|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Danmarks Statistik |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Division of agricultural statistics |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Sejrøgade 11 Danmark |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 05/01/2022 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 05/01/2022 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 05/01/2022 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications. The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding. The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2019/2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:
|
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups: - A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops - A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops - A.01.3: Plant propagation - A.01.4: Animal production - A.01.5: Mixed farming or - The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity. Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex. Annexes: 3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings |
|||
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1. |
|||
3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
The figures do not include Greeland and Faore Islands. |
|||
3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding | |||
The majority of the area of the holding The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm |
|||
3.7.4. Additional information reference area | |||
The most detailed geographical location of the farm is the municipality. Normally no figures for municipalities are published. Only for years of a total agricultural census does Statistics Denmark publish agricultural figures municipalities. For other years figures at NUTS3 or NUTS3 level are published. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Farm structure statistics in Denmark cover the period from 1982 onwards at an almost complet comparability. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports). |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output. |
|
|||
Two kinds of units are generally used:
|
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
5.1. Reference period for land variables | |||
For the farms applying for crops subsidies – and they constitute the vast majority – crops on free land reflect what the farms have reported to the Ministry of Agriculture in April 2020. The deadline for applying for crop subsidies in 2020 was 17 April. Thus the 12-month period is 18 April 2019 - 17 April 2020. For forestry and green house area the reference day 19 June 2020 applies for all farms. |
|||
5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices | |||
For irrigable area the 12 months period prior to the reference day June 19 2020 applies. |
|||
5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing | |||
For cattle Statistics Denmark receives the livestock register June 1 2020. For all other livestock and for animal housing the reference day June 19 2020 applies. |
|||
5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management | |||
The manure management reflects the techniques which the farm has used in 12 months period prior to the reference day June 19 2020. |
|||
5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force | |||
The 12-month period prior to the reference day June 19 2020. |
|||
5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures | |||
The years 2018, 2019 and 2020. |
|||
5.7. Reference day for all other variables | |||
The reference day June 19 2020. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements | |||
Legal act Annexes: 6.1.1 Lov om Danmarks Statistik - Act on Statistics Denmark |
|||
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
Lov om Danmarks Statistik - Act on Statistics Denmark |
|||
6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements | |||
https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/610 |
|||
6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
May 30 2018 |
|||
6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents | |||
Yes | |||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
All work regarding the farm structure census 2020 has been done by Statistics Denmark. The work has been shared between the division of agricultural statistics and a special division on data collecting. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Individual information from surveys is treated strictly confidential. This is also the case for FSS. In practice it means that only a few colleagues at Statistics Denmark have the right to access the FSS survey registers. Such a practice is in line with principle 5 in European Statistics Code of Practice on statistical confidentiality. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1. Aggregated data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells | |||
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold) Other primary confidentiality rules |
|||
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells | |||
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells) | |||
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods | |||
All data sets regarding FSS are stored at a special library on Statistics Denmark’s computer network as SAS data sets going back to 1982. Only authorised colleagues can access the individual farm information. The surveys are delivered to the Danish National Archive, which keeps the information as strictly confidential for 80 years. When designing statistical tables the aim is to secure that no table cells contain very few farms. There are no exact rules regarding "very few farms" but all cells with less than five farms are set to missing. |
|||
7.2.2. Microdata | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination | |||
Yes | |||
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation | |||
Recoding of variables Reduction of information Merging categories Rounding Annexes: Principles regarding access to micro data |
|||
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology | |||
