Continuing vocational training in enterprises (trng_cvt)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Social Statistics Methodology Section

1.5. Contact mail address

Postal address: Lāčplēša Street 1, Riga, LV-1301, Latvia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 16/01/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 16/01/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 16/01/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Continuing Vocational Training Survey (CVTS) collects information on enterprises’ investment in the continuing vocational training of their staff. Continuing vocational training (CVT) refers to education or training measures or activities which are financed in total or at least partly by the enterprise (directly or indirectly). Part financing could include the use of work-time for the training activity as well as financing of training equipment.

Information available from the CVTS is grouped around the following topics:

- Provision of CVT courses and other forms of CVT (training/non-training enterprises)

- CVT strategies

- Participants in CVT courses

- Costs of CVT courses

- Time spent in CVT courses

- Characteristics of CVT courses

- Assessment of CVT activities

The CVTS also collects some information on initial vocational training (IVT).

For further information see the CVTS 6 legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the CVTS 6 implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.2. Classification system

The main groupings for enterprises are by economic activity (NACE), size group and training/non-training enterprises.

3.3. Coverage - sector

CVTS 6 covers all economic activities defined in sections B to N and R to S of NACE Rev. 2.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the CVTS 6 implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for CVTS 6 is the enterprise.

Enterprise definition is compliant with Council Regulation (EEC) No 696/93.

3.6. Statistical population

CVTS 6 covers enterprises with 10 or more persons employed belonging to sections B to N and R to S of NACE Rev. 2.

The total number of enterprises in the target population = 10069.

Variable A2tot (persons employed) refers to 31 December 2020.

3.7. Reference area

Latvia, the whole country.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Data are available for 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2020.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Euro, %, number of persons.


5. Reference Period Top

The reference year for CVTS 6 is the calendar year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

At European level:

Basic legal act: Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council

Implementing act: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1153/2014, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 198/2006

At national level:

Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers "Official Statistics Program for 2020-2022"

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Any CVTS data disseminated or sent to Eurostat has no variables which can be used to identify the responding enterprises. For each respondent, enterprise ID was anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Primary confidentiality: In enterprise statistics cells are defined as confidential according to threshold rule and dominance rule (n,k). Cells are safe to be published if contributed by at least 4 respondents (n=4) as well as share of a single contributor is less than 80% (1,80) or two contributors share is less than 90% (2,90).

The secondary confidentiality criterion is regarded as fulfilled, if the values of confidentiality indicators are not possible to identify through arithmetical operations. In order to ensure it, sometimes additional indicator has to be marked as confidential. Usually a minimum value other than zero is chosen as the additional indicator.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Publicly available release calendar is available for data users.

Press release on 14.11.2022 (available only in Latvian)

https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/izglitiba-kultura-zinatne/muzizglitiba/preses-relizes/14965-darba-deveja

8.2. Release calendar access

https://stat.gov.lv/en/calendar

8.3. Release policy - user access

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 5 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Press release on 14.11.2022 (available only in Latvian)

https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/izglitiba-kultura-zinatne/muzizglitiba/preses-relizes/14965-darba-deveja

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

No other national publications are planned for CVTS 6 as previously already mentioned.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

CVTS national database tables published on 07.11.2022 in both languages, link to English version

https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/education/lifelong-learning/other/14408-continuing-vocational-training?themeCode=II

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not available at national level, can be required through Eurostat.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

CVTS Metadata published on 07.11.2022 in both languages, link to English version

https://stat.gov.lv/en/metadata/14407-continuing-vocational-training 

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

https://www.csp.gov.lv/en/quality-assurance-framework

For national metadata description of CVTS 2020 see 10.6. Documentation on methodology. 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

CSB Quality policy and objectives.

Quality guidelines of the CSB is an informative document describing the CSB and the main aspects of its activity: stages, methods and organizational principles of producing the national statistics, policy of data protection and dissemination. The objective of these guidelines is to promote the implementation of the CSB’s operational strategy by involving in this process every employee of the CSB, developing the communication with society and extending the knowledge of every interested person – respondent, data user and all society – about the activity of CSB.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

This is a quite difficult survey, questions were very comprehensive and complex.

For the enterprises were problematic questions: A12, C5. It's hard for enterprises to choose just 3 answers, they want to choose more.

Were difficult to answer to questions because the information was not always recorded in the enterprises’ accounting systems in a way that can be easily extracted or the information was not recorded by enterprises at all. 

Several of the enterprises, especially the bigger ones, pointed out that we should have informed them at least a year in advance. This would enable them to adjust their accounting systems and thereby better be able to give us requested information.

