|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | FPS Economy SMEs, Self-Employed and Energy - Statbel (Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium) |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Thematic Directorate Economie |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 16, North Gate III , 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 28/02/2022 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 28/02/2022 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 28/02/2022 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications. The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding. The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 3. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:
|
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups: - A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops - A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops - A.01.3: Plant propagation - A.01.4: Animal production - A.01.5: Mixed farming or - The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity. Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included. In some cases it occurs that a few farmers are doing one declaration for several single units. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex. Annexes: 3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings |
|||
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in annex item 3.6.1 The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020. |
|||
3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management” | |||
The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
Not applicable |
|||
3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding | |||
Other | |||
3.7.4. Additional information reference area | |||
The administrative building (this is mostly also the residence of the farmer) |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Farm structure statistics in Belgium cover the period from 1st October 2019 until 30th September 2020 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports). |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output. |
|
|||
Two kinds of units are generally used:
|
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
5.1. Reference period for land variables | |||
From the end of February until the end of April 2020, the farmers declared their main crops to IACS. If a crop was not sown at the moment of the declaration, they must give the area of crops that would be sown. Second crops were not taken into account for IFS. |
|||
5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices | |||
The 12-month period ending on 15 October within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing | |||
The reference day 15 October within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management | |||
The 12-month period ending on 15 October. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing. |
|||
5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force | |||
The 12-month period ending on 30 September within the reference year 2020. |
|||
5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures | |||
The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020. |
|||
5.7. Reference day for all other variables | |||
The reference day 15 October within the reference year 2020. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements | |||
Legal act | |||
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
The legal basis of the agricultural survey was laid down in the Royal decree of June 9, 2014 relating to the organisation agricultural surveys carried out by the Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium. This Royal decree was based on the law of July 4, 1962 concerning public statistics, modified by the law of August 1, 1985 and (modified by the law of) March 22, 2006. |
|||
6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements | |||
http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2014/07/14_1.pdf#Page66 |
|||
6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
2014 |
|||
6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents | |||
Yes | |||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
For all administrative data that were used, Agreements were made between the Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium and the different organisations, namely: - Departement Landbouw en Visserij - Mestbank - Wallonie Agriculture SPW - Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC) |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Strict confidentiality of all collected data is laid down by the Statistics law of July 4, 1962. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1. Aggregated data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells | |||
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold) | |||
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells | |||
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells) | |||
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods | |||
For tables with size classes, the classes with less than 3 holdings are regrouped. If it isn’t possible to regroup them we put ‘:’. Results at municipal level: the results are not disseminated when there are less than 5 holdings in the municipality. We aggregate all these municipalities to one municipality called ‘confidential municipalities’. |
|||
7.2.2. Microdata | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination | |||
Yes | |||
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation | |||
Removal of variables Reduction of information |
|||
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology | |||
Micro-data are disseminated only with an official agreement of the Commission for the protection of Privacy. Requests for micro-data are therefore dealt on case by case basis. Only anonymous microdata are transmitted. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
Crops and animals : 5 August 2021 Other characteristics : March 2022 |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Users are informed by the release calender on the website from Statbel : https://statbel.fgov.be/en |
|||
8.3.1. Use of quality rating system | |||
No | |||
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||
Crops and animals : yearly
Other characteristics : every 3 - 4 years
|
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
Yes | |||
10.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
http://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/cereal-crops-decreased-almost-3-2020 |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.2.1. Production of paper publications | |||
No | |||
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications | |||
Yes, in English also | |||
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link | |||
http://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/cereal-crops-decreased-almost-3-2020 |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.3.2. Accessibility of online database | |||
No | |||
10.3.3. Link to online database | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata | |||
Yes | |||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not available |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
No | |||
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology | |||
No | |||
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers | |||
No | |||
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
There is no documentation available on quality. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Quality management system | |||
No | |||
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures | |||
None | |||
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures | |||
Not applicable |
|||
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures | |||
Not available |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
Not available |
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The list of characteristics for the census is determined by a group of experts on agriculture. Several IFS characteristics are integrated to meet other EU-requirements and national information needs. |
|||
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes | |||
Characteristics surveyed only for national purposes: - The presence of an eventually successor for the farm holder - Short food supply scheme The users of those characteristics are: the regional administrations of agriculture and environmental, the national Bank of Belgium, professional organisations, research centers, universities. - More detailed information about livestock was surveyed to comply with the Regulation (EC) No 1165/2008 of 19 November 2008 concerning livestock and meat statistics and repealing Council Directives 93/23/EEC, 93/24/EEC and 93/25/EEC. - Detailed information about horticultural crops for Wallonia was surveyed to comply with the Regulation (EC) No 543/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of concerning crop statistics. - Information about milk processing at farm level was surveyed to comply with the milk statistics. |
|||
12.1.2. Unmet user needs | |||
All user needs are met |
|||
12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs | |||
Not applicable |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Not available |
|||
12.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
No | |||
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
Not applicable |
|||
12.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
Not applicable | |||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
See categories below. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex. Annexes: 13.2.1. Relative Standards Errors |
|||
