ICT usage in households and by individuals (isoc_i)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

HCSO Multi-domain Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

Hungarian Central Statistical Office

(Központi Statisztikai Hivatal)

Keleti Károly utca 5-7.

H-10240

Budapest

Hungary


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 15/12/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 29/09/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 29/09/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The EU survey on the use of ICT in households and by individuals is an annual survey conducted since 2002. In Hungary, it has been conducted since 2005.

In 2022, the survey collects data on the access to information and communication technologies (ICT), on the use of the internet, e-government, e-commerce, internet of things, as well as green ICT.

3.1.1. Survey name in national and English languages

National language:Felmérés a háztartások és az egyének információs és kommunikációs technológiai (IKT) eszköz használatáról, 2022

English: Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Households and by Individuals 2022

Questionnaire(s) in national language(s) and the translation in English are available in the Annexes.

3.2. Classification system

The following common concepts and definitions apply under the Integrated European Social Statistics (IESS):

  • the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011 published in the following breakdowns: low (ISCED levels 0-2: no formal education, primary education or lower secondary education), medium (ISCED levels 3-4: upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education) and high (ISCED levels 5-6: tertiary programmes which normally need a successful completion of ISCED 3 or 4, or second-stage tertiary education leading to an advanced research qualification);
  • the International Standard Classification for Occupation ISCO-08 at the 2-digit level;
  • the Classification of Economic Activities (NACE Rev.2-2008), at section level;
  • the Common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS 1) – finer granularity of NUTS 2 is provided on optional basis by some Member states;
  • the SCL - Geographical code list;
  • information about household income is provided at lower level of detail. 

Additional classifications used in the national questionnaire:

The above nomenclatures were used in the national questionnaire. No other nomenclatures were used.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The ICT survey in households and by individuals covers those households having at least one member in the age group 16 to 74 years old. Internet access of households refers to the percentage of households that have an internet access, so that anyone in the household could use the internet.

3.3.1. Differences in scope at national level

There are no differences in scope at national level.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The survey is collecting data of internet users, individuals who have used the internet in the three months prior to the survey. Regular internet users are individuals who used the internet, on average, at least once a week in the three months prior to the survey.

This annual survey is used to benchmark ICT-driven developments, both by following developments for core variables over time and by looking in greater depth at other aspects at a specific point in time. While the survey initially concentrated on access and connectivity issues, its scope has subsequently been extended to cover a variety of subjects (for example, the use of e-government and e-commerce) and socio-economic analysis (such as regional diversity, gender specificity, differences in age, education and the employment situation). The scope of the survey with respect to different technologies is also adapted so as to cover new product groups and means of delivering communication technologies to end-users.

For more details on the methodology applicable in each survey year, please consult the Methodological Manual for the respective year on CIRCABC - Methodological Manual - Information society statistics (europa.eu).

Deviations from standard ICT concepts: There are no deviations from the ICT concepts and definitions.

3.5. Statistical unit

Households and Individuals

3.6. Statistical population

In the ICT usage survey, the target population for the different statistical units is:

- individuals: all individuals aged 16 to 74;

- households: all (private) households with at least one member aged 16 to 74. 

Target population composed of households and/or individuals:

  • Number of households:  3 665 401
  • Number of individuals:   7 232 229
3.6.1. Non-compulsory age groups

Non-compulsory age groups also included in the target population:

 

No

Yes

Age scope

Individuals younger than 16?

x

 

 

Individuals older than 74?

x

 

 

3.6.2. Population not covered by the data collection
Non-target population
(the difference between the total population and the target population)
Households Individuals
Approximate number of units outside the general scope of the survey (e.g. individuals younger than 16 or older than 74; households with all members over 74 years old).  417 522  2 271 762
Estimate of the resulting percentage of under-coverage (non-covered population compared to the total country), if applicable    0.6%
3.7. Reference area

The whole territory of Hungary is covered.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Year 2022

3.9. Base period

Not applicable


4. Unit of measure Top

Percentages of ‘Households’ and Percentages of ‘Individuals’


5. Reference Period Top

Module A, B, D, F, G: First quarter of 2022.

