Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: FPS Economy SMEs, Self-Employed and Energy - Statbel (Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

FPS Economy SMEs, Self-Employed and Energy - Statbel (Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Thematic Directorate Economie

1.5. Contact mail address

Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 16, North Gate III , 

1000 Bruxelles, Belgium


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 28/02/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 28/02/2022
2.3. Metadata last update 28/02/2022


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organized in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 3.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and rural development module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

In some cases it occurs that a few farmers are doing one declaration for several single units.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in annex  item 3.6.1

The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry.

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
Other
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

The administrative building (this is mostly also the residence of the farmer)

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in Belgium cover the period from 1st October 2019 until 30th September 2020 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in heads or LSU (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWU (annual working units), standard output in Euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

From the end of February until the end of April 2020, the farmers declared their main crops to IACS. If a crop was not sown at the moment of the declaration, they must give the area of crops that would be sown.

Second crops were not taken into account for IFS. 

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period ending on 15 October within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day 15 October within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 15 October. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 30 September within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day 15 October  within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

The legal basis of the agricultural survey was laid down in the Royal decree of June 9, 2014 relating to the organisation agricultural surveys carried out by the Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium. This Royal decree was based on the law of July 4, 1962 concerning public statistics, modified by the law of August 1, 1985 and (modified by the law of) March 22, 2006.

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2014/07/14_1.pdf#Page66

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

2014

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

For all administrative data that were used,  Agreements were made between the Directorate-general Statistics - Statistics Belgium and the different organisations, namely:

- Departement Landbouw en Visserij

- Mestbank

- Wallonie Agriculture SPW

- Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC)


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Strict confidentiality of all collected data is laid down by the Statistics law of July 4, 1962.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold)
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells)
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

For tables with size classes, the classes with less than 3 holdings are regrouped. If it isn’t possible to regroup them we put ‘:’.

Results at municipal level: the results are not disseminated when there are less than 5 holdings in the municipality. We aggregate all these municipalities to one municipality called ‘confidential municipalities’.

7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
Yes
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
Removal of variables
Reduction of information
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

Micro-data are disseminated only with an official agreement of the Commission for the protection of Privacy. Requests for micro-data are therefore dealt on case by case basis. 

Only anonymous microdata are transmitted.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Crops and animals : 5 August 2021

Other characteristics : March 2022

8.2. Release calendar access

https://statbel.fgov.be/en/calendar/2021

https://statbel.fgov.be/en/calendar

8.3. Release policy - user access

Users are informed by the release calender on the website from Statbel : https://statbel.fgov.be/en

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
No
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

Not applicable


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Crops and animals : yearly

Other characteristics : every 3 - 4 years


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

http://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/cereal-crops-decreased-almost-3-2020

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
No
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
Yes, in English also
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

http://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/cereal-crops-decreased-almost-3-2020

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

 Not available.

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
No
10.3.3. Link to online database

Not applicable

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
No
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

Not applicable

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
No
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Not applicable

10.7. Quality management - documentation

There is no documentation available on quality. 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
No
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
None
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

Not applicable

11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

Not available

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The list of characteristics for the census is determined by a group of experts on agriculture.

Several IFS characteristics are integrated to meet other EU-requirements and national information needs.

12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

Characteristics surveyed only for national purposes:

- The presence of an eventually successor for the farm holder

- Short food supply scheme

The users of those characteristics are: the regional administrations of agriculture and environmental, the national Bank of Belgium, professional organisations, research centers, universities.

- More detailed information about livestock was surveyed to comply with the Regulation (EC) No 1165/2008 of 19 November 2008 concerning livestock and meat statistics and repealing Council Directives 93/23/EEC, 93/24/EEC and 93/25/EEC.

- Detailed information about horticultural crops for Wallonia was surveyed to comply with the Regulation (EC) No 543/2009 of the European Parliament and of the    Council of concerning crop statistics.

- Information about milk processing at farm level was surveyed to comply with the milk statistics.

12.1.2. Unmet user needs

All user needs are met

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Not available

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
No
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

Not applicable

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Not applicable
12.3. Completeness

Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.



Annexes:
13.2.1. Relative Standards Errors
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

There is no case of non-compliant precision requirements for BE.

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

Usual analytical formulas for post-stratified estimator with post-strata identical to sampling strata. 



Annexes:
13.2.3. Formulae for relative standard errors
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
None
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings to the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Below thresholds during the reference period
Ceased activities
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Not available

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

0%

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
None
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

Not available

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

Not available

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
No
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

Not applicable.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
No
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

Not applicable

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
None
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

When the values were too high or when there was an incoherence in the data we contacted the farmer and asked to correct their data. High values were detected by using thresholds. There is no specific list of characteristics. It can occur to every numeric characteristic.

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Pre-filled questions
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
None
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

Not available

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Refusal to participate
Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence)
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

None

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

It is impossible to calculate the non-response rate because administrative data were combined with survey data. Item non-response was minimized by using built-in routings and checks in the online forms. As much as possible answering was made mandatory.

Concerning the paper forms, telephone follow ups were made with the farmers.