Researchers can obtain access to the surveys but only as anonymous information. If a researcher publishes statistical tables based on the individual information it must take place in agreement with Statistics Denmark. It is not very common that researchers requests micro data from FSS. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
The FSS is normally published 9-12 months from the reference day. The 2020 census was published May 27 2021 with a reference day June 19 2020. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
For all tables published online users can see when the next updated is expected to take place, se for instance here: An online table may or may be accompanied by a newsletter. |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Users can find a description of the policy of Statistics Denmark here: https://www.dst.dk/en/OmDS/strategi-og-kvalitet/politikker/kvalitetspolitik |
|||
8.3.1. Use of quality rating system | |||
No | |||
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system | |||
Not applicable, no quality rating system exists for the Danish FSS 2020. |
|
|||
The farm structure survey is published yearly with number of farm by size and geography as well as statistical tables on crops and livestock. Labour force is not on the questionnaire every year. In the recent decade Statistics Denmark has published figures on labour force in agriculture for the years 2013, 2016, 2018 and 2020. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
Yes Annexes: 10.1.1 News letter regarding the Danish farm structure census 2020 News letter regarding the Danish farm structure census 2020. This news letter is written in the official EU language Danish and is not translated into any other language. |
|||
10.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyt/NytHtml?cid=25865 This news letter on the Danish farm structure census 2020 has as its main topic the distribution of agricultural land and farms by men and women. Likewise it focuses on female farm workers and spouses of farmers working on the farms. |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.2.1. Production of paper publications | |||
Yes, but not in English | |||
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications | |||
Yes, but not in English Annexes: 10.2.2 Link to an online publication on zero and conservation tillage |
|||
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link | |||
Statistisk tiårsoversigt 2020 (Statistical ten years review 2020). It is a general publication on all aspects of society, population, economy, employment and business life. It has a few very basic tables on number of farms, crops and livestock. A link to the publication 1964-2001 can be seen here: |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
We do not monitor and record the number of consultations of data tables in the field of farm structure. |
|||
10.3.2. Accessibility of online database | |||
Yes Annexes: Internet tables on the Danish farm structure statistics with text in both Danish and English |
|||
10.3.3. Link to online database | |||
A description of the possibilities of online statistical tables can be seen here: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/brug-statistikken/muligheder-i-statistikbanken
Link to the most basic tables on farm structure: |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata | |||
Yes | |||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not available |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
Yes Annexes: 10.6.2 National documentation on farm structure statistics |
|||
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata | |||
This documentation on farm structure statistics is published by Statistics Denmark July 15 2021. |
|||
10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology | |||
No | |||
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers | |||
No | |||
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
The quality of the Danish FSS is described in our national system of quality reports with text in both Danish and English: [Agricultural and horticultural survey](http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/dokumentation/documentationofstatistics/agricultural-and-horticultural-survey) |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Quality management system | |||
No | |||
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures | |||
Training courses Use of best practices Compliance monitoring Self-assessment |
|||
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures | |||
The quality policy of statistics Denmark is described here: https://www.dst.dk/en/OmDS/strategi-og-kvalitet/kvalitetspolitik |
|||
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures | |||
In the recent years Statistics Denmark has introduced a new validation system called DAF. It is designed especially for business surveys and involves for example giving priority to possible errors by their importance. Additionally controls can be introduced at an early stage, namely already when the farmer completes the questionnaire online. Of course the system also has classical validation procedures with minimum/maxim value controls and comparison with previous surveys where a farm has taken part. This new system was not in place for the farm structure census 2020. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The precision varies for the different items of the statistics. The precision is thus highest for the total agricultural area and less precise for specific crops, especially crops grown by only few farmers. Likewise the precision is best for livestock which many farmers have. This is in particular true for cattle. In the same way the uncertainty is high for small geographical units, e.g. Bornholm. Overall accuracyCoverage: The population includes all active farms in Denmark and is integrated in the Statistical Business Register (ESR), which is kept by Statistics Denmark. In order To ensure that the population is up to date Statistics Denmark regularly makes register merges with IACS and the Central Livestock Register (CHR). The assumption is that if a farm applies for crop subsidies or reports livestock to the livestock register it must be expected to be active in agriculture and should accordingly be marked as such in the register of Statistics Denmark. The sample is selected so that