Pesticide use in agriculture (aei_pestuse)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

Litostrojska cesta 54, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

See sub-categories below.

2.1.1. Main characteristics of statistics

The Plant Protection Products Act (national act) defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the UVHVVR by request and can be delivered to SURS for statistical purposes.

Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides requires from MS statistical data of the plant protection products consumed in agriculture once in a 5 year period. Second data set for Slovenia refer to the reference year 2017 (for the growing season Autumn 2016 - Autumn 2017). They are calculated from the sample of 7500 agricultural holding.

2.1.2. Reference period of data collection

Reference year 2017 (for the growing season Autumn 2016 - Autumn 2017).

2.1.3. National legislation
Yes
2.1.3.1. National legislation - Name

The Plant Protection Products Act;

the national Statistics Act and the programmes of statistical surveys are the fundamental legal basis for the operation of the statistical system. There are two kinds of programmes; medium-term and annual. They determine the main tasks of the producers of national statistics - in an individual year or a medium-term period. Programmes are adopted according to the prescribed procedure and published in the Official Journal of the Republic of Slovenia.

2.1.3.2. National legislation - Link

The Plant Protection Products Act: https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina/2012-01-3287?sop=2012-01-3287

The national Statistics Act (http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO424) and the annual programme of statistical surveys for 2017 (http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=DRUG4295).

2.1.3.3. National legislation - Responsible organisation

The Plant Protection Products Act - responsible institution is UVHVVR (Administration for Food Safety, Veterinary Sector and Plant Protection).

The national Statistics Act and annual programmes of statistical surveys - responsible institution is SURS (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia).

2.1.3.4. National legislation - Year of entry into force

The Plant Protection Products Act: entry into force in 2007 and 2012 (changes).

The national Statistics Act (entry into force in 1995, changes in 2001) and the annual programme of statistical surveys for 2017 (entry into force in 2016, changes in 2017).

 

2.1.3.5. National legislation - Coverage of variables required under EU legislation
National legislation allows all required variables to be covered.
The direct implementation of the EU regulation in the national legal order also applies.
2.1.3.6. Divergence national definitions from EU regulation
There is no differences.
2.1.3.7. National legislation - Legal obligation for respondents to reply (Yes/No)
Yes
2.1.4. Additional comments data description

Legal obligation for respondends:

The Plant Protection Products Act: the Article 19 of this Act provides:
(1) The user of PPPs for professional use must ensure the traceability of each PPP from the purchase to the use of PPPs by keeping data on the use of PPPs.
(2) For each treatment separately, it must keep data on the use of PPPs, which contain at least the data referred to in Article 67 of Regulation 1107/2009 / EC.
(3) Data on the use of PPPs must be kept by the user of PPPs for professional use for at least three years from the date of purchase of PPPs or treatment.
(4) The user of PPP for professional use must submit the data referred to in the second paragraph of this Article to the Administration at its request.
(5) The Administration shall forward the data referred to in the preceding paragraph to the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia if it needs them for the purpose of collecting and processing statistical data on the use of PPPs.
(6) The Minister shall prescribe the more detailed content and manner of keeping data on the use of PPPs referred to in the second paragraph of this Article and the manner of transmitting data referred to in the preceding paragraph.

2.2. Classification system

The classification used for pesticides corresponds to Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
The classification system for crops derives from the Annual crop statistics Handbook 2019.

2.3. Coverage - sector

Active substances in PPP used in agriculture in Slovenia in growing season 2017.

Pesticides used on seeds are not taken into account. The justification is in the Annex of the previous quality report from 2014 (see the attached file in the annexes: "AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data").

2.3.1. Crops covered by the statistics

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

2.3.2. Commercial non-agricultural uses of pesticides

Not relevant in particular survey.

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Sources and methods of data collection

The source of data are the administrative records on the use of plant protection products market.  The Plant Protection Products Act defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the Administration of the Republic of Slovenia for safety food, veterinary medicine and plant protection by request and can be delivered to SURS for statistical purposes.

Definitions

The Regulation 1185/2009 deals with the pesticides which are plant protection products; however, it is expected that biocide products will become part of this regulation once the first evaluation of active substances in biocide products is available.

 Active substance is a substance in the plant protection product which is biologically active and serves to achieve the intention, while non-active substances help to formulate the plant protection product.

 Fungicides are products for the extermination of fungi provoking vegetal diseases, including bactericides for extermination of microbes.