Modules C: in last months before 1 April 2022; between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022

Modules E: have ever used

5.1. Survey period

The survey period was from 7 April to 16 June 2022. The duration of the admission was extended by 10 days - from 17 June to 26 June 2022 - in Budapest and in the cities with county status in order to meet the territorial proportions.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

The legal basis for the 2022 EU survey on the use of ICT in households and by individuals is the Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 October 2019 establishing a common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households, based on data at individual level collected from samples (OJ  L 261 I, 14.10.2019, p. 1), as implemented by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1223 of 27 July 2021 specifying the technical items of the data set, establishing the technical formats for transmission of information and specifying the detailed arrangements and content of the quality reports on the organisation of a sample survey in the use of information and communication technologies domain for reference year 2022 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 2269, 27.07.2021, pp. 1-45).

Complementary national legislation constituting the legal basis for the survey on the use of ICT in households and by individuals:  Art No. CLV of 2016 on Official Statistics.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

1)     Official statistical activity is regulated by Act CLV of 2016 on Official Statistics entered into force on 1 January 2017 and by Government Decree 184/2017. (VII. 5.) issued for the implementation of this law.

2)     Law CXII of 2011 on the right to self-determination as regards information and freedom of information.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Confidentiality policy of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (highlighting some principles):

-          confidential data management

-          protection of personal data

-          publicity of statistical data

-          prohibition of disclosure of individual-level information

-          regulated data protection

In addition to the general data protection information, the household ICT survey has its own data management information: The first name of the person selected to answer is recorded, the full name will not be recorded.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The target date is January of the survey followed year.

8.2. Release calendar access

The results of the survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals for the year 2022 will be available on the HCSO website (www.ksh.hu) under the STADAT-tables by the end of December 2022 and under HCSO's Dissemination database by the end of January 2023.

Tables (STADAT) in 2022: https://www.ksh.hu/katalogus/#/stadat/naptar/en

Dissemination database: https://statinfo.ksh.hu/Statinfo/haDetails.jsp?query=kshquery&lang=en

Publication: https://www.ksh.hu/katalogus/#/kiadvanyok/tema/informacio-kommunikacio!kategoria=atfogo-elemzes

Data for 2022 will be published in a separate analyzing publication in the first half of 2023.

The results will be available furthermore in the Statistical Pocket Book in May 2023, in the Statistical Year Book in September 2023 and in the Regional Statistical Year Book of Hungary in second half of 2023.

8.3. Release policy - user access

In line with the Community legal framework and the Eurostat Statistics Code of Practice HCSO disseminates ICT data on HCSO's website respecting professional independence and in an objective, professional and transparent manner in which all users are treated equitably. The detailed arrangements are governed by the Hungarian protocol on impartial access to national data for users.

https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/tajpol_web_eng.pdf?lang=en


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Online news releases to specific occasions (eg. Internet day): https://www.ksh.hu/infografika/2020/internet_napja_2020.pdf

Data visualisations: https://www.ksh.hu/infografika/2021/internethasznalat_2021.pdf

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

A detailed publication based on the results of the 2022 survey is expected to be available in the first half of 2023.

Detailed, analytical publications published annually (Digital society) are available on HCSO's website, which are accessible through the following links:

Helyzetkép, 2021 - Digitális társadalom  https://www.ksh.hu/apps/shop.kiadvany?p_kiadvany_id=1075775&p_temakor_kod=KSH&p_lang=HU

The results will be available furthermore in the Statistical Pocket Book in May 2023, in the Statistical Year Book in September 2023 and in the Regional Statistical Year Book of Hungary in second half of 2023.

