Income and living conditions (ilc)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: State Data Agency. Statistics Lithuania


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

State Data Agency. Statistics Lithuania

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Living Standard and Employment Statistics Division

1.5. Contact mail address

29 Gedimino Ave., LT-01500, Vilnius, Lithuania


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

30 May 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

30 May 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

30 May 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) is a survey-based instrument aiming at collecting timely and comparable cross-sectional and longitudinal multidimensional microdata on income, poverty, social exclusion and living conditions. In addition, it collects module variables every three years, six years or ad-hoc new policy needs modules.

The EU-SILC instrument provides two types of data:

  • Cross-sectional data pertaining to a given time or a certain time period with variables on income, poverty, social exclusion and other living conditions;
  • Longitudinal data pertaining to individual-level changes over time, observed periodically over four year rotation scheme (Annex III (2) of 2019/1700).

Social exclusion and housing condition information is collected mainly at household level while labour, education and health information is obtained for persons aged 16 and over. The core of the instrument is income information at very detailed component level and mainly collected at personal level.

3.2. Classification system
  • International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED'2011);
  • International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08);
  • Classification of Economic Activities (NACE Rev.2-2008);
  • Common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS 2);
  • SCL - Geographical code list;
  • The recommendations made by the United Nations in the Canberra Group Handbook on Household Income Statistics should also be taken into account.

For more details on the classification used please, see EU Vocabularies, Eurostat's metadata server or CIRCABC

3.3. Coverage - sector

Data refer to all private households and individuals living in the private households in the national territory at the time of data collection.

The EU-SILC survey is a key instrument for the European Semester and the European Pillar of Social Rights, providing information on income distribution, poverty and social exclusion, as well as various related living conditions and poverty EU policies, such as on child poverty, access to health care and other services, housing, over indebtedness and quality of life. It is also the main source of data for microsimulation purposes and flash estimates of income distribution and poverty rates.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Statistical concepts and definitions for EU-SILC are specified in Regulation (EU) 2019/1700, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2181, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2242. Additional information is available in the EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology and in the methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables (see CIRCABC).

Further details are provided in items 5, 15.1.1.1, 15.2.2 and 18.3.

3.5. Statistical unit

Statistical units are private households and all persons living in these households who have usual residence in Lithuania. Annex II of the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2242 defines specific statistical units per variable and specifies the content of the quality reports on the organization of a sample survey in the income and living conditions domain pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

3.6. Statistical population

The target population is private households and all persons composing these households having their usual residence in Lithuania. Private household means a person living alone or a group of persons who live together, providing oneself or themselves with the essentials of living.

3.6.1. Reference population

Definitions of reference population, household and household membership

Reference population

Private household definition

Household membership

  No difference to the common definition.

  No difference to the common definition.

 No difference to the common definition.

3.6.2. Population not covered by the data collection

The sub-populations that are not covered by the data collection includes: those who moved out of the country’s territory; or those with no usual residence; or those living in institutions or who have moved to an institution compared to the previous year.

3.7. Reference area

Regions, country.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Yearly. Since 2005 

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

The data involves several units of measure depending upon the variables. Income variables are transmitted to Eurostat in national currency. For more information, see methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables available on CIRCABC


5. Reference Period Top

Description of reference period used for incomes

Period for taxes on income and social insurance contributions

Income reference periods used

Reference period for taxes on wealth

Lag between the income ref period and current variables

 last calendar year

 last calendar year

 last calendar year

 0-4 months


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 was publish in OJ on 10 October 2019, establishing a common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households, based on data at individual level collected from samples (IESS). The Annex to the Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2180 of 16 December 2019 specifies the detailed arrangements and content for the quality reports pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2019/2242.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Confidential microdata are not disclosed by Eurostat. Access to confidential microdata for scientific purposes may be granted on the  basis of Commission Regulation 557/2013 and Regulation 223/2009 of  the European Parliament and the Council on European statistics.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