 Herbicides are products for the extermination of weeds or undesirable plants in general.

 Insecticides are products for the extermination of insects, including acaricides for the extermination of mites.

 Molluscicides are products for the extermination of snails.

 Plant growth regulators are natural or synthetic chemicals that are sprayed or otherwise applied to a seed or plant in order to alter its characteristics.

 Other plant protection products include mineral and vegetal oils, soil sterilants, rodenticides for the extermination of rodents, disinfectants and all other plant protection products.

2.5. Statistical unit

Agricultural holdings

2.6. Statistical population

Active agricultural holdings in Slovenia in 2017

2.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

2.7.1. Geographical area covered

NUTS0 - Slovenia

2.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not relevant.

2.8. Coverage - Time

2014 and 2017

2.9. Base period

Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on an index number of time series.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

3.2. Frequency of data collection

5 year period.

3.3. Data collection

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

3.4. Data validation

Logical controls and corrections have been done for the treated area reported in comparison to the data from the Statistical Agricultural Holdings Register.

Logical controls have been done for the plant protection products doses used in comparison to the recommended dose.

Imputations have been done for the missing data on area or quantity.

Editing have been done for ucertain names of plant protection products used and for extreme doses used.

3.4.1. Data validation measures
Manual
Automatic
3.4.2. Target of data validation measures
Completeness
Outliers
Aggregates
Consistency
Other
3.4.3. Specification target of data validation
Quality is assured with visual and digital checking, comparisson with data on subsidies, individual and systematic corrections, imputations. For statistical editing of data after the first basic controls, we use the metaSOP standard editing program. This allows us to transparently perform data editing and to record metadata. Both individual and system corrections are used in SOP procedures.
3.5. Data compilation

Quantites of active substances are calculated from their share in plant protection products used.

3.6. Adjustment

Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, .


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

4.1.1. Quality management system in organisation
Yes
4.1.2. Specification of implementation

Quality is assured with visual and digital checking, comparisson with data on subsidies, individual and systematic corrections, imputations. For statistical editing of data after the first basic controls, we use the metaSOP standard editing program. This allows us to transparently and transparently edit and record metadata. Both individual and system corrections are used in SOP procedures.

 

4.1.3. Peer review
No
4.1.4. Main conclusions peer review
4.1.5. Future quality improvements
Other
4.1.6. Specification of quality improvements
We will decide on further steps in the light of changes in EU legislation.
4.1.7. Additional comments quality assurance
4.2. Quality management - assessment

Data are derived from a sample of 7500 agricultural holding.

An underestimation comes at least from:

1) it is expected that some agricultural holdings did not report on the use of pesticides before seeding

2) due to unavailability of the information on the pesticides used for seed treatment, that part of the consumption is not considered.

4.2.1. Overall quality
Stable
4.2.2. Relevance
Stable
4.2.3. Accuracy and reliability
Stable
4.2.4. Timeliness and punctuality
Stable
4.2.5. Comparability
Stable
4.2.6. Coherence
Stable
4.2.7. Additional comments quality assessment


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

Data are relevant; due to heterogenity of agricultural praxes, data do not achieve a good accuracy for all different crops.

5.1.1. Unmet user needs
5.1.2. Plans for satisfying unfilled user needs
5.1.3. Additional comments user needs
5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

No measures in place for this domain.

5.2.1. User satisfaction survey
No
5.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey
5.2.3. Satisfaction level
5.2.4. Additional comments user satisfaction
5.3. Completeness

See sub-category below.

5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics because in this data collection, there is no target on the number of data. Member States are asked to collect data on representative crops without stipulating the number of crops.


6. Accuracy and reliability Top
6.1. Accuracy - overall

In addition to the high sampling error for some less used active substances, the biggest uncertainty is caused by the not detailed name of plant protection products used. Data on quantities of plant protection products consumed is a minor problem.

6.1.1. Grading of accuracy
Moderate
6.1.2. Factors lowering accuracy
Other
6.1.3. Specification of factors
As this is a sample survey based on the selection of units according to key crop categories, data on the consumption of certain active substances are less reliable (a wide range of different PPPs is in use).
6.1.4. Additional comments overall accuracy
6.2. Sampling error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

6.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

6.3.1. Coverage error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

6.3.2. Measurement error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

6.3.3. Non response error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

6.3.4. Processing error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx"

6.3.5. Model assumption error

none

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Seasonal adjustment is not applicable to pesticide use statistics since all plant protection treatments associated directly or indirectly with the crop during the reference period are reported.

