROBASE - including production areas under glass or high accessible cover
F0000 -17.62 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
R9000 -19.97 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
R1000 -20.43 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
V0000_S0000 -31.62 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
F0000 -33.28 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
K0000 -100 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)

Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs MAIN AREA in absolute terms

VARIABLE_COMPUTED ABS_VALUE Explanations
ARA -10.008.97 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
UAA -20.126.58 1.EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha). 2.IFS area by regions are recorded by farms center. ACS area are recorded by regions, where area are.
UAA -28.232.91 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)

Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA  (ACS) in relative terms

VARIABLE_COMPUTED REL_VALUE Explanations
I2000 131.39 EUROBASE - crops (hemp) grown for straw. Excluding crops (hemp) for oil, tea, cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
I2200 131.31 EUROBASE - hemp grown for straw. Excluding hemp for oil, tea, cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
C1500 46.9 IFS area by regions are recorded by farms center. ACS area are recorded by regions, where area are.
I5000 43.53 EUROBASE - harvested area. Differences are  mostly for caraway, which production is harvested in the second year
G1000 37.39 EUROBASE - Temporary grasses and grazings excluding leguminous plants harvested green (clover, lucerne, etc)
G0000 13.61 IFS area by regions are recorded by farms center. ACS area are recorded by regions, where area are.
F0000 -11.2 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
R9000 -16.5 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
R1000 -19.5 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
I1190 -22.78 EUROBASE -including area of hemp for seed oil. 
V0000_S0000 -29.68 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
G9900 -50.23 EUROBASE - including small farms (less than 1 ha)
G2000 -87.54 EUROBASE - Leguminous plants harvested green - including annual and perennial leguminous plants (clover, lucerne,  etc.)

Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA (ACS) in absolute terms

VARIABLE ABS_VALUE Explanations
G1000 68.909.79 EUROBASE - Temporary grasses and grazings excluding leguminous plants harvested green (clover, lucerne, etc)
G2000 -62.439.30 EUROBASE - Leguminous plants harvested green - including annual and perennial leguminous plants (clover, lucerne,  etc.)

Livestock comparisons

A4100 (Sheep). The main reason for discrepancies is different reference day: 1 June 2020 in Census 2020; 31 December 2020 in animal production statistics. During the Census 2020, data about number of sheep kept in farms were taken from Animal Register without questioning farms. For animal production statistics needs, the question about sheep was in the survey questionnaire and Animal Register data were prefilled. However, in both cases (Census and the animal production statistics) results are very close to those received from Animal Register.
Another reason – different thresholds. However, in case of sheep, this reason had low influence, because keepers usually keep more than a few sheep and almost all farms which register their sheep are above the threshold (1,7 livestock units) (in case of animal production statistics – all farms with sheep are taken in to account).

A4200 (Goats). The discrepancies occurred due to two reasons: different thresholds of surveys and different reference day.
Different thresholds. In Lithuania a big number of farms keep 1 or 2 goats. In case of Census 2020, the same threshold (1,7 livestock units) was used and much more farms compared to farms with sheep were under the threshold. While in case of animal production statistics – all farms with goats are taken in to account. 

Different reference day: 1 June 2020 in Census 2020; 31 December 2020 in animal production statistics.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

In order to reduce costs, all holdings had the possibility to provide their data electronically. In order to reduce the burden, administrative data were used as much as possible. 

In case of all agricultural data collections data from administrative data sources are used directly or prefilled into questionnaires. In such a way the duplication of asking the same questions is avoided, because farmers have only look at prefilled numbers and approve their correctness. 

Statistics Lithuania pays a lot of attention to reducing the statistical reporting burden on respondents. Its obligations to implement the Law on Reducing the Administrative Burden of the Republic of Lithuania and to reduce the statistical reporting burden on the respondents are defined in the Respondents’ statistical reporting burden reduction policy.

More information can be found https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistines-atskaitomybes-nastos-mazinimas

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
Further automation
Increased use of administrative data
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

Statistics Lithuania make efforts to improve the AC 2020 efficiency. Firstly, agricultural companies and enterprises as well as farmers' and family farms had the possibility to fill in the electronic questionnaire by themselves and to transmit it via web data collection system. Secondly, the market research company collected data using portable computers, the software ORBEON was used for entering statistical data and data collection system e-Statistics for population was used for data transmission to the survey database. Variables on land areas and farm animals (pigs, poultry, rabbits, beehives) were prefilled in to the AC 2020 questionnaires. Moreover, a lot of variables, such as farm animals (cattle, sheep, goats) as well as all characteristics about support for rural development and organic farming were taken directly from administrative data sources without questioning the farmers. 

