|
|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Statistics |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Litostrojska cesta 54, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia |
|
|||
2.1. Data description | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
2.1.1. Main characteristics of statistics | |||
The Plant Protection Products Act (national act) defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the UVHVVR by request and can be delivered to SURS for statistical purposes. Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides requires from MS statistical data of the plant protection products consumed in agriculture once in a 5 year period. Second data set for Slovenia refer to the reference year 2017 (for the growing season Autumn 2016 - Autumn 2017). They are calculated from the sample of 7500 agricultural holding. |
|||
2.1.2. Reference period of data collection | |||
Reference year 2017 (for the growing season Autumn 2016 - Autumn 2017). |
|||
2.1.3. National legislation | |||
Yes | |||
2.1.3.1. National legislation - Name | |||
The Plant Protection Products Act; the national Statistics Act and the programmes of statistical surveys are the fundamental legal basis for the operation of the statistical system. There are two kinds of programmes; medium-term and annual. They determine the main tasks of the producers of national statistics - in an individual year or a medium-term period. Programmes are adopted according to the prescribed procedure and published in the Official Journal of the Republic of Slovenia. |
|||
2.1.3.2. National legislation - Link | |||
The Plant Protection Products Act: https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina/2012-01-3287?sop=2012-01-3287 The national Statistics Act (http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO424) and the annual programme of statistical surveys for 2017 (http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=DRUG4295). |
|||
2.1.3.3. National legislation - Responsible organisation | |||
The Plant Protection Products Act - responsible institution is UVHVVR (Administration for Food Safety, Veterinary Sector and Plant Protection). The national Statistics Act and annual programmes of statistical surveys - responsible institution is SURS (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia). |
|||
2.1.3.4. National legislation - Year of entry into force | |||
The Plant Protection Products Act: entry into force in 2007 and 2012 (changes). The national Statistics Act (entry into force in 1995, changes in 2001) and the annual programme of statistical surveys for 2017 (entry into force in 2016, changes in 2017).
|
|||
2.1.3.5. National legislation - Coverage of variables required under EU legislation | |||
National legislation allows all required variables to be covered.
The direct implementation of the EU regulation in the national legal order also applies.
|
|||
2.1.3.6. Divergence national definitions from EU regulation | |||
There is no differences.
|
|||
2.1.3.7. National legislation - Legal obligation for respondents to reply (Yes/No) | |||
Yes | |||
2.1.4. Additional comments data description | |||
Legal obligation for respondends: The Plant Protection Products Act: the Article 19 of this Act provides: |
|||
2.2. Classification system | |||
The classification used for pesticides corresponds to Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
|||
2.3. Coverage - sector | |||
Active substances in PPP used in agriculture in Slovenia in growing season 2017. Pesticides used on seeds are not taken into account. The justification is in the Annex of the previous quality report from 2014 (see the attached file in the annexes: "AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data"). |
|||
2.3.1. Crops covered by the statistics | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
2.3.2. Commercial non-agricultural uses of pesticides | |||
Not relevant in particular survey. |
|||
2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
Sources and methods of data collection The source of data are the administrative records on the use of plant protection products market. The Plant Protection Products Act defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the Administration of the Republic of Slovenia for safety food, veterinary medicine and plant protection by request and can be delivered to SURS for statistical purposes. Definitions The Regulation 1185/2009 deals with the pesticides which are plant protection products; however, it is expected that biocide products will become part of this regulation once the first evaluation of active substances in biocide products is available. Active substance is a substance in the plant protection product which is biologically active and serves to achieve the intention, while non-active substances help to formulate the plant protection product. Fungicides are products for the extermination of fungi provoking vegetal diseases, including bactericides for extermination of microbes. Herbicides are products for the extermination of weeds or undesirable plants in general. Insecticides are products for the extermination of insects, including acaricides for the extermination of mites. Molluscicides are products for the extermination of snails. Plant growth regulators are natural or synthetic chemicals that are sprayed or otherwise applied to a seed or plant in order to alter its characteristics. Other plant protection products include mineral and vegetal oils, soil sterilants, rodenticides for the extermination of rodents, disinfectants and all other plant protection products. |
|||
2.5. Statistical unit | |||
Agricultural holdings |
|||
2.6. Statistical population | |||
Active agricultural holdings in Slovenia in 2017 |
|||
2.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
2.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
NUTS0 - Slovenia |
|||
2.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
Not relevant. |
|||
2.8. Coverage - Time | |||
2014 and 2017 |
|||
2.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on an index number of time series. |
|
|||
3.1. Source data | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
3.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
5 year period. |
|||
3.3. Data collection | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
3.4. Data validation | |||
Logical controls and corrections have been done for the treated area reported in comparison to the data from the Statistical Agricultural Holdings Register. Logical controls have been done for the plant protection products doses used in comparison to the recommended dose. Imputations have been done for the missing data on area or quantity. Editing have been done for ucertain names of plant protection products used and for extreme doses used. |
|||
3.4.1. Data validation measures | |||
Manual Automatic |
|||
3.4.2. Target of data validation measures | |||
Completeness Outliers Aggregates Consistency Other |
|||
3.4.3. Specification target of data validation | |||
Quality is assured with visual and digital checking, comparisson with data on subsidies, individual and systematic corrections, imputations. For statistical editing of data after the first basic controls, we use the metaSOP standard editing program. This allows us to transparently perform data editing and to record metadata. Both individual and system corrections are used in SOP procedures.
