Income and living conditions (ilc)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department for Social Statistics and Sustainable Development Goals / Living Standard Statistics Unit   

1.5. Contact mail address

Milana Rakića 5, Belgrade, Serbia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

30 September 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

30 September 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

30 September 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) is a survey-based instrument aiming at collecting timely and comparable cross-sectional and longitudinal multidimensional microdata on income, poverty, social exclusion and living conditions. In addition, it collects module variables every three years, six years or ad-hoc new policy needs modules.

The EU-SILC instrument provides two types of data:

  • Cross-sectional data pertaining to a given time or a certain time period with variables on income, poverty, social exclusion and other living conditions;
  • Longitudinal data pertaining to individual-level changes over time, observed periodically over four‐or more year rotation scheme (Annex III (2) of 2019/1700).

Social exclusion and housing condition information is collected mainly at household level while labour, education and health information is obtained for persons aged 16 and over. The core of the instrument is income information at very detailed component level and mainly collected at personal level.

3.2. Classification system
  • International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED'2011);
  • International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08);
  • Classification of Economic Activities (NACE Rev.2-2008);
  • Common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS 2);
  • SCL Geo Code - Geographical code list;
  • The recommendations made by the United Nations in the Canberra Group Handbook on Household
  • Income Statistics should also be taken into account.

For more details on the classification used please, see the list of classification on the Eurostat webpage, Metadata and Statistics explained on classification.

3.3. Coverage - sector

Data refer to all private households and individuals living in the private households in the national territory at the time of data collection.

The EU-SILC survey is a key instrument for the European Semester and the European Pillar of Social Rights, providing information on income distribution, poverty and social exclusion, as well as various related living conditions and poverty EU policies, such as on child poverty, access to health care and other services, housing, over indebtedness and quality of life. It is also the main source of data for microsimulation purposes and flash estimates of income distribution and poverty rates.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Statistical concepts and definitions for EU-SILC are specified in Regulation (EU) 2019/1700, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2181, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2242. Additional information is available in the EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology and in the methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables (see CIRCABC).

Further details are provided in items 5, 15.1.1.1, 15.2.2 and 18.3.

3.5. Statistical unit

Statistical units are private households and all persons living in these households who have usual residence in the Member State. Annex II of the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2242 defines specific statistical units per variable and specifies the, content of the quality reports on the organization of a sample survey in the income and living conditions domain pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

3.6. Statistical population

The target population is private households and all persons composing these households having their usual residence in the Member State. Private household means a person living alone or a group of persons who live together, providing oneself or themselves with the essentials of living.

3.6.1. Reference population

 

Definitions of reference population, household and household membership

Reference population

Private household definition

Household membership

All private households and their current members residing in the territory of the Republic of Serbia (excluding the territory of Kosovo and Metohija) at the time of data collection. Persons living in collective households and in institutions are excluded from the target population.

A household is considered to be:

  • familiy or other community of persons whose members live together, feed together and spend the earned income together (multi-member household);
  • single person who lives, feeds and spends the earned income autonomously (single-member or one-person household).

Household members are all persons that share household expenses, and:

  1. Persons usually resident, related to other members;
  2. Persons usually resident, not related to other members;
  3. Resident boarders, lodgers, tenants;
  4. Live-in domestic servants, au-pairs;
  5. Persons usually resident, but temporarily absent from dwelling (for reasons of holiday travel, work, education or similar);
  6. Children of the household who are being educated away from home;
  7. Persons absent for long periods, but having household ties: persons working away from home;
  8. Persons temporarily absent but having household ties: persons in hospital, nursing home, boarding school or other institution.
3.6.2. Population not covered by the data collection

The sub-populations that are not covered by the data collection includes: those who moved out of the country’s territory; or those with no usual residence; or those living in institutions or who have moved to an institution compared to the previous year.

3.7. Reference area

The data relate to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.

Since 1999, the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia doesn't dispose of certain data for AP Kosovo and Metohia, so they are not contained in the data coverage for the Republic of Serbia (total).

3.8. Coverage - Time

EU-SILC data for the Republic of Serbia are available for the survey years 2013-2024.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

The data involves several units of measure depending upon the variables. Income variables are transmitted to Eurostat in national currency. For more information, see methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables available on CIRCABC


5. Reference Period Top

Description of reference period used for incomes

Period for taxes on income and social insurance contributions

Income reference periods used

Reference period for taxes on wealth

Lag between the income ref period and current variables

The reference period for taxes on income and social insurance contributions for EU-SILC 2024 was previous calendar year 2023.

The income reference is a fixed twelve-month period. For EU-SILC 2024, the period was the year 2023.

The reference period for taxes on wealth for EU-SILC 2024 was the previous calendar year, 2023.

The lag between the income reference period and the household interview was 5-6 months. In EU-SILC 2024 the fieldwork lasted for two months, from May 9th to Jun 30th.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 was publish in OJ on 10 October 2019, establishing a common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households, based on data at individual level collected from samples (IESS). The Annex to the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2180 of 16 December 2019 specifies the detailed arrangements and content for the quality reports pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2019/2242.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Confidential microdata are not disclosed by Eurostat. Access to confidential microdata for scientific purposes may be granted on the  basis of Commission Regulation 557/2013 and Regulation 223/2009 of  the European Parliament and the Council on European statistics.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Data confidentiality is stipulated by:

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Need to protect individual data is an extremely important issue. The results of the survey are published as aggregates, thus securing full confidentiality of information about households and individuals, according to the provisions of the Law on Official Statistics. Statistical micro-databases that are released for use for scientific research purposes contain reduced information about the respondents in order to prevent identification of the surveyed individuals or households.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Yearly publication of results, see Release Calendar | Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia

8.2. Release calendar access

Please refer to the Release calendar - Eurostat (europa.eu) publicly available on the Eurostat’s website.

8.3. Release policy - user access

In line with the Community legal framework and the European Statistics Code of Practice, Eurostat disseminates European statistics on Eurostat's website (see section 10 - 'Accessibility and clarity'), respecting professional independence and in an objective, professional and transparent manner in which all users are treated equitably. The detailed arrangements are governed by the Eurostat protocol on impartial access to Eurostat data for users. Additional information about microdata access is available in Statistics on Income and Living Conditions - Access to microdata - Eurostat (europa.eu).


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

SORS - Publications

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

SORS - Income and Living Conditions

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Online Database - Income and living conditions

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

The data are available in national microdata form, e.g. for researchers, upon prior submission of an official request.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not available.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Not available.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

All requested concepts are provided, 100%

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not applicable.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The SORS quality management system is relied on the Serbian official statistics mission and vision, as well as on the European Statistics Code of Practice – CoP and the Total Quality Management – TQM principles, which together make the common quality framework of the European Statistical System (ESS). For more information, please see the documents at System of quality management of the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of EU-SILC statistical data are policy makers, research institutes, media, and students.

The SILC survey regularly provides data for monitoring and comparing income, poverty, social exclusion and living condition statistics.

In accordance with the research methodology, two types of data are provided annually:

  • Cross-sectional data - refer to a specific time or period of time, and provide information on income, social exclusion, poverty and living conditions
  • Longitudinal data - refers to changes at the individual level over time, observed periodically, over a four-year period

Survey data are used for the analysis and research studies in standard of living, poverty etc. The users of data are: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, The Government of the Republic of Serbia and government institutions, scientific and research institutions, international institutions, students, journalists, legal entities and individuals.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Eurostat carried out a general User Satisfaction Survey (USS) to obtain a better understanding of users’ needs and their satisfaction with the services provided by Eurostat. The survey results indicated that EU-SILC data are of very high relevance to users. For the majority of respondents, both aggregated data and microdata were considered important or essential for their work, regardless of the purpose of use. The use of ad-hoc modules was less widespread compared to the use of annual variables. Users also highlighted a strong need for more detailed microdata.

For further information, please consult the Eurostat User Satisfaction Survey.

12.3. Completeness

The implementation of the survey, data processing and publication of the results are fully aligned with the research methodology defined by the EU regulations and methodological standrards of Eurostat related to the EU-SILC survey.

All variables required by Eurostat, as specified in EU-SILC methodological guidelines, are provided (with the exeption of the variables PY021N/G Company car and HY145N Repayments/receipts for tax adjustment, which have not been collected).

The following optional variable were not collected:

  • RL080: Remote Education
  • HI130G: Interest expenses [not included interest expenses for purchasing the main dwelling]
  • HI140G: Household debts
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

The item is not requested by Reg. 2019/2180.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

According to Reg. (EU) 2019/1700 Annex II, precision requirements for all data sets are expressed in standard errors and are defined as continuous functions of the actual estimates and of the size of the statistical population in a country or in a NUTS 2 region. For the income and living conditions domain, the estimated standard errors of the following indicators are examined according to certain parameters set:

  • Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population;
  • Ratio of at‐persistent‐risk‐of‐poverty over four years to population;
  • Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population in each NUTS 2 region.

Further information is provided in section 13.2 Sampling error.

13.2. Sampling error

EU-SILC is a complex survey involving different sampling designs in different countries. In order to harmonize and make sampling errors comparable among countries, Eurostat (with the substantial methodological support of Net-SILC2) has chosen to apply the "linearization" technique coupled with the “ultimate cluster” approach for variance estimation.

Linearization is a technique based on the use of linear approximation to reduce non-linear statistics to a linear form, justified by asymptotic properties of the estimator. This technique can encompass a wide variety of indicators, including EU-SILC indicators. The "ultimate cluster" approach is a simplification consisting in calculating the variance taking into account only variation among Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) totals. This method requires first stage sampling fractions to be small which is nearly always the case. This method allows a great flexibility and simplifies the calculations of variances. It can also be generalized to calculate variance of the differences of one year to another.

The main hypothesis on which the calculations are based is that the "at risk of poverty" threshold is fixed. According to the characteristics and availability of data for different countries, we have used different variables to specify strata and cluster information.

In particular, countries have been split into 3 groups:

1) BE, BG, CZ, IE, EL, ES, FR, HR, IT, LV, HU, PL, PT, RO, SI, UK, AL and RS, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a two-stage stratified type we used DB050 (primary strata) for strata specification and DB060 (Primary Sampling Unit) for cluster specification;

2) DK, DE, EE, CY, LT, LU, NL, AT, SK, FI, CH whose sampling design could be assimilated to a one stage stratified type we used DB050 for strata specification and DB030 (household ID) for cluster specification;

3) MT, SE, IS, NO, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a simple random sampling, we used DB030 for cluster specification and no strata.

In the case of the Republic of Serbia (RS) sampling errors for the indicators were calculated using the Bootstrap replication method. 

Standard errors were calculated by using Bootstrap replication method, which represents type of repeated resampling method. The general characteristic of repeated resampling method and therefor also of Bootstrap is to draw (sub-) samples from the original sample and to calculate the population parameter of interest from each sample. The variance estimation is then based on the distribution of the several estimates.

The resampling methods have the major advantage of not requiring an explicit expression for the variance of each statistic. They are also more encompassing: by repeating the entire estimation procedure independently for each replication, the effect of various complexities, such as each step of a complex weighting procedure the impact of the sampling variability of the weights themselves can be incorporated into the variance estimates produced. Generally, this cannot be done with the linearization approach. The advantages of the replication methods are very relevant in the context of EU-SILC, because it has to deal with many statistics such as equivalized disposable income, Gini coefficient, poverty rates, etc., in their full complexity.

See Annex - Sampling errors



Annexes:
Sampling Errors
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

 

The concept of accuracy refers to the precision of estimates computed from a sample rather than from the entire population. Accuracy depends on sample size, sampling design effects and structure of the population under study. In addition to that, sampling errors and non-sampling errors need to be taken into account. Sampling error refers to the variability that occurs at random because of the use of a sample rather than a census and non-sampling errors are errors that occur in all phases of the data collection and production process.

 

Main indicators, standard error and CI at country level

  AROPE At risk of poverty Severe Material and Social Deprivation Very low work intensity
Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI
value L U value L U value L U value L U
 Total 24.3 0.7 22.9 25.7 19.7 0.6 18.5  20.1  10.3 0.6 9.2 11.4 6.8 0.6 5.6 8.0
 Male 23.7 0.8 22.2 25.2 19.5 0.7 18.2  20.9  9.9 0.6 8.7 11.1 7.3 0.6 6.1 8.5
 Female 24.9 0.8 23.4 26.4 20.0 0.7 18.7  21.3  10.6 0.6 9.5 11.8 6.4 0.7 5.1 7.7
 Age 0-17 23.9 1.4 21.2 26.6 21.1 1.3 18.6  23.6  7.5 0.9 5.7 9.3 8.3 0.9 6.5 10.2
 Age 18-64 22.6 0.8 21.1 24.1 17.9 0.7 16.5  19.3  9.3 0.6 8.2 10.4 9.0 0.6 7.9 10.1
 Age 65+ 29.4 0.9 27.6 31.3 23.6 0.9 21.9  25.4  14.9 0.8 13.4 16.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a

 

Main indicators, standard error and CI at NUTS 2 level

  AROPE At risk of poverty Severe Material and Social Deprivation Very low work intensity
Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI Ind. Stand. errors 95% CI
value L U value L U value L U value L U
 

 NUTS 2 RS11
 Beogradski Region

15.4 1.2 13.0 17.8 8.7  0.9 6.9  10.5  9.7 1.1 7.6 11.8 3.9 0.8 2.3 5.5
 

 NUTS 2 RS12
 Region Vojvodine

26.8 1.8 23.4 30.2 21.0  1.6 17.8  24.2  13.9 1.2 11.6 16.2 8.2 1.2 5.9 10.5
 

 NUTS 2 RS21
 Region Šumadije i   Zapadne Srbije

25.5 1.4 22.8 28.2 23.0 1.3 20.4 25.6  7.6 0.9 5.9 9.3 6.7 1.2 4.4 9.0

 NUTS 2 RS22
 Region Južne i   Istočne Srbije

30.9 2.0 26.9 34.9 27.7 2.0 23.8 31.6 10.1 1.3 7.5 12.7 8.9 1.5 5.9 11.9

 

Persistent-risk-of-poverty ratio over four years to the population, standard error and CI

  Persistent‐risk‐of‐poverty
Ind. Stand. Errors 95% CI
value L U
 Total 11.3 0.5 10.3 12.3
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors are basically of 4 types:

  • Coverage errors: errors due to divergences existing between the target population and the sampling frame.
  • Measurement errors: errors that occur at the time of data collection. There are a number of sources for these errors such as the survey instrument, the information system, the interviewer and the mode of collection.
  • Processing errors: errors in post-data-collection processes such as data entry, keying, editing and weighting.
  • Non-response errors: errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:
    • Unit non-response: refers to absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample.
    • Item non-response: refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all required information has been obtained.
13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors include over-coverage, under-coverage and misclassification:

  • Over-coverage: relates either to wrongly classified units that are in fact out of scope, or to units that do not exist in practice.
  • Under-coverage: refers to units not included in the sampling frame.
  • Misclassification: refers to incorrect classification of units that belong to the target population
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Coverage error

Main problems

Population (sub-population)

Size of error

Comments

Over-coverage

Persons in private households 

2.3% (142 addresses) 

142 addresses in the EU-SILC 2024 sample turned out to be not located/not found, unable to access, non-existent/non-residential or non-private/unoccupied/not principal residence 

Under-coverage

Not available.

Not available.

 

Misclassification

Not available.

Not available.

 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested by Reg. 2019/2180

13.3.2. Measurement error

 

Measurement error for cross-sectional data

Cross-sectional data

Source of measurement errors

Building process of questionnaire 

Interview training

Quality control

The source of the measurement errors might be:

  • The questionnaire
  • The interviewer
  • The respondents
  • The moment of interview
  • The data entry operators

 

The basis for the development of the Questionnaires was the document EU-SILC 065 (2024 operation) with all of the variables stated in this document covered by the questions in the questionnaires.

From 2018, SORS uses IST (Integrated system of data processing) application for entering data, processing and reporting. IST was entirely designed and developed by SORS experts.

Many logical controls are built into application, which allows interviewers to keep a track of inconsistent responses and make necessary corrections immediately, in order to reduce as much as possible the number of errors in data entry.

 

The process of selection of interviewers and team leaders was organized in several rounds in 2024. Candidates were selected based on several criteria: prior experience in surveys conducted by SORS, education level, working status and availability during training and fieldwork.

For the team leaders, centralized training course was organized, while the rest of interviewers for the main fieldwork took a decentralized training course in 15 Regional Offices and in the Central Office.

The aim was to get acquainted  with the new methodological guidelines and the survey itself. Examples were presented throughout the complete training course. It is important to mention that there was also a lecture on the organization of the fieldwork. 

 

Each team of interviewers (2-4 members) had the team leader on the field and controller from the regional office.

The Team Leader was, among other things, in charge of solving certain methodological issues and uncertainties (whether alone or with the help of the controller). In addition, the Team leader was in charge for keeping records on progress of his/her team in the field, which also helped in the better organization of work in the team. The Controller was in charge of supervising the work of one or two teams during the fieldwork, as well as of providing assistance, solving problems. Experienced statisticians from the SORS were engaged as the controllers.

CAPI application had installed numerous of logical controls to reduce the mistakes.

Field check tables were prepared and updated every day so the controllers can follow the progress of the fieldwork. Those reports were on the web and updated every day according to data submitted to server in SORS every day. 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response errors are errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:

1) Unit non-response which refers to the absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample. According to Annex VI of the Reg.(EU) 2019/2242

Household non-response rates (NRh) is computed as follows:

NRh=(1-(Ra * Rh)) * 100

Where Ra is the address contact rate defined as:

Ra= Number of address/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) successfully contacted/Number of valid addresses/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) selected

and Rh is the proportion of complete household interviews accepted for the database

Rh=Number of household interviews completed and accepted for database/Number of eligible households at contacted addresses (including phone, mail if applicable)

Individual non-response rates (NRp) is computed as follows:

NRp=(1-(Rp)) * 100

Where Rp is the proportion of complete personal interviews within the households accepted for the database

Rp= Number of personal interview completed/Number of eligible individuals in the households whose interviews were completed and accepted for the database

Overall individual non-response rates (*NRp) is computed as follows:

*NRp=(1-(Ra * Rh * Rp)) * 100

For those Members States where a sample of persons rather than a sample of households (addresses, phones, mails etc.) was selected, the individual non-response rates will be calculated for ‘the selected respondent.

2) Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Address (including phone, mail if applicable) contact rate

Complete household interviews

Complete personal interviews

Household Non-response rate

Individual non-response rate

Overall individual non-response rate

(Ra)

(Rh)

(Rp)

(NRh)

(NRp)

(NRp)*

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

A

B

C

 99.62 

 98.89 

 99.92 

 90.70 

 78.55 

 97.37 

 100.0 

 100.0 

 100.0 

 9.65 

 22.33 

 2.70 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

 9.65 

 22.33 

 2.70 

where:

A = total (cross-sectional) sample;

B = New sub-sample (new rotational group) introduced for first time in the survey this year;

C = Sub-sample (rotational group) surveyed for last time in the survey this year.

 

Longitudinal data

Response rate for households by wave

 Response rate for household Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4
  Wave response rate 80.6 89.7 90.4
  L follow-up rate 94.3 95.7 96.5
  Follow-up ratio 92.8 94.6 95.3
  Achieved sample size ratio 92.8 94.6 95.3

 

Response rate for persons by wave

 Response rate for persons Sample persons / co-residents Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4
Wave response rate  Sample persons 100.0 100.0 100.0
 co-residents 100.0 100.0 100.0
L follow-up rate  Sample persons 100.0 100.0 100.0
Achieved sample size ratio (persons aged 16 and over)  All persons 92.0 95.1 95.7
 Sample persons 91.0 94.1 94.6
 co-residents

0

141.1 135.2
Response rate for non-sample persons  co-residents 100.0 100.0 100.0

 

Sample and response rate by wave

 Year of the survey Sample of households Sample of individuals 16+ Response rate of the households Response rate of individuals 16+
  Wave 1 1918 4511 77.7 100.0
  Wave 2 3361 8110 80.6 100.0
  Wave 3 4645 12286 89.7 100.0
  Wave 4 6117 16252 90.4 100.0
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

The computation of item non-response is essential to fulfil the precision requirements. Item non-response rate is provided for the main income variables both at household and personal level.

Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate by indicator

For the table containing the percentage of missing or partial information on income components before imputation as well as the percentage of full information, please refer to the attached annex.

In the case of EU-SILC in Serbia there are a few income components presented in the annex that need further explanation:

  • HY145N: Data not collected
  • PY021N/G: Due to low prevelence, data on Income from private use of company car are not being collected

See Annex - Item non-response



Annexes:
Item non-response
13.3.4. Processing error

 Description of data entry, coding controls and the editing system

Data entry and coding

(if any used)

Editing controls

 There were many logical controls incorporated in the CAPI application including routings, ranges and inconsistences. In case of inconsistences, the message was shown with the suggestion to revise the answer. If the answer was correct, interviewers were supposed to insert a remark for that question explaining the reason for inconsistency.  After the data collection was over, a thorough cleaning of the data was performed. A set of logical controls was made and for all suspicious data remarks were checked. After our custom made logical control was applied, we also used the data checks made by the Eurostat for harmonized data sets.

Re-interview rates by wave

Part I

 Re-interview rates Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4
  (a) individuals in interviewed households % 94.9 93.4 93.0
  (b) individuals out of scope % 5.1 6.6 7.0
  (c) individuals not interviewed for reasons other than their being out of scope % - - -

Part II

Re-interview rates    Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4
  Re-interview rates for people leaving their household total 0.6 0.4 0.6
males 0.6 0.3 0.6
females 0.7 0.5 0.6
  Re-interview rates for young people (16-35) leaving their household total 1.3 0.7 1.3
males 1.0 0.6 1.3
females 1.6 0.9 1.4
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Date of the dissemination of national results. 20 Jun 2025

Number of days between the end of fieldwork and the first fully validated delivery of data to the Commission (Eurostat):

  • End of field-work: 30 Jun 2024
  • First data delivery: 30 Jun 2025

Days between the end of fieldwork and the first fully validated delivery: 365

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

The number of months from the last day of the reference period to the day of publication of first results: 18 months

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

The number of months from the last day of the reference period to the day of publication of complete and final results: 18 months

14.2. Punctuality

The data is published on time and in accordance with Statistical calendar

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Data gathered for year N are published by mid-Jun of year N+1 (where N = year of data collection)


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

There are no conceptual differences between results on national and regional levels.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See Annex - Breaks in series.



Annexes:
Breaks in series
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

12 reference periods.

15.2.2. Comparability and deviation from definition for each income variable

 

 Comparability and deviation from definition for each income variable

 Income

Identifier

Comparability

Deviation from definition if any

 Total hh gross income

(HY010)

 F

 

 Total disposable hh income

(HY020)

 F

 

 Total disposable hh income before social transfers other than old-age and survivors' benefits

(HY022)

 F

 

 Total disposable hh income before all social transfers

(HY023)

 F

 

 Income from rental of property or land

(HY040)

 F

 

 Family/ Children related allowances

(HY050)

 F

 

 Social exclusion payments not elsewhere classified

(HY060)

 F

 

 Housing allowances

(HY070)

 F

 

 Regular inter-hh cash transfers received

(HY080)

 F

 

 Alimonies received

(HY081)

 F

 

 Interest, dividends, profit from capital investments in incorporated businesses

(HY090)

 F

 

 Interest paid on mortgage

(HY100)

 F

 

 Income received by people aged under 16

(HY110)

 F

 

 Regular taxes on wealth

(HY120)

 F

 

 Taxes paid on ownership of household main dwelling

(HY121)

 F

 

 Regular inter-hh transfers paid

(HY130)

 F

 

 Alimonies paid

(HY131)

 F

 

 Tax on income and social contributions

(HY140)

 F

 

 Repayments/receipts for tax adjustment

(HY145)

 NC

 

 Value of goods produced for own consumption

(HY170)

 F

 

 Cash or near-cash employee income

(PY010)

 F

 

 Other non-cash employee income

(PY020)

 F

 

 Income from private use of company car

(PY021)

 NC

 

 Employers social insurance contributions

(PY030)

 F

 

 Contributions to individual private pension plans

(PY035)

 F 

 

 Cash profits or losses from self-employment

(PY050)

 F 

 

 Pension from individual private plans

(PY080)

 F 

 

 Unemployment benefits

(PY090)

 F

 

 Old-age benefits

(PY100)

 F

 

 Survivors benefits

(PY110)

 F

 

 Sickness benefits

(PY120)

 F

 

 Disability benefits

(PY130)

 F

 

 Education-related allowances

(PY140)

 F

 

 F= Fully comparable; L= Largely comparable; P= Partly comparable and NC= Not collected.

 

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The coherence of two or more statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes, by which they were generated, used the same concepts and harmonised methods. A comparison with external sources for all income target variables and the number of persons who receive income from each ‘income component’ will be provided, where the Member States concerned consider such external data to be sufficiently reliable.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

See Annex - Coherence.



Annexes:
Coherence
15.4. Coherence - internal

There is no information on lack of coherence in the EU-SILC 2024 dataset.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Mean (average) interview duration per household =  71.5 minutes.

Mean (average) interview duration per person = 20.5 minutes.

Mean (average) interview duration for selected respondents (if applicable) =  n/a.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

No revision applied on EU-SILC 2024 datasets.

17.2. Data revision - practice

No data revision.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

No data revision.


18. Statistical processing Top

Detailed information concerning sampling frame, sampling design, sampling units, sampling size, weightings and mode of data collection can be found in this section (please see below). Such information is mainly used for the computation of the accuracy measures.

18.1. Source data

Тhe sampling frame is the The Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Serbia, carried out in 2022. Тarget population consists of all persons living in private households in the Republic of Serbia . Persons living in collective households and in institutions are generally excluded from the target population.

18.1.1. Sampling Design

Type of sampling design:

The sample is based on two-stage stratified random sampling design.

Stratification and sub stratification criteria:

Stratification was done according to the type of settlement (urban and other) in four Regions (Belgrade, Vojvodina, Sumadija and Western Serbia and Southern and Eastern Serbia).

Sample selection schemes:

Sample consists of four independent sub-samples (rotational groups), same size and design, representative for the whole population. Primary sampling units (enumeration districts), were selected systematically with probability proportional to size within each stratum. Size measure for each ED was number of households, according to the Census 2022. Second stage units, households were selected randomly with equal probabilities. Every year one rotational group from the previous year is dropped from the sample and new one is added.

Sample distribution over time:

The sample is not distributed over time.

18.1.2. Sampling unit

Primary sampling units were enumeration districts and second stage units were households. 

18.1.3. Sampling frame

Concerning the EU-SILC instrument, three different sample size definitions can be applied:

  • the actual sample size which is the number of sampling units selected in the sample
  • the achieved sample size which is the number of observed sampling units (household or individual) with an accepted interview
  • the effective sample size which is defined as the achieved sample size divided by the design effect with regards to the at-risk-of poverty rate indicator

Given that the effective sample size has been already treated in the section dealing with sampling errors, in this section the attention focuses mainly on the achieved sample size.

 

Actual and achieved sample size

Actual sample size

Achived sample size
6236

5527

 

Achieved sample size

Number of households Persons 16 over Selected respondents
5527 14128

0

 

New rotational group Number of households Percentage
3 1534 27.75

 

Old rotational group Number of households Percentage
4 1296 23.45
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual.

18.3. Data collection

Mode of data collection

 

1-PAPI

2-CAPI

3-CATI

4-CAWI

5-PAPI proxy

6-CAPI-proxy

7-CATI-proxy

8-CAWI proxy

9-other

% of total

75.8

 -

 -

24.2 

 -

 

Description of collecting income variables

The source or procedure used for the collection of income variables

The form (gross, net) in which income variables at component level have been obtained

The method used for obtaining target variables in the required form

All income data were collected through interview.  

For all income variables only net values were collected.  

All gross variables were calculated on the basis of a net-gross conversion. 

 

 

See Annex - Data collection



Annexes:
Data collection
18.4. Data validation

Control of source data is carried out in severeal iterations. Many numerical-logical controls are built into the CAPI application through hard errors and signals. That allowes interviewers to track inconsistent responses and make necessary corrections immediately, which contributes to better data quality. After the fieldwork, additional data cleaning and processing activities are performed during an extensive and comprehensive data cleaning process, which includes cheking the logic and consistency of the data, outliers analysis etc. Finaly, the national EU-SILC databases are verified and validated using Eurostat’s data chek and validation programs.

18.5. Data compilation

Weighting procedure and imputation were carried out according to regulation.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not available.

18.5.2. Weighting methods

See Annex - Weighting procedure.



Annexes:
Weighting procedure
18.5.3. Estimation and imputation

Imputation is used in order to complete missing information because of unit non-response (imputation of missing personal questionnaires) or because of item non-response (e.g. missing income information).

See Annex - Estimation and imputation.



Annexes:
Estimation and Imputation
18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
Rolling module
Household Questionnaire_ENG
Personal Questionnaire_ENG
Household Questionnaire_SRB
Personal Questionnaire_SRB