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

The highest non-response was observed for variables that were considerate as sensitive, such as the importance of the other gainful activities to the agricultural holding and the labour input and variables related to nutrient use and manure on the farm.

Other variables were difficult to answer, especially the number of months a farm can store manure.

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Refusal
Skip of due question
Farmers do not know the answer
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
Low
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

Not available

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
Imputation methods
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
Deductive imputation
Ratio imputation
Sequential hot deck imputation
Previous data for the same unit
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

Not applicable

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

Imputation with SAS

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
Low
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

Not available

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Final results area and livestock : T + 7 M

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Final results other characteristics : T + 16 M

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

 - 30 days


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The agricultural activities are the same as the ones from the Regulation 2018/1091. The majority of the holdings in the farm structure survey are single units. In IACS which is used as population, there are a few farmers who are doing one declaration for several single units. This means that the data recorded in a single record (agricultural holding) covers more than one agricultural holding. (But the reverse also happens.) The problem occurs for only a few cases. It’s impossible to convert the data because in the administrative data on area we cannot see which parcel belongs to which single unit.

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not available (IACS)

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met

UAA excluding kitchen garden:

Total : 1377016 ha

covered by the thresholds: 1368122 ha

Attained coverage: 99.35%

LSU :

Total : 3681717,34

covered by the thresholds: 3663334,24

Attained coverage: 99,50% 

15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

The thresholds applied for the national data collection are the same from the thresholds applied for the data sent to Eurostat.

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

Not applicable.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

No data with different definitions and classification of variables are collected, sent to Eurostat or published.

There are only differences in the level of detail. Some variables are more detailed. This is the case for horticultural variables and variables that are necessary to comply with other EU-requirements and national information needs.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex.
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job correspond to one annual working unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual working units are used to calculate the farm work on the agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1.

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1.

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

No deviations from the Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

- rabbits for fattening

- bees

- equidae

- other

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The collected data, data sent to Eurostat and published data are in compliance with the reference periods/days set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land does not exist
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Not applicable
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

Not applicable

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

Not applicable

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

There are no deviations in the national standards and rules for certification of organic products from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

There are no differences in methods across regions within the country.

Due to the availibility of different administrative data from the regions, two forms were established. One for the Flemish agricultural holdings and one for the Walloon agricultural holdings.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

definition of agricultural holding: >50 years

thresholds: 9 years

geographical coverage: >50 years

definition and classification of variables: >50 years

reference periods/dates for animals: 6 years

reference periods/dates for labour force: 4 years

reference periods/dates for crops: >50 years

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However our country does not raise fur animals.

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

The thresholds were changed to be in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. This change has no impact on the main variables.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding:

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

Other livestock n.e.c.:

In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately.

Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and Equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

Livestock units:

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

Organic animals:

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

The reference period for manure in the FSS 2016 was from 1st October 2015 to 30th September 2016.

In the IFS2020, the reference period for manure was the 12-month period ending on 15 October. This period included the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

Not applicable

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat
between 2016 and 2020 they were identified variations in both animals and crops, here they are presented some explanations.
Livestock
- A2130 :  the number of male cattle is decreasing every year from 2018 onwards.
- A4210K : there are more farms specialising in goat milk and goat cheese. Hence, the number of goats is increasing more than the number of farms with goats.
- A5110O : in 2016 the pullets are not included in C_5_2. If these were included to 2016, the growth of pullet heads would be more moderate (+13% instead
of the current 46%).
- A5140 . Since 2018, farmers in BE have to declare their poultry that was present before the sanitary vacancy.
 

from 2016 to 2020 it was recorded a remarkable increase of holdings without LSU. Between 2016 and 2020, there was a large drop in the number of farms keeping animals. There is a decrease in the number of holdings with cattle (-14%), pigs ( -7%) and poultry (-8%).

 
Crops
- E0000T : The increase from 2016, is due to the a change in the IACS codes for ornamentals and nurseries in Flanders. They have revised the codes in function of the use of the plant.
Conifers can be cultivated with different purposes:
o as seedlings (from seed) for ornamental trees
o as seedlings (from seed) to plant out in forests, for wood production or Christmas tree production
o as ornamental tree, hedge plant or a solitary tree
o as Christmas tree
When the holder is doing his declaration in IACS he classifies the nurseries in function of the purpose of his production. So, there was a shift
from the ornamental plants/trees to the seedlings.
- I1110T: rape and turnip rape seeds are in decline since 2018.-  I1190T is correct. This category includes sunflower seeds and soybeans. These last two crops are on the rise.
- I3000T: the area tobacco has decrease yearly since 2014.
- I5000T: in 2019, kitchen herbs (parsley, chervil, chives, basil and other kitchen herbs) have been moved from the section on vegetables to the section on medicinal and aromatic plants and herbs.
- I6000T: in 2016, this heading contained areas of chicory, hemp, miscanthus and other industrial crops. In 2020, this heading contained only miscanthus and other industrial crops. Chicory was included in V0000_S0000T and hemp in I2200T in 2020.
- NUAA: it is a small area that fluctuates greatly. It represents only 0.06% of the total area of the farms. It is an area asked for in the survey.
- PERCS: the increase is due to the ornamental plants. In 2020 the ornamental plants were included in PERCS. In 2016 they were included under B_1_8_2 (Flowers and ornamental plants (excluding nurseries)). Ornamental plants are including rose trees, ornamental
nurseries and perennial plants. At the same time there is a yearly increase of berries under glass.
- UAA_IB: due to dry summers there is a strong increase in irrigable area.
- V0000_S0000S: the area increase is entirely due to the area increase of strawberries under glass. In 2016, B_1_7_2 also included the aromatic and medicinal plants under glass. In 2020, these were included under ARA09S.
- V0000_S0000TO: in 2020, this category also includes chicory. In 2016 chicory was classified under B_1_6_99 (other industrial crops). The area of chicory is also increasing annually. At the same time, there is an annual increase in the areas of fresh beans, fresh peas and onions.
 