Magyar Statisztikai Zsebkönyv, 2021; in English: Statistical Pocketbook of Hungary, 2021   Publication Repertory - Hungarian Central Statistical Office (ksh.hu)                

Magyar Statisztikai Évkönyv, 2021; in English:  Statistical Yearbook of Hungary, 2021 Publication Repertory - Hungarian Central Statistical Office (ksh.hu)

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

The aggregated results presented on HCSO's website grouped thematically and organized in static (ready-made) tables, which are accessible through the following link:

The comprehensive collection of completed tables (STADAT): “Information, communication

https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ikt/en/ikt0016.html

https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ikt/en/ikt0017.html

https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ikt/en/ikt0018.html

https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ikt/en/ikt0019.html

https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ikt/en/ikt0020.html

Dissemination database: https://statinfo.ksh.hu/Statinfo/haDetails.jsp?query=kshquery&lang=en

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not obtainable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Secure access to microdata files for researchers from 2008 onwards is currently being planned (in the Safe Centre Access in HCSO).

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not requested.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not obtainable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

The “Metainformation/Statistical domain” (Concepts and definitions, Classifications, Data sources, Data collections) for ICT usage statistics are available on HCSO's website, which is accessible through the following link:

https://www.ksh.hu/apps/meta.objektum?p_lang=EN&p_menu_id=110&p_ot_id=100&p_obj_id=CCBE

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

100%

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The QUALITY GUIDELINES for the statistical processes of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office is available on HCSO's website, which is accessible through the following link: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/minosegi_iranyelvek_eng.pdf;

The Quality policy of HCSO is available on HCSO'S website, which is accessible through the following link: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/minpol_web_eng.pdf


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

In general HCSO also has to make Quality Reports for all statistical domains and make effort to improve quality of data collections and data itself.

The main principles for HCSO's quality policy is available on the website: https://www.ksh.hu/guidelines_policies_strategy

The national survey’s questionnaire is based on the Model Questionnaire (MQ) unified by Eurostat. By applying this questionnaire, the HCSO ensures the possibility of the comparison of the results of the survey on European level. The guidelines of the Methodological manual of Eurostat (Methodological manual Part II. Household survey) are also used for compiling the content of the Hungarian questionnaire and the detailed guide. In addition, during the planning of the Hungarian survey and the different stages of the implementation process, the “Quality Guidelines for the Statistical Process of the HCSO” compiled by HCSO are applied in order to ensure compliance with the requirements defined by Eurostat. 

(https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/minosegi_iranyelvek_eng.pdf; https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/estfm_eng.pdf)

11.2. Quality management - assessment

1) From 2015 face-to-face interview was implemented (supported by laptops) during which the interviewers record the data of the questionnaire on the location. The recording software verifies the data input and indicates warnings about the incidental errors.

2) From 2015 it is a personal interview aided by laptop/tablet (CAPI), carried out by the interviewer. Between 2015 and 2019 face-to-face interviews tablet aided (CAPI). From 2020 the HCSO was applied a combination of techniques: web based survey (CAWI), face-to-face interviews (CAPI) and telephone interviews (CATI).

3) The method of filling in the questionnaire can be chosen by the data provider.

In the survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals 2020 quite a new sample design is introduced. The new frame is the population registry.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main user of data on ICT usage is EUROSTAT. Other data users are the OECD, the ITU, the Ministry of Innovation and Technology, several other national government establishments, other decision-makers, under- and postgraduate students, members of the educational and academic sphere, researchers, and the media. Data are published in the EUROSTAT database and are updated yearly.

At European level, the European Commission’s entities (e.g. DG CNECT, DG REGIO, etc.) are the principal users of the data on ICT usage by households and by individuals. Therefore, the main users are consulted regularly (at task forces and ad hoc meetings) on their needs and are involved in the process of the development of the Model Questionnaire from a very early stage.

Users’ needs are considered throughout the whole development process of the Model Questionnaire aiming to provide relevant statistical data for monitoring and benchmarking of European policies.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

National Statistics Code of Practice: 3. User orientation  https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/national_statistics_code_of_practice.pdf

12.3. Completeness

All of the variables required for transmission have been included in the microdata.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

100%


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

The sample design and weighting scheme perform well in general, the net effective sample size is larger by far than required. Non-response rate may indicate some risk of bias which was intended to get reduced by weigh adjustment.

13.2. Sampling error

Jackknife method was applied taking stratification, clustered nature of sample, systematic selection of individuals, rotation, weighting and calibration effects into account. SAS program was used.