the lowest possible sample error is obtained with respect to agricultural area, pigs, cattle, fur animals and standard output. The farms are divided into groups - strata- by typology and size of standard output. The 2021 survey had 69 strata. Farms known to be specialized horticultural or poultry farms are selected exhaustively. As a general rule the bigger a farm is the more likely it is to be selected. Information on crops is selected from IACS kept by the Ministry of Agriculture. When a farmer applies for subsidies he has to specify his crops carefully. IACS must therefore be assumed to be an extremely reliable source. Information on cattle is collected from the Central Livestock Register and fur animals are collected from The Association of Danish Fur animals farmers. For both these types of livestock the farmer answers yes/no, and for farmers having answered yes the number of animals is taken from respectively The Central Livestock and The Association of Danish Fur animals farmers. Control: Several computer validations and checks are made before publishing the results. Due to many different survey characteristics it is not possible to give one figure for the sample error but just some examples:
Certain figures are often reported as round figures, for instance 12.000 chickens. However, there is no reason to assume that there should be any systematic over- or under estimation in the figures. Farmers may forget to answer certain questions. Such errors are difficult to find when it comes to livestock of minor importance like sheep, goats and horses. Questions on work time for the farmer and spouse can be difficult to answer for part time farmers. Sampling error
|
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The statistics fulfill a need for structural information on the Danish agriculture, e.g. number of farms by size and region. Important users are EU, the ministries and agricultural organizations. User NeedsThe farm structure survey fulfils a general need for a structural statistics on the Danish agriculture where the business is described by size, geography, type of farming and other aspects. However, agricultural statistics are more than just business statistics. It is also environmental statistics and the farm structure statistics provides also the users with number of animals and land use in agriculture. The users are in particular EU, the ministries, farmer’s organisations, but also students and interested people in general. EU uses the statistics as a tool in the planning of the common agricultural policy. Many users are interested in figures by municipalities. This need, however, can only be met for years where Statistics Denmark has carried through total censuses. For sample surveys reliable figures by municipalities cannot be made. The most recent total censuses took place in 2010 2020. User SatisfactionThe main impression is that most users are satisfied with the statistics but often they have wishes about more detailed regional figures with figures for municipalities and also more agro environmental statistics. There is no user board for agricultural statistics nor has there ever been conducted any survey on user satisfaction. |
|||
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes | |||
In 2020 the farm structure census certain questions asked certain questions not required by the regulation:
|
|||
12.1.2. Unmet user needs | |||
The farm structure survey fulfils a general need for a structural statistics on the Danish agriculture where the business is described by size, geography, type of farming and other aspects. However, agricultural statistics are more than just business statistics. It is also environmental statistics and the farm structure statistics provides also the users with number of animals and land use in agriculture. The users are in particular EU, the ministries, farmer’s organisations, but also students and interested people in general. EU uses the statistics as a tool in the planning of the common agricultural policy. Many users are interested in figures by municipalities. This need, however, can only be met for years where Statistics Denmark has carried through total censuses. For sample surveys reliable figures by municipalities cannot be made. The most recent total censuses took place in 2010 and 2020. |
|||
12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs | |||
No such plans exist so far. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
No survey on user satisfaction exists. |
|||
12.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
No | |||
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
Not applicable |
|||
12.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
Not applicable | |||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
See categories below. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
No items have been covered in a sample in the Danish IFS 2020 meaning that all values per definition are equal to zero. Annexes: 13.2.1. Relative standard errors |
|||
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
Not relevant, see 13.2.1 |
|||
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors | |||
Not relevant for the Danish farm structure census 2020 since no items have been covered in a sample. |
|||
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted. Annexes: 13.3.1.1. Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate |
|||
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
None | |||
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error | |||
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units None |
|||
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error | |||
Statistics Denmark works currently on keeping its farm register up to date. It is for example done by comparing the most recent edition of IACS with the year before. Farms applying for crop subsidies in year N-1 but not in year N can most often be deleted from the farm register, at least if they cannot at the same time be found in the livestock register. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not requested. |
|||
13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate | |||
Unknown |
|||
13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