|
|||
3.5. Data compilation | |||
Quantites of active substances are calculated from their share in plant protection products used. |
|||
3.6. Adjustment | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because the data collection is not based on time series. |
|
|||
4.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
4.1.1. Quality management system in organisation | |||
Yes | |||
4.1.2. Specification of implementation | |||
Quality is assured with visual and digital checking, comparisson with data on subsidies, individual and systematic corrections, imputations. For statistical editing of data after the first basic controls, we use the metaSOP standard editing program. This allows us to transparently and transparently edit and record metadata. Both individual and system corrections are used in SOP procedures.
|
|||
4.1.3. Peer review | |||
No | |||
4.1.4. Main conclusions peer review | |||
4.1.5. Future quality improvements | |||
Other | |||
4.1.6. Specification of quality improvements | |||
We will decide on further steps in the light of changes in EU legislation.
|
|||
4.1.7. Additional comments quality assurance | |||
4.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
Data are derived from a sample of 7500 agricultural holding. An underestimation comes at least from: 1) it is expected that some agricultural holdings did not report on the use of pesticides before seeding 2) due to unavailability of the information on the pesticides used for seed treatment, that part of the consumption is not considered. |
|||
4.2.1. Overall quality | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.2. Relevance | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.3. Accuracy and reliability | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.4. Timeliness and punctuality | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.5. Comparability | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.6. Coherence | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.7. Additional comments quality assessment | |||
|
|||
5.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
Data are relevant; due to heterogenity of agricultural praxes, data do not achieve a good accuracy for all different crops. |
|||
5.1.1. Unmet user needs | |||
5.1.2. Plans for satisfying unfilled user needs | |||
5.1.3. Additional comments user needs | |||
5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
No measures in place for this domain. |
|||
5.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
No | |||
5.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
5.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
5.2.4. Additional comments user satisfaction | |||
5.3. Completeness | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics because in this data collection, there is no target on the number of data. Member States are asked to collect data on representative crops without stipulating the number of crops. |
|
|||
6.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
In addition to the high sampling error for some less used active substances, the biggest uncertainty is caused by the not detailed name of plant protection products used. Data on quantities of plant protection products consumed is a minor problem. |
|||
6.1.1. Grading of accuracy | |||
Moderate | |||
6.1.2. Factors lowering accuracy | |||
Other | |||
6.1.3. Specification of factors | |||
As this is a sample survey based on the selection of units according to key crop categories, data on the consumption of certain active substances are less reliable (a wide range of different PPPs is in use).