Reference: Wolter, Kirk M.: Introduction to Variance Estimation, Springer, 2007

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Precision estimates for the question "Individuals having ordered goods or services for private use over the internet in the last 12 months" (individuals who ticked 'Within the last 3 months' or 'Between 3 months and a year ago' in question D1 of the 2022 model questionnaire):

Number of respondents (absolute value for ‘Yes’ answers):   4 242

Estimated proportion (in %):  70.32%

Standard error (in percentage points):  0.52

Details of the breakdowns are available in the Annexes below. 

13.3. Non-sampling error

See more details on non-sampling error below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Over-coverage is ~4% (moved abroad, institution, dead), the under-coverage is ~0.6% (individuals with no registered address).

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

4%

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested in the ICT survey.

13.3.2. Measurement error

1)       Measurement errors:  

In some cases it was revealed during the data processing that the person who responded to the questions during the survey was not the individual who had been selected from the sample. Of course, these persons provided their own names when they responded to the questions. These types of errors were detected during the verification of the received data. These personal questionnaires were archived and were not taken into account during the data processing.

2)       Questionnaire design and testing

The questionnaire of the survey will be created in the MAJA IT system. Information windows will be inserted into the questionnaire with explanations for all modules and all questions to assist the designated person in completing the form. The logic-checks will be included in the web-based questionnaires to be completed by data providers and they will also be available on the devices used by interviewers. Based on the results of the built-in logic checks, the respondent or the interviewer shall correct the errors before submitting the questionnaire. 

3)       Interviewer training:  

The HCSO prepares a detailed guide for the interviewers and makes available another educational material (in .ppt format) to the interviewers. This latter material describes the different tasks to be performed in connection with the survey and it provides the professional knowledge related to the content of the questionnaire. Before the interviewers could start their activity, they are going to receive an online educational material prepared for this purpose and the HCSO will also provide additional consultation opportunities. After the training period, the interviewers shall answer test questions to provide feedback on their knowledge gained by going through the educational material.      

4)       Proxy interview rates:  No proxy interviews are used.

13.3.3. Non response error

Information about non-respondents

The unit response rate is the ratio of the number of in-scope respondents (= the number of achieved interviews or the net sample size to the number of eligible elements selected from the sampling frame). 

The overall unit non-response rate is 0.47. Non-respondents can be characterised by area, dwelling unit and individual level data available from sampling frame. The remarkable characteristics are below.

Capital Budapest (region HU11) is subject to non-response the most (58%). The other central region (HU12) is also above the average by far with non-response rate 51%. Other regions are below the average, especially on the East. Besides, it can be stated that the more developed or more urbanized the area is, the higher the non-response rate is. As for individual level, males (48%) and the younger (over 50%) are harder to reach. Within panel subsample, the movers are definitely harder to follow.

Non-response rate may indicate some risk of bias which was intended to get reduced by weigh adjustment involving variables related to non-response mentioned above (see 13.3.3.1.2).

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit response rate is the ratio of the number of in-scope respondents (= the number of achieved interviews or the net sample size to the number of eligible elements selected from the sampling frame).

Unit non-response rate for

  • Households:   
  • Individuals (aged 16-74):  0.47
13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response – sample sizes
  Number of households Number of individuals
(aged 16-74) (< 16) (> 74)
Gross sample [A]

The number of households/individuals initially selected from the sampling frame (if not applicable, indicate why below the table)

   12 012    
Ineligible: out-of-scope [B] 

E.g. when a selected household is not in the target population because all members are over 75 years old or when no dwelling exists at the selected address or a selected individual has died between the reference data of the sampling frame at the moment of the interview.

   265    
Number of eligible elements [C]

Gross sample size corrected of the ineligible cases

   11 747    
Net sample size or final sample [D]

The net sample size (or final sample) corresponds to the number of households/individuals that can be used in the final database.