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
There is no case of non-compliant precision requirements for BE. |
|||
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors | |||
Usual analytical formulas for post-stratified estimator with post-strata identical to sampling strata. Annexes: 13.2.3. Formulae for relative standard errors |
|||
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted. Annexes: 13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate |
|||
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Below thresholds during the reference period Ceased activities |
|||
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error | |||
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units | |||
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not requested. |
|||
13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate | |||
0% |
|||
13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
None | |||
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.1.4. Misclassification error | |||
No | |||
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
13.3.1.5. Contact error | |||
No | |||
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors | |||
When the values were too high or when there was an incoherence in the data we contacted the farmer and asked to correct their data. High values were detected by using thresholds. There is no specific list of characteristics. It can occur to every numeric characteristic. |
|||
13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors | |||
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers | |||
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error | |||
Pre-filled questions Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents |
|||
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality | |||
None | |||
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted. |
|||
13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response | |||
Refusal to participate Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence) |
|||
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response | |||
Reminders Imputation |
|||
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis | |||
None |
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
It is impossible to calculate the non-response rate because administrative data were combined with survey data. Item non-response was minimized by using built-in routings and checks in the online forms. As much as possible answering was made mandatory. Concerning the paper forms, telephone follow ups were made with the farmers. |
|||
13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate | |||
The highest non-response was observed for variables that were considerate as sensitive, such as the importance of the other gainful activities to the agricultural holding and the labour input and variables related to nutrient use and manure on the farm. Other variables were difficult to answer, especially the number of months a farm can store manure. |
|||
13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response | |||
Refusal Skip of due question Farmers do not know the answer |
|||
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response | |||
Reminders Imputation |
|||
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors | |||
Imputation methods | |||
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods | |||
Deductive imputation Ratio imputation Sequential hot deck imputation Previous data for the same unit |
|||
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections | |||
Imputation with SAS |
|||
13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error | |||
Not available |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
Final results area and livestock : T + 7 M |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
Final results other characteristics : T + 16 M |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery | |||
Not requested. |
|||
14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication | |||
- 30 days |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics. |
|||
15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
The agricultural activities are the same as the ones from the Regulation 2018/1091. The majority of the holdings in the farm structure survey are single units. In IACS which is used as population, there are a few farmers who are doing one declaration for several single units. This means that the data recorded in a single record (agricultural holding) covers more than one agricultural holding. (But the reverse also happens.) The problem occurs for only a few cases. It’s impossible to convert the data because in the administrative data on area we cannot see which parcel belongs to which single unit. |
|||
15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not available (IACS) |
|||
15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met | |||
UAA excluding kitchen garden: Total : 1377016 ha covered by the thresholds: 1368122 ha Attained coverage: 99.35% LSU : Total : 3681717,34 covered by the thresholds: 3663334,24 Attained coverage: 99,50% |
|||
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat | |||
The thresholds applied for the national data collection are the same from the thresholds applied for the data sent to Eurostat. |
|||
15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook | |||
No data with different definitions and classification of variables are collected, sent to Eurostat or published. There are only differences in the level of detail. Some variables are more detailed. This is the case for horticultural variables and variables that are necessary to comply with other EU-requirements and national information needs. |
|||
15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job | |||
The information is available in the annex. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.1. AWU |
|||
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers | |||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||
15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups | |||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
|||
15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients | |||
No deviations from the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. |
|||
15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.” | |||
- rabbits for fattening - bees - equidae - other |
|||
15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.5. Reference periods/days | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
The collected data, data sent to Eurostat and published data are in compliance with the reference periods/days set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. |
|||
15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.6. Common land | |||
The concept of common land does not exist | |||
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land | |||
Not applicable | |||
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 | |||
There are no deviations in the national standards and rules for certification of organic products from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 |
|||
15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country | |||
There are no differences in methods across regions within the country. Due to the availibility of different administrative data from the regions, two forms were established. One for the Flemish agricultural holdings and one for the Walloon agricultural holdings. |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
definition of agricultural holding: >50 years thresholds: 9 years geographical coverage: >50 years definition and classification of variables: >50 years reference periods/dates for animals: 6 years reference periods/dates for labour force: 4 years reference periods/dates for crops: >50 years |
|||
15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.2.2. Description of changes | |||
Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However our country does not raise fur animals. |
|||
15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission | |||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.3.2. Description of changes | |||
The thresholds were changed to be in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. This change has no impact on the main variables. |
|||
15.2.4. Geographical coverage | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.4.2. Description of changes | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.5.2. Description of changes | |||
Legal personality of the agricultural holding: In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings. Other livestock n.e.c.: In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately. Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and Equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c." Livestock units: In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001. Organic animals: While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included. |
|||
15.2.6. Reference periods/days | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | |||
15.2.6.2. Description of changes | |||
The reference period for manure in the FSS 2016 was from 1st October 2015 to 30th September 2016. In the IFS2020, the reference period for manure was the 12-month period ending on 15 October. This period included the reference day used for livestock and animal housing. |
|||
15.2.7. Common land | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
There have been no changes | |||
15.2.7.2. Description of changes | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
between 2016 and 2020 they were identified variations in both animals and crops, here they are presented some explanations.