In the process of statistical data collection, processing and analysis and dissemination of statistical information, Statistics Lithuania fully guarantees confidentiality of the data submitted by respondents (households, enterprises, institutions, organisations and other statistical units), as defined in the Confidentiality policy guidelines of the State Data Agency.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Statistical Disclosure Control Manual, approved by Order No DĮ-29 of 19 January 2024 of the Director General of Statistics Lithuania;

The State Data Governance Information System Data Security Regulations and Rules for the Secure Management of Electronic Information in the State Data Governance Information System, approved by Order No DĮ-163 of 20 August 2024 of the Director General of the State Data Agency.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Data release calendar can be found in the official statistical website

8.2. Release calendar access

Please refer to the Release calendar - Eurostat (europa.eu) publicly available on the Eurostat’s website.

8.3. Release policy - user access

In line with the Community legal framework and the European Statistics Code of Practice, Eurostat disseminates European statistics on Eurostat's website (see section 10 - 'Accessibility and clarity'), respecting professional independence and in an objective, professional and transparent manner in which all users are treated equitably. The detailed arrangements are governed by the Eurostat protocol on impartial access to Eurostat data for users. Additional information about microdata access is available in Statistics on Income and Living Conditions - Access to microdata - Eurostat (europa.eu).


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Data release calendar can be found in the official statistical website

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

More information can be found in the official statistical website

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

More information can be found in the official statistical website.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Optional.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

More information can be found in the open dataset dedicated website.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

More information can be found in the official statistical website

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Optional

10.6. Documentation on methodology

More information can be found in the official statistical website.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Optional

10.7. Quality management - documentation

More information can be found in the official statistical website.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The quality of statistical information and its production process is ensured by the provisions of the European Statistics Code of Practice and ESS Quality Assurance Framework

In 2007, a quality management system, conforming to the requirements of the international quality management system standard ISO 9001, was introduced at Statistics Lithuania. The main trends in activity of Statistics Lithuania aimed at quality management and continuous development in the institution are established in the Quality Policy. Monitoring of the quality indicators of statistical processes and their results and self-evaluation of statistical survey managers is regularly carried out in order to identify the areas which need improvement and to promptly eliminate the shortcomings.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Quality of data is in compliance with the requirements of accuracy, timeliness and punctuality, coherence and comparability.

According to the yearly updated Plan for Measuring the Indicators of Activities of The State Data Agency, results of the quality indicators of the statistical Income and Living Conditions Survey are presented in fields 13–15 of this metainformation inventory. 

The quality of the information obtained is analysed. Additional statistical quality checks are performed at the macro level. The estimates of statistical indicators are compared with the previous period, other statistical information and data from administrative sources.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of EU-SILC statistical data are policy makers, research institutes, media, and students.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Eurostat carried out an online general User Satisfaction Survey (USS) in the period between April and July 2019 to obtain a better knowledge about users, considering their needs and satisfaction with the services provided by Eurostat. The survey has shown that EU-SILC is of very high relevance for users. For the majority, both aggregates and micro-data were important or essential in their work irrespective of the purpose of their use. The use of the ad-hoc modules was less widespread than the use of the nucleus variables. Nevertheless, there was high interest to repeat these modules in order to have the possibility of comparing data over time. Users emphasized their strong need for more detailed micro-data, which is currently not possible. Under the new legal framework implemented from 2021, the NUTS 2 division will be available for the main indicators. Finally, users were satisfied with overall quality of the service delivered by Eurostat, which encompasses data quality and the supporting service provided to them.

For more information, please consult the User Satisfaction Survey.

12.3. Completeness

All required variables are transmitted to Eurostat according to the Regulation.

HY145N is collected under HY140(G,N) seeing the most of the income components are reported gross.

HY121(G,N) collected under HY120(G,N).

Voluntary module on impact of covid-19 has been not collected.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

optional


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

According to Reg. (EU) 2019/1700 Annex II, precision requirements for all data sets are expressed in standard errors and are defined as continuous functions of the actual estimates and of the size of the statistical population in a country or in a NUTS 2 region. For the income and living conditions domain, the estimated standard errors of the following indicators are examined according to certain parameters set:

  • · Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population;
  • · Ratio of at‐persistent‐risk‐of‐poverty over four years to population;
  • · Ratio at‐risk‐of‐poverty or social exclusion to population in each NUTS 2 region.

Further information is provided in section 13.2 Sampling error.

13.2. Sampling error

EU-SILC is a complex survey involving different sampling designs in different countries. In order to harmonize and make sampling errors comparable among countries, Eurostat (with the substantial methodological support of Net-SILC2) has chosen to apply the "linearization" technique coupled with the “ultimate cluster” approach for variance estimation.

Linearization is a technique based on the use of linear approximation to reduce non-linear statistics to a linear form, justified by asymptotic properties of the estimator. This technique can encompass a wide variety of indicators, including EU-SILC indicators. The "ultimate cluster" approach is a simplification consisting in calculating the variance taking into account only variation among Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) totals. This method requires first stage sampling fractions to be small which is nearly always the case. This method allows a great flexibility and simplifies the calculations of variances. It can also be generalized to calculate variance of the differences of one year to another.

The main hypothesis on which the calculations are based is that the "at risk of poverty" threshold is fixed. According to the characteristics and availability of data for different countries, we have used different variables to specify strata and cluster information. 

In particular, countries have been split into 3 groups:

1) BE, BG, CZ, IE, EL, ES, FR, HR, IT, LV, HU, PL, PT, RO, SI, UK and AL, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a two-stage stratified type we used DB050 (primary strata) for strata specification and DB060 (Primary Sampling Unit) for cluster specification;

2) DK, DE, EE, CY, LT, LU, NL, AT, SK, FI, CH whose sampling design could be assimilated to a one stage stratified type we used DB050 for strata specification and DB030 (household ID) for cluster specification;

3) MT, SE, IS, NO, whose sampling design could be assimilated to a simple random sampling, we used DB030 for cluster specification and no strata.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The concept of accuracy refers to the precision of estimates computed from a sample rather than from the entire population. Accuracy depends on sample size, sampling design effects and structure of the population under study. In addition to that, sampling errors and non-sampling errors need to be taken into account. Sampling error refers to the variability that occurs at random because of the use of a sample rather than a census and non-sampling errors are errors that occur in all phases of the data collection and production process.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors are basically of 4 types:

  • Coverage errors: errors due to divergences existing between the target population and the sampling frame.
  • Measurement errors: errors that occur at the time of data collection. There are a number of sources for these errors such as the survey instrument, the information system, the interviewer and the mode of collection.
  • Processing errors: errors in post-data-collection processes such as data entry, keying, editing and weighting.
  • Non-response errors: errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:
    • Unit non-response: refers to absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample.
    • Item non-response: refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all required information has been obtained.
13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors include over-coverage, under-coverage and misclassification:

  • Over-coverage: relates either to wrongly classified units that are in fact out of scope, or to units that do not exist in practice.
  • Under-coverage: refers to units not included in the sampling frame.
  • Misclassification: refers to incorrect classification of units that belong to the target population
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

No coverage errors were detected

 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

optional

13.3.2. Measurement error

 Proxy interview rate = 24.9 per cent

Measurement error for cross-sectional data

Cross-sectional data

Source of measurement errors

Building process of questionnaire 

Interview training

Quality control

 The measurement errors originate from the questionnaire (its wording, design), the data collection method, the interviewers and the respondents. While it is impossible to avoid this type of errors completely, procedures were taken to reduce them as much as possible. 

The questionnaires were developed according to the EU-SILC regulations and methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables DocSILC065. The questionnaires were tested during the first wave of pilot survey conducted in 2004. Designing questionnaires for main operation errors and interviewers feedbacks from the pilot survey were considered. Also the experience from the different waves of the survey was used to improve the questionnaire.  

The interviewer's training was carried-out by specialists from Living standard statistics and Interviewers management divisions in Statistics Lithuania in the middle of January. Interviewers’ manual presenting instructions on filling in the questionnaires and detailed explanations for all income components, particularly benefits, were prepared. Special emphasis was placed on tracing rules and specifics of assigning household and person numbers in the longitudinal survey. Methodical explanations were combined with practical tests using laptops. Fieldwork has started immediately after interviewers training.

Fieldwork was carried out by permanent interviewers. In total 7 supervisers and 71 interviewers were involved. One interviewer had an average 95 selected addresses.

 

 The interviewer's were consulted and checked by supervisors and specialists from Living standard statistics and Interviewers management divisions during the fieldwork  

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response errors are errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. Two main types of non-response errors are considered:

1) Unit non-response which refers to the absence of information of the whole units (households and/or persons) selected into the sample. According to Annex VI of the Reg.(EU) 2019/2242

  • Household non-response rates (NRh) is computed as follows:

NRh=(1-(Ra * Rh)) * 100

Where Ra is the address contact rate defined as:

Ra= Number of address/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) successfully contacted/Number of valid addresses/selected person (including phone, mail if applicable) selected

and Rh is the proportion of complete household interviews accepted for the database

Rh=Number of household interviews completed and accepted for database/Number of eligible households at contacted addresses (including phone, mail if applicable)

• Individual non-response rates (NRp) is computed as follows:

NRp=(1-(Rp)) * 100

Where Rp is the proportion of complete personal interviews within the households accepted for the database

Rp= Number of personal interview completed/Number of eligible individuals in the households whose interviews were completed and accepted for the database

• Overall individual non-response rates (*NRp) is computed as follows:

*NRp=(1-(Ra * Rh * Rp)) * 100

For those Members States where a sample of persons rather than a sample of households (addresses, phones, mails etc.) was selected, the individual non-response rates will be calculated for ‘the selected respondent.

2) Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Unit non-response rate for cross-sectional

Cross sectional data
Address (including phone, mail if applicable) contact rate Complete household interviews Complete personal interviews Household Non-response rate Individual non-response rate Overall individual non-response rate
(Ra)* (Rh)* (Rp)* (NRh)* (NRp)* (NRp)*
A* B* C* A* B* C* A* B* C* A* B* C* A* B* C* A* B* C*
99.5 98.66 99.94 84.13 66.56 95.78 100.0 100.0 100.0 16.29 34.33 4.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.29 34.33 4.28

 

where

A=total (cross-sectional) sample,

B =New sub-sample (new rotational group) introduced for first time in the survey this year,

C= Sub-sample (rotational group) surveyed for last time in the survey this year.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

The computation of item non-response is essential to fulfil the precision requirements. Item non-response rate is provided for the main income variables both at household and personal level.

Item non-response which refers to the situation where a sample unit has been successfully enumerated, but not all the required information has been obtained.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate by indicator

Annex

13.3.4. Processing error

 Description of data entry, coding controls and the editing system

Data entry and coding

(if any used)

Editing controls

 Data were entered by interviewers or respondents.  Orbeon software was used for data entry.  Completed questionnaires were checked by supervisors. Necessary call-backs were made.The computer program included the possible logical checks between questions and questionnaires, also a package of alerts (warning and error ones) related to ranges of admissible values and logical connections between questions. Coding controls were implemented in post-data-collection. After the data entry was finished the data were checked for consistency by specialists of the Living Standard and Employment Statistics Division of Statistics Lithuania
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See the information provided in 14.1.1 and 14.1.2

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Statistical information is published in 12 months after the end of the reporting period (fieldwork)

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Statistical information is published in 13 months after the end of the reporting period (fieldwork)

14.2. Punctuality

See the information provided in 14.2.1 

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Statistical information is published in accordance with an Official Statistics Calendar. In case of delay, users are notified in advance by indicating the reason and a new date of publication.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Statistical information is comparable between EU countries.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Since 2005

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Since 2005

15.2.2. Comparability and deviation from definition for each income variable

Comparability and deviation from definition for each income variable

Income

Identifier

Comparability

Deviation from definition if any

Total hh gross income

(HY010)

 F

 

Total disposable hh income

(HY020)

 F

 

Total disposable hh income before social transfers other than old-age and survivors' benefits

(HY022)

 F

 

Total disposable hh income before all social transfers

(HY023)

 F

 

Income from rental of property or land

(HY040)

 F

 

Family/ Children related allowances

(HY050)

 F

 

Social exclusion payments not elsewhere classified

(HY060)

 F

 

Housing allowances

(HY070)

 F

 

Regular inter-hh cash transfers received

(HY080)

 F

 

Alimonies received

(HY081)

 F

 

Interest, dividends, profit from capital investments in incorporated businesses

(HY090)

 F

 

Interest paid on mortgage

(HY100)

 F

 

Income received by people aged under 16

(HY110)

 F

 

Regular taxes on wealth

(HY120)

 F

 

Taxes paid on ownership of household main dwelling

(HY121)

 F

 

Regular inter-hh transfers paid

(HY130)

 F

 

Alimonies paid

(HY131)

 F

 

Tax on income and social contributions

(HY140)

 F

 

Repayments/receipts for tax adjustment

(HY145)

 F

 

Value of goods produced for own consumption

(HY170)

 F

 

Cash or near-cash employee income

(PY010)

 F

 

Other non-cash employee income

(PY020)

 F

 

Income from private use of company car

(PY021)

 F

 

Employers social insurance contributions

(PY030)

 F

 

Contributions to individual private pension plans

(PY035)

 F

 

Cash profits or losses from self-employment

(PY050)

 F

 

Pension from individual private plans

(PY080)

 F

 

Unemployment benefits

(PY090)

 F

 

Old-age benefits

(PY100)

 F

 

Survivors benefits

(PY110)

 F

 

Sickness benefits

(PY120)

 F

 

Disability benefits

(PY130)

 F

 

Education-related allowances

(PY140)

 F

 

F= Fully comparable; L= Largely comparable; P= Partly comparable and NC= Not collected.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The coherence of two or more statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes, by which they were generated, used the same concepts and harmonised methods. A comparison with external sources for all income target variables and the number of persons who receive income from each ‘income component’ will be provided, where the Member States concerned consider such external data to be sufficiently reliable.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Annex

15.4. Coherence - internal

no inconsistencies


16. Cost and Burden Top

Mean (average) interview duration per household = 41 minutes.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

The revision policy applied by Statistics Lithuania is described in the Description of Procedure for Performance, Analysis and Publication of Revisions of Statistical Information.

17.2. Data revision - practice

The final results are published, no scheduled revisions are performed.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

The average size of revisions is not calculated.


18. Statistical processing Top

Detailed information concerning sampling frame, sampling design, sampling units, sampling size, weightings and mode of data collection can be found in this section (please see below). Such information is mainly used for the computation of the accuracy measures.

18.1. Source data

The sampling frame of EU-SILC is the Population Register updated regularly.

The sources of income are the statistical survey and the following administrative data sources: the State Social Insurance Fund Board (Sodra), the State Tax Inspectorate (STI), the Ministry of Social Security and Labour (MSSL).

18.1.1. Sampling Design

For the first time households which were selected for the survey in 2005 divided into 4 rational groups. One of these groups was dropped out after 2005 operation and not included to the survey of 2006 according to the original integrated design. A new sub-sample of households was selected to the sample of year 2006. For new sample stratified sample design was used. Population register was used as a sampling frame. Simple random sample of persons was used in each stratum. The second group was dropped out after 2006 operation and not included to the survey of year 2007. A new sub-sample of households was selected to the sample of year 2007 according the same rules as selected a new sub-sample before and so was in every following year. And so on.

While selecting the new rotational group of the sample the country were grouped into 25 strata: 5 largest cities, other cities and rural area by county (a total of 10 counties). Simple random sample of non–institutional persons aged 16 and over was selected from the Population Register in each stratum. Household which lives in the selected person’s address was surveyed.

Within each of 25 strata simple random sample was used to select the person’s address. 

18.1.2. Sampling unit

Persistent resident aged 18 and over with related household members.

18.1.3. Sampling frame

Population Register

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Fixed income reference period was used and therefore the sample was not principally divided into months or weeks. Fieldwork period was from the January till the April.

18.3. Data collection

Mode of data collection

 

1-PAPI

2-CAPI

3-CATI

4-CAWI

5-PAPI proxy

6-CAPI-proxy

7-CATI-proxy

8-CAWI proxy

9-other

% of total

 0.1

 7.72

 79.36

 12.61

0.02

1.05

 21.73

2.09

0.21

 

 

Description of collecting income variables

The source or procedure used for the collection of income variables

The form (gross, net) in which income variables at component level have been obtained

The method used for obtaining target variables in the required form

Where applicable the EU-SILC income target variables were split into sub-components. The sub-components were defined according to the Lithuanian regulations and benefit system. All data related to income variables were collected from interviews.

Administrative data were used for making the survey income data more accurate or for supplementing them. The State Social Insurance Fund Board data and the State Tax Inspectorate under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania data have been linked to sample data and used for checking cash or near-cash employee income (PY010, PY120), social insurance contributions and taxes on income (components of HY140), old-age benefits (PY100). Maternity and maternity/paternity allowances (component of HY050), dividends and interest (component of HY090), care allowance, social assistance, old-age, and survivor’s pensions have been taken from the administrative data; we just asked if person received income from maternity allowance, dividends or not. 

Employee cash and near-cash income (PY010), self-employment income (PY050), unemployment benefits (PY090), family/children related allowances (HY050), interest, dividends, profit from capital investments (HY090), income received by people aged under 16 (HY110) were collected in net and/or gross. The remaining variables were collected only in gross.  

 The gross-net/net-gross conversion was used for either gross or net was collected. Conversion algorithms were created on the bases of country tax system. All income variables that are subjected to taxation and/or social insurance contribution were recorded gross and net in to the microdata files. Other income variables were recorded only gross. 

 

18.4. Data validation

Completed questionnaires were checked by supervisors. Necessary call-backs were made.The computer program included the possible logical checks between questions and questionnaires, also a package of alerts (warning and error ones) related to ranges of admissible values and logical connections between questions. Coding controls were implemented in post-data-collection. After the data entry was finished the data were checked for consistency by specialists of the Living Standard and Employment Statistics Division.

18.5. Data compilation

Non-income data are mainly collected as interview, some personal data are obtained from population register.

Income data are collected from interview, linked to an administrative data, compared and edited if needed.

All wave data are pieced together by topic, compared and edited if necessary.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

no additional information

18.5.2. Weighting procedure

annex

18.5.3. Estimation and imputation

Item non-response is mostly related employee cash or near cash income (PY010), cash benefits or losses from self-employment (PY050) and tax on Income and Social Contributions (HY140). Also few cases are related disability benefits (PY130), family/child related allowances (HY050) and interest, dividends, etc (HY090).

Deterministic methods (median imputation) were used for PY010G, PY050G.PY030G, HY090G.

Deductive methods were used for HY050G, HY140G (deductive imputation).

The data on the private use of the company car is collected in the individual questionnaire. The questions about car mode, type, year and other are asked. The amount which person has gained is estimated using Straight Line Method.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
LT_2024_Annex 2-Item_non_response_13.3.3.2.1
LT_2024_Annex 3-Sampling_errors_13.2
LT_2024_Annex 4-Data_collection_18.3
LT_2024_Annex 5-Weighting procedure
LT_2024_Annex 5 -Weighting procedure
LT_2024_Annex 7-Coherence_15.3-15.3.2
LT_2024_Annex 8-Breaks in series_15.2-updated
LT_2024_Annex 9-Rolling module
LT_2024_Annex A EU-SILC - content tables
LT 2024 questionnaires