 6 243  6 246    
Unit response rate [E] = [D] / [C]

The unit response rate is the ratio of the number of in-scope respondents (= the number of achieved interviews or the net sample size to the number of eligible elements selected from the sampling frame)

   0.53    

Comments, if any: cases with unknown eligibility were counted as eligible

13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response – methods, minimization and substitution

1)       Methods used for dealing with unit non-response

Unit non-response was handled with weighting. Response propensity was estimated by logistic regression with covariates correlated with both response and the main objective variable: gender and age as individual level variables; household size as dwelling unit level variable; type of locality, degree of urbanisation, size of locality, average taxable income per capita, population % of employed, of unemployed and of with tertiary educational attainment level as PSU level variables. To compensate unit non-response in the panel subsample (that is panel attrition) target variable of ICT usage from previous year was also involved.

2)       Methods used for minimizing unit non-response:  

- An individualized hello-letter was sent to the persons chosen from the sample. 

- In the first phase of the data-recording period gift vouchers were sent to some respondents raffled from those persons who completed the questionnaire via Internet within the frame of the online self-completion process. 

- On the 14th day after the recording started, the HCSO sent a reminder via e-mail or by post to those who had not yet completed the questionnaire.

- In the second and third phases of the recording, the interviewers contacted via telephone or personally those persons who had not completed the questionnaire in the first phase via Internet. In the second phase of the data collection, gift vouchers were offered to those who responded to the interviewers. 

3)       Substitution permitted:  No 

4)       Substitution rate (in %):  0%, no proxy interviews or substitution was allowed 

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Items with low response rates (observed rates in %)It is not relevant.

13.3.4. Processing error

It is not relevant.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested for ICT Survey


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

The first data transmission was in time. The data of the 2022 survey the HCSO will be published earlier than planned, in December 2022. 

14.1.1. Time lag - first result
Restricted from publication
14.1.2. Time lag - final result
Restricted from publication
14.2. Punctuality

1 day before the target date.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

There is 1 day before the target date. The first publication of data is 2,5 month data delivery.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Data derived from the data collection are comparable on international level, as the questionnaire and the data collection methodology had been elaborated in cooperation with the EUROSTAT and with member countries. Regional data (NUTS 2) accurately represent the regional characteristics of ICT usage also.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not relevant

15.2. Comparability - over time

Possible limitations in the use of data for comparisons over time: 

Data collection started in 2005. It has a regulatory background since the data collection year 2006, thus the survey is collected based on a unified methodology. Main indicators have time series from 2005 (indicators coming from the permanent modules). There are permanent modules (internet use, use of e-government, use of e-commerce) and there are ad hoc modules (eg. digital skills) that are not included in the questionnaire every year. The data collected and processed according to the unified methodology can be compared to the results of the previous years until the survey completed in 2019. Due to above methodological changes data of the 2020 survey have a limited comparability with the previous years' data.

However the data collected in 2022 is comparable with data collected in 2021 except for the following.   

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The length of comparable time series depends on the module and variable considered within each of the modules of the survey.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable

15.4. Coherence - internal

All statistics are coherent within the dataset.

15.4.1. Survey questionnaire – mandatory questions

MANDATORY questions in the Eurostat model questionnaire 2022:

The table in the file 'SIMS_2022_annexes_HU' in the Annexes lists the questions that do not reflect the coverage of subjects and characteristics of Annex 2 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1898 of the 20 July 2021. 

15.4.2. Survey questionnaire – optional questions

Adoption of OPTIONAL questions and items in the Eurostat model questionnaire 2022:

The table in the file 'SIMS_2022_annexes_HU' in the Annexes lists the optional questions from the annual Eurostat model questionnaire 2022 included in the national questionnaire and their coverage for age groups beyond the standard scope. 

15.4.3. Survey questionnaire – additional questions at national level

A2.

What types of internet connections are used at home?
  a) Fixed broadband connections, e.g. DSL, ADSL, VDSL, cable, optical fibre, satellite, Wi-Fi
  b) Mobile broadband connections (via mobile phone network, at least 3G, e.g. UMTS, using (SIM) card or USB key, mobile phone or smart phone as modem)

B.2.1

How much time did you spend on average a day with surfing the Internet? Please give it in hours!   (tick one)

B3. k1)

View or download other free video content online, including torrent

B3. m1)

Use of augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality (VR) applications or games on the Internet

B3. r1)

Using a smart watch or other digital device to track key physiological indicators

B3. r2)

How often do you the health / physiological data collected by the smartwatch or other smart device be downloaded or transferred automatically to your computer or any application?

B3. r3)

How often do you share health / physiological data collected by the smart watch or other smart device electronically?

B3. t1)

Use of independent internet financial service (Fintech) (e.g. Paypal, Revolut, Barion, PayU, etc.)

B3. t2)

Participation in an online fundraiser (crowfunding) organized by individuals, NGOs or businesses (e.g. Kickstarter, Indiegogo, etc.)

B3. t3)

Ordering a service, concluding a contract with a service provider

B3. t4)

Use of job search and social work services

B5.1

How often did you use the Internet for telecommuting (home office) in the first quarter 2022?  

B6.

How often have you used mobile internet in general in the first quarter 2022?

C7.1

 Which of the following services do you use for private purposes?
  a) Ügyfélkapu  (Digital gateway)
  b) SzüF
  c) Highway sticker shopping online
  d) Parking online
  e) Online tax return
  f) Neptun / eKréta
  g) nyilvantarto.hu
  h) e-bejelentő (e-bejelento.gov.hu)
  i) e-papír (epapir.gov.hu)

D2.q)

 Other services

D10.1

When you buy a good or service online, from a browser, or through an app, which of the following payment options do you use?
  a) cash on delivery
  b) by bank transfer
  c) by online credit card payment
  d) through a banking application
  e) via an independent application (e.g. Paypal)
  f) other (e.g. in cash for personal collection)

KI1.

How profoundly do you think you understand the following digital terms?

 

Frequency of use in Module B.3, B.5.1, B.6:  Daily use (1); Weekly use (2); Less than weekly use (3); Not used (4).

15.4.4. Survey questionnaire – deviations

Effects of deviations from the routing used in the Eurostat model questionnaire:

All statistics are coherent within the dataset. 


16. Cost and Burden Top
Restricted from publication


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Revision policy/practice: Validated data are transmitted and published.

1. Scheduled revision

1.1 Routine revision: there is no routine (regular) revision

1.2 Major revision: between 2006 and 2014 none occurred, one took place in 2015.

HCSO used the population number formed and updated on the basis of the 2001 census as key figure for the population surveys, among them for grossing up the voluntary data collection OSAP 2003 Survey on the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in households and individuals. However the key figures formed from the 2011 census by 1 October 2011, used for population surveys differed from the updated population number, making the reweighting, revision of the population censuses. The revision included all regular population related data collections for the publication period from October 2011. A new key figure system has been completed for the 2006 - 2011 period considering the 2011 census and showing a corrected population number; with the help of this tool the population sampling had to be reweighted for this timeframe. Based on the major revision of the HCSO population data collection, data published in 2015 had been grossed up and re-processed based on the new key figures as per the 2011 census.

2. Non scheduled revisions: Data revisions not announced in advance occur only in exceptional cases namely if any unforeseeable event (data error, technical problem, etc.) makes the revision of data necessary. Last year there was no non-scheduled revision in this statistical domain.

17.2. Data revision - practice

The Data revision policy of HCSO is available on the HCSO's website, which is accessible through the following link: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/bemutatkozas/eng/ksh_revizios_politikaja_2018_eng.pdf

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not relevant


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

The source of the raw data is described with more details in the paragraphs below.

18.1.1. Sampling frame

Survey participation: voluntary.  The survey is stand-alone.

Registry of settlements at the 1st stage. Population registry restricted to individuals aged 16-74 at the 2nd stage. There is a shortcoming: the percentage of invalid addresses, movers and other frame errors may be over 10%. This can be handled with effective field work (follow-up) and the possibility of CAWI.

18.1.2. Sampling design

In 2020 a brand new design was introduced. ICT sample is a stratified two-stage probability sample of individuals. 

Number of individuals interviewed in the household: One (basically) Given a sample of individuals it is rare to have more than one selected individuals in the same household.

PSUs are localities. In the population of smaller towns or villages settlements are stratified by NUTS2 regions, size, average taxable income per capita and population with tertiary educational level. In the population of larger towns each town is a stratum of its own. They are self-representing towns. PSUs are selected with pps method.

Individuals are selected within PSUs with systematic random selection method from a list sorted by date of birth.

ICT sample has a ¼ rotational pattern. 

Longitudinal component: In the sample in 2022 3400 new individuals were selected in the new rotational group.  

18.1.3. Net effective sample size
Restricted from publication
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual

18.3. Data collection

1) Methods used to gather data:the recording period was divided into 3 parts as follows:

  • a) Only CAWI  
  • b) Combination of techniques: CAWI, CAPI, CATI
  • c) Only CAPI and CATI

2) Short description of the survey method:

From 2015 it is a personal interview aided by laptop/tablet (CAPI), carried out by the interviewer. Between 2015 and 2019 face-to-face interviews laptop/tablet aided (CAPI). From 2020 web based survey (CAWI), face-to-face interviews (CAPI) and telephone interviews (CATI).

In 2022: CAWI: 26.2% 

              CAPI: 32.4%

              CATI: 41.4%

             Total:100.0%

 3) Variables completed from an external source:

  • The date of birth of the person
  • Address (Name of settlement, and the districts of Budapest, name of street, street-number)
18.4. Data validation

Hungary validates the data according to the standards provided by Eurostat. At electronic data collections the questionnaire’s basic connections are built in the data collection instrument, the data provider has to correct errors prior to sending in the questionnaire. In the framework of the sub-process takes place the coding and registration of reasons for missing questionnaires or data receptions. For eliminating errors in microdata, there are validation rules built in the data entry and processing system. The result of the survey is logically analysed by age, regions and other indicators by experts of HCSO. Statistical analysis is carried out based on the general and specific indicators.

18.5. Data compilation

Unit non-response is handled with weighting and calibration. For the treatment of unit non-response were had broader possibilities with new frame with gender, age and household composition being available for weight adjustment. Besides, other area level auxiliary variables were used just as before. Calibration was made with iterative raking.

In case of the household's net monthly income the data of a randomly chosen household having the same socio-demographic characteristics will be imputed.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

For the target indicator "Individuals having ordered goods or services for private use over the internet in the last 12 months" (individuals who ticked 'Within the last 3 months' or 'Between 3 months and a year ago' in question D1 of the 2022 model questionnaire): It is not relevant.

In case of the household’s net monthly income the data of a randomly chosen household having the same socio-demographic characteristics was imputed.

Imputation rate (% of observations): 16.667%

Imputation rate (share of estimate):  17.263%

18.5.2. Use of imputation methods

Methods used to impute item non-response:

Deterministic imputation: Donor

18.5.3. Grossing-up procedures

Grossing up procedures have been applied to: Individuals and Households

       Description of the weighting procedures:

Households:

Generalised weight share method applied to the final individual weight provided the input weight for household level calibration. Iterative raking method was used with the following controls at NUTS2 level:

  • population by gender and age (16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30,34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74);
  • 16-74 population by degree of urbanisation;
  • 16-74 population in household of size 1 (estimated from LFS);
  • number of households in scope (estimated from LFS).

Final household weights were bounded with the interval (180, 2700)

Individuals:

Design weights were given by sample design.

First adjustment was the weighting for non-response (see 13.3.3.1.2.).

The adjusted weights were then calibrated to population counts with iterative raking. The following constraints were used at NUTS2 level:

  • population by gender and age (16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30,34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74);
  • 16-74 population by degree of urbanisation;
  • 16-74 population in household of size 1 (estimated from LFS).

Final individual weights were bounded with the interval (330, 3300).

18.6. Adjustment

Not relevant

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not relevant


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
INFOSOC_HHNSI_A_HU_2022_Questionnaire_HU
INFOSOC_HHNSI_A_HU_2022_Interviewer_instructions_HU
INFOSOC_HHNSI_A_HU_2022_NationalQ_EN
SIMS_2022_annexes_HU