6.5. Data revision - policy

The methodological explanation on data revision is available on the website

https://www.stat.si/dokument/5299/RevisionOfStatisticalDataMEgeneral.pdf

Only final data for 2017 survey are available.

6.6. Data revision - practice

no revision

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

no revision

6.6.2. Data revisions - conceptual changes
No
6.6.3. Reason for revisions

no revision

6.6.4. Impact of revisions
Not important
6.6.5. Additional comments data revisions


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top

Timeliness +9 months. Punctuality is 0 days - data are on www.stat.si  according to the list of publications announced in advance for the whole year.

7.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

+ 15 months (between the end of the reference period and the publication).

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

+ 15 months (between the end of the reference period and the publication).

7.1.3. Reasons for possible long production times?

Not relevant.

7.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

7.2.4. Punctuality - delivery and publication

0 days

7.2.1. Data release according to schedule
YES
7.2.2. Data release on target date
YES
7.2.3. Reasons for delays

No delays.


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in pesticide use statistics.

8.2. Comparability - over time

Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series.

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series.

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

Data can not be directly compared to any other statistics.

Data can only be indirectly compared to the amount of active substances sold. Pesticides sale is calculated on the base of calendar year, while consumption is calculated on the base of growing year. Moreover, parallel import occurs, which is not taken into account in pesticides sale statistics.

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because the data collection is based on a five-year period.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

National Accounts take into account pesticides but are not represented separately in any figure.

8.6. Coherence - internal

Data are consistent.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

First release

9.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
9.1.2. Link to news releases

https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/8014

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

No publications

9.2.1. Production of paper publication
No
9.2.2. English paper publication
No
9.2.3. Production of electronic publication
No
9.2.4. English electronic publication
No
9.2.5. Link to publications

No paper publication.

9.3. Dissemination format - online database

Data available online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery (sub-topic: use of pesticides).

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

not known

9.3.2. Accessibility of on-line database
Yes
9.3.3. Link to on-line database

Data available online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery (sub-topic: use of pesticides).

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

We consider as microdata figures on quantity of active substances consumed in a reference year. They are published in the online database (see also 9.3).

9.4.1. Accessibility of micro-data
Yes
9.4.2. Link to micro-data

https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery

9.5. Dissemination format - other

none

9.6. Documentation on methodology

Documentation on methodology includes both a quality report and methodological explanations to the published data.

9.6.1. Availability of national reference metadata
Yes
9.6.2. Link to national reference metadata

https://www.stat.si/statweb/File/DocSysFile/8736 and https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf

9.6.3. Availability of methodological papers
Yes
9.6.4. Link to methodological papers

Methodological explanations http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/Common/PrikaziDokument.ashx?IdDatoteke=8736

9.6.5. Availability of handbook
No
9.6.6. Link to handbook
9.7. Quality management - documentation

national metadata available (https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf) and this one sent to Eurostat

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

complete

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

no consultations

9.7.3. Availability of quality report
YES
9.7.4. Link to quality report

https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf (only in slovene)


10. Cost and Burden Top

Cost and burden for reporting units: the Plant Protection Products Act defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the UVHVVR by request.

Cost and burden for statistical office: cca 3800 hours of work of the staff were needed for the survey plus cca 1200 hours of students work for data input.

10.1. Efficiency gains
Further automation
10.2. Specification efficiency gains
We strive to make all procedures as standardized as possible (use of standard tools).
10.3. Measures to reduce burden
Less variables surveyed
Less respondents
10.4. Specification burden reduction
In 2017, we reduced both the sample size and the number of observed crops.


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Transmission of confidential national data to Eurostat
Yes
11.1.2. Confidentiality according to Regulation
Yes
11.1.3. Data confidentiality policy

Statistical confidentiality policy https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/FundamentalPrinciples/StatConf

11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

see 11.2.1

11.2.1. Procedures for confidentiality

Primary data protection is done on the basis of number of reporting units.

Secondary data protection is done for non-disclosure due to aggregates on different levels and due to different tables published.

As data on active substances themself are computed from quantities of plant protection products consumed and as they refer mainly to groups of crops, no further data protection was considered necessary.

11.2.2. Additional comments confidentiality - data treatment


12. Comment Top

Pesticides used on seeds are not taken into account. The justification is in the Annex of the previous quality report from 2014 (see the attached file in the annexes: "AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data").


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data
ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI