|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Ministry of Agriculture |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Directorate Agriculture and Regional Policy Agrostatistics Department |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | 55, Blvd. Hristo Botev, Sofia 1040, Bulgaria |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 31/03/2022 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 31/03/2022 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 31/03/2022 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2019/2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2019/2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:
|
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups: - A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops - A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops - A.01.3: Plant propagation - A.01.4: Animal production - A.01.5: Mixed farming or - The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity. Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex. Annexes: 3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings |
|||
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
Yes | |||
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1. |
|||
3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2. Data has been collected and sent concerning farms that have used fertilizers but do not have animals of the above mentioned species. All holdings were monitored comprehensively and all collected data were sent to Eurostat. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
No |
|||
3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding | |||
The main building for production The location where all agricultural activities are situated The majority of the area of the holding The most important parcel by physical size The most important parcel by economic size The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm |
|||
3.7.4. Additional information reference area | |||
A mixed approach has been chosen to determine the location of the holdings. Criteria for determining the location of holdings: If the holding has an agricultural building (livestock building, granary, machinery, etc.), the location of the holding is determined by: 1. The location of the main agricultural building; If the holding does not have an agricultural building, the location of the holding shall be determined by: 2. The location of the majority of the area of the holding; 3. The location of the most important parcel chosen by physical size; 4. The location of the most important parcel chosen by economic size (arable land, perennials, pastures); 5. The location of the farmer's residence if it is not further than 5 km straight from the farm. In determining the location of the farms, spatial data was used for the declared area in IACS, by plots. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2003 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports). |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output. |
|
|||
Two kinds of units are generally used:
|
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
5.1. Reference period for land variables | |||
The use of land refers to the reference year 2019/2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown. The 12-month period ending on 31.08.2020 within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices | |||
The 12-month period ending on 31.08.2020 within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing | |||
The reference day 31.08.2020 within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management | |||
The 12-month period ending on 31.08.2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing. |
|||
5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force | |||
The 12-month period ending on 31.08.2020 within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures | |||
The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020. |
|||
5.7. Reference day for all other variables | |||
The reference day 31.08.2020 within the reference year 2020. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements | |||
Legal act | |||
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
Law on the Census of Agricultural Holdings in the Republic of Bulgaria in 2020. Annexes: 6.1.2. Law on the Census of Agricultural Holdings in the Republic of Bulgaria in 2020 |
|||
6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements | |||
6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
15.03.2019 |
|||
6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents | |||
Yes | |||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Within the framework of agreements, census data is provided by the Ministry of Agriculture of Eurostat and the NSI of Bulgaria. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Individual data are confidential and are not disseminated as such (affidavits, Law on statistics). The protection of statistical confidentiality is guaranteed by the Statistics Act, the Law on the Census of Agricultural Holdings in the Republic of Bulgaria. The census participants fill in affidavits. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1. Aggregated data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells | |||
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold) Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total) Secondary confidentiality rules |
|||
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells | |||
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells) | |||
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods | |||
Published only aggregated data, not published when there are less than 3 holdings contributing to the value of the indicator or the data of one of the units accounts for over 85% of the published index. Confidential data is replaced by the sign "c", there is a case of aggregation of variables with a low level of distribution for the country. |
|||
7.2.2. Microdata | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination | |||
No | |||
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation | |||
None | |||
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology | |||
There are rules for releasing confidential data for the purpose of research and the provision of confidential data is performed according to these rules. According to Art.26a of the Statistics Act individual and anonymous data may be provided for the purpose of research to universities or legal persons whose main activity is research after permission by the President of the National Statistical Institute. RULES FOR PROVISION OF ANONYMOUS INDIVIDUAL DATA FOR SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Art. 2. The following users may apply for access to anonymized individual data: 1. universities and other higher education institutions; 2. research organisations and institutions; 3. other agencies, organisations or institutions in which there are separate structural units carrying out research activities; 4. oter legal entities using data for research and analytical purposes; 5. natural persons who, for the purposes of scientific and research work, need anonymized data. Art. 3. The User and eServices Department at the Multisectoral statistics and user services Department maintain and update a list of users that includes the user name, type of data provided, and date of submission. Art. 4. The data shall be provided on a technical medium in csv, sav, xls or any other format specified in the application. ....... Section IV PROVISION OF ANONYMOUS INDIVIDUAL DATA Art. 17. When anonymizing the data, the following requirements are met: 1. anonymised individual data cannot be provided if they disobey the provisions of Art. 25; 2. the individual records in the database of the requested survey are processed by competent officers by deleting all identifying individual signs from the data (name, address, publicly accessible identification number, etc.), which directly or indirectly identify a particular statistical unit; 3. in the case of records where these rules are not abided by for certain characteristics, the directorates in whose portfolio the data is prepared shall assess whether they should entirely erase the data, delete the data only in the cells of those characteristics, or take other appropriate solutions to protect individual data. Art. 18. The following procedures shall be followed when providing data from studies for consecutive periods (years, quarters, etc.): 1. where, in the case of comparative analyzes, it is necessary to provide anonymized data from several consecutive observations, the individual data shall be coded with the same numbers for each unit in the database for the individual periods; 2.under item 1, the information database can be processed with special software products, which prevent the eventual disclosure of the data for the statistical units by means of methods for comparison of the used identification numbers. Art. 19. In order to assess the risk of revelation of data sets prepared by the user by matching anonymized individual data in combination with external data, they are subject to re-control by the experts in the concerned domain.
Microdata from 2020 census has not been disseminated. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
By 31.03.2022 the data has to be transmitted to Eurostat. By 30.06.2022 data has to be published on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture (NSP2022). |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
https://www.nsi.bg/en/content/18680/basic-page/national-statistical-programme-2021 |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
The information is disseminated by a publication on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture, simultaneously for all users. A bilingual hard copy book in Bulgarian and English publishes for the results of the Agricultural Census. |
|||
8.3.1. Use of quality rating system | |||
Yes, the EU quality rating system | |||
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system | |||
The methodology is described in the EU handbook. |
|
|||
For census every 10 years, for sample surveys for IFS every 3 years. Preliminary data 2021 https://www.agrostat.bg/ISASPublic Final data 2022. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
No | |||
10.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.2.1. Production of paper publications | |||
Yes, in English also | |||
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications | |||
Yes, in English also | |||
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link | |||
Census of agricultural holdings in 2020 – Preliminary results, Ministry of Agriculture, 2021 |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.3.2. Accessibility of online database | |||
No | |||
10.3.3. Link to online database | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata | |||
Yes | |||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Information on users‘ request. |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
No | |||
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook | |||
There is no instruction on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture, only a data entry guide. Interviewer's instruction; Data Entry Guide https://www.agrostat.bg/ISASPublic/Structure Data Entry Guide in the agrostatistics information system (ISAS) Manual of controls when filling in the statistical questionnaire - no link, printed edition |
|||
10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers | |||
Agricultural Census Program in 2020 |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
No available documentation on quality. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Quality management system | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures | |||
Training courses Use of best practices Quality guidelines Benchmarking Compliance monitoring |
|||
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures | |||
Multi-level data control. We comply with the documents prepared by NSI. https://www.nsi.bg/sites/default/files/files/pages/Quality/1.4.%20GUIDELINES%20NSS_BG.pdf |
|||
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures | |||
Information system improvements. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
Good. In 2020, a census of agricultural holdings was conducted for core structural and module data, therefore the data is free from sampling errors. The list of survey holdings has been updated with data from administrative sources and operating holdings above the specified thresholds can be considered covered. The studied variables are many in number, which necessitates a large number of validations, the data is controlled at several levels (by controllers, by experts, by validations in the information system during data entry and mandatory validations by Eurostat). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The data users are individuals and legal entities. The data is used for: Policy, management needs, trend setting, research needs, business and entrepreneurship. Mainly information related to basic data is used - area, animals, labour force. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to reach the data transmission values for some of the variables required by Regulation (EU) 2018/1091, more detailed information is collected through the statistical questionnaire.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1.2. Unmet user needs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There were requests for more detailed data, but this increased the number of the variables increasing the burden on the respondents and the budget. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. The annual statistics and modular data for 2023 and 2026 will cover the need for data. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working group meeting. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3. Completeness | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
See categories below. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.