Livestock
- A2130 : the number of male cattle is decreasing every year from 2018 onwards.
- A4210K : there are more farms specialising in goat milk and goat cheese. Hence, the number of goats is increasing more than the number of farms with goats.
- A5110O : in 2016 the pullets are not included in C_5_2. If these were included to 2016, the growth of pullet heads would be more moderate (+13% instead
of the current 46%).
- A5140 . Since 2018, farmers in BE have to declare their poultry that was present before the sanitary vacancy.
from 2016 to 2020 it was recorded a remarkable increase of holdings without LSU. Between 2016 and 2020, there was a large drop in the number of farms keeping animals. There is a decrease in the number of holdings with cattle (-14%), pigs ( -7%) and poultry (-8%).
Crops
- E0000T : The increase from 2016, is due to the a change in the IACS codes for ornamentals and nurseries in Flanders. They have revised the codes in function of the use of the plant.
Conifers can be cultivated with different purposes:
o as seedlings (from seed) for ornamental trees
o as seedlings (from seed) to plant out in forests, for wood production or Christmas tree production
o as ornamental tree, hedge plant or a solitary tree
o as Christmas tree
When the holder is doing his declaration in IACS he classifies the nurseries in function of the purpose of his production. So, there was a shift
from the ornamental plants/trees to the seedlings.
- I1110T: rape and turnip rape seeds are in decline since 2018.- I1190T is correct. This category includes sunflower seeds and soybeans. These last two crops are on the rise.
- I3000T: the area tobacco has decrease yearly since 2014.
- I5000T: in 2019, kitchen herbs (parsley, chervil, chives, basil and other kitchen herbs) have been moved from the section on vegetables to the section on medicinal and aromatic plants and herbs.
- I6000T: in 2016, this heading contained areas of chicory, hemp, miscanthus and other industrial crops. In 2020, this heading contained only miscanthus and other industrial crops. Chicory was included in V0000_S0000T and hemp in I2200T in 2020.
- NUAA: it is a small area that fluctuates greatly. It represents only 0.06% of the total area of the farms. It is an area asked for in the survey.
- PERCS: the increase is due to the ornamental plants. In 2020 the ornamental plants were included in PERCS. In 2016 they were included under B_1_8_2 (Flowers and ornamental plants (excluding nurseries)). Ornamental plants are including rose trees, ornamental
nurseries and perennial plants. At the same time there is a yearly increase of berries under glass.
- UAA_IB: due to dry summers there is a strong increase in irrigable area.
- V0000_S0000S: the area increase is entirely due to the area increase of strawberries under glass. In 2016, B_1_7_2 also included the aromatic and medicinal plants under glass. In 2020, these were included under ARA09S.
- V0000_S0000TO: in 2020, this category also includes chicory. In 2016 chicory was classified under B_1_6_99 (other industrial crops). The area of chicory is also increasing annually. At the same time, there is an annual increase in the areas of fresh beans, fresh peas and onions.