It becomes more usual that enterprises can not declare how much precisely was paid for CVT, because smaller enterprises often buy a set of services (bundled service) paying common monthly bill, of which one of components is ensuring also CVT for employees.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of the CVTS are State and municipal authorities and agencies, international organisations, the media and students.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

No user satisfaction surveys have been conducted. As European level user groups are the main user for this survey, it would be too early to analyse user satisfaction before any dissemination from Eurostat.

12.3. Completeness

The final dataset covers all NACE sectors, enterprise size groups and variables as requested in the CVTS 6 legislation.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Overall the accuracy of CVTS data is satisfactory. 

Response rate Rate
Unweighted response rate 92.9%
Weighted design response rate 92.5%
Weighted measurement response rate 94.2%
13.2. Sampling error

Software R and set of procedures from vardpoor package is used. The precision estimation is done by the ultimate cluster method (Hansen, Hurwitz and Madow, 1953) with Taylor linearization for linear statistics and residual estimation from the regression model to take weight calibration into account.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

See table 13.2.1 "Sampling errors - indicators" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3. Non-sampling error

No additional information.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Frame population consists of units which are economic active in the reference period and belong to NACE groups defined in regulation. The sampling frame is made from statistical business register. Economically active enterprises with at least 10 persons employed are included in the sampling frame. 

See table 13.3.1 "Coverage error" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

 

Over-coverage Rate
Unweighted over-coverage 9.6%
Weighted design over-coverage 11.0%
Weighted measurement over-coverage 4.7%

See table 13.3.1.1 "Over-coverage - rate" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)". 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Data collector (helpdesk) training was conducted before start of the field-work to prevent measurement errors. Outliers were additionally checked.

13.3.3. Non response error

The enterprises were constantly reminded to fill out the survey on the website. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate
Non-response Rate
Unweighted non-response rate 7.1%
Weighted design non-response rate 7.5%
Weighted measurement non-response rate 5.8%

To increase the response rate, reminders were sent to non-respondents via e-mail, notification about unfilled questionnaire has been shown in the application of web-questionnaire and reminder phone calls were also made.

See table 13.3.3.1 "Unit non-response - rate" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Item non­-response has been detected and corrected during the data collection period.

See table 13.3.3.2 "Item non-response - rate" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3.4. Processing error

The data was collected via a web-based survey tool EDV. This tool contained most of the logical checks, data validation rules are described in the CSB data production system "Integrated Metadata Driven Statistical Data Management System (ISDAVS CASIS)". The respondents could see the errors they had made and correct the errors (respondent cannot transmit the data before those errors are corrected). Entry errors were also detected both by manual comparisons and during running logical controls at CSB of Latvia. Logical errors were eliminated by contacting the respondent. 

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

T+18 months.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

T+24 months.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

T+24 months.

14.2. Punctuality

Countries should transmit data to Eurostat no later than 18 months after the end of the reference year.

CVTS 2020 microdata was sent to Eurostat via eDAMIS on 21.06.2022.

See table 14.2 "Project phases - dates" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not applicable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

No deviations from the requirements.

Some additional variables related to COVID-19 were collected, see table 15.1 "Comparability - geographical" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See table 15.2 "Comparability - over time" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

Large proportion of enterprises providing training (CVT courses and other forms of CVT) is mainly due to the fact that 96.8% enterprises report guided on-the-job training in 2020.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Data are available for 2005, 2010, 2015.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See table 15.3 "Coherence - cross-domain" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

CVTS results for a given reference year are based on microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Burden on respondents: average time spent filling in the questionnaire 75 minutes (1 hour 15 minutes).

Cost for each survey separately was not estimated.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

See table 18.1 "Source data and data collection" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Every 5 years.

18.3. Data collection

The survey is mandatory. Legal basis: the Statistics Law and the Official Statistical program.

See table 18.1 "Source data and data collection" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

18.4. Data validation

Validation of data, incl. checking of consistency in responses and treatment of this issue was made. The majority of validation rules were incorporated in the web-survey, but additional checks were applied to the received data in the CSB Integrated Metadata Driven Statistical Data Management System (ISDAVS).

18.5. Data compilation

The design weights, that are the inverses of the inclusion probabilities, were calculated according to the sample design, with all enterprises within the same stratum having equal design weights.

Outliers were calculated in groups of stratum, using distance method.

The design weights were adjusted using the data of response level in each stratum. Under-coverage errors were calculated, using information from actual target population. Over-coverage errors were estimated using sample information.

Horvitz-Tompson estimators are used, where final weights are design weights corrected as mentioned above.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

No imputations, see also table 18.5.1 "Imputation - rate" in annex "LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

The survey requires information at a very detailed level on the cost and hours spent on training, broken down into the number of training participants and the type of training. Many enterprises do not have personnel to do this kind of administration and collect this type of information, thus, it influences the quality of data. The burden of the CVTS should be reduced. 


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
CVTS_2020_Questionnaire_&_instructions_Latvia
LV - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)