Farm typology

from 2016 to 2020 it was recorder an increase of holdings FT class 16 in 2020. This increase is due to the decrease in OTE 162 (farms with combined cultivation of cereals, oilseeds, protein crops and root crops). This is due to the strong decrease in the number of farms growing cereals (-
9%) and sugar beet (-9%). While the number of farms growing potatoes has increased by 5%. 
Besides this decrease, there is an increase of 23% in OTE 166 (farms with various combinations of arable crops). This mainly concerns farms that combine arable crops with vegetables. for example, there is a strong increase compared to 2016 in the area of fresh peas (+15%), fresh beans (+23%), onions (+60%) and chicory roots (+22%).

Other gainful activities

The increase in the number of holders who have another activity outside the holding is mainly due to the decrease in the number of sole holders (-5.2% compared to 2016) while the number of legal entities increased by 8.8%. At the same time, between 2016 and 2020, a decrease was observed in the number holders working more than half-time (-8.9%) and an increase in the number of holders working less than half-time (+7.2%). This indicates that more and more holders have another activity outside the holding.

15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
No
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
No
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

In 2020 there was one data collection for all agricultural statistics.

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

PERC: For the figure of IFS (VALUE), PERC=PERCT and for Landuse (VALUE_EUROBASE), PERC=PERCT+PERCS. The figure for Landuse does not include Christmas trees.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

We use as far as possible administrative data. For 2020: almost all the cultivated areas were provided by the IACS, cattle and pigs were provided by SANITEL (registration system of animals)some variables for AHMM are administrative data from he Vlaamse Landmaatschappij.

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
On-line surveys
Increased use of administrative data
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

In order to reduce administrative burden, the same data may only be collected once (‘collect once – use often’). This policy is also applied in the census.

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

The core and the module labour force were carried out as a census. As there is one form it is impossible to separate the average duration to fill the variables for the core and the LF. 

Average: 28 minutes

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

See item 16.3.1

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not relevant

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

Average : 44 minutes

The time to fill in the core and labour force variables are included.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Belgium publishes only a revision for their statistics when errors are discovered after data have been placed in the public domain.

The FSS dataset in Belgium is not placed in the public domain, so there is no revision.

17.2. Data revision - practice

There was no revision for the FSS. 

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18. Timetable_statistical_process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

Statistical Farm Register 

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Quarterly
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Not applicable
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Sample
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

The sample is a stratified simple random sample of agricultural Holding. The stratification is made on 3 criteria: location (NUTS1) , type of livestock (7 categories) and size of the holding (2 categories). Large holding are covered exhaustively. Sampling fractions are determine to largely fulfill precision requirement, taking into account expected response rate.

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Stratified one-stage random sampling
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Unit size
Unit location
Unit specialization
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
No
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

In all NUTS1 and livestock type, the largest unit are covered exhaustively 

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Sampling fractions are determine to largely fulfill precision requirement, taking into account expected response rate

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Other
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

sample selection : SAS

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2.Description and quality of administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
Resistance to change caused by a general lack of trust in the quality of the source
The final validated data in the source would not be in time to meet statistical deadlines or would relate to a period which does not coincide with the reference period
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches is available on  Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between.

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Postal, non-electronic version
Postal, electronic version (email)
Use of Internet
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Manual
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3. questionaire core and labour force Wallonia
18.3.3. questionaire core and labour force Flanders
18.3.3. questionaire core, labour force and animal housing Wallonia
18.3.3. questionaire core, labour force and animal housing Flanders
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Completeness checks
Routing checks
Relational checks
Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
None
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

Blaise and SAS

18.5. Data compilation

See information in next items

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation rate for some variables : 

A2300F_EXRY_T=1,88% 

STCAP_COMP=3,39%

WH_MAN_AWU_PC=2,45%

WH_HLD_AWU_PC=9,60%

UAAT_IB=13,61%

These imputation rates are unweighted.

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Calibration
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

SO – Standard output

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

STATBEL (TDE) - Statistic Belgium (Thematic Directorate Economie)

STATBEL (CDC) - Statistic Belgium (Data Collection)

STATBEL (CMC) - Statistic Belgium (Methodology)

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top