Farm typology
from 2016 to 2020 it was recorder an increase of holdings FT class 16 in 2020. This increase is due to the decrease in OTE 162 (farms with combined cultivation of cereals, oilseeds, protein crops and root crops). This is due to the strong decrease in the number of farms growing cereals (- Other gainful activities The increase in the number of holders who have another activity outside the holding is mainly due to the decrease in the number of sole holders (-5.2% compared to 2016) while the number of legal entities increased by 8.8%. At the same time, between 2016 and 2020, a decrease was observed in the number holders working more than half-time (-8.9%) and an increase in the number of holders working less than half-time (+7.2%). This indicates that more and more holders have another activity outside the holding. |
|||
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time | |||
No | |||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture. |
|||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts. |
|||
15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level | |||
No | |||
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level | |||
In 2020 there was one data collection for all agricultural statistics. |
|||
15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level | |||
Yes | |||
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level | |||
PERC: For the figure of IFS (VALUE), PERC=PERCT and for Landuse (VALUE_EUROBASE), PERC=PERCT+PERCS. The figure for Landuse does not include Christmas trees. |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics | |||
We use as far as possible administrative data. For 2020: almost all the cultivated areas were provided by the IACS, cattle and pigs were provided by SANITEL (registration system of animals)some variables for AHMM are administrative data from he Vlaamse Landmaatschappij. |
|||
16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
On-line surveys Increased use of administrative data |
|||
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains | |||
In order to reduce administrative burden, the same data may only be collected once (‘collect once – use often’). This policy is also applied in the census. |
|||
16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes) | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.3.1. Core | |||
The core and the module labour force were carried out as a census. As there is one form it is impossible to separate the average duration to fill the variables for the core and the LF. Average: 28 minutes |
|||
16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘ | |||
See item 16.3.1 |
|||
16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’ | |||
Not relevant |
|||
16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’ | |||
Average : 44 minutes
The time to fill in the core and labour force variables are included.
|
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Belgium publishes only a revision for their statistics when errors are discovered after data have been placed in the public domain. The FSS dataset in Belgium is not placed in the public domain, so there is no revision. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
There was no revision for the FSS. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
|||
Annexes: 18. Timetable_statistical_process |
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1. Population frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1.1. Type of frame | |||
List frame | |||
18.1.1.2. Name of frame | |||
Statistical Farm Register |
|||
18.1.1.3. Update frequency | |||
Quarterly | |||
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.2.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.4.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5. Module “Rural development” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.5.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Sample | |||
18.1.6.2. Sampling design | |||
The sample is a stratified simple random sample of agricultural Holding. The stratification is made on 3 criteria: location (NUTS1) , type of livestock (7 categories) and size of the holding (2 categories). Large holding are covered exhaustively. Sampling fractions are determine to largely fulfill precision requirement, taking into account expected response rate. |
|||
18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Stratified one-stage random sampling | |||
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Unit size Unit location Unit specialization |
|||
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
No | |||
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
In all NUTS1 and livestock type, the largest unit are covered exhaustively |
|||
18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Sampling fractions are determine to largely fulfill precision requirement, taking into account expected response rate |
|||
18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Other | |||
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection | |||
sample selection : SAS |
|||
18.1.13. Administrative sources | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them | |||
The information is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annex. Annexes: 18.1.13.2.Description and quality of administrative sources |
|||
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used | |||
Resistance to change caused by a general lack of trust in the quality of the source The final validated data in the source would not be in time to meet statistical deadlines or would relate to a period which does not coincide with the reference period |
|||
18.1.14. Innovative approaches | |||
The information on innovative approaches is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.3.1. Methods of data collection | |||
Postal, non-electronic version Postal, electronic version (email) Use of Internet |
|||
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires | |||
Manual | |||
18.3.3. Questionnaire | |||
Please find the questionnaire in annex. Annexes: 18.3.3. questionaire core and labour force Wallonia 18.3.3. questionaire core and labour force Flanders 18.3.3. questionaire core, labour force and animal housing Wallonia 18.3.3. questionaire core, labour force and animal housing Flanders |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.4.1. Type of validation checks | |||
Completeness checks Routing checks Relational checks Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection |
|||
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation | |||
None | |||
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation | |||
Blaise and SAS |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
See information in next items |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
Imputation rate for some variables : A2300F_EXRY_T=1,88% STCAP_COMP=3,39% WH_MAN_AWU_PC=2,45% WH_HLD_AWU_PC=9,60% UAAT_IB=13,61% These imputation rates are unweighted. |
|||
18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor | |||
Calibration | |||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Covered under Data compilation. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
19.1. List of abbreviations | |||
CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CAPI – Computer Assisted Personal Interview CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview FSS – Farm Structure Survey IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics LSU – Livestock units NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview SO – Standard output UAA – Utilised agricultural area STATBEL (TDE) - Statistic Belgium (Thematic Directorate Economie) STATBEL (CDC) - Statistic Belgium (Data Collection) STATBEL (CMC) - Statistic Belgium (Methodology) |
|||
19.2. Additional comments | |||
No additional comments. |
|
|||
|
|||