|
|||
6.1.4. Additional comments overall accuracy | |||
6.2. Sampling error | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
6.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
6.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
6.3.3. Non response error | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
6.3.4. Processing error | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annexes: "ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI.xlsx" |
|||
6.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
none |
|||
6.4. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Seasonal adjustment is not applicable to pesticide use statistics since all plant protection treatments associated directly or indirectly with the crop during the reference period are reported. |
|||
6.5. Data revision - policy | |||
The methodological explanation on data revision is available on the website https://www.stat.si/dokument/5299/RevisionOfStatisticalDataMEgeneral.pdf Only final data for 2017 survey are available. |
|||
6.6. Data revision - practice | |||
no revision |
|||
6.6.1. Data revision - average size | |||
no revision |
|||
6.6.2. Data revisions - conceptual changes | |||
No | |||
6.6.3. Reason for revisions | |||
no revision |
|||
6.6.4. Impact of revisions | |||
Not important | |||
6.6.5. Additional comments data revisions | |||
|
|||
Timeliness +9 months. Punctuality is 0 days - data are on www.stat.si according to the list of publications announced in advance for the whole year. |
|||
7.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
+ 15 months (between the end of the reference period and the publication). |
|||
7.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
+ 15 months (between the end of the reference period and the publication). |
|||
7.1.3. Reasons for possible long production times? | |||
Not relevant. |
|||
7.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.4. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
0 days |
|||
7.2.1. Data release according to schedule | |||
YES | |||
7.2.2. Data release on target date | |||
YES | |||
7.2.3. Reasons for delays | |||
No delays. |
|
|||
8.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
Data are collected on a country level (NUTS 0). Therefore, the data are not comparable on a regional level. The geographical comparability between countries is evaluated by Eurostat. |
|||
8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in pesticide use statistics. |
|||
8.2. Comparability - over time | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series. |
|||
8.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series. |
|||
8.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
Data can not be directly compared to any other statistics. Data can only be indirectly compared to the amount of active substances sold. Pesticides sale is calculated on the base of calendar year, while consumption is calculated on the base of growing year. Moreover, parallel import occurs, which is not taken into account in pesticides sale statistics. |
|||
8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because the data collection is based on a five-year period. |
|||
8.5. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
National Accounts take into account pesticides but are not represented separately in any figure. |
|||
8.6. Coherence - internal | |||
Data are consistent. |
|
|||
9.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
First release |
|||
9.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
Yes | |||
9.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
9.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
No publications |
|||
9.2.1. Production of paper publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.2. English paper publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.3. Production of electronic publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.4. English electronic publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.5. Link to publications | |||
No paper publication. |
|||
9.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
Data available online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery (sub-topic: use of pesticides). |
|||
9.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
not known |
|||
9.3.2. Accessibility of on-line database | |||
Yes | |||
9.3.3. Link to on-line database | |||
Data available online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery (sub-topic: use of pesticides). |
|||
9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
We consider as microdata figures on quantity of active substances consumed in a reference year. They are published in the online database (see also 9.3). |
|||
9.4.1. Accessibility of micro-data | |||
Yes | |||
9.4.2. Link to micro-data | |||
https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/85/agriculture-forestry-and-fishery |
|||
9.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
none |
|||
9.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
Documentation on methodology includes both a quality report and methodological explanations to the published data. |
|||
9.6.1. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
Yes | |||
9.6.2. Link to national reference metadata | |||
https://www.stat.si/statweb/File/DocSysFile/8736 and https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf |
|||
9.6.3. Availability of methodological papers | |||
Yes | |||
9.6.4. Link to methodological papers | |||
Methodological explanations http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/Common/PrikaziDokument.ashx?IdDatoteke=8736 |
|||
9.6.5. Availability of handbook | |||
No | |||
9.6.6. Link to handbook | |||
9.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
national metadata available (https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf) and this one sent to Eurostat |
|||
9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
complete |
|||
9.7.2. Metadata - consultations | |||
no consultations |
|||
9.7.3. Availability of quality report | |||
YES | |||
9.7.4. Link to quality report | |||
https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/10444/SPK_KME_PEST_R_2017.pdf (only in slovene) |
|
|||
Cost and burden for reporting units: the Plant Protection Products Act defines in Article 19 that all users of plant protection products which are sold in specialised shops are obliged to keep records of their use. The same article states that those records should be sent to the UVHVVR by request. Cost and burden for statistical office: cca 3800 hours of work of the staff were needed for the survey plus cca 1200 hours of students work for data input. |
|||
10.1. Efficiency gains | |||
Further automation | |||
10.2. Specification efficiency gains | |||
We strive to make all procedures as standardized as possible (use of standard tools).
|
|||
10.3. Measures to reduce burden | |||
Less variables surveyed Less respondents |
|||
10.4. Specification burden reduction | |||
In 2017, we reduced both the sample size and the number of observed crops.
|
|
|||
11.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Transmission of confidential national data to Eurostat | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.2. Confidentiality according to Regulation | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.3. Data confidentiality policy | |||
Statistical confidentiality policy https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/FundamentalPrinciples/StatConf |
|||
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
see 11.2.1 |
|||
11.2.1. Procedures for confidentiality | |||
Primary data protection is done on the basis of number of reporting units. Secondary data protection is done for non-disclosure due to aggregates on different levels and due to different tables published. As data on active substances themself are computed from quantities of plant protection products consumed and as they refer mainly to groups of crops, no further data protection was considered necessary. |
|||
11.2.2. Additional comments confidentiality - data treatment | |||
|
|||
Pesticides used on seeds are not taken into account. The justification is in the Annex of the previous quality report from 2014 (see the attached file in the annexes: "AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data"). |
|
|||
|
|||
AEI_PESTQRS_5_SI_2014_0000 Annex underestimation of data ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019_SI |