Also, such routine operations as data check were automated by introducing logical and arithmetical controls to data entry programs (both to the program created using ORBEON, ORACLE software and ABBYY Form Filler).

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

The average duration of farm interview was 14 minutes for farmers’ and family farms and 69 minutes for agricultural companies and enterprises. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules.

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

The average duration of farm interview was 14 minutes for farmers’ and family farms and 69 minutes for agricultural companies and enterprises. There is no information about the separate duration for core and modules.

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not relevant (data were collected from the administrative data source).

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

The average duration of farm interview was 14 minutes for farmers’ and family farms and 69 minutes for agricultural companies and enterprises. There is no information about the separate durations for core and modules.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

The revision policy applied by Statistics Lithuania is described in the Description of Procedure for Performance, Analysis and Publication of Revisions of Statistical Information.

There are no planned revisions of published AC 2020 data. 

17.2. Data revision - practice

Final results are published and are not subject to subsequent revision. The exception is only in case of significant errors, changes in classifications, methodologies, new statistical data sources, etc.

Individual depersonalised data are validated by Statistics Lithuania and Eurostat using strict rules; later, aggregated data are checked again. AC 2020 data revision was not planned because data were carefully checked against administrative data sources and are consistent with validation rules. 

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18.Timetable_statistical_process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

Statistical farm Register

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Continuous
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Sample
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

The stratification variables were standard output and Local Administrative Units (municipalities). 

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Stratified one-stage random sampling
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Unit size
Unit location
Unit specialization
Unit legal status
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
No
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Within the full coverage strata were holdings: with a standard output of EUR 8 000 or more, i.e. y. belonging to economic size classes IV to XIV; certified organic farms; belonging to specific groups growing walnut, nursery, perennial plants for twining, weaving, flax, oilseeds, tobacco, hops, aromatic, medicinal and culinary plants, seed and seedling plants, other energy and industrial plants, fiber plants as well as farms where ostriches are kept.

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

The relevant analysis of FSS 2016 data was done for decision regarding the sample size.

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Neymann allocation
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Sample
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

The stratification variables were standard output and Local Administrative Units (municipalities). Only the data of holdings that have cattle, pigs, sheep, goats or poultry are sent to Eurostat.

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Stratified one-stage random sampling
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Unit size
Unit location
Unit specialization
Unit legal status
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
No
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

Within the full coverage strata were holdings: with a standard output of EUR 8 000 or more from livestock, certified organic livestock farms; belonging to specific group keeping ostriches.

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

The relevant analysis of FSS 2016 data was done for decision regarding the sample size.

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Neymann allocation
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

The software tool used for sample selection was SAS.

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
None
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches is available on  Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between.

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Face-to-face, electronic version
Telephone, electronic version
Use of Internet
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Not applicable
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3. Questionnaire_for farmers' and family farms (EN)
18.3.3. Questionnaire_for agricultural companies and enterprises (EN)
18.3.3. Questionnaire_for agricultural companies and enterprises (LT)
18.3.3. Questionnaire_for farmers and family farms (LT)
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Data format checks
Completeness checks
Range checks
Relational checks
Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection
Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
Interviewers
Supervisors
Staff from central department
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

During AC 2020 only electronic questionnaires were used. Validation rules were prepared and integrated into questionnaires. Moreover, additional validation rules were prepared for data processing software ORACLE. Also, some mistakes or inconsistencies were found during AC 2020 data comparison at macro level.

18.5. Data compilation

The weights of holdings in the module's sample were adjusted for non-response. Over–coverage holdings were not taken into account.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

The unweighted unit imputation rate was 11 % in the population frame (17900 holdings were imputed).  For core variables unweighted imputation rate was the same as unit imputation rate. For variables in the sample-based module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’, the unweighted imputation rate was 4,8 % in the gross sample size. For variables in the sample-based module ‘Animal housing and manure management’, the unweighted imputation rate was 3,5 % in the gross sample size.

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Design weight
Non-response adjustment
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

AC - Agricultural Census

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

SO – Standard output

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top