Annexes: 13.2.1 Relative standard errors |
|||
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
There is no discrepancy in accuracy, as 2020 was a complete census. |
|||
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors | |||
However for the purpose of the IFS2020 we did not calculate the relative standard error. In our case is not applicable. |
|||
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted. The unit non-response rate in 2020 is 0.0%. It was 0.3% in 2016. The over-coverage rate in 2020 is 33.9%. In 2016, it was 29%. The unit non-response rate has remained relatively stable while the over-coverage rate has slightly increased. The high over-coverage rate is due to the following: As a result of the great dynamics of agricultural structures in the country (farm consolidation and the termination of the activities of small ones), the envisaged in the planning number of farms was not reached. The trend towards depopulation of villages and the aging of the rural population are the main reasons for the large number of closed farms. The pandemic situation due to the Coronavirus has affected the list update. Part of the planned meetings with the local authorities were organised as remote meetings, which did not allow the qualitative updating of the list of agricultural holdings, despite the efforts made in this direction. The Coronavirus pandemic has also had an adverse impact on agriculture. Due to the introduced restrictions and increased morbidity, part of the farmers gave up agricultural activity for the reference period. Together with other factors shaping the picture in agriculture, the emergence of highly infectious diseases in recent years in farm animals and poultry led to the liquidation of a large number of farms in 2019 and 2020. Annexes: 13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate |
|||
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Below thresholds during the reference period Temporarily out of production during the reference period Ceased activities Merged to another unit Duplicate units |
|||
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error | |||
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units | |||
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error | |||
Other. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not requested. |
|||
13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate | |||
Low. |
|||
13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
New births Units with outdated information in the frame (variables below thresholds in the frame but above thresholds in the reference period) |
|||
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error | |||
Many controls have been carried out, All established holdings with activity above the threshold are included in the submitted data. |
|||
13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error | |||
Not available. |
|||
13.3.1.4. Misclassification error | |||
No | |||
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error | |||
Agricultural census was conducted and there was no stratification process. |
|||
13.3.1.5. Contact error | |||
Yes | |||
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error | |||
An information from administrative sources was looked from the local authorities - mayors. |
|||
13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors | |||
The causes are commonly categorised as: - Survey instrument: the form, questionnaire or measuring device used for data collection may lead to the recording of wrong values; Data collection with a paper questionnaire implies technical mistakes. In order to limit these errors multiple controls are set in the computer system during data entry
Some logically related fields get controlled. Example: The sum of the crop area can not be greater than UAA, irrigated area and organic farming area can not be larger than main area, etc. - Respondent: respondents may, consciously or unconsciously, give erroneous data; The individual data is compared and clarified if necessary with a second interview. Such interviews are carried out by phone in case significant differences are recorded between the interview data, the administrative crosschecks and data from previous surveys. - Interviewer: interviewers may influence the answers given by respondents. Low possibility of such an error. Problems, caused by difficult questions, unclear definitions, sensitive questions etc. which are likely to determine measurement errors. |
|||
13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors | |||
Complexity of variables Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers Other |
|||
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error | |||
Pre-testing questionnaire Pre-filled questions Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents Training of enumerators Other |
|||
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality | |||
Moderate | |||
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error | |||
Presence of errors related to non-compliance with the indicated units of measurement - ha/dka; sq.m./ha; ton /kg. During the online introduction, administrative data on areas and animals were available in the system. In order to eliminate the errors in the measurement, checks for logical connection and comparison with administrative data have been made. |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted. The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible). |
|||
13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response | |||
Refusal to participate Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence) |
|||
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Reminders |
|||
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis | |||
The data on existing farms were collected through reminders and repeated contact with respondents and assistance from local authorities. |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
The ratio of the in-scope units which have not responded to a particular item is not calculated, it is not possible to calculate it by variables. For some of the modules, there are small farms without an answer for some of the variables. |
|||
13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate | |||
Art of the variables of the AHMM module. |
|||
13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response | |||
Skip of due question Farmers do not know the answer |
|||
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Reminders Other |
|||
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error | |||
In most cases, there is a lack of response to only some of the variables from small farms. This does not affect the total value of the variable. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