None | |||
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error | |||
When keeping the farm register up to date farms found in IACS or the livestock will added the statistical farm register and will thus next year be added to survey population. Special for the farm structure census 2020 the following measure was taken: When we received IACS 2020 in July we found about 1.500 farms which were not in the census. Instead of just imputing these farms we sent them a questionnaire and included them thereby in the census. |
|||
13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error | |||
Nothing to remark |
|||
13.3.1.4. Misclassification error | |||
No | |||
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.1.5. Contact error | |||
No | |||
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors | |||
There is no information on measurement errors regarding the farm structure survey 2020. |
|||
13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors | |||
Not applicable | |||
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error | |||
None | |||
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality | |||
Unknown | |||
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error | |||
Statistics Denmark has no knowledge of the size of measurement errors in the 2020 Danish farm structure census, nor do we know whether certain items should be more subject to measurement errors than others. |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted. |
|||
13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response | |||
Failure to make contact with the unit Refusal to participate |
|||
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response | |||
Reminders Imputation |
|||
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis | |||
See the annex Annexes: 13.3.3.1.3 Unit non-response in the Danish farm structure census 2020 |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
Normally all parts of the questionnaire are completed by the farmer. When completing the questionnaire online the procedure is that the farmer cannot leave a section before having answered the questions. And when the questionnaires are completed by telephone interviews the interviewer will ask all questions. In the annex the degree of imputation is shown. Annexes: 13.3.3.2 The imputation rate for animal housing and storage facilities for manure. |
|||
13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate | |||
The highest item non-response rate concerns the questions on animal housing for other cattle than diary cows. 17,4 percent of the farms failed to answer the questions. The codes are these: A2000X2300F_AVGNR Other bovine animals - average number A2000X2300F_TS_SL Other bovine animals in tied stalls (slurry) A2000X2300F_TS_SO Other bovine animals in tied stalls (solid manure) A2000X2300F_LH_SL Other bovine animals in loose/cubicle housing (slurry) A2000X2300F_LH_SO Other bovine animals in loose/cubicle housing (solid manure) A2000X2300F_OH_SL Other bovine animals in other types of housing (slurry) A2000X2300F_OH_SO Other bovine animals in other types of housing (solid manure) A2000X2300F_T_ALW Other bovine animals always outdoors A2000X2300F_T_PART Other bovine animals partly outdoors (grazing) A2000X2300F_EXRY Other bovine animals with access to exercise yards |
|||
13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response | |||
Farmers do not know the answer | |||
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Imputation |
|||
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality | |||
Moderate | |||
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error | |||
The most important reason for item non-response for animal housing and storage facilities for manure is that these questions are new and might be seen as difficult. It is as mentioned in the 13.3.3.2.1 particularly high for “other cattle than dairy cows”. That is to be expected since relatively many farms with “other cattle” are small and medium sized farms which are not selected to the farm structure sample surveys so often. In the annex in 13.3.3.2.1 it is shown that item-non rate is much lower for farms with dairy cows and pigs. These farms are generally big and might be more used to deal with technical details regarding their business. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors | |||
Data processing | |||
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods | |||
Nearest neighbour imputation | |||
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors | |||
No specific actions in this field can be identified other than insisting on being careful and encouraging colleagues to do so as well. Fortunately at Statistics Denmark we have a culture where we realise that mistakes happen. And when a mistake happens we concentrate on correcting it rather than putting blame on the “guilty” persons. |
|||
13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections | |||
All staff at Statistics Denmark has the authority to correct mistakes regarding their normal responsibilities, if necessary to use normal tool like excel and SAS. |
|||
13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality | |||
Unknown | |||
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
Not applicable, no model assumptions have been used in the Danish FSS 2020. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
There is no provisional publication. |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
The survey was published, May 27 2011, about 12 months after the reference day and 5 months after the end of the reference year. |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery | |||
Not requested. |
|||
14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication | |||