See sub-categories below |
|||
13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors | |||
Data entry | |||
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods | |||
None | |||
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors | |||
Comparison with administrative sources, logical connections between variables. |
|||
13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections | |||
Agrostatistics experts |
|||
13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error | |||
Other |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
4 months, April 2021 |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
The final results are expected to be published on 30.06.2022 - 18 months after 31.12.2020 |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery | |||
Not requested. |
|||
14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication | |||
There is no delay. The publication with the final data is forthcoming. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||||||||||||||||||
There is no difference in definitions, there is a difference in the scope. The sent data are for the basic data and for the modules for all farms, incl. of the extended framework, observed exhaustively. According to the data sent to Eurostat, the common land is pre-allocated to grassland farms, which affects the type of agriculture, SO, UAA and permanent grassland. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations | |||||||||||||||||||
In 2020, a census was conducted and the collected from all farms data, including the data for modules, were sent |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met | |||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria has expanded the framework by introducing lower national threshold criteria and including surveyed farms that are below the thresholds set out in the regulation. The extended framework covers the entire UAA and LSU on agricultural farms, covering over 98%.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria sent data for all monitored farms defined in national legislation, in order to achieve fuller coverage and maintain comparable thresholds over the years. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook | |||||||||||||||||||
We collected, sent to Eurostat, and published data with the same definitions and classification of variables compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874, and EU handbook. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job | |||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex. The number of working hours and days in the year for full-time work corresponds to one annual work unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work done by one person who is employed on a full-time in the farm. Annual labour units are used to calculate agricultural work on agricultural farms. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.1 AWU |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers | |||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups | |||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients | |||||||||||||||||||
A criterion for the national agricultural threshold (extended framework) LSU 0.8 for equidae was used. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.” | |||||||||||||||||||
No differences between the types of livestock that we include under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations | |||||||||||||||||||
The reason for using LSU 0.8 for equidae is to allocate the common land to the agricultural holdings with grazing animals. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5. Reference periods/days | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||||||||||||||||||
No |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6. Common land | |||||||||||||||||||
The concept of common land exists | |||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data | |||||||||||||||||||
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land | |||||||||||||||||||
Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings based on a statistical model. | |||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land | |||||||||||||||||||
Administrative sources | |||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land | |||||||||||||||||||
The information was obtained by administrative sources about permanent grassland areas from the municipal land fund, which is not distributed individually to agricultural farms, but is used collectively by livestock farms. This area is distributed proportionally to the grassland farms (including equidae) from the census using the LSU unit area coefficient. The distribution is at the municipal level. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections | |||||||||||||||||||
The distribution of the total land (grassland) at the municipal level and the way of determining the location of the farm is not precise enough. The proportional allocation based on LSU and the inclusion of the total land in the UAA of the farms affects the type of holdings and their SO. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
No |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country | |||||||||||||||||||
No. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||||||||||||||||||
There is a new regulatory framework for the survey 2020, which minimally changes of the thresholds and variables. The length of the comparable time series is 1, because there was a break in the time series concerning the reference periods. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 deals with farms with only fur animals. Holdings with only fur animals are included in our data collection according to the national thresholds. We added thresholds related to fur animals. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria applies lower thresholds than the requirements of the Regulation. There is no reason to believe that there is a break in the time series and the main variables. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4. Geographical coverage | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
In the previous structural survey big active farms (above certain criteria) on the territory of more than one administrative regions were reported separately for each region (NUTS3). In 2020, 1 record per holding was sent, regardless of the size of the farm and the geographical location of its activity - cultivated crops and animals. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