The FSS is normally published 9-12 months from the reference day. The 2020 census was published May 27 2021 with a reference day June 19 2020. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistics Denmark follows the definition laid down in the regulation, article 2 that states that a farm “means a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The differences are described in detail in 15.1.3.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The introduction in of new FSS threshold in 2010 meant a small break in the comparability between the 1982-2009 figures, also because we for national reasons included farms with minks for the first time. 1.167 were farm were includes which would not have been included (see attached 2010-newsletter) with threshold applied till 2009 (an agricultural area of at least 5,0 ha or a standard gross margin of at least 5.000 euro). But only 431 was due to the new EU thresholds, the remaining 731 farms were due to the inclusion of farms with minks as the only farm activity. So seen over the whole period 1982-2020 the comparability is almost complete. We have preferred to keep this comparability and not add more than 3.000 small farms to the statistics. Annexes: 15.1.3.3 News letter, the Danish FSS 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
No such deviations exist in the Danish farm structure census. The definitions are in line with the Eurostat handbook. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.1 AWU |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The livestock unit coefficients are the as laid down in the regulation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.” | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are no differences between the types of livestock that Denmark includes under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the type of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5. Reference periods/days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The reference periods are in line with regulation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6. Common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The concept of common land does not exist | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All agricultural land in Denmark is owned somebody, most often private farmers. To a smaller extent agricultural land can also be owned by for example municipalities and churches. But it never occurs that there is a piece of land which can be used in common by several farms. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The organic farm certification is administrated by the Ministry of Agriculture. It is in line with Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the Danish farm structure census 2020 is data collected in the same way all over the country. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2. Comparability - over time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to FSS 2016 we have in order to be in line with the EU reqirements introduced seven new rules in IFS 2020 for farms being covered, see the annex. Therefore, the length of comparable time series is 1. Annexes: 15.2.1 Comparability over time, Danish Farm structure statistics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series Annexes: 15.2.2.1 Farms only sent to Eurostat |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. Therefore, for Eurostat, IFS 2020 data includes data on holdings with only minks unlike FSS 2016. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Danish FSS 2020 has been subject to the same thresholds that were applied in the 2010 census and the sample surveys in 2013 and 2016, see Regulation 1166/2008, Annex II. But in order to fulfill the requirements of the new regulation 2018/1091 new thresholds have been added:
In addition, the 2016 thresholds (presented in the 2016 national methodological report) include:
the 2020 thresholds include a modified version of these thresholds:
(as illustrated in the annex attached to 2020 quality report item 3.6.1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4. Geographical coverage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been no changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series Annexes: Farm only sent to Eurostat |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal personality of the agricultural holding In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.
Other livestock n.e.c. In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately. Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."
Livestock units In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient of 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.
Organic animals While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6. Reference periods/days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In FSS 2016 the reference day was May 13 and in IFS 2020 June 19. By groups of variables, there are some changes presented in the following table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7. Common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been no changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FSS2016 data are currently under review. The issue is wrongly calculated extrapolation factors for small farms < 5.0 ha. Identified trends on Livestock - A6111, rabbits. Very few Danish farms have rabbits. This was also the case in 2016. So we should bear in mind that the 2016 result was subject to a considerable sample error. Only 28 farms in the sample had rabbits. - A2300G Non diary cows: The number of these animals has decreased about 20 percent in the recent decade. The reason is bad economy for cattle held for meat production whereas the economy for milk production cows has been somehow better, see statistikbanken.dk/REGNPRO2 There is in these years a tendency towards specialisation and concentration in the Danish agriculture. One consequence of this tendency is relatively fewer farms with livestock and relatively more farms with plant production only. For instance the share of farms with cattle and pigs in Denmark has decreased slightly from 2016 to 2020. But the most important reasons for the increase are these two:
Identified trends on crops - ARA99T, other crops: This crop is like all crops on free land collected from IACS, a source we consider as extremely reliable. It is small crop so we should remember a high sample error in 2016. Identified trends on labour force MOGA_NFAM_RH, non-family workers working on non-agricultural activities on the farm as their main occupation: We have no explanation for the drop from 2016 to 2020. The Farm typology evolution The number of small farms with less than 5.0 hectares has increased drastically from 2016 to 2020. This development is not real. We have added 3.863 small Danish farms by having introduced new thresholds leading to a break in the comparability between 2016 and 2020. These 3.863 farms would not have been included had the thresholds laid down in regulation 1166/2008 still been in force. This is, however, not the whole explanation. There are problems with the extrapolation factors of the 2016 survey regarding the small farms. One option to solve the issue could be to recalculate the 2016-extrapolation factors. this had a severe impact also in thes evolution of number of holdings by SO_EURO and by LSU class. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
We do not have any suitable sources for such an analysis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes Annexes: 15.3.4.1 Compare FSS with oher statistics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs Annual Crops Statistics CULTIVATED AREA in relative terms - Vegetables and strawberries: The item in ANC is collected in a special survey different from FSS in combination with extrapolations based mainly on IACS. Furthermore ANC includes green house crops. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.4. Coherence - internal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules. Annexes: 15.4 Danish farm structure statistics compared with other statistics |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics | |||
Farmers having taken part in the pig survey in April do not need to report pigs to the FSS only one month later. But they have to complete all other parts of the FSS questionnaire. |
|||
16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
None | |||
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains | |||
FSS 2020 used pretty much the same tools as FSS 2016. |
|||
16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes) | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.3.1. Core | |||
The questionnaire is normally completed online and we have thereby no knowledge on how long time it takes. In cases where the questionnaire is completed through telephone interviews the experience is that it most often can be completed in less than ten minutes. How the time is distributed by the different parts of the questionnaire is it not possible to say anything certain about. |
|||
16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘ | |||
No safe knowledge is available. |
|||
16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’ | |||
Not relevant since all items of this module are collected from administrative registers. |
|||
16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’ | |||
No safe knowledge is available. |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Not relevant for FSS 2020 since there is no provisional version of the survey. If major mistakes are found after first publication they will of course be corrected and the correction will be announced on our homepage. No such thing happened to the Danish FSS 2020. Statistics Denmark has no special revision policy and practice differs from statistics to statistics. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
There was only one publication of FSS 2016 and thereby no revisions. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
|||
Annexes: 18. Timetable_statistical_process |
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1. Population frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1.1. Type of frame | |||
List frame | |||
18.1.1.2. Name of frame | |||
FSS population register |
|||
18.1.1.3. Update frequency | |||
Continuous | |||
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.2.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.4.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
None | |||
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5. Module “Rural development” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.5.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
None | |||
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.6.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
None | |||
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.13. Administrative sources | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them | |||
The information is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annex. Annexes: 18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources |
|||
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used | |||
Other | |||
18.1.14. Innovative approaches | |||
The information on innovative approaches is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.3.1. Methods of data collection | |||
Postal, electronic version (email) | |||
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires | |||
Not applicable Annexes: Validation and data processing in the Danish FSS |
|||
18.3.3. Questionnaire | |||
Please find the questionnaire in annex. Annexes: 18.3.3. Questionnaire 18.3.3. Questionnaire in Danish/Spørgeskema på dansk |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.4.1. Type of validation checks | |||
Completeness checks Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection |
|||
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation | |||
Staff from central department | |||
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation | |||
Oracle and SAS |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
Not applicable Annexes: Validation and data processing in the Danish FSS |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
Among 36.576 farms sent to Eurostat, the following apply:
|
|||
18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Covered under Data compilation. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
19.1. List of abbreviations | |||
CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CAPI – Computer Assisted Personal Interview CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview FSS – Farm Structure Survey IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics LSU – Livestock units NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview SO – Standard output UAA – Utilised agricultural area |
|||
19.2. Additional comments | |||
No additional comments. |
|
|||
|
|||