Legal personality of the agricultural holding In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which triggers fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings. Other livestock n.e.c. In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately. Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c." Livestock units In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches, and other poultry were each considered in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient of 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02, and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001. Organic animals While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6. Reference periods/days | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7. Common land | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.2. Description of changes | |||||||||||||||||||
In 2016, the data on the total land were transmitted as separate records of statistical units at the municipal level, and in 2020 the data on the total land were proportionally distributed to the UAA of agricultural holdings where grazing animals are kept. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||||||||||||||||||
Evolution over time, major trends: |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time | |||||||||||||||||||
No | |||||||||||||||||||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level | |||||||||||||||||||
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level | |||||||||||||||||||
The data from IACS and Annual Statistics are comparable. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level | |||||||||||||||||||
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level | |||||||||||||||||||
The major remarks from the cross-domain coherence analysis on MAIN AREA are: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA remarks: IFS vs ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
|||||||||||||||||||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||||||||||||||||||
The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by applying a wide range of validation rules. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics | |||
The burden of the respondents is due to the large number of characteristics and the specific and difficult matter. The respondents were re-asked for data on annual production surveys, which was used to control the basic data collected in the census. |
|||
16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
On-line surveys Further automation Increased use of administrative data |
|||
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains | |||
Not applicable |
|||
16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes) | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.3.1. Core | |||
Not available |
|||
16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘ | |||
Not available |
|||
16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’ | |||
Administrative data |
|||
16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’ | |||
Not available |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Bulgaria uses a Code of Practice for the Official Statistics developed for all Official Statistics, which covers the first release of many of the components of FSS (see link below). As far as the FSS dataset is concerned, it is subject to validation by Eurostat and revisions may be made to the dataset until it is approved by Eurostat. Once the dataset has passed Eurostat validation, we do not intend to make any further revisions unless a significant error is found. http://www.nsi.bg/sites/default/files/files/pages/Quality_e/1.4.%20GUIDELINES%20NSS_FINAL_EN.pdf |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Data revision for IFS data was not performed. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
|||
Annexes: 18. Timetable_statistical_process |
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1. Population frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1.1. Type of frame | |||
List frame | |||
18.1.1.2. Name of frame | |||
The statistical register of the agricultural farms supplemented with new holdings and updated by removing the inactive ones. |
|||
18.1.1.3. Update frequency | |||
Less frequent | |||
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.2.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.3.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
None | |||
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.4.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5. Module “Rural development” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.5.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.6.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.13. Administrative sources | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them | |||
The information is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annex. Annexes: 18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources |
|||
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used | |||
Other | |||
18.1.14. Innovative approaches | |||
The information on innovative approaches is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.3.1. Methods of data collection | |||
Face-to-face, non-electronic version Face-to-face, electronic version Use of Internet |
|||
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires | |||
Manual | |||
18.3.3. Questionnaire | |||
BG_StatisticalQuestionnaireCensus2020 Annexes: 18.3.3. BG_StatisticalQuestionnaireCensus2020_en 18.3.3. BG_StatisticalQuestionnaireCensus2020_bg |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.4.1. Type of validation checks | |||
Data format checks Completeness checks Range checks Relational checks Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics |
|||
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation | |||
Interviewers Supervisors Staff from local departments Staff from central department |
|||
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation | |||
Comparison of the data, control for logical connection in the information system (including validations from the manual), Eurostat data testing system. |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
An algorithm has been created for processing the collected data in the information system for bringing them into a form suitable for transmission to Eurostat (microdata file). |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Covered by Data compilation. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
19.1. List of abbreviations | |||
CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CAPI – Computer Assisted Personal Interview CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview FSS – Farm Structure Survey IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics LSU – Livestock units NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview SO – Standard output UAA – Utilised agricultural area |
|||
19.2. Additional comments | |||
No additional comments. |
|
|||
|
|||